Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Who Gets the Last Bed? A Discrete-Choice Experiment Examining General Population Preferences for Intensive Care Bed Prioritization in a Pandemic.
Street, Amelia E; Street, Deborah J; Flynn, Gordon M.
  • Street AE; Intensive Care Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Street DJ; Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Flynn GM; Intensive Care Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital.
Med Decis Making ; 41(4): 408-418, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1117298
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the key patient attributes important to members of the Australian general population when prioritizing patients for the final intensive care unit (ICU) bed in a pandemic over-capacity scenario.

METHODS:

A discrete-choice experiment administered online asked respondents (N = 306) to imagine the COVID-19 caseload had surged and that they were lay members of a panel tasked to allocate the final ICU bed. They had to decide which patient was more deserving for each of 14 patient pairs. Patients were characterized by 5 attributes age, occupation, caregiver status, health prior to being infected, and prognosis. Respondents were randomly allocated to one of 7 sets of 14 pairs. Multinomial, mixed logit, and latent class models were used to model the observed choice behavior.

RESULTS:

A latent class model with 3 classes was found to be the most informative. Two classes valued active decision making and were slightly more likely to choose patients with caregiving responsibilities over those without. One of these classes valued prognosis most strongly, with a decreasing probability of bed allocation for those 65 y and older. The other valued both prognosis and age highly, with decreasing probability of bed allocation for those 45 y and older and a slight preference in favor of frontline health care workers. The third class preferred more random decision-making strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

For two-thirds of those sampled, prognosis, age, and caregiving responsibilities were the important features when making allocation decisions, although the emphasis varies. The remainder appeared to choose randomly.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud / Actitud Frente a la Salud / Cuidados Críticos / Toma de Decisiones / Pandemias / COVID-19 / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adolescente / Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged / Young_adult País/Región como asunto: Oceanía Idioma: Inglés Revista: Med Decis Making Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: 0272989X21996615

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud / Actitud Frente a la Salud / Cuidados Críticos / Toma de Decisiones / Pandemias / COVID-19 / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adolescente / Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged / Young_adult País/Región como asunto: Oceanía Idioma: Inglés Revista: Med Decis Making Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: 0272989X21996615