Should videolaryngoscopy be routinely used for airway management? An approach from different scenarios in medical practice

During the past two decades, the videolaryngoscope (VDL) has become a valuable and effective tool for the management of the airway, not just in the realm of anesthesiology, but also in other medical specialties in clinical scenarios requiring tracheal intubation. In countries such as the United States, this represents over 15 million cases in the operating room and 650,000 outside the OR. The overall accumulated incidence of difficult airway is 6.8% events in routine practice and between 0.1 and 0.3 % of failed intubations, both associated with complications such as desaturation, airway injury, hemodynamic instability and death. Notwithstanding the fact that the VDL has proven advantages such as improved visualization of the glottis, higher first attempt success rates, and a shortened learning curve, most of the time its use is limited to rescue attempts or as a secondary option. The aim of this article is to comment the advantages and limitations of the VDL vs. the direct laryngoscope in a wide range of clinical settings, including the operating room, intensive care units, emergency departments, pediatrics, obstetrics, and Covid-19 to consider its routine use.

En las últimas dos décadas, el videolaringoscopio (VDL) se ha convertido en una herramienta valiosa y eficaz para el manejo de la vía aérea no solo en el ámbito de anestesiología, sino en otras especialidades médicas durante escenarios clínicos que requieren la intubación traqueal y las cuales, en países como Estados Unidos corresponden anualmente a más de 15 millones dentro de salas de cirugía y 650.000 fuera de ella. Aproximadamente, hay una incidencia global acumulada de 6,8 % de eventos de vía aérea difícil en la práctica rutinaria y 0,1 al 0,3 % de intubaciones fallidas, ambas asociadas a complicaciones como desaturación, daño en la vía aérea, inestabilidad hemodinámica y muerte. Pese a que el VDL ha demostrado ventajas como mejoría de la visualización de la glotis, aumento de tasa de éxito al primer intento y menor curva de aprendizaje, su uso en la mayoría de las veces se ve limitado como dispositivo de rescate o de manera secundaria. El propósito de este artículo es comentar acerca de las ventajas y limitaciones del VDL vs. el laringoscopio directo en un variado número de escenarios clínicos, como salas de cirugía, unidades de cuidado intensivo, emergenciología, pediatría, obstetricia y covid-19, con el fin de considerar si su uso debiera hacerse de manera rutinaria.

The-pattern-of-cut-throat-injuries-early-management-and-outcomea-prospective-study-in-a-tertiary-care-hospital

Objective: To analyze pattern, sex and age ratio, common causes, the most common site and extent of the injury in the patients with cut throat injury at our hospital. To compare the same with previous similar studies conducted at other centers in different parts of the world. Also to note the early management and outcome in our study. DepartmentSetting: of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Gauhati Medical college and Hospital, Guwahati, from January 2022 to January 2023. Methods: A total of 60 cases of cut throat injury were included in our study. Proforma was prepared to collect data. Results: 60 cases of cut throat injury patients were included in the study. Out of 60 cases 51 were males and 9 were females. Simple primary wound closure was done in 58 cases and 2 required secondary wound repair. In 20 patients, tracheostomy with primary repair was done. 32 patients needed psychiatric consultation. In our study,Conclusion: majority were males between 20 years to 40 years from lower middle socioeconomic status. Early and improved management will reduce the mortality and morbidity.

Comparison of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with two different videolaryngoscopes: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI), which is the gold standard in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), may cause myocardial ischaemia by disturbing the balance between haemodynamic changes and oxygen supply and consumption of the myocardium as a result of sympathetic stimulation. In this study, we aimed to compare two different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC and Airtraq) in the hemodynamic response to ETI. Methods: Fifty ASA II-III CABG surgery patients were randomly assigned to C-MAC or Airtraq. The hemodynamic data included arterial blood pressure [systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP)] and heart rate (HR) and were recorded at six different points in time: before laryngoscopy-T1, during laryngoscopy-T2, immediately after intubation-T3, and 3 (T4), 5 (T5) and 10 (T6) minutes after intubation. Intraoperative complications were recorded. Patients were questioned about postoperative complications 2 and 24hours following extubation. Results: The hemodynamic response to ETI was significantly greater with C-MAC. The increase in HR started with the laryngoscopy procedure, whereas increases in SAP, DAP, and MAP started immediately after ETI (p = 0.024; p = 0.012; p = 0.030; p = 0.009, respectively). In group analyses, T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 comparisons did not show any significant differences in HR with Airtraq. However, with C-MAC, HR after intubation increased significantly compared to the pre-laryngoscopy values (T1-T3) (p = 0.004). The duration of laryngoscopy was significantly reduced with C-MAC (p < 0.001), but the duration of intubation and total intubation were similar (p = 0.36; p = 0.79). Conclusions: Compared to C-MAC, the hemodynamic response to ETI was less with Airtraq. Thus, Airtraq may be preferred in CABG patients for ETI.

Laringoscopia directa vs videolaringoscopia en la intubación del paciente con COVID-19 / Direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy in COVID-19 patient intubation

Introducción: Muchos enfermos de COVID-19 requieren ser ventilados. La laringoscopia directa (LD) es el método tradicional empleado en el manejo de la vía aérea; sin embargo, la videolaringoscopia (VL) es una alternativa en estos pacientes. Objetivo: Comparar la laringoscopia directa y la videolaringoscopia en el manejo de la vía aérea en pacientes con COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo. El universo y la muestra estuvieron conformado por los pacientes intubados por médicos de la brigada Henry Reeve en hospitales de Cancún y Ciudad de México. Se conformaron dos grupos; el Grupo laringoscopia directa con 91 pacientes y el Grupo videolaringoscopia con 103. Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, número de predictores de una vía respiratoria anatómicamente difícil (VRAD), visualización de la apertura glótica, intentos de intubación y las complicaciones de la intubación. El análisis estadístico de los datos se realizó con el paquete estadístico SPSS 23.0. Resultados: Los grupos fueron comparables en cuanto a edad, sexo y predictores de vía respiratoria anatómicamente difícil. La visualización glótica completa o parcial en el grupo videolaringoscopia fue de 97 por ciento, mientras que en el grupo laringoscopia directa fue de 86 por ciento. La intubación endotraqueal al primer intento superó el 70 por ciento en el grupo VL y el 50 por ciento en el grupo LD. Las principales complicaciones encontradas fueron la desaturación y la hipotensión arterial con una mayor frecuencia en el grupo LD (40,7 por ciento y 49,5 por ciento). Conclusiones: La videolaringoscopia mejoró la visualización glótica y la intubación endotraqueal al primer intento, con menos complicaciones en los pacientes estudiados(AU)

Introduction: Many COVID-19 patients require ventilation. Direct laryngoscopy is the traditional method used for airway management; however, videolaryngoscopy is an alternative in these patients. Objective: To compare direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy for airway management in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out. The universe and the sample consisted of patients intubated by physicians from Henry Reeve brigade at hospitals in Cancun and Mexico City. Two groups were formed: the direct laryngoscopy group, with 91 patients, and the videolaryngoscopy group, with 103 patients. The variables studied were age, sex, number of predictors of an anatomically difficult airway, visualization of the glottic opening, intubation attempts, and intubation complications. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the SPSS 23.0 statistical package. Results: The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex and predictors of an anatomically difficult airway. Complete or partial glottic visualization in the videolaryngoscopy group was 97 percent , while in the direct laryngoscopy group it was 86 percent . Endotracheal intubation at the first attempt exceeded 70 percent in the videolaryngoscopy group and 50 percent in the direct laryngoscopy group. The main complications observed were desaturation and arterial hypotension with a higher frequency in the direct laryngoscopy group (40.7 percent and 49.5 percent , respectively). Conclusions: Video laryngoscopy improved glottic visualization and endotracheal intubation at the first attempt, with fewer complications in the patients studied(AU)

Aplicaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas del videolaringoscopio C-MAC® en cirugía de vía aérea pediátrica / Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of the C-MAC® videolaryngoscope in pediatric airway surgery

Resumen La patología quirúrgica de la vía aérea pediátrica suele ser desafiante. Una visualización adecuada de las estructuras faríngeas y laríngeas es absolutamente necesaria para su correcto diagnóstico y tratamiento. Distintos instrumentos, como laringoscopios de intubación, laringoscopios de suspensión y broncoscopios flexibles o rígidos, permiten acceder a la vía aérea. Muchas veces se requiere el uso de una combinación de ellos para abordar con éxito estos problemas. En esta revisión, discutimos el uso de videolaringoscopios en el manejo de condiciones como estenosis subglótica, lesiones de vía aérea y cuerpos extraños. Aunque los anestesiólogos los utilizan frecuentemente para intubaciones difíciles debido a su cámara incorporada que facilita la visión de las estructuras laríngeas, existen escasos informes sobre su uso por cirujanos de vía aérea. Las ventajas sobre la laringoscopía convencional incluyen una mejor visualización, la capacidad de supervisar el procedimiento a través de una pantalla, una mejor ergonomía, que es portátil y que permite una rápida inserción de diferentes instrumentos. Consideramos que es particularmente útil en la dilatación de estenosis subglóticas. Presentamos un método fácil, barato y reproducible para realizarla.

Abstract Surgical pediatric airway diseases are often challenging, and an adequate visualization of pharyngeal and laryngeal structures is absolutely necessary for their correct diagnosis and treatment. Different instruments such as intubation laryngoscopes, suspension laryngoscopes and flexible and rigid bronchoscopes allow for access to the airway, and using a combination of them, is usually required to successfully address these problems. In this review, we discuss the use of videolaryngoscopes in the management of conditions such as subglottic stenosis, airway lesions and foreign bodies. Although commonly used by anesthesiologists for difficult intubations because of their built-in cameras that facilitate the view of laryngeal structures, there are scarce reports on its use by airway surgeons. Advantages over standard laryngoscopy include improved visualization and the ability to supervise the procedure through a screen. We also consider that it allows for improved ergonomics, portability and fast insertion of different instruments. We have found it to be particularly useful in subglottic stenosis dilation and an easy, cheap and reproducible method is also presented.

Videolaringoscopia en el abordaje de la vía aérea durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 / Videolaryngoscopy for airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: A finales del año 2019 se reportaron casos de neumonía atípica en Wuhan provocados por un nuevo coronavirus. La intubación endotraqueal puede causar contaminación del personal de salud. Las pautas recientes prefieren la videolaringoscopia porque aumenta las posibilidades de intubación y evita del contacto cercano con el paciente. Objetivos: Describir el abordaje de la vía aérea con videolaringoscopia en pacientes con COVID-19 e identificar las principales complicaciones aparecidas durante la intubación endotraqueal. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, transversal, en el periodo de diciembre de 2020 a febrero de 2021, en el Centro Médico Naval de la Ciudad de México. El universo estuvo conformado por 178 pacientes con COVID-19 que requirieron intubación endotraqueal. Se tomó una muestra de 103 pacientes los cuales fueron atendidos por los médicos cubanos. Resultados: Los pacientes mayores de 60 años representaron el 63,1 por ciento de los casos y el sexo masculino el 65 por ciento El 42,1 por ciento tuvieron un predictor de vía aérea difícil y el 30,1 por ciento, dos o más predictores. Se visualizó completamente la glotis en el 39,8 por ciento de los casos y, parcialmente, en un 57,3 por ciento. La intubación al primer intento se logró en el 73,8 por ciento. Las principales complicaciones encontradas fueron la desaturación (33 por ciento) y la hipotensión arterial (37,9 por ciento). Conclusiones: La videolaringoscopia podría mejorar la visualización de la apertura glótica y la intubación endotraqueal al primer intento. La desaturación y la hipotensión arterial fueron complicaciones que podrían esperarse en los pacientes con la COVID-19 durante este procedimiento(AU)

Introduction: At the end of 2019, cases of atypical pneumonia were reported in Wuhan caused by a new coronavirus. Endotracheal intubation may cause contamination of healthcare personnel. According to recent guidelines, videolaryngoscopy is preferred, because it increases the chances of intubation and avoids close contact with the patient. Objectives: To describe airway management with videolaryngoscopy in patients with COVID-19 and to identify the main complications that appeared during endotracheal intubation. Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out, in the period from December 2020 to February 2021, at the Naval Medical Center in Mexico City. The universe consisted of 178 patients with COVID-19 who required endotracheal intubation. A sample of 103 patients was taken, who were cared for by Cuban doctors. Results: Patients older than 60 years represented 63.1 percent of the cases, while the male sex represented 65 percent. 42.1 percent had one predictor of difficult airway and 30.1 percent had two or more predictors. The glottis was visualized fully in 39.8 percent of cases and partially in 57.3 percent. Intubation on the first attempt was achieved in 73.8 percent. The main complications found were desaturation (33 percent) and arterial hypotension (37.9 percent). Conclusions: Videolaryngoscopy could improve visualization of the glottic opening and endotracheal intubation on the first attempt. Desaturation and hypotension were complications that could be expected in COVID-19 patients during this procedure(AU)

Mobile remote technology in the learning of laryngoscopy in intubation in a training hospital / La tecnología móvil a distancia en el aprendizaje de laringoscopia en la intubación en un hospital de entrenamiento

Abstract: Introduction: Simulation-based training has become a comprehensive practice to improve skill levels in procedures such as intubation. Clinicians performing endotracheal intubation must be competent to perform this technical skill safely. Objective: Determine the success of the use of mobile remote technology in learning intubation laryngoscopy during training in the hospital. Material and methods: Experimental, cross-sectional, comparative, non-blind, randomized study which was made up of 117 students of the Bachelor of Medicine degree at the Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon. Results: Group A with conventional laryngoscopy achieved successful intubation in an average of 106.86 ± 84.87 seconds, group B in 62.90 ± 65.81 and when crossing the groups in the technique, the time of video laryngoscopy was taken, where group A reported an average time of 64.25 ± 34.23, while the time recorded in group B was 84.25 ± 55.67 seconds. Conclusion: The use of mobile remote technology is effective for the preparation of doctors and future doctors when performing an orotracheal intubation. Videolaryngoscopy was significant to conventional laryngoscopy when performed in inexperienced personnel.

Resumen: Introducción: El entrenamiento basado en simulación se ha convertido en una práctica integral para mejorar los niveles de habilidad en procedimientos como la intubación. Los médicos que realizan intubación endotraqueal deben ser competentes. Objetivo: Determinar el éxito del uso de la tecnología remota móvil en el aprendizaje de la laringoscopía de intubación durante la formación en el hospital. Material y métodos: Estudio experimental, transversal, comparativo, no ciego, aleatorizado que contó con 117 estudiantes de la Licenciatura en Medicina de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Resultados: El grupo A con laringoscopía convencional logró intubación exitosa en un promedio de 106.86 ± 84.87 segundos, el grupo B en 62.90 ± 65.81 y al cruzar los grupos en la técnica se tomó el tiempo de videolaringoscopía, donde el grupo A reportó un tiempo promedio de 64.25 ± 34.23, mientras que el tiempo registrado en el grupo B fue de 84.25 ± 55.67 segundos. Conclusión: El uso de tecnología remota móvil es efectivo para la preparación de médicos y futuros médicos a la hora de realizar una intubación orotraqueal. La videolaringoscopía fue significativa para la laringoscopía convencional cuando se realizó en personal sin experiencia.

King Vision Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation for General Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study

With new advances in technology, intubation using video laryngoscopy has been gaining popularity, particularlyin patients with difficult airways or as rescue devices in failed intubation attempts. This study was done tocompare the effectiveness of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVL) and Macintosh laryngoscope whenperforming tracheal intubation under general anesthesia Eighty patients requiring endotracheal intubationduring general anaesthesia were randomly assigned into two groups to undergo tracheal intubation usingeither a King Vision video laryngoscope (n=40) or Macintosh laryngoscope (n=40). The primary outcomeswere the time of intubation and Cormack-Lehane grading and secondary outcomes were number of attemptsand optimisation manoeuvres required and complications related to laryngoscopy and intubation. King Visionvideo laryngoscope was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormackand Lehane grading, requirement of optimisation manoeuvres and need of second attempt for intubationexcept time of intubation which was comparable between the two groups.

Awake supraglottic airway guided flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airways: a case series and narrative review / 대한마취과학회지

Awake intubation is indicated in difficult airways if attempts at securing the airway after induction of general anesthesia may lead to harm due to potential difficulties or failure in those attempts. Conventional awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation is performed via the nasal, or less commonly, oral route. Awake oral flexible bronchoscopic intubation (FBI) via a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is a less common technique; we refer to this as ‘supraglottic airway guided’ FBI (SAGFBI). We describe ten cases with anticipated difficult airways in which awake SAGFBI was performed. After sedation and adequate airway topicalization, an Ambu Auragain™ SAD was inserted. A flexible bronchoscope, preloaded with a tracheal tube, was then inserted through the SAD. Finally, the tracheal tube was railroaded over the bronchoscope, through the SAD and into the trachea. The bronchoscope and the SAD were carefully removed, whilst keeping the tracheal tube in-situ. The technique was successful and well tolerated by all patients, and associated complications were rare. It also offered the advantages of performing an ‘awake test insertion’ of the SAD, an ‘awake look’ at the periglottic region, and an ‘awake test ventilation.’ In certain patients, awake SAGFBI offers advantages over conventional awake FBI or awake videolaryngoscopy. More research is required to evaluate its success and failure rates, and identify associated complications. Its place in difficult airway algorithms may then be further established.

Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study / Comparação de diferentes estiletes usados para intubação com o videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®: um estudo randômico e controlado

Abstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet®; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups (p < 0.05 for group NS- group GEB, group NS- group DS, group NS- group CS and group NS- group HS). The duration to pass the vocal cords significantly differed among all groups (p < 0.001). The total intubation duration was shortest when using D-blade stylet, CoPilot stylet and hockey stick stylet. Although no difference was observed between stylet groups, a significant difference was found between each of these three and no stylet and gum elastic bougie (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.

Resumo Objetivo O ângulo do videolaringoscópio C-D-MAC Blade®, usado para intervenções em via aérea difícil, não é compatível com os tubos endotraqueais rotineiramente usados. Métodos Um estudo prospectivo, randômico e cruzado foi conduzido para comparar cinco métodos de intubação em modelo de via aérea, com o uso de diferentes estiletes em cinco grupos: taco de Hockey; D-blade; CoPilot VL® rígido; Gum Elastic Bougie e controle (sem estilete). Um manequim foi utilizado para simular intubação difícil com o laringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Foi avaliada a duração de cada fase de intubação. Resultados Os participantes deste estudo (33 residentes de anestesiologia e 20 especialistas em anestesiologia) concluíram 265 intubações no total. O número de tentativas realizadas sem estilete foi significativamente maior que o dos outros grupos (p < 0,05 para SE-GEB, SE-DB, SE-CP e SE-HS). O tempo para passar pelas cordas vocais foi significativamente diferente entre todos os grupos (p < 0,001). O tempo total de intubação foi menor com o uso de D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey. Embora não tenha havido diferença entre D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey, uma diferença significativa foi observada entre cada um desses três e os grupos sem estilete e Gum Elastic Bougie (p < 0,05 e p < 0,001, respectivamente). Conclusão A escolha do estilete certo leva ao uso mais eficiente do videolaringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Em nosso estudo, o uso do D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey proporcionou intubação mais rápida, facilitou a passagem pelas cordas vocais e diminuiu o tempo total de intubação. Para confirmar os resultados de nosso estudo, estudos controlados e randômicos com humanos são necessários.

Comparison between the Reflux Finding Score and the Reflux Symptom Index in the Practice of Otorhinolaryngology

Abstract Introduction The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease has a prevalence of 12% of the urban population in Brazil. Koufman proposed the term to designate Laryngeal Pharyngeal Reflux (LPR) symptoms, signs or tissue damage resulting from aggression of the gastrointestinal contents in the upper aerodigestive tract. Belafsky et al proposed a score that points to inflammatory laryngeal signs through videolaryngoscopic findings, the Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Moreover, in 2002, they published the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Objective The objective of this study is to provide a comparison between the Reflux Finding Score and the Reflux Symptom Index in the practice of Otorhinolaryngology. Methods Our study involved a total of 135 patients who visited the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) clinic Núcleo de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço de São Paulo between April 2014 and May 2015 with suspected LPR.We excluded nine patients and the study group was 126 patients. All patients were ranked by their RSI and RFS scores. Results The study group consisted of 126 patients (88 women and 38 men). Their main complaints were cough (40.4%), globus (21.4%), dysphonia (19.8%), throat clearing (15.8%), postnasal drip (3.17%), snoring (1.5%), dysphagia (1.5%), cacosmia (0.7%), and regurgitation (1.5%). The RSI ranges from 13 to 42 with a mean of 20.7 (SD = 6.67). The RFS ranged from 3 to 19 with a mean of 9.53 (SD = 2.64). Conclusion The RSI and RFS can easily be included in ENT routines as objective parameters,with low cost and high practicality. Based on the clinical index, the specialist can evaluate the need for further tests.

Application of HC-videolaryngoscopy in nasotracheal intubation for patients with predicted difficult airway undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of HC-videolaryngoscopy in nasotracheal intubation for patients with predicted diffi-cult airway undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery.Methods:70 patients undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery with predicted difficult airway were enroled and randomly divided into 2 groups(n =35).Nasotacheal intubation was performed with HC-videolaryngoscopy (group VL)and Macintosh laryngoscopy(group ML)respectively.The duration and success rate of intubation,degree of glottis expo-sure,hemodynamic response as well as intubation related complications were evaluated.Results:There was higher success rate of first attempt(P <0.05),shorter intubation duration(P <0.05)and fewer frequency of multiple intubation(P <0.05)in group VL than in group ML.During intubation,the first and the best Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view was better in group VL(P <0.05)and less intuba-tion assistance was required in group VL(P <0.05).1 3 patients in group ML were intubated with VL after failure of the first attempt with ML.Conclusion:HC-videolaryngoscopy is safe and effective in the nasotracheal intubation for the patients with predicted difficult airway undergoing oral maxillofacial surgery.

Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways

OBJECTIVE: Videolaryngoscopy has mainly been developed to facilitate difficult airway intubation. However, there is a lack of studies demonstrating this method's efficacy in pediatric patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the TruView infant EVO2 and the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with conventional direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in children with a bodyweight ≤10 kg in terms of intubation conditions and the time to intubation. METHODS: In total, 65 children with a bodyweight ≤10 kg (0-22 months) who had undergone elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were retrospectively analyzed. Our database was screened for intubations with the TruView infant EVO2, the C-MAC videolaryngoscope, and conventional direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The intubation conditions, the time to intubation, and the oxygen saturation before and after intubation were monitored, and demographic data were recorded. Only children with a bodyweight ≤10 kg were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 23 children were intubated using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope, and 22 children were intubated using the TruView EVO2. Additionally, 20 children were intubated using a standard Macintosh blade. The time required for tracheal intubation was significantly longer using the TruView EVO2 (52 sec vs. 28 sec for C-MAC vs. 26 sec for direct LG). However, no significant difference in oxygen saturation was found after intubation. CONCLUSION: All devices allowed excellent visualization of the vocal cords, but the time to intubation was prolonged when the TruView EVO2 was used. The absence of a decline in oxygen saturation may be due to apneic oxygenation via the TruView scope and may provide a margin of safety. In sum, the use of the TruView by a well-trained anesthetist may be an alternative for difficult airway management in pediatric patients. .