Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telemedicine and YouTube™: Video quality analysis before and after COVID-19 pandemic.
Mirone, Vincenzo; Abate, Marco; Fusco, Giovanni M; Cirillo, Luigi; Napolitano, Luigi; Morra, Simone; Di Bello, Francesco; Califano, Gianluigi; Mirone, Claudia; La Rocca, Roberto; Creta, Massimiliano; Celentano, Giuseppe; Capece, Marco; Mangiapia, Francesco; Longo, Nicola; Collà Ruvolo, Claudia.
  • Mirone V; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. mirone@unina.it.
  • Abate M; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. marcoabate5@gmail.com.
  • Fusco GM; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. giom.fusco@gmail.com.
  • Cirillo L; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. cirilloluigi22@gmail.com.
  • Napolitano L; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. luiginap89@gmail.com.
  • Morra S; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. simonemorra93@gmail.com.
  • Di Bello F; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. fran.dibello12@gmail.com.
  • Califano G; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. gianl.califano2@gmail.com.
  • Mirone C; Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples. claudia.mirone@unina.it.
  • La Rocca R; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. robertolarocca87@gmail.com.
  • Creta M; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. max.creta@gmail.com.
  • Celentano G; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. dr.giuseppecelentano@gmail.com.
  • Capece M; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. drmarcocapece@gmail.com.
  • Mangiapia F; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. mangiapiaf@gmail.com.
  • Longo N; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. nicola.longo@unina.it.
  • Collà Ruvolo C; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples. c.collaruvolo@gmail.com.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 95(2): 11341, 2023 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239808
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the quality content of YouTubeTM videos on telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

First, the frequency of worldwide YouTube™ and Google™ searches for telemedicine was analyzed. Second, we queried YouTube™ with telemedicine-related terms. Third, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT A/V), the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Misinformation tool were used for the quality assessment.

RESULTS:

According to selection criteria, 129 videos were collected for the analysis. From January 2018 to January 2022, the peak relative interest on YouTube™ and Google™ occurred in March 2020. Of all, 27.1 and 72.9% were uploaded before (Jan 2018-Feb 2020) and after (Mar 2020-Mar 2022) the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. According to the PEMAT A/V, the overall median understandability and actionability was 50.0% (33.3 [IQR 0-66.7] vs 50.0 [27.1-75], p = 0.2) and 66.7% (63.6 [IQR 50.0-75.7] vs 67.9 [50.0-79.2],p = 0.6), respectively. According to GQS, 3.9%, 17.8%, 24.0%, 26.4% and 27.9% were classified as excellent, good, medium, generally poor, and poor-quality videos, respectively. The highest rate of poor-quality videos was recorded in videos uploaded before COVID-19 pandemic (37.1 vs 24.5%). According to overall misinformation score, a higher score was recorded for the videos uploaded after COVID-19 pandemic (1.8 [IQR 1.4-2.3] vs 2.2 [1.8-2.8], p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The interest in telemedicine showed a significant peak when the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. However, the contents provided on YouTubeTM were not informative enough. In the future, official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Arch Ital Urol Androl Asunto de la revista: Medicina Reproductiva / Nefrología / Urología Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medios de Comunicación Sociales / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: Arch Ital Urol Androl Asunto de la revista: Medicina Reproductiva / Nefrología / Urología Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo