Brain imaging of pain sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

A relevant aspect in osteoarthritic pain is neural sensitization. This phenomenon involves augmented responsiveness to painful stimulation and may entail a clinically worse prognosis. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study pain sensitization in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sixty patients were recruited and pain sensitization was clinically defined on the basis of regional spreading of pain (spreading sensitization) and increased pain response to repeated stimulation (temporal summation). Functional magnetic resonance imaging testing involved assessing brain responses to both pressure and heat stimulation. Thirty-three patients (55%) showed regional pain spreading (simple sensitization) and 19 patients (32%) showed both regional spreading and temporal summation. Sensitized patients were more commonly women. Direct painful pressure stimulation of the joint (articular interline) robustly activated all of the neural elements typically involved in pain perception, but did not differentiate sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Painful pressure stimulation on the anterior tibial surface (sensitized site) evoked greater activation in sensitized patients in regions typically involved in pain and also beyond these regions, extending to the auditory, visual, and ventral sensorimotor cortices. Painful heat stimulation of the volar forearm did not discriminate the sensitization phenomenon. Results confirm the high prevalence of pain sensitization secondary to knee osteoarthritis. Relevantly, the sensitization phenomenon was associated with neural changes extending beyond strict pain-processing regions with enhancement of activity in general sensory, nonnociceptive brain areas. This effect is in contrast to the changes previously identified in primary pain sensitization in fibromyalgia patients presenting with a weakening of the general sensory integration.

Efecto del condroitín sulfato en la sinovitis de pacientes con artrosis de rodilla / Effect of chondroitin sulphate on synovitis of knee osteoarthritic patients

Objetivo: Evaluar mediante ecografía el efecto del condroitín sulfato (CS) en la sinovitis de pacientes con artrosis (OA) de rodilla, y colaborar en el conocimiento de los mecanismos bioquímicos involucrados en la inflamación sinovial. Métodos: Estudio controlado, aleatorizado, ciego simple de 70 pacientes con OA de rodilla tratados durante 6 meses con CS o paracetamol (PCT). Los pacientes fueron visitados a tiempo basal, a las 6 semanas, y a los 3 y 6 meses para valorar el estado de su OA según los siguientes parámetros: sinovitis evaluada mediante ecografía (según definición de expertos OMERACT); dolor y función, mediante la escala visual analógica y el índice de Lequesne; y concentración de mediadores inflamatorios en suero y líquido sinovial, mediante ELISA. Resultados: El tratamiento con CS redujo en un 50% el número de individuos que presentaban sinovitis; sin embargo, se observó un incremento de un 123% en el grupo tratado con PCT. En los pacientes sin sinovitis inicial, se observó el establecimiento de esta en un 85,71 y 25% de los casos tratados con PCT y CS, respectivamente. Ambas terapias mejoraron la función articular, pero únicamente el tratamiento con CS produjo una mejora significativa del dolor al final del tratamiento. Se observó una asociación entre el tratamiento con CS y los cambios en la concentración de RANTES y UCN en el líquido sinovial. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con CS tiene un efecto mantenido beneficioso, previniendo la aparición de sinovitis o disminuyendo su presencia, así como reduciendo los síntomas de la artrosis. El PCT también mejora los síntomas clínicos, pero no tiene ningún efecto sobre la inflamación. Las variaciones observadas en la concentración de RANTES y UCN podrían estar relacionadas con el efecto antiinflamatorio asociado al tratamiento con CS (AU)

Objective: To evaluate by ultrasonography the effect of chondroitin sulfate (CS) on synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). To collaborate in the understanding of the biochemical mechanisms involved in the synovial inflammation process. Methods: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial involving 70 patients with primary KOA treated for 6 months with CS or acetaminophen (ACT). Evaluation of KOA status at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months included: ultrasonography to assess synovitis (following the OMERACT expertise group definition), visual analogue scale and Lequesne index to measure pain and function, and ELISA to quantify inflammatory mediators in serum and synovial fluid. Results: Synovitis presence was reduced by 50% in the CS group while a 123% increase was observed in ACT group. Conversely, patients without initial synovitis and treated with ACT reached 85.71% synovitis onset, but only 25% in CS group. Both therapies improved articular function, but only CS resulted in significant pain improvement at the end of the treatment. Changes in RANTES and UCN synovial fluid concentration were associated with CS treatment. Conclusions: Treatment with CS had a sustained beneficial effect, preventing synovitis onset or reducing its presence as well as reducing KOA symptoms. ACT ameliorated clinical symptoms but had no effect on inflammation. The CS anti-inflammatory effect could be related to the observed changes in RANTES and UCN concentration (AU)

Efectos del condroitín sulfato sobre la respuesta cerebral a la estimulación dolorosa en pacientes con artrosis de rodilla. Estudio de resonancia magnética funcional aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado con placebo / Effects of chondroitin sulfate on brain response to painful stimulation in knee osteoarthritis patients. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Introducción: La artrosis de rodilla es causa de dolor e incapacidad funcional. Uno de los problemas para evaluar la eficacia de los analgésicos ha sido la falta de medidas objetivas de dolor, aunque la resonancia magnética funcional (RMf) ha surgido como un medio útil para objetivar la respuesta del cerebro a la estimulación dolorosa. Hemos investigado el efecto del condroitín sulfato (CS) sobre la respuesta del cerebro a la estimulación dolorosa de la rodilla en pacientes con artrosis mediante RMf. Métodos: Veintidós pacientes recibieron CS (800mg/día) y 27 placebo y fueron evaluados inicialmente y después de 4 meses de tratamiento. En cada sesión de RMf se aplicó presión dolorosa sobre la interlínea de la rodilla y en la superficie de la rótula. El resultado se cuantificó como la atenuación de la respuesta cerebral a la estimulación dolorosa de la rodilla. Resultados: La RMf de la maniobra rotuliana mostró una reducción de la activación en la región de la sustancia gris periacueductal del mesencéfalo significativamente mayor durante el tratamiento con CS que en la condición de placebo. El grupo de CS, pero no el de placebo, mostró además una reducción de la activación en la representación cortical de la pierna tras el tratamiento. No se observaron efectos del CS con presión dolorosa sobre la interlínea de la rodilla. Conclusiones: La RMf fue sensible para objetivar los efectos del CS sobre la respuesta del cerebro a la presión dolorosa sobre el cartílago rotuliano-femoral, que es un resultado coherente con la acción conocida del CS sobre la regeneración de los condrocitos. El presente trabajo muestra nuevamente la utilidad de la RMf para objetivar los efectos del tratamiento en el dolor de origen artrósico (AU)

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is causing pain and functional disability. One of the inherent problems with efficacy assessment of pain medication was the lack of objective pain measurements, but functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged as a useful means to objectify brain response to painful stimulation. We have investigated the effect of chondroitin sulfate (CS) on brain response to knee painful stimulation in patients with knee osteoarthritis using fMRI. Methods: Twenty-two patients received CS (800mg/day) and 27 patients placebo, and were assessed at baseline and after 4 months of treatment. Two fMRI tests were conducted in each session by applying painful pressure on the knee interline and on the patella surface. The outcome measurement was attenuation of the response evoked by knee painful stimulation in the brain. Results: fMRI of patella pain showed significantly greater activation reduction under CS compared with placebo in the region of the mesencephalic periaquecductal gray. The CS group, additionally showed pre/post-treatment activation reduction in the cortical representation of the leg. No effects of CS were detected using the interline pressure test. Conclusions: fMRI was sensitive to objectify CS effects on brain response to painful pressure on patellofemoral cartilage, which is consistent with the known CS action on chondrocyte regeneration. The current work yields further support to the utility of fMRI to objectify treatment effects on osteoarthritis pain (AU)

Effect of chondroitin sulphate on synovitis of knee osteoarthritic patients. / Efecto del condroitín sulfato en la sinovitis de pacientes con artrosis de rodilla.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate by ultrasonography the effect of chondroitin sulfate (CS) on synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). To collaborate in the understanding of the biochemical mechanisms involved in the synovial inflammation process. METHODS: Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial involving 70 patients with primary KOA treated for 6 months with CS or acetaminophen (ACT). Evaluation of KOA status at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months included: ultrasonography to assess synovitis (following the OMERACT expertise group definition), visual analogue scale and Lequesne index to measure pain and function, and ELISA to quantify inflammatory mediators in serum and synovial fluid. RESULTS: Synovitis presence was reduced by 50% in the CS group while a 123% increase was observed in ACT group. Conversely, patients without initial synovitis and treated with ACT reached 85.71% synovitis onset, but only 25% in CS group. Both therapies improved articular function, but only CS resulted in significant pain improvement at the end of the treatment. Changes in RANTES and UCN synovial fluid concentration were associated with CS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with CS had a sustained beneficial effect, preventing synovitis onset or reducing its presence as well as reducing KOA symptoms. ACT ameliorated clinical symptoms but had no effect on inflammation. The CS anti-inflammatory effect could be related to the observed changes in RANTES and UCN concentration.

Effects of chondroitin sulfate on brain response to painful stimulation in knee osteoarthritis patients. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging study. / Efectos del condroitín sulfato sobre la respuesta cerebral a la estimulación dolorosa en pacientes con artrosis de rodilla. Estudio de resonancia magnética funcional aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado con placebo.

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis is causing pain and functional disability. One of the inherent problems with efficacy assessment of pain medication was the lack of objective pain measurements, but functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged as a useful means to objectify brain response to painful stimulation. We have investigated the effect of chondroitin sulfate (CS) on brain response to knee painful stimulation in patients with knee osteoarthritis using fMRI. METHODS: Twenty-two patients received CS (800mg/day) and 27 patients placebo, and were assessed at baseline and after 4 months of treatment. Two fMRI tests were conducted in each session by applying painful pressure on the knee interline and on the patella surface. The outcome measurement was attenuation of the response evoked by knee painful stimulation in the brain. RESULTS: fMRI of patella pain showed significantly greater activation reduction under CS compared with placebo in the region of the mesencephalic periaquecductal gray. The CS group, additionally showed pre/post-treatment activation reduction in the cortical representation of the leg. No effects of CS were detected using the interline pressure test. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI was sensitive to objectify CS effects on brain response to painful pressure on patellofemoral cartilage, which is consistent with the known CS action on chondrocyte regeneration. The current work yields further support to the utility of fMRI to objectify treatment effects on osteoarthritis pain.

Comparative efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid and corticoid injections in osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: results of a 6-month single-masked randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid and betamethasone in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the thumb. METHODS: Eighty-eight evaluable patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the thumb (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) received ultrasound-guided intra-articular treatment with hyaluronic acid (48) or betamethasone (40). In total, 3 local injections were scheduled at 7-day intervals. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS: In both study groups, the pain Visual Analogue Scale and Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis scores decreased significantly during follow-up compared to baseline. There were no significant differences between the groups. However, at 90 days, the functional score showed a trend towards greater clinical improvement in the hyaluronic acid group (P 0.071). A subanalysis of patients with Functional Index score≥5 and Visual Analogue Scale score≥3 at baseline showed a significantly higher median functionality score in the hyaluronic acid group (P 0.005 at 90 days and P 0.020 at 180 days). Further limiting analysis to a baseline pain score≥5 showed significantly greater improvement in functionality score (P 0.004 at 180 days), which was already apparent after the second intra-articular injection at 14 days (P 0.028). In this patient subset, the mean pain score also improved significantly at 180 days (P 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Both hyaluronic acid and betamethasone were effective and well-tolerated for the management of rhizarthrosis. Hyaluronic acid was more effective over time and more efficiently improved functionality and pain in patients with more severe symptoms.

Recomendaciones para una prescripción segura de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos: documento de consenso elaborado por expertos nominados por 3 sociedades científicas (SER-SEC-AEG) / Safe prescription recommendations for non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Consensus document ellaborated by nominated experts of three scientific associations (SER-SEC-AEG)

Este artículo señala las recomendaciones claves para una adecuada prescripción de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos a pacientes que presentan indicación de tratamiento con esta medicación, en base a la evidencia científica actual y teniendo en consideración aspectos de seguridad gastrointestinal y cardiovascular. Las recomendaciones se han consensuado por expertos designados por 3 sociedades científicas (Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Asociación Española de Gastroenterología y Sociedad Española de Cardiología), siguiendo una metodología Delphi a 2 rondas. Las áreas que se han tenido en cuenta engloban: eficacia, riesgo cardiovascular, riesgo gastrointestinal, riesgo hepático, riesgo renal, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, anemia, dolor postoperatorio y estrategias de prevención. Se propone un algoritmo de manejo de pacientes que recoge los aspectos fundamentales de las recomendaciones (AU)

This article outlines key recommendations for the appropriate prescription of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to patients with different musculoskeletal problems. These recommendations are based on current scientific evidence, and takes into consideration gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety issues. The recommendations have been agreed on by experts from three scientific societies (Spanish Society of Rheumatology [SER], Spanish Association of Gastroenterology [AEG] and Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC]), following a two-round Delphi methodology. Areas that have been taken into account encompass: efficiency, cardiovascular risk, gastrointestinal risk, liver risk, renal risk, inflammatory bowel disease, anemia, post-operative pain, and prevention strategies. We propose a patient management algorithm that summarizes the main aspects of the recommendations (AU)

Recomendaciones para una prescripción segura de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos: documento de consenso elaborado por expertos nominados por 3 sociedades científicas (SER-SEC-AEG) / Safe prescription recommendations for non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Consensus document ellaborated by nominated experts of three scientific associations (SER-SEC-AEG)

Este artículo señala las recomendaciones claves para una adecuada prescripción de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos a pacientes que presentan indicación de tratamiento con esta medicación, en base a la evidencia científica actual y teniendo en consideración aspectos de seguridad gastrointestinal y cardiovascular. Las recomendaciones se han consensuado por expertos designados por 3 sociedades científicas (Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Asociación Española de Gastroenterología y Sociedad Española de Cardiología), siguiendo una metodología Delphi a 2 rondas. Las áreas que se han tenido en cuenta engloban: eficacia, riesgo cardiovascular, riesgo gastrointestinal, riesgo hepático, riesgo renal, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, anemia, dolor postoperatorio y estrategias de prevención. Se propone un algoritmo de manejo de pacientes que recoge los aspectos fundamentales de las recomendaciones

This article outlines key recommendations for the appropriate prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to patients with different musculoskeletal problems. These recommendations are based on current scientific evidence, and takes into consideration gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety issues. The recommendations have been agreed on by experts from three scientific societies (Spanish Society of Rheumatology [SER], Spanish Association of Gastroenterology [AEG] and Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC]), following a two-round Delphi methodology. Areas that have been taken into account encompass: efficiency, cardiovascular risk, gastrointestinal risk, liver risk, renal risk, inflammatory bowel disease, anemia, post-operative pain, and prevention strategies. We propose a patient management algorithm that summarizes the main aspects of the recommendations

[Safe prescription recommendations for non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Consensus document ellaborated by nominated experts of three scientific associations (SER-SEC-AEG)]. / Recomendaciones para una prescripción segura de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos: documento de consenso elaborado por expertos nominados por 3 sociedades científicas (SER-SEC-AEG).

This article outlines key recommendations for the appropriate prescription of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to patients with different musculoskeletal problems. These recommendations are based on current scientific evidence, and takes into consideration gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety issues. The recommendations have been agreed on by experts from three scientific societies (Spanish Society of Rheumatology [SER], Spanish Association of Gastroenterology [AEG] and Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC]), following a two-round Delphi methodology. Areas that have been taken into account encompass: efficiency, cardiovascular risk, gastrointestinal risk, liver risk, renal risk, inflammatory bowel disease, anemia, post-operative pain, and prevention strategies. We propose a patient management algorithm that summarizes the main aspects of the recommendations.

Safe prescription recommendations for non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: consensus document ellaborated by nominated experts of three scientific associations (SER-SEC-AEG).

This article outlines key recommendations for the appropriate prescription of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to patients with different musculoskeletal problems. These recommendations are based on current scientific evidence, and takes into consideration gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety issues. The recommendations have been agreed on by experts from three scientific societies (Spanish Society of Rheumatology [SER], Spanish Association of Gastroenterology [AEG] and Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC]), following a two-round Delphi methodology. Areas that have been taken into account encompass: efficiency, cardiovascular risk, gastrointestinal risk, liver risk, renal risk, inflammatory bowel disease, anemia, post-operative pain, and prevention strategies. We propose a patient management algorithm that summarizes the main aspects of the recommendations.

Characterization of opticin digestion by proteases involved in osteoarthritis development.

OBJECTIVE: Opticin is a class III member of the small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan (SLRP) family, produced in articular joint tissues. In normal and osteoarthritic (OA) cartilage, opticin is degraded. This study aimed to assess whether human cartilage opticin is degraded by the main proteases involved in OA pathophysiology, and to determine the protease cleavage sites of this SLRP. METHODS: We analyzed the proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-1, -2, -3, -7, -8 and -9, and ADAMTS-4 and -5 on proteoglycan extracts from normal and moderately fibrillated OA human cartilage, and on recombinant human opticin. Opticin degradation was analyzed by Western blotting and cleavage sites were determined by sequence analysis. RESULTS: All eight proteases digested opticin from proteoglycan extracts from both normal and OA samples, as well as recombinant human opticin, MMP-2 and MMP-7 are the proteases that degrade recombinant human opticin most efficiently. The opticin cleavage site determined for these MMPs was between the glycosylation and leucine-rich repeat domains. MMP-7 had two additional digestion sites near the N-terminal end of opticin. CONCLUSION: Opticin is a substrate for several MMPs and aggrecanases involved during OA cartilage degradation, and seems to be a preferential substrate for MMP-7. The role of opticin in cartilage degeneration could be related to decreased levels of intact opticin, followed by its proteolytic degradation, which in turn may stimulate some of the modifications observed in the OA cartilage, such as neovascularisation and changes in the extracellular matrix.

Evaluación económica de tramadol/paracetamol en el manejo del dolor en pacientes con osteoartrosis en España / Economic evaluation of tramadol/paracetamol in the management of pain in patients with osteoarthritis in Spain

Objetivo. Comparar el coste del tratamiento del dolor en la osteoartrosis (OA) con tramadol/paracetamol frente a los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) solos o en combinación con un inhibidor de la bomba de protones (IBP) desde el punto de vista del Sistema Nacional de Salud de España. Métodos. Se realizó un modelo analítico de decisiones que evaluó los costes derivados de las tres estrategias de tratamiento durante 6 meses. Se utilizó un análisis de minimización de costes considerando datos referentes al uso de recursos, costes farmacológicos y costes derivados del tratamiento de los acontecimientos adversos (AA) de la medicación. Resultados. En el análisis del caso base, el coste del tratamiento del dolor de la OA durante 6 meses con tramadol/paracetamol fue de 232,86 €, comparado con 274,60 € con los AINE + IBP y 133,75 € con los AINE solos. Por tanto, el tratamiento con tramadol/paracetamol produce un ahorro de 41,74 € por paciente durante 6 meses respecto a AINE + IBP y un coste adicional de 99,11 € respecto a los AINE solos. Al considerar los AA renales, tramadol/paracetamol produce un ahorro comparado con los tratamientos que contienen AINE (140,02 € respecto de los AINE solos y 280,86 € respecto de los AINE + IBP). Conclusiones. Basándose en los resultados de un modelo teórico analítico de decisiones, los datos sugieren que tramadol/paracetamol produce ahorros comparado con los AINE + IBP en el tratamiento del dolor de la OA durante 6 meses. Tramadol/paracetamol también produce ahorros comparado con los AINE solos si se consideran los AA renales (AU)

Objective. To compare the costs of treating osteoarthritis (OA) pain using combination tramadol/paracetamol tablets, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents (NSAID) alone or NSAID plus proton pump inhibitors (PPI) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Methods. A decision-analytical model was constructed to analyze the cost associated with three treatment strategies over 6 months. A cost-minimization approach was used, which considered data related to resource use, medication costs and costs for the treatment of adverse events. Results. In the base-case analysis, costs for 6 months of treatment of OA pain using tramadol/paracetamol were €232.86, compared with €274.60 for NSAID + PPI and €133.75 for NSAID alone. This provided a savings of €41.74 per patient over 6 months for tramadol/paracetamol compared with NSAID + PPI and a cost increase of €99.11 compared with NSAID alone. When renal adverse events associated with NSAID were considered, tramadol/paracetamol was cost saving compared with all NSAID-based regimens (saving €140.02 vs NSAID alone, €280.86 vs NSAID + PPI). Conclusion. Based on the results of a theoretical decision-analytic model, the data obtained may suggest that tramadol/paracetamol is cost saving compared with NSAID + PPI for the treatment of OA pain over a period of 6 months. Tramadol/paracetamol is also cost saving compared with treatment with NSAID alone if considering renal adverse events (AU)

[Economic evaluation of tramadol/paracetamol in the management of pain in patients with osteoarthritis in Spain]. / Evaluación económica de tramadol/paracetamol en el manejo del dolor en pacientes con osteoartrosis en España.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of treating osteoarthritis (OA) pain using combination tramadol/paracetamol tablets, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents (NSAID) alone or NSAID plus proton pump inhibitors (PPI) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: A decision-analytical model was constructed to analyze the cost associated with three treatment strategies over 6 months. A cost-minimization approach was used, which considered data related to resource use, medication costs and costs for the treatment of adverse events. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, costs for 6 months of treatment of OA pain using tramadol/paracetamol were €232.86, compared with €274.60 for NSAID + PPI and €133.75 for NSAID alone. This provided a savings of €41.74 per patient over 6 months for tramadol/paracetamol compared with NSAID + PPI and a cost increase of €99.11 compared with NSAID alone. When renal adverse events associated with NSAID were considered, tramadol/paracetamol was cost saving compared with all NSAID-based regimens (saving €140.02 vs NSAID alone, €280.86 vs NSAID + PPI). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of a theoretical decision-analytic model, the data obtained may suggest that tramadol/paracetamol is cost saving compared with NSAID + PPI for the treatment of OA pain over a period of 6 months. Tramadol/paracetamol is also cost saving compared with treatment with NSAID alone if considering renal adverse events.

In vivo evaluation of 3-dimensional polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage repair in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Cartilage tissue engineering using synthetic scaffolds allows maintaining mechanical integrity and withstanding stress loads in the body, as well as providing a temporary substrate to which transplanted cells can adhere. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the use of polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for the regeneration of articular cartilage in a rabbit model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Five conditions were tested to attempt cartilage repair. To compare spontaneous healing (from subchondral plate bleeding) and healing due to tissue engineering, the experiment considered the use of osteochondral defects (to allow blood flow into the defect site) alone or filled with bare PCL scaffold and the use of PCL-chondrocytes constructs in chondral defects. For the latter condition, 1 series of PCL scaffolds was seeded in vitro with rabbit chondrocytes for 7 days and the cell/scaffold constructs were transplanted into rabbits' articular defects, avoiding compromising the subchondral bone. Cell pellets and bare scaffolds were implanted as controls in a chondral defect. RESULTS: After 3 months with PCL scaffolds or cells/PCL constructs, defects were filled with white cartilaginous tissue; integration into the surrounding native cartilage was much better than control (cell pellet). The engineered constructs showed histologically good integration to the subchondral bone and surrounding cartilage with accumulation of extracellular matrix including type II collagen and glycosaminoglycan. The elastic modulus measured in the zone of the defect with the PCL/cells constructs was very similar to that of native cartilage, while that of the pellet-repaired cartilage was much smaller than native cartilage. CONCLUSION: The results are quite promising with respect to the use of PCL scaffolds as aids for the regeneration of articular cartilage using tissue engineering techniques.

Osteonecrosis vertebral y vertebroplastia percutánea / Vertebral osteonecrosis and percutaneous vertebroplasty

La osteonecrosis vertebral se caracteriza por presentar el fenómeno de vacío intravertebral. Es un proceso poco frecuente y aunque puede ser debido a diferentes afecciones, la causa más frecuente es la postraumática. La explicación de que aparezca gas intravertebral no es del todo conocida. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 74 años que después de sufrir un traumatismo vertebral inició clínica de dolor dorsolumbar intenso. El estudio radiológico simple, la tomografía computarizada y la resonancia magnética confirmaron el fenómeno del vacío intravertebral. Hemos hecho una revisión de este signo radiológico y comentamos la evolución después de vertebroplastia percutánea (AU)

Vertebral osteonecrosis is characterized by the presence of the intravertebral vacuum phenomenon. It is a relatively uncommon disease and although it may be caused by different pathologies, the most frequent cause is posttraumatic. The explanation for the presence of intravertebral gas is not known completely. We present the case of a 74-year-old patient who after suffering a vertebral traumatism, to complain of intense vertebral pain. A simple radiological study, CT scan, and magnetic resonance confirmed the presence of intravertebral vacuum phenomenon. We studied this radiological sign and then commented on its evolution after percutaneous vertebroplasty (AU)

[Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome]. / Eficacia de la gabapentina en el tratamiento del síndrome del túnel carpiano.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), as well as the electromyographic (EMG) evolution after 6 months. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective study with a 6-month follow-up of patients with EMG diagnosis of primary CTS starting treatment with 1.800 mg/day of gabapentin. At baseline visit and after 6 months of treatment a complete clinical evaluation and an EMG study were performed. Adverse effects of gabapentin were also registered. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included, mean age (standard deviation) 58.88 (7.69) years. After 6 months of treatment, a statistically significant reduction of pain (p = 0.001) and improvement of severity of symptoms (p = 0.008) were observed, although functional capacity did not change. EMG was performed in 19 patients at 6 months. Compared to baseline EMG: 52.6% patients showed no changes in EMG findings, while 5.3% patients showed improvement and in 26.3% the EMG was normal. Progression was only seen in 15.8% of patients after 6 months of treatment. In 28% of the patients gabapentin was stopped because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, gabapentin was effective in the reduction of pain and improvement of the severity of the symptoms. Results of EMG after 6 months of treatment showed no changes, with improvement and/or remission in 84.2% of the cases. The drug was safe and well tolerated.