Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development of a brief scoring system to predict any-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.
Jiwa, Nasheena; Mutneja, Rahul; Henry, Lucie; Fiscus, Garrett; Zu Wallack, Richard.
  • Jiwa N; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States of America.
  • Mutneja R; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, United States of America.
  • Henry L; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, United States of America.
  • Fiscus G; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States of America.
  • Zu Wallack R; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254580, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315888
ABSTRACT
Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection are at a high general risk for in-hospital mortality. A simple and easy-to-use model for predicting mortality based on data readily available to clinicians in the first 24 hours of hospital admission might be useful in directing scarce medical and personnel resources toward those patients at greater risk of dying. With this goal in mind, we evaluated factors predictive of in-hospital mortality in a random sample of 100 patients (derivation cohort) hospitalized for COVID-19 at our institution in April and May, 2020 and created potential models to test in a second random sample of 148 patients (validation cohort) hospitalized for the same disease over the same time period in the same institution. Two models (Model A two variables, presence of pneumonia and ischemia); (Model B three variables, age > 65 years, supplemental oxygen ≥ 4 L/min, and C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L) were selected and tested in the validation cohort. Model B appeared the better of the two, with an AUC in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of 0.74 versus 0.65 in Model A, but the AUC differences were not significant (p = 0.24. Model B also appeared to have a more robust separation of mortality between the lowest (none of the three variables present) and highest (all three variables present) scores at 0% and 71%, respectively. These brief scoring systems may prove to be useful to clinicians in assigning mortality risk in hospitalized patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: Ciencia / Medicina Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Journal.pone.0254580

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Límite: Adulto / Anciano / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: Ciencia / Medicina Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Journal.pone.0254580