Colecistectomía segura: ¿Qué es y cómo hacerla? ¿Cómo lo hacemos nosotros? / Safe cholecystectomy: What is it and how to do it? How do we do it?

La colecistectomía laparoscópica es uno de los procedimientos más realizados a nivel mundial. La técnica laparoscópica se considera el estándar de oro para la resolución de la patología de la vesícula biliar secundaria a litiasis, y aunque es un procedimiento seguro, no se encuentra exenta de complicaciones. La complicación más grave es la lesión de la vía biliar, que, aunque es poco frecuente, con una incidencia de 0,2 a 0,4%, conduce a una disminución en la calidad de vida y contribuye a un aumento en la morbi-mortalidad. El objetivo de este artículo es reportar nuestra técnica quirúrgica, enfatizando los principios del programa de cultura para una colecistectomía segura, propuesta y descrita por the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), para minimizar los riesgos y obtener un resultado quirúrgico satisfactorio

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most performed procedures worldwide. The laparoscopic technique is considered the gold standard for the resolution of gallbladder pathology secondary to lithiasis, and although it is a safe procedure, it is not without complications. The most serious complication is the injury to the bile duct, which, although rare, with an incidence of 0.2% to 0.4%, leads to a decrease in quality of life and contributes to an increase in morbidity and mortality. The objective of this article is to report our surgical technique, emphaszing the principles of the program for a safe cholecystectomy, proposed and described by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), to minimize the risks and obtain a satisfactory surgical result

Extra hepatic bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), being one of the most common performed surgical procedure among the basic surgeries. Incidence of common bile duct (CBD) injury as high as 1.4-3% has been reported in some studies. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and predictors of CBD injury who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted at Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh India. Data was collected for a period of 1 year between March 2019 till 2020.Results: In majority of laparoscopic cholecystectomy we encountered moderate degree of difficulty. Extra hepatic bile duct injuries occurred in 1.4% of cases and were classified according to Strasberg classification. Type A injury was most common followed by type E2. Most major bile duct injuries were recognized intraoperatively. No mortality was noted in our study.Conclusions: Bile duct injuries is a major complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with significant morbidity and mortality, reduced survival impaired quality of life and subsequent litigations. Majority of bile duct injuries, results mainly from the surgeon’s inexperience, misinterpretation of anatomy and poor surgical techniques.

The critical view of safety prevents the appearance of biliary injuries? analysis of a survey / Visão crítica de segurança previne lesões biliares? análise de um levantamento

ABSTRACT Background: The risk of bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy remains a concern, despite efforts proposed for increasing safety. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been adopted promoting to reduce its risk. Aim: To perform a survey to assess the awareness of the CVS, estimating the proportion of surgeons that correctly identified its elements and its relationship with BDI. Methods: An anonymous online survey was sent to 2096 surgeons inquiring on their common practices during cholecystectomy and their knowledge of the CVS. Results: A total of 446 surgeons responded the survey (21%). The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the elements of CVS was 21.8% and 24.8% among surgeons claiming to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS (p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, career length was the most significant factor related to BDI (p=0.002). Conclusions: The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the Critical View of Safety was low, even among those who claimed to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS.

RESUMO Racional: O risco de lesão do ducto biliar (BDI) durante a colecistectomia continua a ser preocupante, apesar dos esforços propostos para aumentar a segurança. A Visão Crítica da Segurança (CVS) foi adotada e proposta para redução de seu risco. Objetivo: Realizar levantamento para avaliar a conscientização da CVS, e estimando a proporção de cirurgiões que identificaram corretamente seus elementos e sua relação com BDI. Métodos: Pesquisa online anônima foi enviada para 2096 cirurgiões perguntando sobre suas práticas comuns durante a colecistectomia e seu conhecimento da CVS. Resultados: Um total de 446 cirurgiões responderam a pesquisa (21%). A porcentagem que identificou corretamente os elementos da CVS foi de 21,8% e 24,8% entre os cirurgiões que afirmam conhecê-la. A porcentagem dos que relataram BDI foi maior entre os que incorretamente identificaram os elementos da CVS (p=0,03). Na análise multivariada, o tempo na carreira foi o fator mais significativo relacionado à BDI (p=0,002). Conclusões: A porcentagem de cirurgiões que identificaram corretamente a CVS foi baixa, mesmo entre aqueles que alegaram conhecê-la. A porcentagem de cirurgiões que relataram BDI foi maior entre aqueles que incorretamente identificaram os elementos da CVS.

The Effectiveness of a Snake Liver Retractor during Needlescopic Grasper Assisted Sinlge-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Aspect of Securing a Critical View of Safety

PURPOSE: Limited traction has been an obstacle in the advancement of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). Adequate retraction is necessary for safe performance of a cholecystectomy. In this study, we introduce our method for securing CVS for prevention of bile duct injury during performance of SILC and evaluated the effectiveness of the snake liver retractor. METHODS: A total of 148 patients who underwent needlescopic assisted SILC (nSILC) from February 2011 to February 2012 at Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea were analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: G roup I consisted of patients who underwent nSILC without use of a snake liver retractor from February 2011 to October 2011 (n=51) and group II consisted of patients who underwent nSILC using a snake liver retractor from October 2011 to February 2012 (n=97). Patient characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between groups in order to evaluate the effectiveness of use of a snake liver retractor during performance of SILC. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, and history of previous abdominal surgery. However, more difficult surgeries for acute cholecystitis were performed in group II. Nevertheless, no differences in operative outcomes, such as operative time, rate of bile spillage, open conversion rate, intraoperative complication, and postoperative hospital stay were observed between groups. In addition, CVS identification time was rather shorter in group II, compared with group I. CONCLUSION: Results of this study showed that nSILC using a snake liver retractor can allow for achievement of CVS safely and for expansion of indication for SILC through improvement of exposure and obtaining adequate traction.