Methodology for the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chinese Patent Medicine （Part 8）： Quality Evaluation with AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT / 中医杂志

ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines for Chinese patent medicine （CPM） with internationally recognized tools the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation （AGEREE） Ⅱ and reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare （RIGHT）， thereby providing refe-rence for the clinical application and future development of CPM guidelines. MethodsDatabases including CNKI， VIP， Wanfang and Sinomed were searched for CPM guidelines， as well as medlive.cn， websites of China Association of Chinese Medicine and Chinese Medical Association， and reference lists of the included papers. The quality of the guidelines was evaluated using the AGREE Ⅱand RIGHT tools， and consistency tests were performed using Interclass Correlation Coefficient， and descriptive analysis and chi-square test were used to analyze the reporting rate for each domain and the average score for each item. ResultsFinally， 140 CPM guidelines were included， of which 51 were disease-oriented and 89 were drug-oriented， all of which were issued by China. For 51 disease-oriented CPM guidelines， the highest average score of all six AGREE Ⅱ domains was 73.32% for clarity， and the lowest was 26.80% for application； for 89 drug-oriented CPM guidelines， the highest average score was 55.62% for scope and purpose， and the lowest was 31.32% for rigour of development. In terms of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist， the highest reporting rate was 68.26% for background， and lowest was 27.45% for other areas regarding the disease-oriented CPM guidelines； the highest reporting rate was 61.31% for background， and the lowest was 4.49% for other areas regarding drug-oriented CPM guidelines. The average reporting rate was higher for disease-oriented than drug-oriented CPM guidelines in three domains of AGREE Ⅱ （rigour of development， clarity of presentation， editorial independence）， as well as four domains of RIGHT checklist （basic information， evidence， funding and declaration and management of interests， and other areas）. ConclusionThe overall methodology and reporting quality of the current CPM guidelines still need to be improved. It is recommended that future guideline development teams should strictly refer to the AGREE Ⅱ and RIGHT checklist， and take into account of the characteristics of CPM guidelines and relevant methodo-logical suggestions in the development and reporting of CPM guidelines， thereby guiding the clinical use of CPM in a better way.

Guidelines for Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer / 中国实验方剂学杂志

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of digestive tract. In 2020， 1.93 million new cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed globally， ranking third in the global incidence spectrum， and 930 000 new deaths were reported， ranking second in the global cause of death spectrum. Meanwhile， the medical cost of metastatic colorectal cancer is the highest among all stages. A large number of studies have demonstrated that traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） treatment can bring clinical benefits to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with unique efficacy. In order to further standardize the TCM diagnosis and treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and improve the level of TCM diagnosis and treatment， Xiyuan Hospital， China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences， together with other relevant units in China， according to the guideline development process of the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development and the relevant requirements of the Clinical Evidence Grading Criteria on TCM Based on Evidence Body， the Regulations for Group Standards of China Association of Chinese Medicine and others， combined with the characteristics of TCM diagnosis and treatment and the actual situation in China， the Guidelines for TCM Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer was developed in accordance with the Catalogue of TCM Diagnosis and Treatment Plans for 105 Diseases in 24 Specialties issued by Department of Medical Administration of National Administration of TCM.

Critical review of clinical practice guidelines for evaluation of neck mass in adults / Revisão crítica das diretrizes de prática clínica para avaliação de massas cervicais em adultos

Abstract Objective: Several clinical practice guidelines have been produced and disseminated for the evaluation of a neck mass. However, to date, the quality and methodologic rigor of these clinical practice guidelines have not been appraised. Therefore, this study set out to identify and assess the methodologic quality of national and international guidelines for the evaluation and management of neck masses in adults. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS and grey literature sources until September 2020. The quality of these guidelines was assessed by four reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition (AGREE II). Domain scores were considered acceptable quality if they scored >60%, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess agreement among the appraisers. Results: Seven guidelines were assessed for evaluation. Among these, only the American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) achieved an overall rating of ‟high". The remaining four guidelines achieved ratings of either ‟average" or ‟low". The ‟Scope and Purpose" domain achieved the highest mean score (94.4%±5.0%), and lowest was ‟Applicability" (51.5%±29.2%). ICC analysis showed substantial to very good agreement across all domains (0.75-0.98). Conclusion: These findings highlight the variability in methodologic quality of guidelines for the evaluation and management of adult neck mass. The results from this analysis highlight the need to improve guidelines development process for this topic and may guide the selection and use of these guidelines in clinical practice.

Resumo Introdução: Várias diretrizes de práticas clínicas foram produzidas e divulgadas para a avaliação de massa cervical. Porém, até o momento, a qualidade e o rigor metodológico dessas diretrizes de práticas clínicas não foram avaliados. Objetivo: Identificar e avaliar a qualidade metodológica das diretrizes nacionais e internacionais para a avaliação e tratamento de massas cervicais em adultos. Método: Fizemos uma pesquisa abrangente das fontes de dados Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus e literatura cinza até setembro de 2020. A qualidade dessas diretrizes foi avaliada por quatro revisores com a 2a edição do Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Os escores dos domínios foram considerados de qualidade aceitável se pontuassem >60% e os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC) foram calculados para avaliar a concordância entre os avaliadores. Resultados: Sete diretrizes foram investigadas para avaliação. Entre elas, apenas a American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO), o Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB) e a American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) obtiveram uma classificação geral ‟alta". As quatro diretrizes restantes obtiveram classificações ‟media" ou ‟baixa". O domínio ‟Escopo e objetivo'" obteve o maior escore médio (94,4% ± 5,0%) e o domínio ‟Aplicabilidade" obteve o menor escore (51,5%±29,2%). A análise ICC mostrou concordância substancial a muito boa em todos os domínios (0,75-0,98). Conclusão: Esses achados destacam a variabilidade na qualidade metodológica das diretrizes para avaliação e tratamento de massa cervical em adultos. Os resultados dessa análise destacam a necessidade de melhorar o processo de desenvolvimento de diretrizes para esse tópico e podem orientar a seleção e o uso dessas diretrizes na prática clínica.

Systematic Identification and Critical Appraisal of Pediatric COVID-19 Guidelines Applicable in India

Objective To systematically identify and critically appraise the methodological quality of pediatric guidelines applicable to management of COVID-19 in India. Methods Pediatric COVID-19 guidelines applicable to India, published until 30 April 2021, were identifed through a systematic search across ten databases. Each was critically appraised for methodological quality using the AGREE-II tool, by at least two appraisers. Median (interquartile range) of the total score and domain-wise scores were calculated, and compared for Indian vs. foreign guidelines, updated vs. original versions of guidelines, and those developed earlier vs. later in the pandemic. Results A total of 62 guidelines was identifed. Only 8 (12.9%) were published in India. The overall AGREE-II score ranged from 4.7% to 72.8%; with median (IQR) 37.9% (29.4, 48.6). This suggested overall low(er) methodological quality. The median (IQR) domain-wise scores were as follows: Scope and Purpose 66.7% (58.3, 83.3), Stakeholder Involvement 41.7% (30.6, 83.3), Rigor of Development 23.4% (14.8, 37.5), Clarity of Presentation 59.7% (50.0, 75.0), Applicability 27.1% (18.8, 33.3), and Editorial Independence 8.3% (0.0, 45.8). This suggested diversity in quality of diferent aspects of the guidelines, with very low quality in the critical domain of methodological rigor. There were no statistically signifcant diferences in the overall scores of Indian vs. foreign guidelines, updated versions vs. original versions, and those developed earlier vs. later in the pandemic. Conclusion The currently available pediatric COVID-19 guidelines have low methodological quality, adversely afecting their credibility, validity, and applicability. Urgent corrective strategies are presented for consideration.

Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 en pacientes con falla cardiaca del Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión (Callao, Perú) / Clinical Practice Guideline for the management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in patients with Heart Failure at Daniel Alcides Carrion National Hospital (Callao, Peru)

Objetivo: Emitir recomendaciones para el manejo de la diabetes en pacientes con falla cardiaca, contextualizadas al Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión (HNDAC) del Callao, Perú. Material y métodos: Se buscó sistemáticamente las GPC publicadas en los últimos 3 años en bases de datos, repositorios y organismos elaboradores. Se seleccionó aquellas que alcancen un puntaje >60% en la evaluación global con el instrumento AGREE-II. De cada guía se extrajeron las recomendaciones con sus respectivas preguntas clínicas. La aceptabilidad y aplicabilidad de las recomendaciones al contexto del HNDAC fueron evaluadas por médicos especialistas mediante la matriz ADAPTE. La dirección del HNDAC emitió una resolución directoral de la GPC con la versión final del documento. Resultados: De 26 GPC, 3 cumplieron requisitos: Diabetes Canadá 2018, SIGN 2017 y ESC/EASD 2019. Se adoptaron 9 recomendaciones. Los Inhibidores SGLT-2 fueron de primera elección, luego los GLP-1 e inhibidores DPP4, por último, insulina y metformina. Tanto tiazolidinedionas, saxagliptinas y sulfonilureas están contraindicadas. Conclusiones: Mediante un proceso de adopción y contextualización, se elaboró una GPC para el manejo de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en pacientes con falla cardiaca.

Objetive:To issue contextualized recommendations for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. GPC published in the last 3 Materials and methods:years were systematically searched in databases, repositories, and guideline development organizations. Those that achieve a score >60% in the overall evaluation with the AGREE-II instrument were selected. From each guide, the recommendations with theirrespectiveclinicalquestionwereextracted.The acceptability and applicability of the recommendations to the Peruvian context were evaluated by medical specialists from different institutions in the country (MINSA, EsSalud and armed forces) using the ADAPTE matrix. The final version of the document was approved by a directorial resolution in the "Daniel Alcides Carrión" National Hospital. Of 26 GPC, 3 met Results:therequirements:DiabetesCanada2018,SIGN2017and ESC/EASD 2019. Nine recommendations were adopted. SGLT-2 inhibitors were first choice in treatment, then GLP-1 and DPP4 inhibitors, finally insulin and metformin. Both thiazolidinedions, saxagliptins and sulfonylureas are contraindicated. Conclusions:Through a process of adoption and contextualization, a GPC was developed for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure.

Attention Situation of Chinese Patent Medicine for Constipation in Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines/Consensus and National Reimbursement Drug List / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ （AGREE Ⅱ）tool， and to study the attention situation of the included Chinese patent medicines in China's National Reimbursement Drug List in the guidelines/consensus. MethodThe data of CNKI，VIP，Wanfang Data，SinoMed，PubMed and Cochrane from the inception of the databases to October 2021 were searched to collect the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Then，the diagnosis and treatment standards and recommended Chinese patent medicines were extracted. Two researchers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines/consensus with AGREE Ⅱ tool independently. The quality of reports was evaluated by Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare （RIGHT） Statement. The recommended Chinese patent medicines in the guidelines/consensus were compared with those in the National Reimbursement Drug List. ResultEleven consensus and 2 guidelines were included，involving 794 experts. The scores of AGREE II were clarity of presentation（59.0%），scope and purpose（44.0%），stakeholder involvement（23.1%），rigor of development （12.1%），applicability （11.1%），and editorial independence （8.3%） from high to low. Five articles were recommended at B level（recommended after revision） and 8 articles were at C level （not recommended）. The average scores of RIGHT Statement were as follows：basic information （93.59%），background （57.69%），evidence （18.46%），recommendations （20.88%），review and quality assurance （19.23%），funding，declaration and management of interests （0.00%）， and other information （0.00%）. The included guidelines/consensus recommended a total of 27 Chinese patent medicines，among which 20 were included in the National Reimbursement Drug List，with 4 species of Class A and 16 species of Class B， accounting for 74.1% of all recommended Chinese patent medicines. Ten purgative Chinese patent medicines in the National Reimbursement Drug List were recommended by the guidelines/consensus，accounting for 50% of all purgative drugs， and 8 were not recommended. There were prescriptions for purgation， for promoting digestion and removing food stagnation， for clearing heat and purging fire，and for warming the middle and dissipating cold，Tibetan medicine and Mongolian medicine. ConclusionBy the AGREE Ⅱ assessment，the methodological quality of the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation included in this study needed to be improved in the future. The report quality evaluated with RIGHT Statement was low. Most drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List were paid attention in the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Moreover，the drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List could basically fulfill the clinical needs reflexed from the guidelines/consensus recommendations. However， the reasons of some drugs failing to be included in the National Reimbursement Drug List needed to be studied in the future.

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines or consensus for pancreatic diseases in China from 2016 to 2021 / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective:To evaluate the methodological quality and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines or consensuses in the field of Chinese pancreatic diseases from 2016 to 2021, and provide reference for formulating clinical practice guidelines and consensuses in this field.Methods:VIP, Wanfang , CNKI and CBM databases were searched for articles published from January 2016 to March 2021. The main index terms were " pancreas" , " guideline" , " consensus" , and the supplementary index terms were " pancreatitis" , " pancreatic cancer" , " pancreatic head cancer" . Two researchers independently selected the literature. The appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE-China) was utilized to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines or consensuses, and the reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare (RIGHT) tool was used to assess the reporting quality.Results:A total of 14 literature were included, including 7 literature on pancreatic cancer, 3 literature on acute pancreatitis, 1 literature on chronic pancreatitis and 3 literature on others. The results of the assessment by the AGREE-China tool showed that there were no document with a total score greater than or equal to 60.0 points, two with 40.0 to 59.9 points, eleven with 20.0 to 39.9 points, and one with less than 20.0 points. Among the results of RIGHT list, basic information was reported the highest(72.62%) and funding and declaration was the lowest(0).Conclusions:The methodological and reporting quality of the guidelines or consensuses on pancreatic disease in China from 2016 to 2021 are generally not high. In the process of developing domestic guidelines or consensuses on pancreatic diseases, the guideline developer should refer to AGREE-China and RIGHT to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines or consensuses.

Plasmodium vivax malaria across South America: management guidelines and their quality assessment

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Plasmodium vivax malaria represents a major public health problem. This study presents the quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for the management of P. vivax malaria. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Additionally, five guidelines were assessed with the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) II protocol. RESULTS The general performance on the domains of stakeholder involvement, development rigor, and editorial independence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Most guidelines lack a solid research methodology, which implies ambiguous accuracy. Much needs to be done in the area of therapeutics and quality of policies.

AGREE-based evaluation and content analysis of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture-moxibustion / 中国针灸

OBJECTIVE@#To carry out the methodological quality evaluation and content analysis of the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture-moxibustion in China, and to provide reference for the development and updating of future guidelines.@*METHODS@#With Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and EvaluationⅡ(AGREEⅡ), 20 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture and moxibustion in China were evaluated from six aspects: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence. In addition, the contents of 20 guidelines were systematically analyzed, and the characteristics of guidelines were summarized from the aspects of disease selection, operation technology type and safety.@*RESULTS@#The scores of six domains were scope and purpose (91.1%), stakeholder involvement (68.5%), rigour of development (68.6%), clarity of presentation (90.3%), applicability (34.5%) and editorial independence (16.7%). The recommendations of the 20 acupuncture guidelines covered common clinical problems such as diagnosis, treatment and precautions, which were in line with the clinical characteristics of acupuncture and moxibustion in terms of content structure.@*CONCLUSION@#The methodology of the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture and moxibustion in China conformed to the requirements of AGREEⅡ on the quality evaluation, and the overall quality was moderate, but the aspects of applicability and editorial independence were still needed to be improved. The contents of recommendations in 20 guidelines were specific and clear, in line with the characteristics of acupuncture and moxibustion, presenting clinical reference value. In the future, in the process of guideline development, the method of developing acupuncture and moxibustion guidelines should be constantly improved to improve the quality of the guidelines; in the meantime, more attention should be paid to the generalization and clinical applicability evaluation.

Evaluation of Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases / 中华消化杂志

Objective To evaluate Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases published in the past five years in order to recommend the high-quality guidelines and help with the promotion and implementation of them.Methods From January 2013 to June 2018,the officially published Chinese practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases were selected.The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the guideline/consensus was evaluated by " Evaluation Criteria for Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 (AGREE-China 2017)".The guideline/consensus were independently scored by three evaluators and then calculated the average value.Descriptive analysis methods were used to analyze the Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases.Those with the total score more than 40.0 points were included in the recommended list.Results A total of 119 officially published clinical practice guideline/consensus of digestive diseases were retrieved,and 74 clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases were included in the evaluation.Among them,18 (24.3％,18/74) scored over 60.0 points,31 (41.9％,31/74) scored between 40.0 and 59.9 points.Finally 48 guideline or consesus were selected for the recommended list 19 cases of esophagus and gastrointestinal diseases,18 cases of liver diseases,five cases of biliary and pancreafic diseases,and six cases of digestive endoscopy.The three guideline/consensus with the high scores (＞ 80.0 points) were The Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the Maragement of Helicobacter pylori Infection,Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatmeat of Cholestatic Liver Disease (2015) and Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chroaic Hepatitis B (2015 Update).The higher the score of the guideline/consensus,the more scientific and rigorous the method,and the clearer the evaluation of evidence grade and the description of the formation of recommendations.Compared with international standards of guideline/consensus development,there are still some problems in Chinese guidelines or consensus such as no explanation of retrieval strategy,no basis of evidence classification and no description of the formation process from evidence to recommendation.Conclusions The quality of Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases has been improved year by year.However the scientific aspects need to be further improved.AGREE-China which demonstrates good validity,realiability and practicability is easy and clear to use.

Evaluation of Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases / 中华消化杂志

Objective@#To evaluate Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases published in the past five years in order to recommend the high-quality guidelines and help with the promotion and implementation of them.@*Methods@#From January 2013 to June 2018, the officially published Chinese practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases were selected. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the guideline/consensus was evaluated by "Evaluation Criteria for Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017(AGREE-China 2017)" . The guideline/consensus were independently scored by three evaluators and then calculated the average value. Descriptive analysis methods were used to analyze the Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases. Those with the total score more than 40.0 points were included in the recommended list.@*Results@#A total of 119 officially published clinical practice guideline/consensus of digestive diseases were retrieved, and 74 clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases were included in the evaluation. Among them, 18 (24.3%, 18/74) scored over 60.0 points, 31 (41.9%, 31/74) scored between 40.0 and 59.9 points. Finally 48 guideline or consesus were selected for the recommended list 19 cases of esophagus and gastrointestinal diseases, 18 cases of liver diseases, five cases of biliary and pancreafic diseases, and six cases of digestive endoscopy. The three guideline/consensus with the high scores (> 80.0 points) were The Fifth Chinese National Consensus Report on the Maragement of Helicobacter pylori Infection, Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatmeat of Cholestatic Liver Disease (2015) and Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chroaic Hepatitis B (2015 Update). The higher the score of the guideline/consensus, the more scientific and rigorous the method, and the clearer the evaluation of evidence grade and the description of the formation of recommendations. Compared with international standards of guideline/consensus development, there are still some problems in Chinese guidelines or consensus such as no explanation of retrieval strategy, no basis of evidence classification and no description of the formation process from evidence to recommendation.@*Conclusions@#The quality of Chinese clinical practice guideline/consensus for digestive diseases has been improved year by year. However the scientific aspects need to be further improved. AGREE-China which demonstrates good validity, realiability and practicability is easy and clear to use.

Quality appraisal of evidence-based guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury at vaginal delivery / 中华护理杂志

Objective To review the methodological quality of evidence-based guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury at vaginal delivery,and analyze the characteristics of guidelines to provide references for evidence-based decision-making.Methods We systematically searched websites of professional organizations,websites of clinical practice guidelines and databases for guidelines on prevention and repair of perineal injury,and used AGREE Ⅱ to evaluate the chosen guidelines.Results We identified totally 7 relevant evidence-based guidelines in this field.The average standardized scores of guidelines in 6 domains of AGREE Ⅱ were 90.21％(scope and purpose),68.25％ (stakeholder involvement),69.94％ (rigor of development),89.41％ (clarity of presentations),70.63％ (applicability),and 68.25％(independence),respectively.The overall standardized score for 7 guidelines was 75.65％,and the total score was 5.67 (7 points).For overall quality,4 of them were grade A and 3 of them were grade B.Conclusion The overall quality of included guidelines were high,but stakeholder involvement,rigor of development and independence in some guidelines needs to be improved.There was no Chinese evidence-based gui-deline in this field,and high-quality foreign guidelines could be used as evidence in combination with local conditions.

