Metaanálisis de la validez del inmunodiagnóstico del virus linfotrópico de células T humanas i/ii en bancos de sangre, 2000-2018 / Meta-analysis regarding the validity of the immunodiagnosis of human T-cell lymphotropic virus I/II in blood banks, 2000-2018 / Meta-análise da validade do imunodiagnóstico do vírus linfotrópico de células t humanas I/II em bancos de sangue, 2000-2018

Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar la validez del inmunodiagnóstico del htlv i/ii en bancos de sangre, con base en estudios publicados en la literatura científica. Metodología: Se efectuó un metaanálisis de pruebas diagnósticas siguiendo la guía prisma y las recomendaciones de Cochrane. Se evaluó la calidad metodológica con quadas y se garantizó la reproducibilidad y la exhaustividad. Se realizó también un análisis de efectos aleatorios para la sensibilidad, la especificidad, los cocientes de probabilidad, la razón de momios diagnóstica y la curva característica operativa del receptor (roc) con sus intervalos de confianza (ic) del 95 %. Resultados: Se tamizaron 4604 estudios, de los cuales solo tres cumplieron el protocolo. Se evaluaron 548 infectados con htlv i/ii y 6643 sanos. El inmunodiagnóstico de htlv i/ii presentó una sensibilidad del 99 % (ic95 % = 98,0-99,0), especificidad del 100 % (ic95 % = 99,9-100), cocientes de probabilidad positivo de 315,8 (ic95 % = 128,2-778,5) y negativo de 0,02 (ic95 % = 0,01-0,04), razón de momios diagnóstica de 24373 (ic95 % = 6864-86545) y área bajo la curva roc del 99,9 %. Conclusión: Se dispone de pocos estudios en este campo del inmunodiagnóstico htlv i/ii. El elevado número de sujetos analizados evidenció alta validez del inmunodiagnóstico, lo que resulta determinante para garantizar la inocuidad de las unidades de sangre, la detección de portadores asintomáticos, la disminución de la transmisión y el inicio de tratamiento.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the validity of the immunodiagnosis of htlv i/ii in blood banks, based on studies published in the scientific literature. Methodology: A meta-analysis of diagnostic tests was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane recommendations. The methodological quality was evaluated with QUADAS, and reproducibility and completeness were guaranteed. A random effects analysis was also performed with respect to sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results: 4,604 studies were screened, of which only three complied with the protocol. 548 subjects infected with HTLV I/II and 6,643 healthy subjects were evaluated. The immunodiagnosis of HTLV I/II had a sensitivity of 99 % (95 % CI = 98.0-99.0), a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI = 99.9-100), a positive likelihood ratio of 315.8 (95 % CI = 128.2-778.5) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (95 % CI = 0.01-0.04), a diagnostic odds ratio of 24,373 (95 % CI = 6,864-86,545), and an area under the ROC curve of 99.9 %. Conclusion: Few studies are available in the field of HTLV I/II immunodiagnosis. The high number of subjects analyzed showed high validity of the immunodiagnosis, which is decisive to guarantee the safety of the blood units, the detection of asymptomatic carriers, the decrease in transmission, and the start of treatment.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a validade do imunodiagnóstico do HTLV I/II nos bancos de sangue, baseados nos estudos publicados na literatura científica. Metodologia: Foi realizada uma meta-análise de testes diagnósticos seguindo a guia PRISMA e as recomendações de Cochrane. Foi avaliada a qualidade metodológica com QUADAS e garantiu-se a reprodutibilidade e a integridade. Realizou-se também uma análise de efeitos aleatórios para a sensibilidade, a especificidade, os quocientes de probabilidade, a razão de probabilidade diagnóstica e a Curva Característica de Operação do Receptor (Curva ROC) com seus Intervalos de Confiança (IC) de 95%. Resultados: Foram selecionados 4604 estudos, dos quais somente 3 cumpriram com o protocolo. Foram avaliados 548 infectados com o vírus HTLV I/II e 6.643 saudáveis. O imunodiagnóstico de HTLV I/II apresentou uma sensibilidade de 99% (IC95% = 98,0-99,0), especificidade de 100% (IC95%= 99,9-100), quocientes de probalidade positiva de 315,8 (IC95% = 128,2-778,5) e negativo de 0,02 (IC95% = 0,01-0,04), razão de probabilidade diagnóstica de 24373 (IC95% = 6864-86545) e área sob a curva ROC de 99,9%. Conclusão: São poucos os estudos disponíveis neste campo do imunodiagnóstico HTLV I/II. O elevado número de pessoas analisadas evidenciou alta validade do imunodiagnóstico, o que é decisivo para garantir a inocuidade das unidades de sangue, a detecção de portadores assintomáticos, a diminuição da transmissão e o início do tratamento.

Prevalencia de enteroparasitos en individuos seropositivos y seronegativos a los virus HTLV-I/II

Para determinar la prevalencia de enteroparásitos en individuos seropositivos a los virus HTLV-I/II, se seleccionaron aleatoriamente 75 donantes que asistieron a los Bancos de Sangre de dos instituciones sanitarias del municipio Maracaibo, Venezuela. Se contactaron personalmente 50 individuos seropositivos a virus HTLV-I/II (grupo muestra) y 25 seronegativos (grupo control), quienes aportaron una muestra fecal para diagnóstico parasitológico. Estas fueron sometidas al examen al fresco con solución salina fisiológica (SSF) al 0,85%, tinción temporal de Lugol y técnica de concentración con formol-éter (Ritchie). Además se realizó cultivo en Agar Nutritivo (método de Arakaki) para investigar la presencia de larvas de Strongyloides stercoralis. Se determinó una prevalencia general de enteroparásitos en el grupo muestra de 54% y 44% en el grupo control. Predominó el monoparasitismo entre todos los individuos estudiados. Las especies identificadas fueron: Blastocystis spp. 47,3% y 15,4%, Entamoeba coli 21% y 15,4%, Endolimax nana 13% y 53,8%, Complejo Entamoeba 10,5% y 15,4%, Giardia intestinalis 5,2% y 0%, y Entamoeba hartmanni 2,6% y 0% en el grupo muestra y grupo control, respectivamente. No se detectó Strongyloides stercoralis ni otros helmintos intestinales, en los individuos estudiados. Blastocystis spp. fue el más frecuente en los pacientes seropositivos (diferencia estadísticamente significativa) que en el grupo control, lo que pudiese relacionarse con una mayor persistencia de este cromista en pacientes coinfectados con HTLV-I/II. Se puede concluir que el estatus serológico del individuo HTLV-I/II positivo parece no influir en la presencia o adquisición de parásitos intestinales.

Prevalence of intestinal parasites in seropositive and seronegative to HTLV I/II viruses

The prevalence of intestinal parasites in individuals seropositive for the HTLV-I/II virus was studied. A total of 75 donors who attended the blood banks of two health institutions in Maracaibo, Venezuela were randomly selected: 50 patients seropositive for HTLV-I/II (study group) and 25 seronegative individuals (control group). The participants in the study were all contacted personally, after which they provided a fecal sample for parasitological diagnosis. The fresh samples were examined using 0.85% physiological saline solution (PSS), Lugol’s solution for temporary staining and the formalin-ether concentration technique (Ritchie). In addition, samples were cultured on nutrient agar (Arakaki method) to determine the presence of Strongyloides stercoralis larvae. Overall prevalences of 54% intestinal parasites in the study group and 44% in the control group were found. Monoparasitism prevailed among all the individuals studied. The species identified in the study and control groups were: Blastocystis spp. 47.3% and 15.4%, Entamoeba coli 21% and 15.4%, Endolimax nana 13.0% and 53.8%, Entamoeba complex 10.5% and 15.4%, Giardia intestinalis 5.2% and 0%, and Entamoeba hartmanni 2.6% and 0 %, respectively. Strongyloides stercoralis and other intestinal helminths were not detected in the individuals studied. Blastocystis spp. was significantly more common in seropositive patients than in the control group, which could be associated with a greater persistence of this chromista in patients co-infected with HTLV-I / II.It can be concluded that the positive serological status of HTLV-I / II infected individuals does not seem to influence either the presence or acquisition of intestinal parasites.

Prevalence of HCV Infection in Hemodialysis Patients of South Khorasan in Comparison With HBV, HDV, HTLV I/II, And HIV Infection.

Background and objective: This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection as well as HBV, HDV, HTLV I/II, and HIV infection in hemodialysis patients in our district. Methods: The subjects of this study involved 41 hemodialysis patients admitted to hemodialysis ward, Vali- Asr hospital. HBV, HDV, HIV, and HTLV1/2 infections were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. Serum anti- HCV anti-body was measured using the 3rd generation of ELISA kit. HCV Viremia was evaluated in all patients using RT-PCR technique. Results: HCV infection was not observed in none of patients by ELISA technique; however RT-PCR technique demonstrated HCV viremia in one (2.43%) patient. HBsAg was detected in 4(9.75%) patients, and one (2.43%) was Anti HTLV 1/2 positive; none of patients were HDV or HIV positive. Conclusion: HCV infection is less common than HBV infection in our patients. ELISA technique can not demonstrate all hemodialysis patients with HCV infection, For this reason it is requirement to evaluate this group of patients for HCV infection using RT-PC technique.

Coinfection by HTLV-I/II is associated with an increased risk of strongyloidiasis and delay in starting antiretroviral therapy for AIDS patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of HIV-1-HTLV-1 coinfected patients, in Bahia, Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective, comparative study. RESULTS: Among a total of 123 consecutive HIV infected patients, 20 men (20.6 percent) and 6 women (23.1 percent) had detectable antibodies against HTLV-I/II. The major risk factor associated with coinfection by HTLV was intravenous drug use (57.7 percent of coinfected patient versus 9.2 percent of HTLV seronegative patients, p < 0.0001). Coinfected patients had higher absolute lymphocyte counts (1,921 + 762 versus 1,587 + 951, p = 0.03). Both groups of patients had similar means of CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts. However, among patients with AIDS CD4+ cell counts were significantly higher among those coinfected with HTLV-I/II (292 ± 92 cells/mm³, versus 140 ± 177cells/mm³, p = 0.36). The frequency and type of opportunistic infections were similar for both groups, but strongyloidiasis and encephalopathy were more frequently diagnosed in coinfected patients (p < 0.05). On the other hand, patients coinfected with HTLV-I/II received significantly less antiretroviral therapy than singly infected by HIV-1. CONCLUSION: Coinfection by HTLV-I/II is associated with an increased risk of strongyloidiasis for HIV patients. Higher CD4 count may lead to underestimation of immunodeficiency, and delay to initiate antiretroviral therapy.

Soroprevalência do vírus linfotrópico de células T humanas (HTLV I/II) em indivíduos doadores de sangue do hemocentro da cidade de Maringá-PR / Seroprevalence of human t-cell lymphotropic virus type (HTLVI/II) in blood donors from the blood bank in Maringá-PR, Brazil

O vírus linfotrópico de células T humanas (HTLV) é transmitido por transfusões, uso compartilhado de agulhas, aleitamento e contato sexual. A prevalência varia de acordo com a região geográfica, grupo racial e população estudada. Cerca de 1 a 4% dos indivíduos infectados desenvolvem algum tipo de doença em decorrência da infecção. É reconhecida a associação entre a infecção pelo HTLV-I e Leucemia de Células T do Adulto e Paraparesia Espástica Tropical (PET). O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar uma avaliação da prevalência de soropositividade para HTLV I/II na população de doadores de sangue do Hemocentro Regional de Maringá-Pr. Foram analisados os registros laboratoriais de 28.194 doadores de sangue do Hemocentro Regional de Maringá, no período de abril de 2003 a março de 2006, e observou-se que a soropositividade para o HTLV-I/II pelo teste ELISA na população geral de doadores (n=28.194) foi de 0,067% (n=19), das quais 52,63% eram do sexo feminino e 47,36% do sexo masculino. Através deste, conclui-se que medidas eficazes de saúde pública devem ser desenvolvidas para prevenir a disseminação dos vírus-T linfotrópicos humanos, pois não existem maneiras efetivas de se controlar as doenças associadas ao vírus. O aconselhamento de indivíduos soropositivos também deve ser observado, sendo uma das principais formas de prevenção.

The Human T cell Lymphotropic Virus Type (HTLV) is transmitted by transfusions, shared use of needles, breast feeding, and sexual contact. The prevalence varies according to the geographical area, racial group, and studied population. About 1 to 4% of the infected individuals develop some type of disease due to infection. The association is recognized among the HTLV-I infection and Leukemia of the Adult?s T-cells, and Tropical Spastic Paraparesis (PET). The objective of this article is to evaluate the seropositivity prevalence for HTLV I/II in the blood donors from the Maringá Regional Blood Bank population. 28.194 blood donors from the Maringá Regional Blood Bank data lab were analyzed from April,2003 to March,2006; and it was observed that the seropositivity for HTLV-I/II through the ELISA test in the donor population (n=28.194) was 0,067% (n=19), as 52,63% were female and 47,36% male. Thus, it is concluded that effective public health actions should be taken in order to prevent the of the human-T lymphotropic virus spread, because there are not effective ways of controlling the diseases associated with it. Counseling seropositivity individuals should also be taken into account as one of the major prevention ways.