Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Annals of King Edward Medical College. 2005; 11 (3): 279-281
em Inglês | IMEMR | ID: emr-69651

RESUMO

In this study total hundred patients wee included. Fifty [group I] were subjected to COPA device for airway maintenance and in other fifty [group II] LMA was used. In this study first attempt successful insertion rate in group I was 90% while in group II it was 94%. However statistical analysis showed no significant different in both groups. Regarding maneuvers needed to maintain smooth breathing in group I head tilt was used in 2%. It is significantly high in group I than in group II. Laboured breathing was seen in 6% in group I while 2% in group II. There was no significant difference in both groups. According to this study LMA is better in all respect as it is easier to insert and better fit in


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Máscaras Laríngeas , Respiração , Anestesia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA