RESUMO
Resumen Objetivo. Identificar las diferencias en el procesamiento cortical de emojis en personas con alta y baja empatía afectiva. Método. El estudio se llevó a cabo con 69 participantes, distribuidos en dos grupos -baja y alta empatía afectiva-, según su puntaje en el Índice de Reactividad Interpersonal. Cada participante observó emojis con expresiones de alegría, ira y neutros. Se registraron los potenciales relacionados a eventos (PRE) P100, N170 y LPP. Resultados. Se encontró una mayor amplitud del N170 en el grupo de personas con alta empatía afectiva y, en general, mayor magnitud del LPP ante emojis de ira. Conclusión. Los resultados sugieren que los emojis son procesados corticalmente de forma similar al rostro humano y que la empatía afectiva modula la codificación del emoji, pero no la atención temprana y el enganche atencional hacia estos estímulos.
Abstract Objective. The objective of this research was to identify the differences in the cortical processing of emojis in people with high and low affective empathy. Method. The study was carried out with 69 participants divided into two groups, low and high affective empathy, according to their score in the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Each participant observed emojis with happy, neutral and angry expressions. Events related potential (ERP) P100, N170 and LPP were recorded. Results. An amplitude greater than N170 in the high affective empathy group, and a generally greater magnitude of the LPP in response to angry emoji were found. Conclusion. The results suggest that the emojis are processed cortically in a similar way to the human face and that affective empathy modulates the coding of the emoji but not the early attention and the attentional attachment to these stimuli.
Resumo Escopo. Identificar as diferencias no processamento cortical de emojis em pessoas com alta e baixa empatia afetiva. Metodologia. O estudo foi feito com 69 participantes, distribuídos em dois grupos, baixa e alta empatia afetiva, segundo sua pontuação no Índice de Reatividade Interpessoal. Cada participante observou emojis com expressões de alegria, neutrais e ira. Foram registrados os potenciais relacionados a eventos (PREs) P100, N170 e LPP. Resultados. Foi achada uma maior amplitude do N170 em um grupo de pessoas com alta empatia afetiva e, em geral, maior magnitude do LPP frente a de emoji com ira. Conclusão. Os resultados sugerem que os emojis são processados corticalmente de forma similar ao rosto humano e que a empatia afetiva modula a codificação do emoji mas não a atenção precoce e o engajamento atencional para estes estímulos.
Assuntos
Humanos , Empatia , Atenção , Face , Mídias SociaisRESUMO
The obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a diverse and multidimensional psychiatric syndrome, characterized by obsessions and compulsions, where anxiety is considered to be a key clinical component. Imaging studies have shown brain abnormalities in patients with OCD involving mainly the frontotemporal circuits, the orbitofrontal and the anterior cingulate cortex. These techniques have a high spatial resolution to identify brain alterations in this disorder but have less time resolution and are more expensive than electrophysiological studies. The electroencephalogram (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) are the most common electrophysiological techniques used in the research of OCD. The EEG represents the electrical activity of the brain as recorded by electrodes placed on the scalp. The ERPs are voltage fluctuations that are temporarily linked to the presence of a physical or mental event. The best-known type of EEG is the <
El Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo (TOC) es un trastorno psiquiátrico crónico, clínicamente heterogéneo, multidimensional, caracterizado por la presencia de obsesiones y compulsiones, en el cual la ansiedad es un componente fundamental del cuadro clínico. Los estudios de imágenes tienen una gran resolución espacial que permite la identificación de las alteraciones presentes en esta entidad pero tienen menor resolución temporal y son de mayor costo que los estudios electrofisiológicos. Entre las técnicas electrofisiológicas más utilizadas para investigar el TOC se encuentran el electroencefalograma (EEG) y los potenciales relacionados con eventos (PREs). El EEG es el registro de la actividad eléctrica cerebral, es decir, de las diferencias de voltaje entre dos electrodos situados sobre el cuero cabelludo, en función del tiempo. Los PREs son las fluctuaciones de voltaje que están asociadas temporalmente a la presencia de un evento físico o mental. El tipo de EEG más conocido es aquél que se analiza por inspección visual (EEG tradicional: EEG-T) y que se describe mediante la presencia y distribución topográfica de cuatro tipos de actividades electroencefalográficas: delta (δ), theta (θ), alfa (α) y beta (β). Las bandas δ y θ se identifican como actividades lentas mientras que las bandas α y β se conocen como actividades rápidas. En el TOC se ha referido la actividad lenta como la anormalidad más común en el EEG-T, especialmente la actividad de tipo θ, aunque también se han descrito EEGs normales. Por otra parte, las medidas espectrales de banda ancha (MEBAs) han comprobado este exceso de actividad lenta además de anormalidades en las bandas rápidas, particularmente en la α. Entre las MEBAs más utilizadas se encuentran la potencia absoluta y la potencia relativa. Se ha demostrado, tanto con las MEBAs como con el análisis de generadores del EEG, que aquellos pacientes que tienen un exceso de a en regiones anteriores y medias responden mejor a los inhibidores de la recaptura de serotonina, lo cual es de gran utilidad clínica. Los PREs se dividen en dos tipos: exógenos y endógenos. En este trabajo se hará referencia a los endógenos o cognitivos. Entre los componentes de los PREs cognitivos más característicos están el N200 y el P300. En los pacientes con TOC se han descrito amplitudes mayores y latencias más cortas en los componentes P3b y N200, lo cual se ha atribuido a hiperalertamiento cortical y sobrefocalización de la atención. También se han observado correlaciones positivas entre la amplitud del componente N200 y la cronicidad del trastorno y entre la amplitud del componente P300 y la severidad de la sintomatología del TOC. Los pacientes con este trastorno tienen la sensación de que <
RESUMO
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neuro-developmental disorder clinically characterized by three core symptoms: deficits in attentional processes, failure in inhibitory control -usually expressed through behavioral and cognitive impulsiveness-, and motor and verbal restlessness. Deficit in attentional resources is the main alteration in patients with this disorder. Attention can be considered as a neurocognitive state of neural preparation that precedes both perception and action. Attention focalizes consciousness in order to filter the constant flux of sensorial information, solve competence between stimuli for parallel processing and recruit and activate cerebral regions necessary to accomplish appropriate responses. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are a technique that has proven useful in the gathering of valuable information in the study of ADHD. One of the most studied ERPs is the P300 component. The most robust finding in the P300 research in ADHD is a decrease in the amplitude of the component in patients when compared to normal controls. This finding is usually interpreted as an evidence for a deficit in attention. ADHD usually presents commorbidity with several disorders; research shows that up to 87% of the children with ADHD present commorbidity with another disorder, up to 60% has either a behavioral or affective disorder commorbid with ADHD. Due to the wide range of disorders that are usually associated with this entity, it is useful in the research of commorbidity to use dimensional diagnostics, that is, a patient with ADHD may have commorbidity with an externalized disorder (EXT) (i.e. oppositionist defiant disorder); an internalized (INT) disorder (i.e. anxiety or affective disorder); or both an externalized and an internalized disorder (MIX). Commorbidity may have important implications in the electrophysiology of ADHD since no homogeneous results have been evident in the scarce research on the subject. Taking into account these considerations, the following experiment was designed in order to answer the question: Patients with the same main diagnostic, ADHD, but different commorbidities (INT and MIX) show different psychophysiological patterns of activation, as measured by ERPs to a continuous performance task? Sixteen patients diagnosed with ADHD by a specialist were recruited. Diagnosis was corroborated by a semi-structured interview, K-SADS-PL-MX, eight of them with an externalized comorbid (EXT) disorder, and eight of them with at least two comorbid disorders, one externalized an one internalized (MIX). A control group (CON) of eight normal subjects with no psychiatric diagnostic and matched by sex was also recruited. All subjects were between 13-16 years old with no history of Central Nervous System damage and normal IQ in the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children. Brain electrical activity was recorded in the 19 derivations of the 10-20 international system while subjects executed a continuous performance task (CPT). Comparisons of behavioral data between groups showed some significant differences. A one-way ANOVA found differences between groups in the mean reaction time to the first part of the CPT and in the number of false positives in the second part. Electrophysiological data was analyzed with a non-parametrical multivariate test of permutations. When comparing responses to the frequent stimulus with responses to the infrequent, statistically significant differences were found in every subject; such differences share the topography and latency characteristics of the P3b component. When comparing the amplitude of this component between the groups, only two statistically significant differences were found. First, the EXT group presented a greater amplitude of the component elicited by the first part of the task in a latency of 425 to 445 msec in the parietal region of the medial line than the CON group. Second, also in response to the first part of the task, the amplitude of the CON group was bigger than that of the MIX group in a latency between 355 and 420 msec in the left temporal anterior region. No other comparison yielded significant results. When comparing between groups, mean reaction time to the first part of the task was the only behavioral variable that adequately distinguished control and patients. Even though controls executed significantly faster, they maintained the same efficacy as no differences were found in the number of errors or correct responses. This result is not surprising due to the fact that long reaction times usually denote inattention and so the fact that both groups of patients execute slower than the controls may be interpreted as a sign that, in spite of having different commorbidities, inattention is still a common problem in every patient of the sample. On the second part of the task, only the number of false positives showed statistically significant differences. However, in a posterior analysis of the data, it was evident that such differences were only between the EXT and the CON groups, with the EXT group presenting significantly more errors. False positives, especially on the second part of the task, are a measure of behavioral inhibition. Failure in inhibitory control is one of the three main symptoms of ADHD. However, some have proposed it as the main characteristic of the disorder. Analysis of the electrophysiological response to the first part of the task showed characteristic profiles of execution for each group. First, the P300 component was smaller in amplitude in the MIX group than in the control group and, even though differences were significant only in one derivation (T3), several other electrode sites more typically associated with the P300 component (C3, C4, P3, P4 and Pz) showed similar tendencies that did not reach statistical significance. Second, EXT patients had greater amplitude of the same P300 component in Pz than CON subjects. This result may seem to contradict most of the research on ADHD and P300. Nevertheless, considering the behavioral data, specially that no differences in correct responses were found between patients an controls, it is posible to assert that the greater amplitude of the component represents an overactive compensation in attentional circuits, necessary in the EXT group in order to execute at the same level of non-ADHD subjects. The results of this study present with information on a poorly reasearched subject: comorbidity and electrophysiology on ADHD.
La principal función afectada en el trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH) es la atención, la cual puede considerarse como un estado neurocognoscitivo cerebral de preparación que precede tanto a la percepción como a la acción. Los potenciales relacionados con eventos (PREs), una técnica útil en el estudio de la atención en esta entidad, pueden definirse como los cambios en la actividad eléctrica cerebral asociados temporalmente con la aparición de un evento, ya sea un estímulo o un proceso cognitivo. Con esta técnica es posible explorar las representaciones eléctricas de los procesos sensoriales y congnoscitivos con una alta resolución temporal. Uno de los PREs más estudiados en el TDAH es el P300, un componente positivo que ocurre en una latencia de alrededor de los 300 mseg. El hallazgo más contundente en el estudio del P300 en pacientes con TDAH es un decremento en la amplitud al compararlos con sujetos controles, lo cual suele ser interpretado como expresión de una atención deficiente. Por otro lado, el TDAH suele presentarse en comorbilidad con diferentes trastornos y siendo la presentación más infrecuente del síndrome es el TDAH <
RESUMO
El presente trabajo investiga desde un abordaje biocomportamental aspectos electroneurofisiológicos correlativos al aprendizaje de categorías lógicas en sujetos humanos sanos. Se empleó la técnica de potenciales relacionados a eventos (PREs) para registrar la actividad electrofisiológica de los sujetos durante la realización de una tarea de relaciones de equivalencia (Sidman, 1982). Como resultado, pudo observarse la siguiente sucesión temporal relacionada con los estímulos de comparación: un potencial visual temprano en la región occipital, luego un componente negativo en la región frontal y otro positivo tardío parietal. Finalmente, en sincronía con las respuestas, se obtuvo un componente negativo lateralizado en la región central. Se discute el significado funcional de los potenciales identificados, y se propone como planteo experimental examinar la correspondencia temporal de los distintos componentes PREs entre sí y con el tiempo de respuesta, como dispositivo experimental para el estudio de aspectos funcionales y estructurales del comportamiento complejo en humanos.