Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Is N -acetylcysteine effective in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019? A meta-analysis.
Chen, Chih-Hao; Hung, Kai-Feng; Huang, Chii-Yuan; Leong, Jing-Li; Chu, Yuan-Chia; Chang, Chun-Yu; Wang, Mong-Lien; Chiou, Shih-Hwa; Cheng, Yen-Fu.
  • Chen CH; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Hung KF; Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Huang CY; Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Leong JL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chu YC; Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chang CY; Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Wang ML; Information Management Office, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Chiou SH; Medical AI Development Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Cheng YF; Department of Information Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 86(3): 274-281, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2222868
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It has brought tremendous challenges to public health and medical systems around the world. The current strategy for drug repurposing has accumulated some evidence on the use of N -acetylcysteine (NAC) in treating patients with COVID-19. However, the evidence remains debated.

METHODS:

We performed the systematic review and meta-analysis that complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases and reference lists were searched from inception to May 14, 2022. Studies evaluating the efficacy of NAC in treating patients with COVID-19 were regarded as eligible. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42022332791).

RESULTS:

Of 778 records identified from the preliminary search, four studies were enrolled in the final qualitative review and quantitative meta-analysis. A total of 355 patients were allocated into the NAC group and the control group. The evaluated outcomes included intubation rate, improvement, duration of intensive unit stay and hospital stay and mortality. The pooled results showed nonsignificant differences in intubation rate (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.16-1.89; p = 0.34; I2 = 75%), improvement of oxygenation ([MD], 80.84; 95% CI, -38.16 to 199.84; p = 0.18; I2 = 98%), ICU stay (MD, -0.74; 95% CI, -3.19 to 1.71; p = 0.55; I2 = 95%), hospital stay (MD, -1.05; 95% CI, -3.02 to 0.92; p = 0.30; I2 = 90%), and mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.23-1.45; p = 0.24; I2 = 54%). Subsequent trial sequential analysis (TSA) showed conclusive nonsignificant results for mortality, while the TSA for the other outcomes suggested that a larger sample size is essential.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current evidence reveals NAC is not beneficial for treating patients with COVID- 19 with regard to respiratory outcome, mortality, duration of ICU stay and hospital stay.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio pronóstico / Investigación cualitativa / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Chin Med Assoc Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental / Estudio pronóstico / Investigación cualitativa / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado / Revisiones / Revisión sistemática/Meta análisis Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Chin Med Assoc Asunto de la revista: Medicina Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo