A study on language features in Alzheimer's disease versus behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia / 中华老年医学杂志

Objective To investigate and compare the language features among patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia(bv-FTD),Alzheimer's disease(AD) and healthy controls,and to determine the clinical value of language tests in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the two kinds of dementia diseases.Methods A total of 17 bv-FTD patients,18 AD patients and 18 healthy controls were enrolled in Beijing hospital from Nov.2012 to Dec.2013.The language performances in four aspects of listening,speaking,reading and writing by seven items of listening comprehension,repetition,naming,speaking,read aloud,reading comprehension and writing were compared by using the one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)and least significant difference(LSD)tests.Results There were significant differences among the three groups in speaking general scores (AD 128± 46,bv-FTD 113 ± 19,controls 158 ± 13) (F =23.34,P =0.049) and in writing (AD 8 ± 5,bv-FTD 8 ± 4,controls 11 ± 1) (F =27.07,P =0.000).A t rend of statistical difference was observed in general scores of listening comprehension(F =20.96,P =0.060).No difference was found in general scores of repetition,in naming,in reading aloud and in reading comprehension(all P ＞ 0.05).As compared with controls,bv-FTD patients were comprehensively impaired in sub-items of listening comprehension,in naming and in speaking(all P ＜0.05).As compared with controls,AD patients were significantly impaired in a few sub-items of listening comprehension,in naming and in speaking(P ＜0.05).There were significant differences in naming objects,grammar and word finding between AD patients and bv-FTD patients(51± 19 vs.47±13,6±1 vs.6±1,6±1 vs.6±1,P=0.037,0.010 and 0.021,respectively).Conclusions The detailed language examinations are helpful for screening AD and bv-FTD.However,the values are limited in the differential diagnosis between the two types of dementia diseases.It is necessary to combine the detailed language examinations with other tests.

An Autopsy Confirmed Case of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia with Corticobasal Degeneration Pathology

A 63-year-old man presented with a 1.5-year history of progressive personality changes. Clinical evaluations revealed severe frontal dysfunction and bilateral frontal atrophy/glucose hypometabolism. He was diagnosed as probable behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. He continued to decline, and died at the age of 66. At autopsy, numerous tau-positive gilial threads and coiled bodies were observed in the white matter. Tau-positive astrocytic plaques and neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were also seen in cerebral cortices, which were compatible with corticobasal degeneration.

An Autopsy Confirmed Case of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia with Corticobasal Degeneration Pathology

A 63-year-old man presented with a 1.5-year history of progressive personality changes. Clinical evaluations revealed severe frontal dysfunction and bilateral frontal atrophy/glucose hypometabolism. He was diagnosed as probable behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. He continued to decline, and died at the age of 66. At autopsy, numerous tau-positive gilial threads and coiled bodies were observed in the white matter. Tau-positive astrocytic plaques and neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were also seen in cerebral cortices, which were compatible with corticobasal degeneration.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and applicability of the Brazilian version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) / Tradução, adaptação transcultural e aplicabilidade da Escala de Estadiamento e Progressão da Degeneração Lobar Frontotemporal

ABSTRACT Background: Staging scales for dementia have been devised for grading Alzheimer's disease (AD) but do not include the specific symptoms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Objective: To translate and adapt the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) to Brazilian Portuguese. Methods: The cross-cultural adaptation process consisted of the following steps: translation, back-translation (prepared by independent translators), discussion with specialists, and development of a final version after minor adjustments. A pilot application was carried out with 12 patients diagnosed with bvFTD and 11 with AD, matched for disease severity (CDR=1.0). The evaluation protocol included: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Executive Interview (EXIT-25), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Results: The Brazilian version of the FTD-FRS seemed appropriate for use in this country. Preliminary results revealed greater levels of disability in bvFTD than in AD patients (bvFTD: 25% mild, 50% moderate and 25% severe; AD: 36.36% mild, 63.64% moderate). It appears that the CDR underrates disease severity in bvFTD since a relevant proportion of patients rated as having mild dementia (CDR=1.0) in fact had moderate or severe levels of disability according to the FTD-FRS. Conclusion: The Brazilian version of the FTD-FRS seems suitable to aid staging and determining disease progression.

RESUMO Introdução: As escalas de estadiamento das demências, como a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), foram elaboradas para graduar a doença de Alzheimer (DA) e não incluem os sintomas específicos da degeneração lobar frontotemporal (DLFT). Objetivo: Realizar a tradução e adaptação cultural da Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) para o contexto brasileiro e apresentar dados preliminares da sua aplicabilidade. Métodos: O processo de adaptação transcultural consistiu em: tradução, retrotradução (realizadas por tradutores independentes), discussão com especialistas sobre a versão em português e equivalência com a versão original, desenvolvimento da versão final com pequenos ajustes. Foi feita uma aplicação piloto em 12 pacientes com diagnóstico de demência frontotemporal variante comportamental (DFTvc) e 11 com DA, pareados quanto à gravidade da demência (CDR=1). O protocolo de avaliação incluiu a Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), Mini Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM), Executive Interview (EXIT-25), Inventário Neuropsiquiátrico (INP) e a Escala de Avaliação Clínica da Demência (CDR). Resultados: A FTD-FRS na versão brasileira pareceu apropriada. Resultados preliminares revelaram maiores níveis de incapacidade na DFTvc do que em pacientes com DA (DFTvc: 25% leve, 50% moderado, 25% grave; AD: 36.36% leve, 63.64% moderado). A CDR parece subestimar a gravidade da demência na DFTvc, uma vez que uma relevante proporção dos pacientes classificados com leves (CDR=1) de fato apresentaram nível moderado ou grave de comprometimento na FTD-FRS. Conclusão: A versão brasileira da FTD-FRS pode se mostrar adequada para auxiliar no estadiamento e determinar a progressão da DLFT.

Functional profile of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease and normal controls / Perfil funcional de pacientes com demência frontotemporal variante comportamental (bvDFT) em comparação com pacientes com doença de Alzheimer e controles normais

ABSTRACT There are few studies describing the functional changes in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and it is not clear which aspects of functionality are affected by the disease. Objective: The aim of the present investigation was to characterize the functional profile of patients previously diagnosed with bvFTD. Methods: The sample consisted of 31 patients diagnosed with bvFTD, who were compared to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n=31) and to healthy control subjects (NC) (n=34), matched for schooling and age. bvFTD and AD patients were matched by severity of dementia. The protocol included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS-BR), Functional Activities Questionnaire (PFAQ), Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Results: The group with bvFTD showed worse performance on Initiation and Planning/Organization in the DAD and on ability to feed oneself in the DAFS-BR, as well as higher scores on the PFAQ, suggesting greater dependence in the bvFTD group. Conclusion: The results suggest that individuals with bvFTD display greater functional impairment compared to AD patients with a similar degree of dementia severity and to healthy controls. Direct assessment of functionality proved unable to clearly differentiate between the dementia subtypes.

RESUMO Existem poucos estudos sobre alterações funcionais na variante comportamental da demência frontotemporal (DFTvc). Objetivo: Caracterizar o desempenho funcional de pacientes com diagnóstico prévio de DFTvc. Métodos: Trinta e um pacientes com DFTvc foram comparados a pacientes com doença de Alzheimer (DA) (n=31) e adultos saudáveis (NC) (n=34), pareados para idade e escolaridade. Os pacientes com DFTvc e DA foram pareados pela gravidade da demência. O protocolo incluiu o Mini Exame do Estado Mental, Escala de Depressão Geriátrica (GDS), Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS-BR), Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD), Functional Activities Questionnaire (PFAQ) e Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Resultados: O grupo com DFTvc apresentou pior desempenho em Iniciação e Planejamento/Organização na DAD, em Alimentação na DAFS-BR e pontuação mais elevada na PFAQ, sugerindo que a dependência na DFTvc é mais acentuada. Conclusão: Os resultados apresentados sugerem que indivíduos com DFTvc apresentam maior prejuízo funcional, quando comparados com participantes com DA com grau semelhante de gravidade e com adultos saudáveis. A avaliação direta da funcionalidade não ajudou a diferenciar os subtipos de demência de modo significativo.