SARS-CoV-2 RNA Testing Using Different Assays-Impact on Testing Strategies in a Clinical Setting.
Int J Mol Sci
; 23(21)2022 Oct 25.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2081940
ABSTRACT
In order to assess SARS-CoV-2 real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results in a real-life setting, three independent laboratories in Graz (Austria) set up a continuous cross comparison schedule. The following test systems were used The QIAGEN NeuMoDx SARS-CoV-2 Assay, the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene) on a MicroLab Nimbus (Hamilton) platform combined with RealStar SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay (Altona Diagnostics GmbH), and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test on a fully automated cobas 6800 system (Roche). A total of 200 samples were analysed, 184 (92%) were found to be concordant with all testing platforms, 14 (7%) discordant. Two (1%) samples tested invalid on a single platform and were excluded from further analysis. Discordant results were distributed randomly across the assays. The Ct values from all assays correlated closely with each other. All discordant samples showed Ct values ≥ 26. SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR assays may show considerable variability, especially in samples with low viral RNA concentrations. Decision makers should thus balance the advantages and disadvantages of RT-qPCR for mass screening and adopt suitable strategies that ensure a rational management of positive samples with high Ct values.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
Disponível
Coleções:
Bases de dados internacionais
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
SARS-CoV-2
/
COVID-19
Tipo de estudo:
Estudo diagnóstico
/
Estudo experimental
/
Estudo prognóstico
/
Ensaios controlados aleatorizados
Limite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglês
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
País de afiliação:
Ijms232112845
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS