Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Dientamoeba fragilis infection / Características clínicoepidemiológicas de las infecciones por Dientamoeba fragilis

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics of D. fragilis infection are described, with special focus on the clinical and epidemiological aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective and descriptive study was performed, including all the patients with Dientamoeba fragilis infection who attended a specialized unit between January 2012 and December 2017. PCR was used to diagnose D. fragilis. Patients were treated with metronidazole or paromomycin and reviewed at four and eight weeks post-treatment. Cure was defined as the negativization of all parasitological tests, in absence of symptoms. RESULTS: 163 patients were diagnosed. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (36.2%), chronic diarrhoea (12.3%), anal itching (10.4%), abdominal discomfort (9.2%), skin disease (8%), acute diarrhoea (4.3%) and vomiting (4.3%). Fifty patients were asymptomatic. Forty-two patients had eosinophilia in blood. Thirty-eight cases (23.3%) had a coinfection by Enterobius vermicularis. One hundred and seven patients received treatment, sixty-one of them with metronidazole and the rest with paromomycin. Ninety-nine patients (91%) were cured. The rate of cure was 100% in the paromomycin group versus 86.8% in the metronidazole group (p = 0.005; OR: 1.173 [1.057-1.302]). The absence of cure was associated with E. vermicularis coinfection (p = 0.014; OR: 6.167 [1.432-26.563] and with longer duration of the symptoms (175 [± 159SD]) versus 84 [± 88SD] days, p = 0.014) but multivariable analysis did not confirm these associations. CONCLUSION: Dientamoeba fragilis is an important and underestimated cause of gastrointestinal disease in both the autochthonous and immigrant or traveller population. More studies are needed to clarify its optimal treatment and the role played by E. vermicularis in its transmission and maintenance

INTRODUCCIÓN: Se describen las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de la infección por Dientamoeba fragilis. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo de los pacientes diagnosticados de infección por D. fragilis en una unidad especializada entre 2012-2017. El diagnóstico de D. fragilis se realizó mediante PCR. Los pacientes fueron tratados con metronidazol o paromomicina y revisados a las 4 y 8 semanas tras tratamiento. Se consideró a los pacientes curados tras negativización microbiológica en ausencia de síntomas. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 163 pacientes. Los síntomas más frecuentes fueron: dolor abdominal (36,2%), diarrea crónica (12,3%), prurito anal (10,4%), malestar abdominal (9,2%), síntomas cutáneos (8%), diarrea aguda y vómitos (4,3%, respectivamente). Cincuenta pacientes estaban asintomáticos. Cuarenta y dos pacientes presentaron eosinofilia. En 38 pacientes se observó coinfección por Enterobius vermicularis. Ciento siete pacientes recibieron tratamiento, 61 con metronidazol y el resto con paromomicina, con una curación del 91%. La tasa de curación fue del 100% en los pacientes tratados con paromomicina y del 86,8% en el grupo del metronidazol (p = 0,005; OR: 1,173 [1,057-1,302]). La no curación se asoció a la coinfección por E. vermicularis (p = 0,014; OR: 6,167 [1,432-26,563]) y con la mayor duración de los síntomas (175 [± 159 DE] versus 84 [± 88 DE] días; p = 0,014), pero el análisis multivariable no confirmó dichas asociaciones. CONCLUSIÓN: D. fragilis es causa importante y subestimada de enfermedad gastrointestinal tanto en poblaciones autóctonas como inmigrantes o viajeros. Se necesitan más estudios para aclarar su tratamiento óptimo y el papel desempeñado por E. vermicularis en su tratamiento

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Dientamoeba fragilis infection.

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics of D. fragilis infection are described, with special focus on the clinical and epidemiological aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective and descriptive study was performed, including all the patients with Dientamoeba fragilis infection who attended a specialized unit between January 2012 and December 2017. PCR was used to diagnose D. fragilis. Patients were treated with metronidazole or paromomycin and reviewed at four and eight weeks post-treatment. Cure was defined as the negativization of all parasitological tests, in absence of symptoms. RESULTS: 163 patients were diagnosed. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (36.2%), chronic diarrhoea (12.3%), anal itching (10.4%), abdominal discomfort (9.2%), skin disease (8%), acute diarrhoea (4.3%) and vomiting (4.3%). Fifty patients were asymptomatic. Forty-two patients had eosinophilia in blood. Thirty-eight cases (23.3%) had a coinfection by Enterobius vermicularis. One hundred and seven patients received treatment, sixty-one of them with metronidazole and the rest with paromomycin. Ninety-nine patients (91%) were cured. The rate of cure was 100% in the paromomycin group versus 86.8% in the metronidazole group (p=0.005; OR: 1.173 [1.057-1.302]). The absence of cure was associated with E. vermicularis coinfection (p=0.014; OR: 6.167 [1.432-26.563] and with longer duration of the symptoms (175 [±159SD]) versus 84 [±88SD] days, p=0.014) but multivariable analysis did not confirm these associations. CONCLUSION: Dientamoeba fragilis is an important and underestimated cause of gastrointestinal disease in both the autochthonous and immigrant or traveller population. More studies are needed to clarify its optimal treatment and the role played by E. vermicularis in its transmission and maintenance.

Prevalence of D. fragilis infection in the household contacts of a group of infected patients / Prevalencia de infección por D. fragilis en contactos domiciliarios de un grupo de pacientes infectados

INTRODUCTION: The results of a study on the household contacts of patients with D. fragilis infection are presented. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive study was carried out on all Dientamoeba fragilis-infected patients treated at the Tropical Medicine Unit of Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias between 2012- 2017 and their household contacts. Three stool samples per patient and three stool samples from each of their household contacts were concentrated and analysed. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the presence of D. fragilis in all stool samples. Co-infection with E. vermicularis was studied in both groups. Patients and contacts who failed to deliver one or more samples for diagnosis and patients without household contacts were excluded. RESULTS: 44 Patients infected with D. fragilis, as well as their 97 household contacts were enrolled. 50.5% of household contacts had a positive PCR for D. fragilis. 20 were also coinfected with E. vermicularis. The presence of infection was significantly more frequent in patients with children (34/15 versus 24/24; p= 0.064; OR: 2.267 [0.988-5.199]), E. vermicularis infection in the children being 20/29 versus 0/48 (p = 0.0001), and in another family member being 29/20 versus 15/33 (p = 0.008; OR: 3.190 [1.384-7.352]). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of D. fragilis infection in household contacts was high. It was associated with the presence of children in the family nucleus and coinfection with E. vermicularis irrespective of gender, age, rural area or contact with animals

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los informes de sensibilidad acumulada son una herramienta valiosa para guiar el tratamiento empírico de infecciones urinarias, sobre todo en el contexto actual de crecientes tasas de resistencia. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de bacterias aisladas de urocultivos de pacientes pediátricos durante un período de 5 años. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los urocultivos del período 2011-2015. La identificación y estudios de sensibilidad se realizaron con el sistema Vitek-2 (BioMérieux(R)) y se interpretaron según los criterios de EUCAST. Se analizaron los datos de sensibilidad antimicrobiana según sexo y tramos de edad (neonatos, 1 mes-5 años, 5-15 años) y se compararon con los datos de mayores de 15 años. RESULTADOS: En el período analizado se procesaron 17.164 urocultivos de 7.924 pacientes menores de 16 años. Los porcentajes de sensibilidad en estos pacientes fueron: ampicilina 36,3%; amoxicilina/clavulánico 75,3%; cefuroxima 83,2%; cotrimoxazol 68,9%; ciprofloxacino 85,3%; fosfomicina 85,5%; nitrofurantoína 84,4%, y cefalosporinas de tercera generación 89-91%. Aminoglucósidos (>92%) y carbapenemas (95%) mantienen las mayores tasas de sensibilidad. La prevalencia de aislamientos productores de BLEE fue significativamente menor en niños menores de 16 años (1,5% vs. 4,1%). En menores de 16 años, los aislamientos de Escherichia coli procedentes de mujeres fueron significativamente (p < 0,0001) más sensibles a ampicilina (41% vs. 30%) y amoxicilina-clavulánico (82% vs. 72%) que en varones. CONCLUSIONES: La elaboración de informes de sensibilidad acumulados desglosados por edad o sexo permite detectar importantes diferencias. En nuestra área, cefuroxima puede considerarse como primera opción de tratamiento empírico en pacientes pediátricos

Prevalence of D. fragilis infection in the household contacts of a group of infected patients.

INTRODUCTION: The results of a study on the household contacts of patients with D. fragilis infection are presented. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive study was carried out on all Dientamoeba fragilis-infected patients treated at the Tropical Medicine Unit of Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias between 2012- 2017 and their household contacts. Three stool samples per patient and three stool samples from each of their household contacts were concentrated and analysed. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the presence of D. fragilis in all stool samples. Co-infection with E. vermicularis was studied in both groups. Patients and contacts who failed to deliver one or more samples for diagnosis and patients without household contacts were excluded. RESULTS: 44 Patients infected with D. fragilis, as well as their 97 household contacts were enrolled. 50.5% of household contacts had a positive PCR for D. fragilis. 20 were also coinfected with E. vermicularis. The presence of infection was significantly more frequent in patients with children (34/15 versus 24/24; p= 0.064; OR: 2.267 [0.988-5.199]), E. vermicularis infection in the children being 20/29 versus 0/48 (p=0.0001), and in another family member being 29/20 versus 15/33 (p=0.008; OR: 3.190 [1.384-7.352]). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of D. fragilis infection in household contacts was high. It was associated with the presence of children in the family nucleus and coinfection with E. vermicularis irrespective of gender, age, rural area or contact with animals.