Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy and Safety of Qingfei Paidu Decoction for Treating COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wang, Qi; Zhu, Hongfei; Li, Mengting; Liu, Yafei; Lai, Honghao; Yang, Qiuyu; Cao, Xiao; Ge, Long.
  • Wang Q; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zhu H; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Li M; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Liu Y; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Lai H; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Yang Q; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Cao X; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Ge L; Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 688857, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1378197
ABSTRACT

Background:

Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) has been widely used in treating COVID-19 in China. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive and systematic evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of QFPD. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QFPD in patients with COVID-19.

Methods:

We searched seven databases up to 5 March 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data of interest, and assessed risk of bias. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias of cohort and non-randomized trials. The "Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group" was adopted for controlled pre-post studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) to assess the certainty of evidence. We carried out a random effect meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. For outcomes that could not be meta-analyzed, we performed a descriptive analysis.

Results:

We identified 16 studies with 11,237 patients, including one RCT, six non-randomized trials, two cohort studies, and seven pre-post studies. The certainty of evidence was low to very low because of the observational study design. QFPD combined with conventional treatment might decrease the time for nucleic acid conversion (MD = -4.78 days, 95% CI -5.79 to -3.77), shorten the length of hospital stay (MD = -7.95 days, 95% CI -14.66 to -1.24), shorten the duration of symptoms recovery of fever (MD = -1.51 days, 95% CI -1.92 to -1.09), cough (MD = -1.64 days, 95% CI -1.91 to -1.36) and chest CT (MD = -2.23 days, 95% CI -2.46 to -2.00), improve the overall traditional Chinese medicine symptom scores (MD = 41.58 scores, 95% CI 32.67 to 50.49), and change the laboratory indexes, such as WBC, AST, and CRP.

Conclusion:

QFPD combined with conventional treatment might be effective for patients with COVID-19. No serious adverse reactions related to QFPD were observed. Further high-quality studies are still needed in the future.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Medicina tradicional Idioma: Inglés Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Fphar.2021.688857

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Medicina tradicional Idioma: Inglés Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Fphar.2021.688857