Eficacia y seguridad del misoprostol vaginal comparado con dinoprostona en maduración cervical e inducción del parto / Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction

Resumen OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia del misoprostol intravaginal con el dispositivo vaginal de liberación prolongada de dinoprostona en la inducción del parto. Además, analizar el perfil de seguridad en relación con los desenlaces maternos y perinatales. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo efectuado en pacientes atendidas entre 2018 y 2020 en el Área Sanitaria de Ferrol, La Coruña, España, con partos que se iniciaron con inducción con prostaglandinas. Las pacientes se dividieron en dos cohortes, en función de la prostaglandina sintética administrada (misoprostol por vía vaginal o dinoprostona en dispositivo intravaginal). Para la comparación entre ambos grupos se aplicó la prueba U de Mann-Whitney. Para las variables cualitativas se describió su cantidad total y el porcentaje, que se compararon con prueba de χ2 de Pearson. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 508 pacientes con inducción del parto. En las indicaciones de ésta no se encontraron diferencias entre uno y otro grupo, aunque destacó la indicación del misoprostol en pacientes con embarazo cronológicamente prolongado (63%) y de dinoprostona en rotura prematura de membranas (49%). En relación con los desenlaces perinatales, se registró un Apgar menor de 7 a los 5 minutos en 2 pacientes tratadas con dinoprostona y 1 con misoprostol; así como un pH arterial umbilical menor de 7.10 en 8 pacientes tratadas con dinoprostona y 7 con misoprostol. CONCLUSIONES: Los datos aquí reportados hacen suponer que ambas prostaglandinas consiguen una tasa de inicio del parto similar, aunque la dinoprostona parece reducir el tiempo hasta el inicio del parto en mujeres con indicación de inducción.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol with the dinoprostone extended-release vaginal device in labor induction. In addition, to analyze the safety profile in relation to maternal and perinatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study performed in patients attended between 2018 and 2020 in the Health Area of Ferrol, La Coruña, Spain, with deliveries that were initiated with prostaglandin induction. The patients were divided into two cohorts, depending on the synthetic prostaglandin administered (misoprostol vaginally or dinoprostone in intravaginal device). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. For qualitative variables, the total number and percentage were described and compared with Pearson's 2 test. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients undergoing labor induction were analyzed. No differences were found in the indications for induction of labor between one group and the other, although the indication for misoprostol in patients with chronologically prolonged pregnancy (63%) and for dinoprostone in premature rupture of membranes (49%) stood out. In relation to perinatal outcomes, an Apgar of less than 7 at 5 minutes was recorded in 2 patients treated with dinoprostone and 1 with misoprostol; as well as an umbilical arterial pH of less than 7.10 in 8 patients treated with dinoprostone and 7 with misoprostol. CONCLUSIONS: The data reported here suggest that both prostaglandins achieve a similar rate of onset of labor, although dinoprostone appears to reduce the time to onset of labor in women indicated for induction.

Inducción de trabajo de parto en pacientes COVID-19: experiencia en el Hospital San Juan de Dios / Labor induction in COVID-19 patients: experience in the San Juan de Dios Hospital

INTRODUCCIÖN Y OBJETIVOS: Describir la experiencia de los partos en gestantes con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR asintomáticas o con sintomatología leve y aquellas sin la enfermedad, y determinar la tasa de éxito de parto vaginal en inducción de trabajo de parto. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes que tuvieron su parto entre 15 de Abril y 03 de Julio del 2020 en el Hospital San Juan de Dios. Se incluyeron las pacientes inducidas con Dinoprostona, Oxitocina o ambas de manera secuencial y se dividieron según estatus COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR al ingreso. Se caracterizó demográficamente el grupo de pacientes positivas y se determinaron los datos de ambos grupos en relación a la necesidad de inducción de trabajo de parto y su éxito para parto vaginal. RESULTADOS: De un total de 657 nacimientos, hubo un 9.7% (n=64) de pacientes con COVID 19, de las cuales un 23.4% (n=15) requirió inducción de trabajo de parto, con una tasa de éxito para parto vaginal de un 66.7% (n=10). De estas pacientes, un 50% recibió Oxitocina, un 40% Dinosprostona y un 10% ambos medicamentos de forma secuencial. En las pacientes negativas, hubo un total de 568 nacimientos, con un 29.8% (n=169) de usuarias que requirieron inducción. La tasa de éxito para parto vaginal en este grupo fue de 72.2% (n=122), utilizando un 50% Oxitocina; un 27% Dinoprostona; un 14.8% ambas; y un 8.2% Balón de Cook. CONCLUSIONES: Sabemos que los resultados de este estudio están limitados por el bajo número de pacientes incluidas, sin embargo, podemos observar que, en nuestra experiencia con las pacientes que arrojaron PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivas, asintomáticas o con enfermedad leve, se logró realizar la inducción de trabajo de parto según protocolos habituales, obteniendo porcentajes de éxito para partos vaginales, similares a las pacientes sin la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Describe the experience of deliveries in pregnant women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID 19 by asymptomatic RT-PCR or with mild symptoms and those without the disease, and determine the success rate of vaginal delivery in the induction of labor. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had their delivery between 15th April and 03rd of July, 2020 in the San Juan de Dios Hospital. Patients induced with Dinoprostone, Oxytocin or both sequentially were included, and were divided according to COVID 19 status by RT-PCR on their admission process. The group of positive patients was demographically characterized and the data of both groups was determined in relation to the need for labor induction and its success for vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Of a total of 657 births, there were 9.7% (n = 64) of patients with COVID 19, of which 23.4% (n = 15) required labor induction, with a success rate for vaginal delivery of 66.7% (n = 10). Of these patients, 50% received Oxytocin, 40% Dinosprostone and 10% both drugs sequentially. In the negative patients, there were a total of 568 births, with 29.8% (n = 169) of users requiring labor induction. The success rate for vaginal delivery in this group was 72.2% (n = 122); 50% using Oxytocin; 27% Dinoprostone; 14.8% using both; and 8.2% using Cook's Catheter. CONCLUSIONS: We know that the results of this study are limited by the low number of patients included, however, in our experience, we can observe that, in patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive, asymptomatic or with mild disease, it was possible to perform induction of labor according to standard protocols, achieving success rates for vaginal deliveries, similar to patients without the disease.

Métodos farmacológicos de indução do trabalho de parto: qual o melhor? / Pharmacological methods for induction of labor: what's the best?

A indução do parto consiste em estimular artificialmente as contrações uterinas coordenadas e efetivas antes de seu início espontâneo, levando ao desencadeamento do trabalho de parto em mulheres que ultrapassaram a 22ª semana de gravidez. A antecipação do parto pode ser necessária em diversas situações obstétricas, como gestação prolongada, diabetes, ruptura prematura das membranas e pré-eclâmpsia. Estima-se que mais de 15% de todas as gestantes apresentem alguma indicação de indução do parto. Vários métodos de indução do parto são propostos, tanto naturais como artificiais e, dentre estes, os métodos farmacológicos merecem especial destaque. Realizou-se uma revisão da literatura baseada nos melhores níveis de evidências e considerando os graus de recomendação. De acordo com a literatura, a utilização de estrogênio, propranolol, relaxina, mefepristone e hialuronidade não deve ser estimulada por não existirem evidências suficientes para a sua recomendação. O seu uso, portanto, deve ser limitado a protocolos de pesquisas. Ocitocina é um método de indução efetivo que pode ser usado em pacientes com ruptura das membranas amnióticas. Prostaglandinas (PG) e misoprostol (um éster sintético da PGE1) são efetivos para a indução do parto independentemente da integridade das membranas. Prostaglandinas devem ser administradas preferencialmente por via vaginal. Habitualmente, o misoprostol é preferido devido a questões práticas, como o baixo custo e a facilidade de administração e estocagem. Doses baixas de misoprostol devem ser utilizadas e a atualmente recomendada é de 25 g a cada 4 ou 6 horas. Tanto a via oral como a via vaginal podem ser utilizadas.

Induction of labor consists of stimulation of effective and coordinated uterine contractions before their spontaneous onset for the purpose of bring on labor in women who have surpassed the 22nd week of pregnancy. In several obstetrical situations, such as prolonged pregnancy, diabetes, premature rupture of membranes and preeclampsia, anticipation of labor and delivery may be necessary. It is estimated that more than 15% of all pregnant women eventually present any indication for induction of labor. Several natural and artificial methods for induction are proposed. Among them, pharmacological methods are the most relevant. A literature review was carried out based on the highest levels of evidence and on the grade of recommendations. According to the literature, the use of estrogens, relaxin, mifepristone and hyaluronidade should not be stimulated because there are not enough evidences for their recommendation, so their utilization should be limited to research protocols. Oxytocin is an effective method for induction of labor that may be used in patients with ruptured membranes. On the other hand, prostaglandins and misoprostol (a prostaglandin E1 analog) are effective for induction of labor independently on the membrane integrity. Vaginal administration should be preferred for prostaglandins. Misoprostol is habitually preferred due to practical questions, such as low cost and facility for storage and administration. Low doses of misoprostol should be used, and the currently recommended dose is 25 g every four or six hours. Both vaginal and oral routes of administration can be used.