A human primary airway microphysiological system infected with SARS-CoV-2 distinguishes the treatment efficacy between nirmatrelvir and repurposed compounds fluvoxamine and amodiaquine (preprint)

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid mobilization of resources toward the development of safe and efficacious vaccines and therapeutics. Finding effective treatments to stem the wave of infected individuals needing hospitalization and reduce the risk of adverse events was paramount. For scientists and healthcare professionals addressing this challenge, the need to rapidly identify medical countermeasures became urgent, and many compounds in clinical use for other indications were repurposed for COVID-19 clinical trials after preliminary preclinical data demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Two repurposed compounds, fluvoxamine and amodiaquine, showed efficacy in reducing SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in preclinical experiments, but ultimately failed in clinical trials, highlighting the need for improved predictive preclinical tools that can be rapidly deployed for events such as pandemic emerging infectious diseases. The PREDICT96-ALI platform is a high-throughput, high-fidelity microphysiological system (MPS) that recapitulates primary human tracheobronchial tissue and supports highly robust and reproducible viral titers of SARS-CoV-2 variants Delta and Omicron. When amodiaquine and fluvoxamine were tested in PREDICT96-ALI, neither compound demonstrated an antiviral response, consistent with clinical outcomes and in contrast with prior reports assessing the efficacy of these compounds in other human cell-based in vitro platforms. These results highlight the unique prognostic capability of the PREDICT96-ALI proximal airway MPS to assess the potential antiviral response of lead compounds.