Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in infertile men with spermatogenic impairment of differing severity / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

The extent of spermatogenic impairment on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes and the risk of major birth defects have been little assessed. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between various spermatogenic conditions, sperm origin on ICSI outcomes, and major birth defects. A total of 934 infertile men attending the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Ren Ji Hospital (Shanghai, China) were classified into six groups: nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA; n = 84), extremely severe oligozoospermia (esOZ; n = 163), severe oligozoospermia (sOZ, n = 174), mild oligozoospermia (mOZ; n = 148), obstructive azoospermia (OAZ; n = 155), and normozoospermia (NZ; n = 210). Rates of fertilization, embryo cleavage, high-quality embryos, implantation, biochemical and clinical pregnancies, abortion, delivery, newborns, as well as major birth malformations, and other newborn outcomes were analyzed and compared among groups. The NOA group showed a statistically lower fertilization rate (68.2% vs esOZ 77.3%, sOZ 78.0%, mOZ 73.8%, OAZ 76.6%, and NZ 79.3%, all P < 0.05), but a significantly higher implantation rate (37.8%) than the groups esOZ (30.1%), sOZ (30.4%), mOZ (32.6%), and OAZ (31.0%) (all P < 0.05), which was similar to that of Group NZ (38.4%). However, there were no statistically significant differences in rates of embryo cleavage, high-quality embryos, biochemical and clinical pregnancies, abortions, deliveries, major birth malformations, and other newborn outcomes in the six groups. The results showed that NOA only negatively affects some embryological outcomes such as fertilization rate. There was no evidence of differences in other embryological and clinical outcomes with respect to sperm source or spermatogenic status. Spermatogenic failure and sperm origins do not impinge on the clinical outcomes in ICSI treatment.

Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization: definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Infertility affects 10%-15% of couples worldwide. Of all infertility cases, 20%-70% are due to male factors. In the past, men with severe male factor (SMF) were considered sterile. Nevertheless, the development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) drastically modified this scenario. The advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), specifically regarding surgical sperm retrieval procedures, allowed the efficacious treatment of these conditions. Yet, before undergoing ICSI, male factor infertility requires careful evaluation of clinical and lifestyle behavior together with medical treatment. Epidemiologically speaking, women whose male partner is azoospermic tend to be younger and with a better ovarian reserve. These couples, in fact, are proposed ART earlier in their life, and for this reason, their ovarian response after stimulation is generally good. Furthermore, in younger couples, azoospermia can be partially compensated by the efficient ovarian response, resulting in an acceptable fertility rate following in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. Conversely, when azoospermia is associated with a reduced ovarian reserve and/or advanced maternal age, the treatment becomes more challenging, with a consequent reduction in IVF outcomes. Nonetheless, azoospermia seems to impair neither the euploidy rate at the blastocyst stage nor the implantation of euploid blastocysts. Based on the current knowledge, the assessment of male infertility factors should involve: (1) evaluation - to diagnose and quantify seminologic alterations; (2) potentiality - to determine the real possibilities to improve sperm parameters and/or retrieve spermatozoa; (3) time - to consider the available "treatment window", based on maternal age and ovarian reserve. This review represents an update of the definition, prevalence, causes, and treatment of SMF in a modern ART clinic.

PGT or ICSI? The impression of NGS-based PGT outcomes in nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

This retrospective study demonstrates the clinical outcomes of patients with nonmosaic Klinefelter's syndrome (KS) who underwent preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) was performed for sperm retrieval. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was conducted for embryo analysis. A total of 18 couples aged ≤35 years were included, and 22 oocyte retrieval cycles were completed. Euploidy was detected in 29 of 45 (64.4%) embryos. Additionally, the numbers of aneuploid and mosaic embryos detected were 8 (17.8%) and 8 (17.8%), respectively, regardless of a lack of sex chromosome abnormalities. Finally, 13 couples with euploid embryos completed 14 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Ten couples had clinical pregnancies, and 6 of them had already delivered 5 healthy babies and 1 monozygotic twin. There were also 4 ongoing pregnancies and 2 biochemical pregnancies, but no early pregnancy loss was reported. Based on our results, we speculate that for KS patients, when sperm can be obtained by micro-TESE, the cryopreservation strategy makes the ovarian stimulation procedure more favorable for female partners. The paternal genetic risk of sex chromosome abnormalities in their offspring is extremely low in men with KS. In addition to PGT, the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedure is comparably effective but more economical for young nonmosaic KS couples. ICSI should be offered as an option for such couples, but monitoring by prenatal genetic diagnosis is recommended.

El efecto de la vitamina D3 y su relación. con el nivel de glóbulos blancos en las mujeres con aborto espontáneo, inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (ICSI) técnicao / The effect of vitamin D3 and its relationship with the level of white blood cells in women spontaneous miscarriage undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique

Women were studied undergoing ICSI for 84 who suffer non-pregnancy at the Fertility Center, Al-Sadr Medical Hospital in Najaf Governorate, Period between January 2019 and March 2020. WBC, Vitamin D3 and ß-hCG were measured, The pregnant women was divided into (Pregnancy Group, and spontaneous miscarriage) and then demonstrate the immunological effect on pregnancy of women after ICSI technique. Current resultsstudy showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in hormone level ß-hCG is evidence of the presence of high success rates for pregnancy in women who performed operations IVF, where the success rate at the beginning of the matter reached 61.9%, after which it decreased to 33.3% after the first three months due to the occurrence of spontaneous miscarriage of pregnant women due to various immunological and physiological reasons, a positive correlation between the level of ß-hCG and other parameters in the study (Vitamin D3 -WBC).Also The current resultsshowed a significant decrease in a groups (pregnancy failure) and the group (spontaneous miscarriage) compared with the control group (continued pregnancy) in relation to the level of vitamin D3 Also, The current results showed a significant increasein (pregnancy failure) and (spontaneous miscarriage) compared with control groups (continuation of pregnancy) in relation WBC numbers, and the present study founds a negative relationship between the level of vitamin D3 and WBC.

Are specialized sperm function tests clinically useful in planning assisted reproductive technology?

CASE STUDY 40-year-old male patient and 32-year-old female partner, with a history of primary infertility of two years duration. The workup revealed idiopathic mild oligoasthenotheratozoospermia, and no apparent female infertility factors. The couple has failed three intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles, planning more IUI cycles but also considering in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

A comparison of the relative efficiency of ICSI and extended culture with epididymal sperm versus testicular sperm in patients with obstructive azoospermia / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing blastocyst transfer outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilizing epididymal versus testicular sperm for men with obstructive azoospermia. All cases at a single center between 2012 and 2016 were included. Operative approach was selected at the surgeon's discretion and included microepididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction. Blastocyst culture was exclusively utilized prior to transfer. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, blastulation rate, euploidy rate, and implantation rate. A mixed effects model was performed. Seventy-six microepididymal sperm aspiration cases and 93 testicular sperm extraction cases were analyzed. The live birth rate was equivalent (48.6% vs 50.5%, P = 0.77). However, on mixed effects model, epididymal sperm resulted in a greater likelihood of fertilization (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.81, P = 0.02) and produced a higher blastulation rate (adjusted OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.1-1.85, P = 0.01). As a result, the epididymal sperm group had more supernumerary blastocysts available (4.3 vs 3, P < 0.05). The euploidy rate was no different. Pregnancy rates were no different through the first transfer cycle. However, intracytoplasmic sperm injection following microepididymal sperm aspiration resulted in a greater number of usable blastocysts per patient. Thus, the true benefit of epididymal sperm may only be demonstrated via a comparison of cumulative pregnancy rates after multiple transfers from one cohort.

Success rates of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with serum anti-sperm antibodies: a consecutive cohort study / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Antisperm antibodies (ASAs) are assumed to be a possible causative factor for male infertility, with ASAs detected in 5%-15% of infertile men but in only 1%-2% of fertile ones. It remains unclear whether ASAs have an adverse effect on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This study investigated differences in the rates of fertilization, pregnancy, and live births associated with serum ASA-positive and ASA-negative men following IVF or ICSI. Five hundred and fifty-four consecutive infertile couples undergoing IVF (n = 399) or ICSI (n = 155) were included. The two-sample two-sided t-test and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Lower rates of fertilization (41.7% vs 54.8%, P = 0.03), good embryos (18.9% vs 35.2%, P = 0.00), pregnancy (38.5% vs 59.4%, P = 0.00), and live births (25.8% vs 42.5%, P = 0.00) were observed in men of the IVF group with a positive serum ASA than in those with a negative ASA. ASA positivity/negativity correlated with pregnancy rates (P = 0.021, odds ratio [OR]: 0.630, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.425-0.932) and live birth rates (P = 0.010, OR: 1.409, 95% CI: 1.084-1.831) after controlling for the female serum follicle-stimulating hormone level and the couple's ages at IVF. Women coupled with ASA-positive men had lower live birth rates with IVF than with ICSI (25.8% and 47.4%, respectively; P = 0.07). Women coupled with ASA-positive men had lower rates of pregnancy and live births following IVF than those coupled with ASA-negative men but had a similar outcome with ICSI.

Evaluación de la eficacia de los laboratorios de embriología y anatomía patológica en el análisis de las biopsias testiculares de pacientes azoospérmicos / Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Laboratories of Embryology and Pathological Anatomy in the Analysis of Testicular Biopsies of Patients with Azoospermia

Objetivos: El propósito de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia de los laboratorios de embriología y de anatomía patológica para hallar espermatozoides en las muestras de tejido testicular obtenido por biopsia testicular (testicular sperm extraction, TESE) en pacientes con azoospermia no obstructiva. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo y prospectivo de todos los pacientes con azoospermia no obstructiva atendidos en CRECER y en la Clínica Privada Pueyrredón, entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2016. En este estudio solo se incluyeron aquellos pacientes en los que la muestra obtenida con TESE fue enviada simultáneamente al anatomopatólogo y al laboratorio de embriología. Para el análisis de los resultados de las biopsias el estudio se detuvo a fines de 2016, pero el seguimiento de los pacientes continuó hasta el mes de octubre de 2017, registrándose todos aquellos casos que realizaron procedimientos de inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI) con muestras obtenidas de TESE y se anotó la obtención de embriones, embarazos y nacimientos. Resultados: El laboratorio de embriología halló espermatozoides en 36 de los 68 pacientes (52,9%), mientras que el laboratorio de patología solo informó presencia en 21 pacientes (30,88%). Hubo acuerdo en el hallazgo de espermatozoides entre ambos laboratorios en 20 de los 68 casos (29,41%), mientras que en 16 pacientes el laboratorio de embriología encontró espermatozoides donde el de patología no pudo hacerlo (23,53%). Al mismo tiempo, el laboratorio de patología halló espermatozoides solo en un caso en el que el de embriología informó su ausencia para la misma muestra analizada (1,47%) (p=0,0003). Conclusiones: El laboratorio de embriología es significativamente más eficaz para determinar la presencia de espermatozoides en las muestras de TESE, teniendo mejor rendimiento que el de patología, por lo que consideramos que, si las muestras fueran analizadas solo por el patólogo, se perdería la posibilidad de lograr muchos embarazos realizando ICSI más TESE.(AU)

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of embryology and pathological anatomy laboratories to find spermatozoa in testicular tissue samples obtained by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Materials and methods: It was carried out a retrospective and prospective analysis of all the patients with non-obstructive azoospermia treated at CRECER and at Clínica Privada Pueyrredón, between January 2006 and December 2016. This study only includes patients in whom the sample obtained with TESE was sent at the same time to the pathology and embryology laboratory. For the analysis of the results of the biopsies, the study was stopped at the end of 2016, but the follow-up of the patients continued until October 2017, registering all those cases that performed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with samples obtained from TESE and wrote down the patients who´ve got embryos, pregnancies, and births. Results: The embryology laboratory found sperm in 36 of the 68 patients (52.9%), while the pathology laboratory only reported presence in 21 patients (30.88%). There was agreement in the finding of sperm between both laboratories in 20 of the 68 cases (29.41%), while in 16 patients the embryology laboratory found sperm where the pathology department could not do so (23.53%). At the same time, the pathology laboratory found sperm only in one case in which the embryology department reported its absence for the same sample analyzed (1.47%) (p=0.0003). Conclusions: The embryology laboratory is significantly more efficient to determine the presence of sperm in the samples of TESE, having better performance than the pathology one. Taking into account that, we believe that if the samples are only analyzed by the pathologist, the possibility of getting many pregnancies performing ICSI plus TESE would be lost. (AU)

Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

In the present study, we evaluated the impact of sperm origins and concentration on the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A total of 1201 ICSI cycles were retrospectively analyzed for male azoospermia or oligozoospermia between January 2015 and December 2015 in the Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups (Group 1 vs Group 2/3; surgically extracted sperm vs ejaculated sperms): Group 1 included 343 ICSI cycles and Group 2 analyzed 388 cycles on semen with sperm concentration <5 × 106 ml-1 (severe oligozoospermia group). Group 3 included 470 cycles with sperm concentration between 5 × 106 ml-1 and 15 × 106 ml-1 (mild oligozoospermia group). Fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were analyzed and compared among groups of different semen origins and concentrations on the oocyte retrieval day. Group 2 showed a lower fertilization rate than Group 3 (62.9% ± 21.6% vs 66.8% ± 22.1%,P< 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (51.3%, 46.7%, and 50.0%, respectively), live birth rate per transfer (44.4%, 40.9%, and 41.4%, respectively), accumulative live birth rate (58.3%, 51.0%, and 52.1%, respectively), twin birth rate (18.4%, 10.6%, and 12.6%, respectively), and birth defects rate (0, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively) among three groups. The results of this study indicated that sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles.

Use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with high sperm DNA fragmentation: a SWOT analysis / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Spermatozoa retrieved from the testis of men with high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in the neat semen tend to have better DNA quality. Given the negative impact of SDF on the outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), an increased interest has emerged about the use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (Testi-ICSI). In this article, we used a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to summarize the advantages and drawbacks of this intervention. The rationale of Testi-ICSI is bypass posttesticular DNA fragmentation caused by oxidative stress during sperm transit through the epididymis. Hence, oocyte fertilization by genomically intact testicular spermatozoa may be optimized, thus increasing the chances of creating a normal embryonic genome and the likelihood of achieving a live birth, as recently demonstrated in men with high SDF. However, there is still limited evidence as regards the clinical efficacy of Testi-ICSI, thus creating opportunities for further confirmatory clinical research as well as investigation of Testi-ICSI in clinical scenarios other than high SDF. Furthermore, Testi-ICSI can be compared to other laboratory preparation methods for deselecting sperm with damaged DNA. At present, the available literature supports the use of testicular sperm when performing ICSI in infertile couples whose male partners have posttesticular SDF. Due to inherent risks of sperm retrieval, Testi-ICSI should be offered when less invasive treatments for alleviating DNA damage have failed. A call for continuous monitoring is nonetheless required concerning the health of generated offspring and the potential complications of sperm retrieval.

Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection / Superando o fator masculino de infertilidade com injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides

Summary Objective: To evaluate the effect of male factor infertility on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes compared with a control group presenting isolated tubal factor. Method: This retrospective study included 743 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated male factor and a control group consisting of 179 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated tubal factor, performed in a private university- -affiliated in vitro fertilization center, between January/2010 and December/2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to maternal age: women ≤35 years old and >35 years old. The effects of infertility causes on laboratorial and clinical ICSI outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-test and (2 test. Results: No differences in controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were observed between male factor cycles and tubal factor cycles in the two age groups. Implantation (male factor 35.5% vs. tubal factor 32.0%, p=0.340), pregnancy (male factor 46.9% vs. tubal factor 40.9%, p=0.184) and miscarriage (male factor 10.3% vs. tubal factor 10.6%, p=0.572) rates were similar between the infertility groups, irrespective of female age. Considering maternal age, the cancelation rate was higher in older women (>35 years old) undergoing ICSI as a result of male factor infertility (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Our results showed that there is no difference in the outcomes of pregnancy between couples with male or tubal factor infertility, which indicates that ICSI surpasses the worse specific outcomes associated with male factor.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito do fator masculino de infertilidade em resultados de injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (ICSI) em comparação com um grupo controle que apresenta o fator tubário isolado. Método: Este estudo retrospectivo incluiu 743 casais submetidos a ICSI por fator masculino e 179 casais por fator tubário, realizada em um centro privado de fertilização in vitro associado à universidade, entre janeiro de 2010 e dezembro de 2016. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a idade materna: mulheres ≤ 35 e > 35 anos de idade. Os efeitos das causas de infertilidade nos resultados laboratoriais e clínicos da ICSI foram avaliados pelos testes T de Student e Qui-quadrado. Resultados: Não foram observadas diferenças nos parâmetros de estimulação ovariana entre os ciclos com fatores masculinos e com fatores tubários. A taxa de implantação (fator masculino 35,5% vs. fator tubário 32,0%, p=0,340), de gravidez (fator masculino 46,9% vs. fator tubário 40,9%, p=0,184) e de aborto (fator masculino 10,3% vs. fator tubário 10,6%, p=0.572) foram semelhantes entre os grupos de infertilidade, independentemente da idade feminina. Considerando a idade materna, a taxa de cancelamento foi maior em mulheres > 35 anos cuja causa de infertilidade era o fator masculino (17,4% vs. 8,9%, p=0,013). Conclusão: Não há diferenças nos resultados de gravidez entre casais com infertilidade dos fatores masculino ou tubário isolados, o que indica que ICSI supera os piores resultados associados ao fator masculino.

Pregnancy and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with normal testicular spermatozoa in a patient with azoospermia and tail stump epididymal sperm

Main findings: An intriguing yet perplexing case report of a successful pregnancy and live birth with intracytoplasmic sperm injection using normal testicular sperm, after the finding of azoospermia in the semen analysis and discovering only tail stump abnormal sperm in the epididymis. Case hypothesis: A tail stump sperm defect of genetic origin was suspected. However, after obtaining normal testicular sperm we concluded that obstructive azoospermia, either idiopathic or secondary to multiple minor genital trauma was the plausible scenario. This has rendered the search of previous reports on a similar condition, but none was found. However, it has raised scientific thoughts for future research. Promising future implications: The importance of reporting this case is to alert urologists performing sperm retrieval that healthy and morphologically normal sperm may be found in the testis of azoospermic men with 100% tail stump epididymal sperm. Retrieval of normal testicular sperm obviates the need of a more complex investigation, including sperm electron microscopy. It also offers the possibility of utilizing such gametes for sperm injections rather than abnormal tail stump sperm that may be associated with a poor reproductive outcome.

An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males

The use of non-ejaculated sperm coupled with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become a globally established procedure for couples with azoospermic male partners who wish to have biological offspring. Surgical methods have been developed to retrieve spermatozoa from the epididymides and the testes of such patients. This article reviews the methods currently available for sperm acquisition in azoospermia, with a particular focus on the perioperative, anesthetic and technical aspects of these procedures. A critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of these sperm retrieval methods is provided, including the authors' methods of choice and anesthesia preferences.

Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role?

Obstructive azoospermia is a relatively common male infertility condition. The main etiologies of obstructive azoospermia include congenital, surgical-derived, traumatic and post-infectious cases. Although seminal tract reconstruction is a cost-effective treatment in most cases, this approach may not be feasible or desired in some cases. In such cases, assisted reproduction techniques offer a method for achieving pregnancy, notably via sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. This process requires several considerations and decisions to be made, including the cause and duration of obstruction, which sperm retrieval technique to use, and whether to use fresh or frozen-thawed sperm. We present a review of obstructive azoospermia and assisted reproduction techniques, highlighting the most relevant aspects of the decision-making process for use in clinical practice.

Prognostic factors for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia

Testicular sperm retrieval techniques associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection have changed the field of male infertility treatment and given many azoospermic men the chance to become biological fathers. Despite the current use of testicular sperm extraction, reliable clinical and laboratory prognostic factors of sperm recovery are still absent. The objective of this article was to review the prognostic factors and clinical use of sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia. The PubMed database was searched for the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms azoospermia, sperm retrieval, and prognosis. Papers on obstructive azoospermia were excluded. The authors selected articles that reported successful sperm retrieval techniques involving clinical, laboratory, or parenchyma processing methods. The selected papers were reviewed, and the prognostic factors were discussed. No reliable positive prognostic factors guarantee sperm recovery for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. The only negative prognostic factor is the presence of AZFa and AZFb microdeletions.

Laboratory processing and intracytoplasmic sperm injection using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa: what can be done to improve outcomes?

There are two main reasons why sperm may be absent from semen. Obstructive azoospermia is the result of a blockage in the male reproductive tract; in this case, sperm are produced in the testicle but are trapped in the epididymis. Non-obstructive azoospermia is the result of severely impaired or non-existent sperm production. There are three different sperm-harvesting procedures that obstructive azoospermic males can undergo, namely MESA (microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration), PESA (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration), and TESA (testicular sperm aspiration). These three procedures are performed by fine-gauge needle aspiration of epididymal fluid that is examined by an embryologist. Additionally, one technique, called TESE (testicular sperm extraction), is offered for males with non-obstructive azoospermia. In this procedure, a urologist extracts a piece of tissue from the testis. Then, an embryologist minces the tissue and uses a microscope to locate sperm. Finding sperm in the testicular tissue can be a laborious 2- to 3-hour process depending on the degree of sperm production and the etiology of testicular failure. Sperm are freed from within the seminiferous tubules and then dissected from the surrounding testicular tissue. It is specifically these situations that require advanced reproductive techniques, such as ICSI, to establish a pregnancy. This review describes eight different lab processing techniques that an embryologist can use to harvest sperm. Additionally, sperm cryopreservation, which allows patients to undergo multiple ICSI cycles without the need for additional surgeries, will also be discussed.

Intracytoplasmic spermatid injection and in vitro maturation: fact or fiction?

Intracytoplasmic injection with testicular spermatozoa has become a routine treatment in fertility clinics. Spermatozoa can be recovered in half of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. The use of immature germ cells for intracytoplasmic injection has been proposed for cases in which no spermatozoa can be retrieved. However, there are low pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic injection using round spermatids from men with no elongated spermatids or spermatozoa in their testes. The in vitro culture of immature germ cells to more mature stages has been proposed as a means to improve this poor outcome. Several years after the introduction of intracytoplasmic injection with elongating and round spermatids, uncertainty remains as to whether this approach can be considered a safe treatment option. This review outlines the clinical and scientific data regarding intracytoplasmic injection using immature germ cells and in vitro matured germ cells.

Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction

Different surgical methods such as PESA, MESA, TESA, TESE and micro-TESE have been developed to retrieve spermatozoa from either the epididymis or the testis according to the type of azoospermia, i.e., obstructive or non-obstructive. Laboratory techniques are used to remove contaminants, cellular debris, and red blood cells following collection of the epididymal fluid or testicular tissue. Surgically-retrieved spermatozoa may be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and/or cryopreservation. In this article, we review the surgical procedures for retrieving spermatozoa from both the epididymis and the testicle and provide technical details of the commonly used methods. A critical analysis of the advantages and limitations of the current surgical methods to retrieve sperm from males with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia is presented along with an overview of the laboratory techniques routinely used to process surgically-retrieved sperm. Lastly, we summarize the results from the current literature of sperm retrieval, as well as the clinical outcome of ICSI in the clinical scenario of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia.

Meiotic spindle of in vivo matured oocytes from infertile women with endometriosis: preliminary data / Fuso meiótico de oócitos maturados in vivo de mulheres inférteis com endometriose: dados preliminares

Objective: To evaluate the presence/localization of meiotic spindles of in vivo matured oocytes from infertile women with and without endometriosis undergoing stimulated cycles for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Methods: Meiotic spindles of oocytes with the first polar body extruded were imaged using polarization microscopy immediately before the intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Results: We analyzed 326 oocytes (79 from endometriosis stages minimal/mild, 51 from endometriosis stages moderate/severe – III/IV, and 196 from the Control Group). No significant differences were seen in the percentage of oocytes in metaphase II with visible and nonvisible spindles and in the spindle localization among the groups. Conclusions: We can conclude from this study that noninvasive analysis of spindles from in vivo matured oocytes of infertile patients with endometriosis did not demonstrate significant differences in terms of the nuclear maturation stage, the percentage of oocytes in metaphase II with visible spindles, and the spindle localization when compared to control group.

Objetivo: Avaliar a presença e localização do fuso celular meiótico de oócitos maturados in vivo de mulheres inférteis, com e sem endometriose, submetidas à estimulação ovariana para injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoide. Métodos: Os fusos meióticos de oócitos com o primeiro corpúsculo polar visível foram analisados por microscopia de polarização imediatamente antes da injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoide. Resultados: Foram analisados 326 oócitos (79 de mulheres com endometriose estágios I/II, 51 de portadoras de endometriose III/IV e 196 do Grupo Controle). Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos tanto na porcentagem de oócitos em metáfase II com fuso celular visível e não visível,como na localização do fuso celular. Conclusões: A análise não-invasiva dos fusos celulares de oócitos maduros de mulheres inférteis com endometriose pélvica não demonstrou diferença significativa em termos de percentagem de oócitos em metáfase II, com fuso visível e não-visível enas diferentes localizações, quando comparados ao Grupo Controle.

Evaluation of seminal parameters in the indication of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of the male factor fertility problem / Avaliação dos parâmetros seminais na indicação da fertilização in vitro ou injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoide para o tratamento do fator masculino

A fertilização in vitro (FIV) tem se mostrado muito eficiente no tratamento de casais inférteis. Com o passar dos anos, a indicação da reprodução assistida para o tratamento do fator masculino cresceu muito, tornando necessárias novas técnicas de fertilização, como a Injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoide (ICSI). De acordo com a Organização Mundial da Saúde, os parâmetros espermáticos (pós-processamento) mínimos para realização da FIV convencional são: concentração ≥5 x 106 /mL, 30% de motilidade progressiva e 30% de morfologia normal. Para homens com parâmetros espermáticos inferiores a esses, a ICSI estaria indicada. Entretanto, esses valores são bastante questionados e não são seguidos em muitos serviços. Por isso, o objetivo deste trabalho foi revisar literatura, visando a analisar os parâmetros seminais na indicação da fertilização in vitro convencional ou ICSI para o tratamento do fator masculino. Após análise dos artigos, concluiu-se que pacientes com parâmetros seminais no limite entre indicação para FIV ou ICSI devem optar pelo segundo método para que seu tratamento seja eficiente. Por outro lado, além dos parâmetros espermáticos, outros fatores também são importantes para a escolha da técnica como, por exemplo: falha prévia de fertilização, qualidade oocitária e idade materna. Atualmente, a técnica de ICSI vem sendo utilizada indiscriminadamente. Porém, uma análise melhor dos parâmetros espermáticos e outros fatores são essenciais para a escolha ou não dessa técnica.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) has proven to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Over the years, assisted reproduction to treat male factor has grown, making new reproduction techniques necessary. Thus, in July 1992, the first pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI)was reported. In method, one spermatozoon is injected into the cytoplasm of the oocyte. According to the World Health Organization, the minimal concentration of spermatozoa in the semen, using conventional IVF, is ≥ 5 x 106 /mL, and more than 30% of motility and 30% of normal morphology. Men with lower spermatic parameters should be submitted to ICSI. However, these values have been questioned in the literature and many clinics do not follow these parameters. Therefore, this study aimed to review the literature on sperm parameters used in the indication of conventional in vitro.