Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22274060

ABSTRACT

Effectiveness of sotrovimab against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was investigated in Qatar using a case-control study design at a time when BA.2 Omicron subvariant dominated incidence. Adjusted odds ratio of progression to severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19, comparing those sotrovimab-treated to those untreated, was 2.67-fold higher (95% CI: 0.60-11.91).

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267042

ABSTRACT

BackgroundWe investigated clinical outcomes of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MethodsPatients who between 23 May 2020 and 18 July 2020 received [≥]24 hours of favipiravir were assigned to the favipiravir group, while those who did not formed the non-favipiravir group. The primary outcome was 28-day clinical improvement, defined as two-category improvement from baseline on an 8-point ordinal scale. Propensity scores (PS) for favipiravir therapy were used for 1:1 matching. Cox regression was used to examine associations with the primary endpoint. ResultsThe unmatched cohort included 1,493 patients, of which 51.7% were in the favipiravir group, and 48.3% were not receiving supplemental oxygen at baseline. Favipiravir was started within a median of 5 days from symptoms onset. Significant baseline differences between the two unmatched groups existed, but not between the PS-matched groups (N = 774). After PS-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the proportion with 28-day clinical improvement (93.3% versus 92.8%, P 0.780), or 28-day all-cause mortality (2.1% versus 3.1%, P 0.360). Favipiravir was associated with more viral clearance by day 28 (79.8% versus 64.1%, P <0.001). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, favipiravir therapy was not associated 28-day clinical improvement (adjusted hazard ratio 0.978, 95% confidence interval 0.862 -1.109, P 0.726). Adverse events were common in both groups, but the 93.9% were Grades 1-3. ConclusionFavipiravir therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia is well tolerated but is not associated with an increased likelihood of clinical improvement or reduced all-cause mortality by 28 days.

3.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21256087

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveWe herein report the initial impact of a national BNT162b2 rollout on SARS-CoV-2 infections in Qatar. MethodsWe included all individuals who by 16 March 2021 had completed [≥]14 days of follow up after the receipt of BNT162b2. We calculated incidence rates (IR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), during days 1-7, 8-14, 15-21, 22-28, and >28 days post-vaccination. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR) relative to the first 7-day post-vaccination period. ResultsWe included 199,219 individuals with 6,521,124 person-days of follow up. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 1,877 (0.9%), of which 489 (26.1%) were asymptomatic and 123 (6.6%) required oxygen support. The median time from first vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 confirmation was 11.9 days (IQR 7.7-18.2). Compared with the first 7-day post-vaccination period, SARS-CoV-2 infections were lower by 65.8-84.7% during days 15-21, days 22-28, and >28 days (P <0.001 for each). For severe COVID-19, the incidence rates were 75.7- 93.3% lower (P <0.001 for each) during the corresponding time periods. ConclusionOur results are consistent with an early protective effect of BNT162b2 against all degrees of SARS-CoV-2 severity.

4.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20156349

ABSTRACT

ObjectivesCoronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly expanding global pandemic resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 patients may present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study is to conduct detailed analysis on patients with AMI and COVID-19. MethodsWe included all patients admitted with AMI and actively known or found to be COVID-19 positive by PCR between the 4th February 2020 and the 11th June 2020 in the State of Qatar. Patients were divided into ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-STE (NSTEMI). ResultsThere were 68 patients (67 men and 1 woman) admitted between the 4th of February 2020 and the 11th of June 2020 with AMI and COVID-19. The mean age was 49.1{+/-}9 years, 46 patients had STEMI and 22 had NSTEMI. 38% had diabetes mellitus, 31% had hypertension, 16% were smokers, 13% had dyslipidemia, and 14.7% had prior cardiovascular disease. Chest pain and dyspnea were the presenting symptoms in 90% and 12% of patients, respectively. Fever (15%) and cough (15%) were the most common COVID-19 symptoms, while the majority had no viral symptoms. Thirty-nine (33 STEMI and 6 NSTEMI) patients underwent coronary angiography, 38 of them had significant coronary disease. In-hospital MACE was low; 1 patient developed stroke and 2 died. ConclusionContrary to previous small reports, in-hospital adverse events were low in this largest cohort of COVID-19 patients presenting with AMI. We hypothesize patients demographics and profile including younger age contributed to these findings. Further studies are required to confirm this observation. Key questionsO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this subject?C_ST_ABSO_LICOVID-19 patients may present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). C_LI What might this study add?O_LIContrary to previous small reports, most COVID-19 patients presenting with AMI have significant obstructive coronary artery disease and favorable in-hospital outcome. C_LI How might this impact on clinical practice?O_LICOVID-19 patients presenting with AMI should be treated according to the standard practice. C_LI

5.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20154690

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThere are limited data on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes at a national level, and none after 60 days of follow up. The aim of this study was to describe national, 60-day all-cause mortality associated with COVID-19, and to identify risk factors associated with admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study including the first consecutive 5000 patients with COVID-19 in Qatar who completed 60 days of follow up by June 17, 2020. Outcomes included all-cause mortality at 60 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, and risk factors for admission to ICU. ResultsIncluded patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 28 and April 17, 2020. The majority (4436, 88.7%) were males and the median age was 35 years [interquartile range (IQR) 28- 43]. By 60 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 14 patients (0.28%) had died, 10 (0.2%) were still in hospital, and two (0.04%) were still in ICU. Fatal COVID-19 cases had a median age of 59.5 years (IQR 55.8-68), and were mostly males (13, 92.9%). All included pregnant women (26, 0.5%), children (131, 2.6%), and healthcare workers (135, 2.7%) were alive and not hospitalized at the end of follow up. A total of 1424 patients (28.5%) required hospitalization, out of which 108 (7.6%) were admitted to ICU. Most frequent co-morbidities in hospitalized adults were diabetes (23.2%), and hypertension (20.7%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that older age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.041, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.022-1.061 per year increase; P <0.001], male sex (aOR 4.375, 95% CI 1.964-9.744; P <0.001), diabetes (aOR 1.698, 95% CI 1.050-2.746; P 0.031), chronic kidney disease (aOR 3.590, 95% CI 1.596-8.079, P 0.002), and higher BMI (aOR 1.067, 95% CI 1.027-1.108 per unit increase; P 0.001), were all independently associated with increased risk of ICU admission. ConclusionsIn a relatively younger national cohort with a low co-morbidity burden, COVID-19 was associated with low all-cause mortality. Independent risk factors for ICU admission included older age, male sex, higher BMI, and co-existing diabetes or chronic kidney disease.

6.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-180764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: GeneXpert MTB/RIF is a real-time PCR assay with established diagnostic performance in pulmonary and extra-pulmonary forms of tuberculosis. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay to the management of patients with any form of active tuberculosis in a single large tertiary center in Saudi Arabia, with a special focus on the impact on time to start of antituberculous therapy compared with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smears and mycobacterial cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, radiological and laboratory records for all patients who were commenced on antituberculous therapy between March 2011 and February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included, 38.6% of which had pulmonary tuberculosis. GeneXpert MTB/RIF was requested for only 39.2% of patients and was the only reason for starting antituberculous therapy for only 12.1%. The median time to a positive GeneXpert MTB/RIF result was 0 days (IQR 3) compared with 0 day (IQR 1) for smear microscopy (P > 0.999) and 22 days (IQR 21) for mycobacterial cultures (P < 0.001). No patients discontinued antituberculous therapy because of a negative GeneXpert MTB/RIF result. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting wherein physicians are highly experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis, GeneXpert MTB/RIF was remarkably under-utilized and had only a limited impact on decisions related to starting or stopping antituberculous therapy. Cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of routine testing of all smear-negative clinical samples submitted for tuberculosis investigations by GeneXpert MTB/RIF warrant further study.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnosis , Life Change Events , Microscopy , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia , Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...