Evidence-based Evaluation of Global Existed Diarrhea Guidelines of Children / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the global existed diarrhea guidelines of children,and provide evidence and methodology reference for clinical practice and the formulation of diarrhea evidence-based guideline of children in China. METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed,Embase,CBM,CNKI,VIP,Wanfang databases and related websites,references included in studies were retrieved additionally from database building to Dec. 2017. The methodological quality of the guideline was evaluated by 2 researchers independently with guideline evaluation toolⅡ(AGREEⅡ). ICC analysis was used to calculate the differences between the evaluation results of 2 researchers and analyze the difference of the guidelines. RESULTS:A total of 1 168 literatures were collected primarily, and 15 guidelines were involved finally,among which 3 guidelines were from USA,2 from British,2 from WHO,each one from Italy,Europe,India,Australia,Malaysia,New South Wales,South Africa and China,respectively. Of 15 guidelines,there were 10 evidence-based guidelines and 5 non-evidence-based guidelines;evidence levels of guidelines and the method of recommendation intensity were different. ICC of 2 researchers were higher than 0.75(P<0.05),indicating good homogeneity among them. The quality of 15 guidelines were not high enough,and the scores of included guidelines in the field of AGREEⅡin descending order were as follows:scope and purpose(84.44%),clarity of presentation(79.82%),stakeholder involvement(45.74%), rigor of development(41.18%), editorial independence (36.39%)and applicability(33.89%). Main prevention and treatment method recommended by guideline included that(1) prevention and treatment of dehydration was the key link in the treatment of children's diarrhea;(2)guidelines generally believed continuous breastfeeding during rehydration could reduce the risk of dehydration in children;(3)zinc preparation was recommended to shorten the course of diarrhea;(4)antibiotics were used rationally, etc. CONCLUSIONS:The quality of global existed diarrhea guidelines of children should be improved. There is no comprehensive diarrhea evidence- based guideline of children in China,and there is a large discrepancy between the situation of pediatric diarrhea therapy in China and WHO standard;it is urgent to establish a standard treatment. It is suggested to formulate high quality pediatric diarrhea guideline in accordance with the national conditions of China,based on standards for international guideline report, comprehensively considering disease burden and characteristics of pediatric diarrhea in China.

Evidence-based Evaluation of Current Global Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura Guidelines of Children / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence-based guidelines of current global pediatric idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) drug therapy, and to provide evidence-based reference for pediatric ITP diagnosis and treatment, the formulation of guideline in China. METHODS: Retrieved from PubMed, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, TRIP medical database, CBM, CJFD, VIP and WANFANG DATA, etc., the evidence-based treatment guideline involving pediatric ITP were included, and methodological quality of the guideline was evaluated by using AGREE Ⅱ tool. The similarities and differences of the guidelines were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 7 pediatric ITP evidence-based guidelines were included, among which 2 came from US, 2 came from Italy, 2 came from British and another one came from Malaysia. The quality of 7 guidelines were not good, among which 6 guidelines were recommended as grade B and 1 guideline was recommended as grade C; only one GRADE evidence-based guideline was found. The score of included guideline in the field of AGREE Ⅱ was in descending order as scope and purpose, clarity, rigor of development, stakeholder involvement, applicability, editorial independence. The main recommended drugs of these guidelines were: glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-D-immunoglobulin, while some guidelines recommend platelet, rituximab and combined medication. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of evidence-based guidelines of ITP for children is in low level and should be improved. There is no evidence-based guideline of ITP for children in China. It is suggested to develop high quality evidence-based guideline for ITP children in China based on AGREE Ⅱ items.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of benznidazole and nifurtimox: a systematic review and quality assessment of published clinical practice guidelines

Abstract The pharmacological management of adults with chronic-phase Chagas disease is challenging despite it being the recent focus of extensive research. One of the challenges in the current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) landscape is the existence of non-evidence-based recommendations for the use of laboratory tests in treatment monitoring. This study aimed to systematically assess the quality and consistency of recommendations of CPGs on the pharmacological management of adults with chronic-phase Chagas disease. Systematic literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO and Google to identify all published CPGs relevant to the pharmacological management of Chagas disease, between January 2010 and March 2016. Three independent reviewers assessed the quality of each CPG using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A total of five CPGs were included and the overall quality of the guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of Chagas disease was moderate-to-low. There was considerable variation in the quality of the CPGs across the AGREE II domains. The domains of scope/purpose, stakeholder involvement, and clarity of presentation were rated well, and the domains of applicability and editorial independence received poor ratings. This review showed that the methodological quality of CPGs for Chagas disease was generally inappropriate, and there was no explicit link between the best available evidence and current recommendations.

Evidence-based Guidelines on Medication Therapy for Purulent Meningitis in Children:A Systematic Review / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the related evidence-based guidelines of purulent meningitis in children,and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed,EMBase,CBM,Wanfang Data-base,CJFD and VIP,NGC,GIN,TRIP and websites of domestic and international medical associations and industry bodies,the treatment guidelines about purulent meningitis in children were collected. Evidence-based evaluation was performed after data extrac-tion and quality evaluation. RESULTS:Finally 3 guidelines were enrolled in total,with development time ranging from 2004 to 2012,from USA,Britain and Australia,respectively. All of the recommendations were level B,scope and purpose and clarityshowed the higher scores in AGREEⅡ,more than 70%,and applicability showed generally low scores. Penicillin and cefotaxi-me were recommended in purulent meningitis of neonates,and vancomycin combined with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone were recom-mended for infants and children(it was combined with vancomycin when Streptococcus pneumoniae infection was suspected). The dose and duration of each guideline were certain different,and the period of treatment should be longer in neonates. In addition, the glucocorticoid was recommended in all guidelines. CONCLUSIONS:The recommendations of medicines for the treatment of pu-rulent meningitis are basically unanimous,with no regional difference,but there are some differences about dose and the course of treatment. In addition,the classification criteria of the levels of evidence and recommendation are still suboptimal,which needs fur-ther improvement. And guidelines on purulent meningitis should be improved inrigourandapplicabilityin future.

Evaluation and comparison of practice guidelines and consensus on type 2 diabetes: a systematic appraisal / 中国药学杂志

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of now available clinical guidelines and consensus statements on type 2 diabetes. Based on this assessment, the comparison of guidelines and consensuses is made to give some suggestions on the methods of making these documents. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed and guideline websites were systematically searched. Literatures were screened according to defined criteria for including. AGREE II was used to instrument assess the quality of the guidelines and consensuses. RESULTS: The result showed that the quality of included guidelines is various, but the overall quality of guidelines is still higher than consensuses. Guidelines got high scores in scope and purpose domain and clarity of presentation domain, but low scores in rigor of development domain and applicability domain. Consensus statements got low scores in all 6 domains. CONCLUSION: The main reason for the difference is consensuses have poor methodology. Rapid advice guidelines were suggested as an alternative for consensus statements.

Methodological Quality Appraisal of 27 Korean Guidelines Using a Scoring Guide Based on the AGREE II Instrument and a Web-based Evaluation

This study evaluated the methodological quality of CPGs using the Korean AGREE II scoring guide and a web-based appraisal system and was conducted by qualified appraisers. A total of 27 Korean CPGs were assessed under 6 domains and 23 items on the AGREE II instrument using the Korean scoring guide. The domain scores of the 27 guidelines were as following: the mean domain score was 82.7% (median 84.7%, ranging from 55.6% to 97.2%) for domain 1 (scope and purpose); 53.4% (median 56.9%, ranging from 11.1% to 95.8%) for domain 2 (stakeholder involvement); 63.0% (median 71.4%, ranging from 13.5% to 90.6%) for domain 3 (rigor of development); 88.9% (median 91.7%, ranging from 58.3% to 100.0%) for domain 4 (clarity of presentation); 30.1% (median 27.1%, ranging from 3.1% to 67.7%) for domain 5 (applicability); and 50.2% (median 58.3%, ranging from 0.0% to 93.8%) for domain 6 (editorial independence). Three domains including scope and purpose, rigor of development, and clarity of presentation were rated at more than 60% of the scaled domain score. Three domains including stakeholder involvement, applicability, and editorial independence were rated at less than 60% of the scaled domain score. Finally, of the 27 guidelines, 18 (66.7%) were rated at more than 60% of the scaled domain score for rigor of development and were categorized as high-quality guidelines.

Guías de práctica clínica en esquizofrenia: evaluación mediante AGREE II / Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Schizophrenia: Evaluation Using AGREE II

Introducción: Colombia se encuentra en estos momentos en la realización de guías de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de diversas patologías. Las guías de práctica clínica representan una herramienta al alcance del clínico para la toma de decisiones sobre sus pacientes. En psiquiatría se dispone internacionalmente de práctica clínica para esquizofrenia, no obstante no se dispone de una guía colombiana ni de una apreciación de las guías desarrolladas en el mundo sobre esta patología. Método: En el marco del desarrollo de la Guía de práctica clínica sobre esquizofrenia para Colombia se realiza una búsqueda sistemática sobre GPC en diversas bases y se evalúan empleando la herramienta AGREE II por parte de 2 personas entrenadas para ello. Se presentan los resultados de esta fase de manera global y por dominios. Resultados: Se encontraron 164 resultados de posibles guías, de las cuales se evalúan finalmente 7 mediante AGREE II. Por dominios y calificación global la guía realizada por el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) obtuvo el mejor puntaje. De las guías evaluadas, únicamente dos eran de América Latina y la mayoría (cuatro) de Europa. Solamente una de las guías evaluadas utilizó el abordaje GRADE para evaluar la calidad de la evidencia y formular las recomendaciones. Conclusión: La diversidad de guías encontrados sobre esquizofrenia no permite una fácil adopción ni adaptación de alguna guía por el médico psiquiatra de acuerdo con los parámetros que se han planteado para Colombia.

Introduction: Colombia is developing multiple national practice guidelines from a range of diseases. Clinical practice guidelines represent a very useful tool to be able to take decision over a patient care that is widely available for the clinician. In psychiatry there are a good number of international clinical guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia nevertheless there is no article that evaluate them scientifically. Methods: In the settings of developing a Colombian schizophrenia practice guideline, a sys tematic search was performed in multiple databases and the results were then evaluated by two trained persons. We present the results globally and by domains. Results: We found 164 matches for possible guidelines. After screening 7 guidelines were evaluated with the AGREE IIinstrument. Globally and by the different domains, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) was the guideline that got the best score. From the guidelines that were reviewed, 4 were from Europe and only 2 were from Latin America. None of the guidelines used GRADE methodology for the recommendations. Conclusion: The diversity of the schizophrenia treatment guidelines does not allow an easy adoption of the recommendation by a psychiatrist in Colombia.

Systematic review of clinical guidelines for Guillain-Barré syndrome in children / 临床儿科杂志

Objective To systematic review the methodological quality of guidelines for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in children, to provide a reference for clinical evidence-based medicine. Methods Guidelines concerning GBS were electronically retrieved from PubMed, EMbase, CBM, Wanfang data, CNKI and Vip. The guide databases includes major medical institutions and industry sites such as NGC, GIN, TRIP , CDC, IDSA, AAP, WHO, Chinese Health and Family Planning Committee website, library of clinical guidelines China and Chinese clinical guidelines for collaboration. All the data were searched from inception of the database or network to Oct. 2013. Two reviews independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of guideline using the AGREEⅡ. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the conformance of the raters' evaluation scores. Results A total of 5 guidelines concerning GBS were included, with a time range from 2003 to 2012, and origins from USA, EU and Canada. The final recommendation levels of the 5 articles were level B. According to the AGREEⅡ, domain 3 and 4 showed the higher scores, and scores were generally low in domain 5. Plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immuneglobulin (IVIG) showed positive effects on the treatment of GBS. But it was not recommended that combined PE and IVIG. Corticosteroids are also not recommended for GBS treatment. Conclusions The recommendations of medicines for GBS are basically consistent. However, the classification criteria of the levels of evidence and recommendation are still unconsistent and suboptimal. The guidelines on GBS should be improved in“Applicability”in future.