Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review of literature.
Mariani, Silvia; De Piero, Maria Elena; Ravaux, Justine M; Saelmans, Alexander; Kawczynski, Michal J; van Bussel, Bas C T; Di Mauro, Michele; Willers, Anne; Swol, Justyna; Kowalewski, Mariusz; Li, Tong; Delnoij, Thijs S R; van der Horst, Iwan C C; Maessen, Jos; Lorusso, Roberto.
  • Mariani S; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • De Piero ME; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Ravaux JM; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Saelmans A; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kawczynski MJ; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Bussel BCT; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Di Mauro M; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Willers A; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Swol J; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kowalewski M; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Li T; Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Delnoij TSR; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van der Horst ICC; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Maessen J; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Lorusso R; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Artif Organs ; 46(7): 1249-1267, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819876
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. While veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS:

PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow-up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation-to-cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors.

RESULTS:

Twenty-eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS-only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID-19 patients (females 28.8%; median age 54.3 years, 95%CI 50.7-57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V-V ECLS, 4.7% on veno-arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V-V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI 13.9-16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V-V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy-right ventricular assist device.

CONCLUSION:

MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID-19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corazón Auxiliar / COVID-19 / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: Artif Organs Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Aor.14261

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corazón Auxiliar / COVID-19 / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: Artif Organs Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo País de afiliación: Aor.14261