Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Development and Validation of a Renal Replacement after Trauma Scoring Tool.
Santos, Jeffrey; Grigorian, Areg; Kuza, Catherine; Emigh, Brent; Jeng, James; Qazi, Alliya; Nguyen, Ninh T; Nahmias, Jeffry.
  • Santos J; From the Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Santos, Grigorian, Jeng, Qazi).
  • Grigorian A; From the Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Santos, Grigorian, Jeng, Qazi).
  • Kuza C; the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (Kuza).
  • Emigh B; the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (Emigh).
  • Jeng J; From the Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Santos, Grigorian, Jeng, Qazi).
  • Qazi A; From the Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Santos, Grigorian, Jeng, Qazi).
  • Nguyen NT; the Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Nguyen).
  • Nahmias J; From the Division of Trauma, Burns, & Surgical Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA (Santos, Grigorian, Jeng, Qazi).
J Am Coll Surg ; 237(1): 79-86, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2279765
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stress on the healthcare system requires careful allocation of resources such as renal replacement therapy (RRT). The COVID-19 pandemic generated difficulty securing access to RRT for trauma patients. We sought to develop a renal replacement after trauma (RAT) scoring tool to help identify trauma patients who may require RRT during their hospitalization. STUDY

DESIGN:

The 2017 to 2020 TQIP database was divided into a derivation (2017 to 2018 data) and validation (2019 to 2020 data) set. A 3-step methodology was used. Adult trauma patients admitted from the emergency department to the operating room or ICU were included. Patients with chronic kidney disease, transfers from another hospital, and emergency department death were excluded. Multiple logistic regression models were created to determine the risk for RRT in trauma patients. The weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive a RAT score, which was validated using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS:

From 398,873 patients in the derivation and 409,037 patients in the validation set, 11 independent predictors of RRT were included in the RAT score derived with scores ranging from 0 to 11. The AUROC for the derivation set was 0.85. The rate of RRT increased to 1.1%, 3.3%, and 20% at scores of 6, 8, and 10, respectively. The validation set AUROC was 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS:

RAT is a novel and validated scoring tool to help predict the need for RRT in trauma patients. With future improvements including baseline renal function and other variables, the RAT tool may help prepare for the allocation of RRT machines/staff during times of limited resources.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesión Renal Aguda / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Am Coll Surg Asunto de la revista: Ginecologia / Obstetrícia Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesión Renal Aguda / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudios diagnósticos / Estudio pronóstico Límite: Humanos Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Am Coll Surg Asunto de la revista: Ginecologia / Obstetrícia Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo