Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Adults With Prone Positioning Using Manual Method Versus Specialty Bed: A Retrospective Comparison Cohort Study.
DeMellow, Jacqueline M; Dhillon, Harbir; Bhattacharyya, Mouchumi; Pacitto, Daniel; Kozik, Teri M.
  • DeMellow JM; Jacqueline M. DeMellow, PhD, RN, CCNS, CPHQ, Dignity Health St Joseph's Medical Center, Stockton, California.
  • Dhillon H; Harbir Dhillon, MD, Dignity Health St Joseph's Medical Center, Stockton, California.
  • Bhattacharyya M; Mouchumi Bhattacharyya, PhD, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California.
  • Pacitto D; Daniel Pacitto, DO, Touro University, Vallejo, California.
  • Kozik TM; Teri M. Kozik, PhD, CNS, CCRN-K, Dignity Health St Joseph's Medical Center, Stockton, California.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 50(3): 197-202, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314062
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and placed in a prone position manually or using a specialty bed designed to facilitate prone positioning. A secondary aim was to compare mortality rates between these groups.

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of electronic medical records. SUBJECTS AND

SETTING:

The sample comprised 160 patients with ARDS managed by prone positioning. Their mean age was 61.08 years (SD = 12.73); 58% (n = 96) were male. The study setting was a 355-bed community hospital in the Western United States (Stockton, California). Data were collected from July 2019 to January 2021.

METHODS:

Data from electronic medical records were retrospectively searched for the development of pressure injuries, mortality, hospital length of stay, oxygenation status when placed in a prone position, and the presence of a COVID-19 infection.

RESULTS:

A majority of patients with ARDS were manually placed in a prone position (n = 106; 64.2%), and 54 of these patients (50.1%) were placed using a specialty care bed. Slightly more than half (n = 81; 50.1%) developed HAPIs. Chi-square analyses showed no association with the incidence of HAPIs using manual prone positioning versus the specialty bed (P = .9567). Analysis found no difference in HAPI occurrences between those with COVID-19 and patients without a coronavirus infection (P = .8462). Deep-tissue pressure injuries were the most common type of pressure injury. More patients (n = 85; 80.19%) who were manually placed in a prone position died compared to 58.18% of patients (n = 32) positioned using the specialty bed (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS:

No differences in HAPI rates were found when placing patients manually in a prone position versus positioning using a specialty bed designed for this purpose.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Úlcera por Presión / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Asunto de la revista: Enfemeria Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texto completo: Disponible Colección: Bases de datos internacionales Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Úlcera por Presión / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Estudio de cohorte / Estudio experimental / Estudio observacional / Estudio pronóstico / Ensayo controlado aleatorizado Tópicos: Covid persistente Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino / Middle aged Idioma: Inglés Revista: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Asunto de la revista: Enfemeria Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Artículo