Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Retrospective quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 by digital PCR showing high accuracy for low viral load specimens.
Lu, Renfei; Wang, Jian; Li, Min; He, Jing; Wang, Yaqi; Dong, Jia; Cai, Weihua.
  • Lu R; Clinical Laboratory, the Nantong Third Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, P. R. China.
  • Wang J; Clinical Laboratory, the Nantong Third Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, P. R. China.
  • Li M; Clinical Laboratory, the Nantong Third Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, P. R. China.
  • He J; Department of Research and Development, RainSure Scientific Co, Ltd., Suzhou, P.R. China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Research and Development, RainSure Scientific Co, Ltd., Suzhou, P.R. China.
  • Dong J; Department of Research and Development, RainSure Scientific Co, Ltd., Suzhou, P.R. China.
  • Cai W; Infectious Diseases Division, the Nantong Third Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, P. R. China. caiweihua10@163.com.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(1): 10-15, 2022 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1704111
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is critical for diagnosis and disease status evaluation of Coronavirus disease 2019. We retrospectively evaluated the infection status and viral load of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Nantong city, China, using a quantitative digital polymerase chain reaction and reverse-transcription PCR.

METHODOLOGY:

A total of 103 clinical specimens from 31 patients were collected and tested by digital PCR and reverse-transcription PCR.

RESULTS:

The overall accuracy of digital PCR was 96.8%, which was higher than the overall accuracy of 87.1% for reverse-transcription PCR. 4 (3.88%) specimens for ORF1ab and 22 (21.36%) specimens for N gene were negative by reverse-transcription PCR but positive by digital PCR. 3 (2.91%, 3/103) specimens of ORF1ab were positive by reverse-transcription PCR but negative by digital PCR. The digital PCR assay exhibited higher sensitivity to measure the N gene than the ORF1ab gene (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results showed that digital PCR assay provides more reliable detection of Coronavirus disease 2019 than reverse-transcription PCR, especially for low viral load specimens.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Infect Dev Ctries Asunto de la revista: Enfermedades Transmisibles Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Infect Dev Ctries Asunto de la revista: Enfermedades Transmisibles Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo