"Research exceptionalism" in the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of scientific retractions in Scopus
Ethics & Behavior
; 33(5):339-356, 2023.
Article
Dans Anglais
| CINAHL | ID: covidwho-20242182
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to outline the profile of retractions of scientific articles on COVID-19 published in journals indexed in the Scopus database between 2020 and 2021. To analyze the data, we used a bibliometric technique, with the Bibliometrix package in the R-Studio software, and descriptive statistics. Twenty-nine retractions were analyzed, and we found that the most common reasons for retraction were related to ethical issues and that 68.97% of authors have previously retracted articles. We concluded that there appears to have been a change in the publication policies of journals, which resulted in an increase in scientific retractions related to COVID-19 during the study period.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Collection:
Bases de données des oragnisations internationales
Base de données:
CINAHL
langue:
Anglais
Revue:
Ethics & Behavior
Année:
2023
Type de document:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS