Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 178-181, 2009.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM | ID: wpr-326532

RESUMO

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety between oral sodium phosphate(NaP) and polyethylene glycol(PEG) on bowel preparation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>One hundred and fifteen inpatients were randomly divided into NaP group and PEG group. The questionnaire was designed for scoring by patients and doctors regarding to tolerance, taste, side effects and cleaning degree etc.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with PEG group, NaP presented better tolerance, lower side effects and higher rate of adequate cleaning quality(P<0.05). NaP could cause electrolytic alterations, such as hyperphosphatemia, hypernatremia, hypocalcemia and hypopotassemia, but these changes were transient and without clinical significance.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Sodium phosphate is safe and effective for bowel preparation, and is better than polyethylene glycol in tolerance.</p>


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Administração Oral , Fosfatos , Usos Terapêuticos , Polietilenoglicóis , Usos Terapêuticos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Métodos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA