Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of recovered left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure; a hospital-based cohort study

Background: The data on incidence of recovered Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and outcome in patients with non ischemic systolic heart failure is limited. We report the incidence, determinants and mortality in patients with recovered LVEF. Methods: The 369 patients with HFrEF with LVEF of less than 40% of non ischemic etiology with available follow up echocardiography study at one year were enrolled. The baseline data of clinical characteristics and treatment was recorded prospectively and were followed up annually for mean of 3.6 years (range 2 to 5 years) to record all cause death and LVEF measured echocardiographically. The recovered, partially recovered and no recovery of LVEF was defined based on increase in LVEF to 50% and more, 41% to 49% and to persistently depressed LVEF to 40% or lower respectively. Results: The LVEF recovered in 36.5%% of the cohort at 5 years. The rate of recovery of LVEF was slower in patients with no recovery of LVEF at one year compared to cohort with partially recovered LVEF (18% vs.53%) at five year. The Baseline LVEF was significantly associated with recovered LVEF, odd ratio (95% C.I.) 1.09(1.04, 1.14). The cumulative mortality at five years was significantly lower in cohort with recovered LVEF (18.1% vs. 57.1%). Conclusions: One third of the patients had recovered LVEF and was significantly associated with baseline LVEF and lower mortality rate.

The clinical effect of sacubitril valsartan combined with dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and non-diabetes patients / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To observe the clinical effect of combination therapy of sacubitril valsartan and dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-diabetes patients. 【Methods】 This study involved 96 patients with HFrEF and non-diabetes. The patients were randomly divided into control group (50 cases) and observation group (46 cases). On the basis of routine treatment, the control group was treated with sacubitril valsartan, while the observation group was treated with sacubitril valsartan and dapagliflozin. After 1-month and 6-month treatment, we monitored blood pressure, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high sensitivity troponin T (cTnT), fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPW), Minnesota soda heart failure life quality score (MLHFQ), the incidence of rehospitalization and death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the two groups. 【Results】 After 6 months, systolic blood pressure, cTnT, NT-proBNP, LVEDd, LVPW, and LAD of the observation group were significantly decreased compared with the control group (P0.05). 【Conclusion】 The combination treatment of sacubitril valsartan and dapagliflozin on HFrEF and non-diabetes patients can significantly improve cardiac function, inhibit myocardial remodeling, reduce the incidence of MACE, and improve the prognosis.

Predictors for early mortality in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are recommended in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients to reduce arrhythmic deaths. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with mortality within one-year following the ICD. The data from our hospital's electronic database system was extracted for patients who were implanted ICD secondary to HFrEF between 2009 and 2019. Overall, 1107 patients were included in the present analysis. Mortality rate at one-year following the device implantation was 4.7%. In multivariate analysis; age, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association classification >2, blood urea nitrogen, pro-brain natriuretic peptide and albumin independently predicted one year mortality

Effects of sakubatril valsartan combined with dagliflozin in the treatment of patients with HFrEF and the effect on serum cTn I and BNP levels / 中国临床药理学与治疗学

AIM: To investigate the effect of sakubatril valsartan combined with dagliflozin in the treatment of patients with HFrEF and the effect on serum cardiac troponin I (CTnl) and B-type brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. METHODS: Seventy patients with HFrEF admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and divided, using random number table method, into control group (35 cases, conventional treatment + sakubatril valsartan) and observation group (35 cases, conventional treatment + sakubatril valsartan + dagliflozin). The treatment effect, myocardial markers (serum cTnl, BNP), exercise capacity (6 min walking experiment), myocardial remodeling-related indexes [(left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular end-systolic internal diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)] and adverse effects were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P 0.05); the changing trends of serum BNP and cTnl expressions were the same in the two groups at 3 months and 6 months of treatment, and the serum BNP and cTnl expressions of patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of sakubatril valsartan and dagliflozin is effective for patients with HFrEF, and can effectively regulate serum cTnl and BNP levels with low adverse reactions.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To conduct the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction （HFrEF），and to provide evidence-based reference for rational drug use and medical and healthy decision-making. METHODS A Markov model was used to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the regimen of empagliflozin in the treatment of HFrEF ，and to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of standard treatment plan plus empagliflozin （empagliflozin group）vs. standard treatment plan （standard treatment group ）. Clinical parameters were obtained from the EMPEROR-Reduced study；cost and utility data came from the published literatures. The cycle of the model was 1 month and the simulation time was 20 years. Single-factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were performed to validate the results of cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS Compared with the standard treatment group ，each additional quality-adjusted life year in the empagliflozin group cost 37 995.94 yuan more ，which was less than China ’s 1 time GDP per capita in 2020（72 447 yuan）. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis showed that steady-state hospitalization rate of 2 groups was the most important factor affecting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio . The results of probability sensitivity analysis showed that when the willingness-to-pay threshold （WTP）was 1 time GDP per capita in 2020（72 447 yuan），the probability of empagliflozin group with cost-effectiveness advantage was 58.8％；when the WTP was 3 times GDP per capita in 2020（217 341 yuan），the probability of empagliflozin group with cost-effectiveness advantage was 63.8％. CONCLUSIONS Compared with standard treatment plan alone，standard treatment plan plus empagliflozin is more cost-effective in the treatment of HFrEF. However ，the economic probability is not high.

Clinical Efficacy of Dapagliflozin Combined with Shexiang Baoxinwan in Treatment of Acute Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ObjectiveTo study the clinical efficacy of dapagliflozin combined with Shexiang Baoxinwan （SXBXW） in the treatment of acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction （HFrEF） and syndrome of Qi deficiency and blood stasis. MethodA total of 176 patients hospitalized due to acute HFrEF （syndrome of Qi deficiency and blood stasis） were selected and randomized into control group， SXBXW group， dapagliflozin group， and SXBXW + dapagliflozin group （the latter three groups were called the intervention groups）. The New York Heart Association （NYHA） class， 6-minute walk test （6MWT） score， Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire （KCCQ） score， traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） syndrome score， N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide （NT-proBNP）， soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 （sST2）， interleukin-6 （IL-6）， and hypersensitive C-reactive protein （hs-CRP） of the patients were evaluated and measured at the time of admission， 1 week after treatment， and 2 weeks of treatment. Furthermore， the hospital stay， in-hospital mortality， and 30-day re-admission rate were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of each group. ResultAfter 1 week of treatment， the SXBXW group exhibited superior NYHA class， KCCQ score， TCM syndrome score and curative effect， IL-6， and hs-CRP to the control group （P<0.05， P<0.01）. After 2 weeks of treatment， the SXBXW group showed superior TCM syndrome score， TCM curative effect， and hs-CRP （P<0.05， P<0.01） to the control group. The dapagliflozin group was superior to the control group in terms of TCM syndrome score， NT-proBNP， and sST2 （P<0.05， P<0.01） after 1 week of treatment and in terms of NYHA class， KCCQ score， NT-proBNP， sST2， and hospital stay （P<0.05， P<0.01） after 2 weeks of treatment. The SXBXW + dapagliflozin group exhibited better efficacy than the control group in terms of NYHA class， 6MWT score， KCCQ score， TCM syndrome score and curative effect， NT-proBNP， sST2， IL-6， and hs-CRP （P=0.014） after 1 week of treatment and in terms of NYHA class， KCCQ score， TCM syndrome score and curative effect， NT-proBNP， sST2， IL-6， hs-CRP， and hospital stay （P<0.01） after 2 weeks of treatment. ConclusionSXBXW and dapagliflozin have good therapeutic effect on acute HFrEF and syndrome of Qi deficiency and blood stasis， and their combination demonstrated better therapeutic effect， with good safety and tolerability.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in which patients have symptoms and signs of HF with normal or near-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%). Roughly half of all patients with HF worldwide have an LVEF ≥50% and nearly half have an LVEF <50%. Thanks to the increased scientific attention about the condition and improved characterization and diagnostic tools, the incidence of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) dropped while that of HFpEF has increased by 45%. HFpEF has no single guideline for diagnosis or treatment, the patient population is heterogeneously and inconsistently described, and longitudinal studies are lacking. To better understand and overcome the disease, in this review, we updated the latest knowledge of HFpEF pathophysiology, introduced the existing promising diagnostic methods and treatments, and summarized its prognosis by reviewing the most recent cohort studies.

Analysis of factors affecting postoperative left ventricular function recovery in patients with valvular disease combined with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To analyze factors affecting the recovery of postoperative left ventricular function in patients with valvular disease combined with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<40%]. Methods    The clinical data of 98 patients with valvular disease combined with HFrEF who underwent surgeries in our hospital from January 2011 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 75 males and 23 females aged 9-78 (55.3±11.9) years. Results    A total of 15 patients were dead after the operation, including 4 deaths within 3 months and 11 mid-long-term deaths after the operation. Ninety-one patients were followed up for more than 6 months (10 months to 8.6 years). The postoperative cardiac function (NYHA) of 91 patients was classⅠ-Ⅱ, the LVEF of 18 (19.8%) patients increased more than 10%, that of 47 (51.6%) patients maintained at the preoperative level, and that of 26 (28.6%) patients decreased. Postoperative LVEF was more prone to recover in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm before operation (P=0.038), valvular disease mainly in aortic valve (P=0.026), obvious reduction of left ventricular end diastolic diameter in early postoperative period (P=0.017), and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) before operation (P=0.018). The risk factors for postoperative LVEF deterioration included large left atrium before operation (P=0.014), smaller left ventricle end systolic diameter before operation (P=0.003), and fast heart rate after operation (P=0.019). Conclusion    Mitral valve prolapse patients with obviously increased left ventricular diameter should receive operation as soon as possible. HFrEF patients with aortic valve disease should receive operation positively. The operation efficacy is satisfactory in the HFrEF patients with high SPAP.

Clinical profile and one-year survival of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The largest report from India

Background India has one of the largest population of heart failure (HF) patients in the world; yet only limited information is available about HF in India. Methods This observational study was performed at Medanta- The Medicity, a large, tertiary-care institute in the National Capital Region of India. Records of HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) registered at Medanta HF clinic during the period early 2014 to mid-2017 were reviewed. Disease characteristics and one-year mortality details were collected. Results Mean age of the subjects (n = 5590) was 59.1 ± 11.8 years with 83.0% males. Mean LVEF was 30.0 ± 6.6%. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was the dominant cause of HF, accounting for 77.8% of the total population. Most patients received guideline-directed medical therapy with a beta blocker being prescribed to 81.8% subjects. The one-year all-cause mortality was 17.6%. On multivariate analysis, age, usage of loop diuretics and ivabradine, and serum creatinine were independently associated with one-year mortality, whereas rheumatic etiology had an inverse association. Conclusions This represents the largest single-center data of HF patients reported so far and the largest study describing clinical outcomes from HF patients in India. Our patients were younger, had high proportion of CAD, and there was higher usage of beta-blockers. Despite this, the one-year mortality was substantial. Given the enormous magnitude of HF burden in India and the paucity of information on this subject, these findings should be of help in identifying key problem areas and potential solutions for management of HF in India.

Prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ejection fraction reduced heart failure receiving ICD implantation / 中国实用内科杂志

OBJECTIVE: By recording the treatment events of implantable cardioverter defibrillator(ICD) in patients with ejection fraction reduced heart failure(HFrEF), to analyze the difference in primary and secondary prevention patients. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was conducted. HFrEF patients with ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with cardioverter defibrillator(CRT-D) implanted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2006 to December 2017 were enrolled in our study. Basic clinical data was collected and ICD treatment events were recorded during follow-up. The appropriate treatment events were identified according to electrocardiogram recorded by ICD. The ICD treatment events of primary and secondary prevention patients were analyzed. RESULTS: 1) A total of 145 patients with HFrEF implanted with ICD or CRT-D were enrolled, 103 primary prevention patients and 42 secondary prevention patients. Primary prevention patients had longer left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVESD) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) than secondary prevention patients. 2) Multivariate competitive risk regression analysis showed that secondary prevention patients and male patients had higher risk of receiving appropriate treatment and appropriate shock therapy. 3) K-M curve and Log-Rank test showed that there was no significant difference in the risk of inappropriate treatment between primary and secondary prevention patients. The main cause of inappropriate treatment was atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: 1) Primary prevention patients have lower risk of receiving appropriate treatment and appropriate shock therapy than secondary prevention patients; 2) There is no significant difference between primary and secondary prevention patients in the risk of inappropriate treatment. The main cause of inappropriate treatment events is atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation.

Función renal en pacientes ambulatorios con insuficiencia cardíaca con fracción de eyección reducida; análisis de su evolución e implicancia pronóstica. Seguimiento a 4 años en una Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Insuficiencia Cardíaca / Renal function in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; analysis of its evolution and forecast implications. A 4 year follow up in a Multidisciplinary Unit of Heart Failure / Função renal em pacientes ambulatoriais com insuficiência cardíaca com fração de ejeção reduzida; análise de sua evolução e implicações prognósticas. Acompanhamento de até 4 anos em uma Unidade Multidisciplinar de Insuficiência Cardíaca

Resumen: Introducción: El deterioro de la función renal está asociado a un aumento de la mortalidad en los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca (IC). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar si la progresión de la enfermedad renal en pacientes estables portadores de IC con fracción de eyección reducida (ICFEr) y enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) se asocia a eventos cardiovasculares (ECV), hospitalización por IC y muerte. Metodología: Estudio de cohorte de seguimiento a 4 años, con análisis en dos etapas: tiempo 1 (inicio del estudio); y tiempo 2 (fin del estudio o muerte). Se definió ICFEr estable como IC con una fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI)<40% sin elementos de descompensación. Se definió ERC con la presencia de un filtrado glomerular estimado (FGe) < 60 ml/min/1,73 y ERC estable en ausencia de fracaso renal agudo. Resultados: Se incluyeron 94 pacientes con media de seguimiento de 37,2 meses; la edad media fue 69,5 años, 71.3% de sexo masculino. La cardiomiopatía era isquémica en 48% y la nefropatía vascular fue la predominante (62%). Se diagnosticó síndrome cardio-renal tipo 2 en 76 (81%) pacientes. Se evidenció descenso significativo del FGe entre los tiempos de análisis (tiempo 1: 45 ± 10 ml/min.; tiempo 2: 38 ± 15 ml/min.; p < 0,001) y 50% de los pacientes tuvieron peoría del estadio de ERC (p = 0,027). Se halló asociación entre progresión de la ERC con mayor frecuencia de ECV (P=0,002), ingresos por IC (OR 3,3;IC95% 1,9-11,2; p = 0.044) y muerte cardiovascular (OR 10,9;IC95% 2,9-40,1; p < 0.001). Conclusiones: La progresión de la ERC en pacientes con ICFEr ambulatorios se asocia a un peor pronóstico en términos de mortalidad cardiovascular, ingresos por IC y ECV.

Abstract: Introduction: Deterioration of renal function is associated with increased mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). The objective of the present study was to assess whether the progression of kidney disease is associated with the appearance of cardiovascular events (CVE), hospitalization for HF and death in a cohort of stable outpatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methodology: A 4 years follow-up cohort study, with a two stage analysis: time 1 (start of the study); and time 2 (end of study or death). Stable HFrEF was defined as HF with an ejection fraction of the left ventricle (LVEF)<40% without elements of decompensation. An estimated glomerular filtration less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 was used as diagnostic criterion for CKD and stable CKD in the absence of acute renal failure. Results: A total of 94 patients were included with a follow up mean of 37.2 months; the mean age was 69.5 years ± 9 years, 71.3% were male. Cardiomyopathy was ischemic in 48% and vascular nephropathy was predominant (62%). Cardio-renal syndrome type 2 was diagnosed in 76 (81%) patients. There was a significant decrease in eGFR between the time of analysis (time 1: 45 ± 10 ml/min, time 2: 38 ± 15 ml/min, p <0.001) and 50% of patients worsened their stage of CKD (p = 0.027). An association was found between progression of CKD with a higher frequency of CVD (P = 0.002), hospitalization for HF (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.9-11.2, p = 0.044) and cardiovascular death (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.9-40.1, p <0.001). Conclusions: The progression of CKD is associated with a worse prognosis in not hospitalized HF patients in terms of cardiovascular mortality, admissions for HF and CVE.

Resumo: Introdução: A deterioração da função renal está associada ao aumento da mortalidade em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC). O objectivo deste estudo foi avaliar se a progressão da doença renal em pacientes com IC estáveis ​​com fracção de ejecção reduzida (ICFER) e doença renal crónica (IRC) está associada com eventos cardiovasculares (DCV), HF hospitalização e morte. Metodologia: Estudo de coorte de acompanhamento aos 4 anos, com análise em duas etapas: tempo 1 (início do estudo); e tempo 2 (fim do estudo ou morte). O rEFFE estável foi definido como IC com fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) <40% sem elementos de descompensação. DRC foi definida na presença de uma taxa de filtração glomerular estimada (EGFR) <60 ml / min / 1,73 CEI e estável na ausência de insuficiência renal aguda. Resultados: Foram incluídos 94 pacientes com seguimento médio de 37,2 meses; a idade média foi de 69,5 anos, 71,3% do sexo masculino. A cardiomiopatia era isquêmica em 48% e a nefropatia vascular era predominante (62%). Síndrome Cardio-renal tipo 2 foi diagnosticada em 76 (81%) pacientes. diminuição significativa da taxa de filtração glomerular entre os tempos de verificação (45 ± 10 ml / min; cerca de 2 cerca de 1 38 ± 15 ml / min; p <0,001) foi evidenciado e 50% dos pacientes tiveram a fase de Peoria DRC (p = 0,027). e morte cardiovascular (OU 10,9 associação entre a progressão DRC de DCV com maior frequência (P = 0,002), o rendimento de IC (OR 3.3, 95 % CI 1.9-11.2 p = 0,044), verificou-se IC 95% 2,9-40,1, p <0,001). Conclusões: A progressão da DRC em pacientes com HFrR ambulatorial está associada a um pior prognóstico em termos de mortalidade cardiovascular, IC e DCV