Accuracy of a smartphone-assisted novel labeling method for marking target axial position in cataract surgery / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To evaluate the convenience and accuracy of a novel smartphone-assisted “any-point two-step method” for finding the target axial position in cataract phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens(IOL)implantation.METHODS: Prospective observational study. A total of 62 cases(62 eyes)of patients with age-related cataracts who underwent cataract phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation in our hospital from October 2021 to April 2022 were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups: 31 cases(31 eyes)in the control group were applied with the “traditional two-step method” using slit lamp to mark the target axial position of the IOL, and 31 cases(31 eyes)in the experimental group were applied with the smartphone-assisted “two-step method” to mark the target axial position of the IOL. The Callisto eye navigation system was used as a standard reference, and the deviation of the reference marking point(deviation-1), the deviation of the target axial marking point(deviation-total), and the deviation of the angle from the reference marking point to the target axial marking point(deviation-2)were calculated and recorded as the preoperative axial marking time.RESULTS:Both deviation-1 and deviation-total values were lower in the experimental group than those in the control group(1.06°±1.39° vs 2.48°±2.23°, 1.77°±1.54° vs 2.81°±1.58°, all P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in the deviation-2 values between the two groups(1.35°±1.40° vs 1.48°±1.79°, P>0.05). The preoperative axial marking took shorter time in the experimental group than in the control group(1.77±1.70 min vs 2.88±3.20 min, P<0.01).CONCLUSION: The smartphone-assisted “any-point two-step method” for finding the target axial position in cataract phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation is simple, time-saving, and accurate compared with the “traditional two-step method”.

Comparison of automated flowcytometric reticulocyte analysis with manual reticulocyte count

Background: Reticulocytes are young or immature red blood cells released from bone marrow and that contain remanants of ribonucleic acid (RNA) and ribosomes. Reticulocyte count (RC) is the index of erythropoietic activity within bone marrow. The reticulocyte counting methods at clinical laboratories are currently divided into manual and automated.Methods: A total of 500 samples of study cases were processed by manual method using New Methylene Blue (NMB) and automated method based on flowcytometry by PENTRA XLR HORIBA hematology analyzer. All quality control parameters were evaluated and values obtained by both methods were compared using various statistical methods.Results: Automated hematology analyzer provides excellent precision and linearity with no significant carryover. On comparing manual and automated RC method good method correlation was found (correlation coefficient r-0.865), however individual case wise percent deviation between manual and automated RC and CRC varied significantly. In addition within run precision calculated for automated RC differed significantly from manual count. The mean of difference between duplicate readings (150 samples) of manual and automated RC (<5%) were 0.3 and 0.01 respectively while 6.3 and 0.15 respectively for >5% RC. Thus, automated method was found to be more precise than the manual RC.Conclusions: The manual count method for RC associated with significant imprecision compared to flowcytometric method mostly based on interobserver variation and the smaller number of cell being counted. In contrast, the automated method is rapid, easy to operate, count higher number of cells with precise measurement.

Automated Versus Manual Estimation Of Platelet Count

Objective:To compare the results of platelet count done by peripheral smear method and by automated cell counter. Material and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in the hematology laboratory of police Hospital Jammu, J & K for the period of two months (February to March 2018). 100 random samples were processed by the automated method (Rayto Haemarray 83) and the manual method (leishman's stained thin blood films) simultaneously. Results: 9 The mean platelet count estimated by the manual method was 208.2 ±100.9× 10 /L, while that estimated by the automated method was 9 206.5 ± 106.0 × 10 /L, with no significant statistical difference between both means (p>0.05). The Pearson correlation test showed significant positive correlation between both methods (r: 0.904), this correlation remained significant when the samples of normal count by the two methods were correlated (r: 0.890), but it was insignificant negative correlation when the samples of low or high counts by the two methods were correlated (r: -0.096 and r: -0.239) respectively. Conclusion: Platelet estimate is an important step in assessment of platelet count and it should be done for every sample of platelet count, especially when the count is lower or higher than normal by any method.

Evaluation of detection performance of urinary vanilmandelic acid on automatic biochemical analyzer / 医疗卫生装备

Objective To evaluate the automatic biochemical analyzer when used to detect urinary vanilmandelic acid (VMA), and to compare it with manual method. Methods The automatic biochemical analyzer using homogenous enzyme immunoassay technology was compared with the manual method on accuracy, precision, linear range, recovery rate, anti-interference capability and etc when used to detect VMA.The comparison was also carried out on positive rate and etc when the two methods were used to test the urine specimens of the healthy subjects and suspected patients of hypertension, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Results The two methods both had the results on accuracy, precision, linear range, recovery rate, anti-interference capability meet the requirements described in the instruction of reagent kit, while the analyzer gained advantages over the manual method.The positive rates by the two methods for testing urine specimens were similar,while the analyzer behaved better in diagnosing the patient with critical value.Conclusion The analyzer proves better than the manual method when used to detect VMA,and thus is worthy promoting in clinical trial.

Comparison of automatic and manual methods for preparation of leukocyte-reduced red blood cell and plasma / 医疗卫生装备

Objective To compare the leukocyte-reduced red blood cells and plasmas respectively prepared by automated blood components separator and manual method so as to provide theoretical basis for automatic and standardized flow of blood components preparation.MethodsThe prepared red blood cells and plasma were measured on the hemoglobin concentration,mean corpuscular volume (MCV),red blood cell count (RBC),haematocrit (HCT),mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH),mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC),average red blood cell volume distribution width,plasma weight and protein content after the first separation,preparation time and etc.These results obtained from different methods were compared and analyzed.Results The plasma weight after the first separation which was one-off prepared were (267.57 ±16.31) g (by automatic method) and (246.06±22.48) g (by manual method) (P＜0.05) respectively.The preparation time were (66.66±9.01) s (by automatic method) and (162.33±22.00) s (by manual method) (P＜0.05) respectively.Other results had no significant difference (P＞0.05).Conclusion All blood components products in this research meet the criterion of GB 18469-2012.However,the quality and separation efficiency of products made by automatic blood component separator are obviously higher than those by manual method.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Samples Showing Weak Serum Reaction on AutoVue System Causing ABO Blood Typing Discrepancies

BACKGROUND: ABO blood typing in pre-transfusion testing is a major component of the high workload in blood banks that therefore requires automation. We often experienced discrepant results from an automated system, especially weak serum reactions. We evaluated the discrepant results by the reference manual method to confirm ABO blood typing. METHODS: In total, 13,113 blood samples were tested with the AutoVue system; all samples were run in parallel with the reference manual method according to the laboratory protocol. RESULTS: The AutoVue system confirmed ABO blood typing of 12,816 samples (97.7%), and these results were concordant with those of the manual method. The remaining 297 samples (2.3%) showed discrepant results in the AutoVue system and were confirmed by the manual method. The discrepant results involved weak serum reactions (<2+ reaction grade), extra serum reactions, samples from patients who had received stem cell transplants, ABO subgroups, and specific system error messages. Among the 98 samples showing ≤1+ reaction grade in the AutoVue system, 70 samples (71.4%) showed a normal serum reaction (≥2+ reaction grade) with the manual method, and 28 samples (28.6%) showed weak serum reaction in both methods. CONCLUSIONS: ABO blood tying of 97.7% samples could be confirmed by the AutoVue system and a small proportion (2.3%) needed to be re-evaluated by the manual method. Samples with a 2+ reaction grade in serum typing do not need to be evaluated manually, while those with ≤1+ reaction grade do.

Comparation of Two Different Methods for Rotavirus and Adenovirus Antigens Detection / 现代检验医学杂志

Objective To compare the detecting results of rotavirus (RV)and adenovirus (AdV)antigens using auto stool pretreatment system (machine method)and manual method.Methods A total of 100 stools collectecd from diarrear patients admitted in gastroenterology outpatient department from September 2014 to Octorber 2014 in Peking University Medical College Hospital were detected to identify RV and AdV antigens using machine method and manual method respectively,and the nucletic acids of positive samples were detected by liquid chip method to verify the results.Results The RV,AdV and co-infection antigen positive detection rate using machine method were 17.0% (17/100),25.0% (25/100)and 12.0% (12/100)respectively,whereas those using the manual method were 4.0% (4/100),13.0% (13/100)and 2.0% (2/100),re-spectively.Taking the nucletic acids detection as the golden method,the false positive detection rate of RV,AdV and co-in-fection antigen using machine method were 23.5% (4/17),20.0% (5/25)and 33.3% (4/12)respectively,whereas those u-sing the manual method were 75.0% (3/4),69.2% (9/13)and 50.0% (1/2),respectively.χ2 test for paired data for RV and AdV positive detection rate,false positive detection rate of RV and false positive detection rate of AdV using two meth-ods were statistically significant (χ2 =15.0,52.8 and 47.5,P values <0.05).Two methods for detecting RV and AdV had poor consistency (Kappa value was 0.25,Kappa values <0.4).Conclusion Machine method has much more advantage on RV and AdV positive detection rate and false positive detection rate than manual method,which is good for clinical applica-tion.

Hegazy’ Simplified Method of Tissue Processing (Consuming Time and Chemicals).

Background: Processing is the next step in the histological process after tissue fixation. There are three methods commonly used for such tissue processing. They are the routine manual, rapid manual and the microwave methods. This study aimed to proceed a simple new manual method in a trial to take the advantages of rapid manual and microwave methods and avoid their disadvantages. Methods: One hundred samples of different tissues and cell blocks were included in this study. They were divided into two equal halves. One half is processed by the routine manual method and the other managed by new suggested technique. Results: The time consuming in the new method was about 7 hours vs. 20 hours in the routine processing. Also, the histologic quality was better in the new method as compared to the routine manual technique. Conclusions: The current simplified method of tissue and cell block processing using mild temperature and moderate agitation possess the advantages of reduction of time of processing, as well as the economic benefit of the utilization of fewer fluids.

Comparison of body fluid count and classification results detected by Sysmex XE-5000 automatic blood cell analyzer and manual method / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To compare the body fluid count results detected by Sysmex XE-5000 automatic blood cell analyzer and manual method .Methods A total of 300 cases of body fluid specimens (including cerebrospinal fluid and fluid of serous cavity ) were analyzed .RBC ,WBC counting and classification were respectively detected by XE-5000 and manual method of improvement Neubauer counting plate .Results The fresh specimens without contain a large number of cell clusters ,which RBC counts(RBC-BF)(100-10 000)× 106/L ,and WBC counts(WBC-BF) (9-50)× 106/L ,showed there were a linear relationship between the in-strument method(r=0 .998 5 ,0 .986 3) .In the range ,there was no significant difference between XE-5000 and manual method(t=9 .96 ,P>0 .05) .Also in this range the results of instrument correlated with those of manual method(r= 0 .989 3 ,0 .971 7 , 0 .924 9) .For those specimens which contain a large number of cell clusters ,RBC-BF and WBC-BF were a badly linear relationship between the instrument method(r=0 .564 8 ,0 .456 1) .Conclusion Body fluid specimens which are fresh and do not contain a large number of cell clusters ,in the range of RBC-BF (100 -10 000) × 106/L ,WBC-BF (9 -50) × 106/L ,Sysmex XE-5000 automatic blood cell analyzer could ensure the results have good accuracy .

New Leukocyte Counting Method of Cerebrospinal Fluid: Using Transparent Ruler Tape / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: To enumerate leukocyte count in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is important for diagnosing bacterial meningitis. Using automated hematology analyzer for enumeration of leukocyte in CSF is below the sensitivity, so microscopic hemocytometric method is standard method. But this requires sufficient practical experience and has limitation of accuracy and stability. So we developed new manual method and evaluated it. METHODS: We designed new method using transparent ruler tape. We performed correlation, accuracy and precision test by counting leukocyte in diluted EDTA blood with three methods: new method, Neubauer and Nageotte hemocytometry. Twenty two CSF were used for stability test, which determines leukocyte count according to time (within one hour and after 2, 4 and 12 hr), by new method and Neubauer hemocytometry at room temperature. RESULTS: There was no clinical significant difference between three methods in correlation test, whereas Neubauer and Nageotte hemocytometry showed a bias to underestimation relative to the results obtained with new method in case with low leukocyte count. The new method showed the lowest CV and most accurate result. In stability test, leukocyte counts decreased being 44.4%, 72.1% of initial values after 2 hr, 14.8%, 31.1%, after 4 hr and 4.2%, 8.7%, after 12 hr, by Nageotte hemocytometry and new method, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new method we devised is simple, easy and applicable to use in a laboratory and offers advantages of improved precision and stability. It may be sufficient for replacing standard methods for leukocyte counting in CSF.