Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Which parameters support disposition decision in suspected COVID-19 cases in the emergency department (ED): a German clinical cohort study.
Möckel, Martin; Stegemann, Miriam Songa; Burst, Volker; Kümpers, Philipp; Risse, Joachim; Koehler, Felix Carlo; Schunk, Domagoj; Hitzek, Jennifer; Dietrich, Tamara Elene; Slagman, Anna.
  • Möckel M; Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany martin.moeckel@charite.de.
  • Stegemann MS; Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Burst V; Department II of Internal Medicine: Nephrology, Rheumatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Kümpers P; Emergency Medicine, Univerity Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Risse J; Emergency Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Koehler FC; Department II of Internal Medicine: Nephrology, Rheumatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Schunk D; Emergency and Acute Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Hitzek J; Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Dietrich TE; Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Slagman A; Emergency and Acute Medicine, Campus Mitte and Virchow, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
BMJ Open ; 11(3): e044853, 2021 03 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1166495
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

One major goal of the emergency department (ED) is to decide, whether patients need to be hospitalised or can be sent home safely. We aim at providing criteria for these decisions without knowing the SARS-CoV-2 test result in suspected cases.

SETTING:

Tertiary emergency medicine.

PARTICIPANTS:

All patients were treated at the ED of the Charité during the pandemic peak and underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing. Patients with positive test results were characterised in detail and underwent a 14-day-follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to identify predictors (primary endpoint), which confirm safe discharge. The clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality or need for mechanical ventilation during index stay or after readmission.

RESULTS:

The primary test population of suspected COVID-19 consisted of n=1255 cases, 45.2% were women (n=567). Of these, n=110 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (8.8%). The median age of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases was 45 years (IQR 33-66 years), whereas the median age of the group tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 was 42 years (IQR 30-60 years) (p=0.096). 43.6% were directly admitted to hospital care.CART analysis identified the variables oxygen saturation (<95%), dyspnoea and history of cardiovascular (CV) disease to distinguish between high and low-risk groups. If all three variables were negative, most patients were discharged from ED, and the incidence of the clinical endpoint was 0%. The validation cohort confirmed the safety of discharge using these variables and revealed an incidence of the clinical endpoint from 14.3% in patients with CV disease, 9.4% in patients with dyspnoea and 18.2% in patients with O2 satuaration below 95%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on easily available variables like dyspnoea, oxygen saturation, history of CV disease, approximately 25% of patients subsequently confirmed with COVID-19 can be identified for safe discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00023117.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Inglés Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Bmjopen-2020-044853

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Inglés Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Bmjopen-2020-044853