The Initial Response of Nuclear Medicine to the COVID-19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT

Objectives: COVID-19 posed profound challenges to nuclear medicine (NM) practice and education on an international scope. Initial lessons learned may be useful in understanding and optimizing dissemination of critical information during global disasters. To better understand the pandemic's initial manifold impact and responses that were in turn enacted, we systematically reviewed relevant articles published during the 2020 calendar year. Method(s) A librarian experienced in systematic reviews performed a rapid scoping review of the English language literature indexed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science by crossing NM and COVID terms;445 citations were returned. Duplicate, extraneous, non-English and non-full text articles were excluded leaving 248 articles which were analyzed by origin, topic, design, and imaging details. Result(s) An array of topics, techniques, journals and countries of origin were encountered. 158 articles appeared in primary NMjournals, 26 appeared in generic radiology journals and 65 in non-imaging journals. Most frequent countries represented were USA (55), Italy (33), France (19) and UK (17), reflecting the hard-hit countries early during the pandemic. 118 clinical articles were case reports or small series of which 80 featured FDG-PET/CT. There were 36 observational studies. Among non-clinical topics, articles focused on safetymeasures (102), economics and recovery (23), remote reading (17) and education (8). There were 17 surveys. Society-based guidelines (47) and individual-group best practices (79) were published relating to cardiology (33), lung scintigraphy (12), andmultiple topics (48). Systematic (10) and narrative reviews (61) were less frequent than opinion articles (75). Frequent modalities discussed were FDG PET (156), nuclear cardiology (56) and lung scintigraphy (35). Conclusion(s) The medical literature has memorialized a robust response of information sharing during the initial challenges the COVID-19 pandemic relating to patient care, operations and education. Through scoping review, we have analyzed the nature of information disseminated. Opinions and single group best practices dominated the literature. Clinical reports during the first year were primarily case reports or small series, frequently FDG-PET/ CT. The nature of the literature matured as the year progressed, and sources of information broadened as the epidemic spread.