Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Reimagining the Clinical Competency Committee to Enhance Education and Prepare for Competency-Based Time-Variable Advancement.
Goldhamer, Mary Ellen J; Martinez-Lage, Maria; Black-Schaffer, W Stephen; Huang, Jennifer T; Co, John Patrick T; Weinstein, Debra F; Pusic, Martin V.
  • Goldhamer MEJ; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mgoldhamer@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Martinez-Lage M; Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA. mgoldhamer@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Black-Schaffer WS; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. mgoldhamer@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Huang JT; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Co JPT; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Weinstein DF; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Pusic MV; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(9): 2280-2290, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1803068
ABSTRACT
Assessing residents and clinical fellows is a high-stakes activity. Effective assessment is important throughout training so that identified areas of strength and weakness can guide educational planning to optimize outcomes. Assessment has historically been underemphasized although medical education oversight organizations have strengthened requirements in recent years. Growing acceptance of competency-based medical education and its logical extension to competency-based time-variable (CB-TV) graduate medical education (GME) further highlights the importance of implementing effective evidence-based approaches to assessment. The Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) has emerged as a key programmatic structure in graduate medical education. In the context of launching a multi-specialty pilot of CB-TV GME in our health system, we have examined several program's CCC processes and reviewed the relevant literature to propose enhancements to CCCs. We recommend that all CCCs fulfill three core goals, regularly applied to every GME trainee (1) discern and describe the resident's developmental status to individualize education, (2) determine readiness for unsupervised practice, and (3) foster self-assessment ability. We integrate the literature and observations from GME program CCCs in our institutions to evaluate how current CCC processes support or undermine these goals. Obstacles and key enablers are identified. Finally, we recommend ways to achieve the stated goals, including the following (1) assess and promote the development of competency in all trainees, not just outliers, through a shared model of assessment and competency-based advancement; (2) strengthen CCC assessment processes to determine trainee readiness for independent practice; and (3) promote trainee reflection and informed self-assessment. The importance of coaching for competency, robust workplace-based assessments, feedback, and co-production of individualized learning plans are emphasized. Individual programs and their CCCs must strengthen assessment tools and frameworks to realize the potential of competency-oriented education.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Competencia Clínica / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: Medicina Interna Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: S11606-022-07515-3

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Competencia Clínica / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: Medicina Interna Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: S11606-022-07515-3