Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic.
Scott, Monte; Baykaner, Tina; Bunch, T Jared; Piccini, Jonathan P; Russo, Andrea M; Tzou, Wendy S; Zeitler, Emily P; Steinberg, Benjamin A.
  • Scott M; Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Baykaner T; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Bunch TJ; Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Piccini JP; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Russo AM; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
  • Tzou WS; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Zeitler EP; Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Steinberg BA; Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 4(3): 193-199, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245003
ABSTRACT

Background:

There are limited data on trends in nationwide cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures in the United States before and during the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective:

We aimed to understand contemporary EP procedural trends and how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them.

Methods:

Trends were obtained from publicly reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2013 to 2020 (latest available). Rates of catheter-based EP procedures (EP studies and ablations) and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures were analyzed. All procedural rates were calculated per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries (year specific). Procedure physician subspecialty was also reported.

Results:

From 2013 to 2019, annual rate of all cardiac EP procedures increased from 817.91 to 1089.68 per 100,000 beneficiaries. Catheter-based EP procedures increased from 323.73 to 675.01, while CIED rates decreased from 494.18 to 414.67. While all ablation procedures increased over time, relative proportion of ablation procedures being pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) increased (9.9% of ablations in 2013, to 18.2% in 2019). In 2020, rates of both catheter-based EP procedures and CIED procedures decreased; however, PVI share of ablation continued to increase in 2020 comprising 25.2% of ablation procedures.

Conclusion:

Rates of EP procedures have increased among Medicare beneficiaries, with catheter-based procedures now eclipsing CIEDs. Additionally, a greater proportion of catheter-based EP procedures are PVI, but they still represent a minority of all ablations. In 2020, rates of EP procedures were attenuated, yet the proportion of PVI ablations increased to over one-fourth of ablation procedures. These data have important implications for the EP workforce.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental Idioma: Inglés Revista: Heart Rhythm O2 Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Estudio experimental Idioma: Inglés Revista: Heart Rhythm O2 Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo