Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 32(6): 410-414, jun.-jul. 2009. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-60812

ABSTRACT

Los pacientes con mieloma múltiple (MM) no tienen mayor incidencia de pancreatitis aguda ni diferente etiología de ésta que la población general. Sin embargo, pueden presentar pancreatitis aguda, o hiperamilasemia o hiperlipasemia aisladas, por causas que son poco habituales sin la presencia de la enfermedad hematológica. En los pacientes con MM, la afectación hepática aparece en el 30 al 50% de los casos. Fundamentalmente se produce como infiltración difusa de predominio sinusoidal, y la aparición en forma de nódulos es menos frecuente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente que recibió un trasplante de médula ósea por MM y que presentó un cuadro compatible clínica y analíticamente con pancreatitis aguda de etiología no filiada, durante el que se identificó la presencia de múltiples lesiones hepáticas ocupantes de espacio que se diagnosticaron mediante biopsia como recidiva extramedular de mieloma (AU)


Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) do not have a higher incidence of acute pancreatitis or pancreatitis of other etiologies than the general population. However, these patients may develop acute pancreatitis, or hyperamylasemia or isolated hyperlipasemia, due to etiologies that are highly infrequent in the absence of hematological disease. Liver involvement is found in 30 50% of patients with MM and mainly manifests as diffuse sinusoidal infiltration and less frequently in the form of nodules. We report the case of a patient who underwent bone marrow transplantation due to MM who showed clinical and laboratory findings compatible with acute pancreatitis of unknown origin, during which the presence of multiple space-occupying hepatic lesions was identified. Based on the results of biopsy, a diagnosis of extramedullary recurrence of MM was established (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/surgery , Recurrence
2.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(6): 410-4, 2009.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19500877

ABSTRACT

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) do not have a higher incidence of acute pancreatitis or pancreatitis of other etiologies than the general population. However, these patients may develop acute pancreatitis, or hyperamylasemia or isolated hyperlipasemia, due to etiologies that are highly infrequent in the absence of hematological disease. Liver involvement is found in 30-50% of patients with MM and mainly manifests as diffuse sinusoidal infiltration and less frequently in the form of nodules. We report the case of a patient who underwent bone marrow transplantation due to MM who showed clinical and laboratory findings compatible with acute pancreatitis of unknown origin, during which the presence of multiple space-occupying hepatic lesions was identified. Based on the results of biopsy, a diagnosis of extramedullary recurrence of MM was established.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/secondary , Pancreatitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Adult , Amylases/blood , Humans , Lipase/blood , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Multiple Myeloma/surgery , Pancreatitis/blood , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Transplantation, Autologous , Ultrasonography
3.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 15(10): 1485-91, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19408339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of oral and intravenous iron treatment in anemic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, considering both hematological and quality-of-life outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter study in IBD patients with iron deficiency anemia. Patients having hemoglobin >10 g/dL were prescribed oral ferrous sulfate. If hemoglobin <10 g/dL, intravenous (sucrose) iron was administered. Oral iron-intolerant patients were changed to intravenous treatment. Clinical (Truelove/Harvey-Bradshaw), hematological (response defined as hemoglobin normalization), and quality-of-life (shortened CCVEII-9 questionnaire) evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: 100 IBD patients (59 Crohn's disease, 41 ulcerative colitis) were included. Mean basal hemoglobin levels were 10.8 +/- 1.3 g/dL (range, 6.6-12.9). Seventy-eight patients received oral treatment and 22 intravenous iron. Hemoglobin normalization was achieved in 86% of patients: 89% with oral, and 77% with intravenous iron. An IBD activity increase was not demonstrated in any patient. Four patients (5.1%) showed oral iron intolerance leading to discontinuation of treatment. No adverse events were reported for intravenous iron. Hemoglobin correlated with CCVEII-9 (P < 0.001). The CCVEII-9 score increased in patients who normalized hemoglobin levels in 3 months (from 58 +/- 9 to 73 +/- 10) or 6 months (54 +/- 9, 68 +/- 12, and 74 +/- 10) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Oral iron treatment is effective and well tolerated in most IBD patients, and does not exacerbate the symptoms of the underlying IBD. Intravenous iron, on the other hand, is an effective and safe alternative treatment for iron deficiency anemia in more severely anemic or intolerant patients. Anemia correction with iron treatment is associated with a relevant improvement in the patients' quality of life.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Crohn Disease/complications , Ferrous Compounds/administration & dosage , Hemoglobins/analysis , Quality of Life , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 15(8): 1190-8, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19291780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine the role of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin in the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease relapses, both in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), in a large, long-term, follow-up study. METHODS: The prospective multicenter study included CD and UC patients who had been in clinical remission for 6 months. At baseline, patients provided a single stool sample for calprotectin and lactoferrin determination. Follow-up was 12 months in patients showing no relapse and until activity flare in relapsing patients. RESULTS: In all, 163 patients (89 CD, 74 UC) were included. Twenty-six patients (16%) relapsed during follow-up. Calprotectin concentrations in patients who suffered a relapse were higher than in nonrelapsing patients (239 +/- 150 versus 136 +/- 158 microg/g; P < 0.001). Relapse risk was higher in patients having high (>150 microg/g) calprotectin concentrations (30% versus 7.8%; P < 0.001) or positive lactoferrin (25% versus 10%; P < 0.05). Fecal calprotectin (>150 microg/g) sensitivity and specificity to predict relapse were 69% and 69%, respectively. Corresponding values for lactoferrin were 62% and 65%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict relapse using calprotectin determination was 0.73 (0.69 for UC and 0.77 for CD). Better results were obtained when only colonic CD disease or only relapses during the first 3 months were considered (100% sensitivity). High fecal calprotectin levels or lactoferrin positivity was associated with clinical relapse in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and both fecal tests were associated with relapse in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin determination may be useful in predicting impending clinical relapse-especially during the following 3 months-in both CD and UC patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Feces/chemistry , Lactoferrin/analysis , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/analysis , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Colitis, Ulcerative/metabolism , Crohn Disease/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Remission Induction
5.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 55(86-87): 1609-14, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19102352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Results of randomized controlled trials showing efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis (UC) should be confirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in UC patients of the Madrid area, looking for clinical predictors of response. METHODOLOGY: Multicenter retrospective survey of all UC patients treated with infliximab in the region of Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: 47 UC patients were included (45% males, mean age 44 +/- 15 yrs), mean follow up of 4.7 months (range 0.5-21), and a total number of 211 infliximab infusions. Clinical response and steroid-free remission rates were, respectively, 97/42% in the 2nd week, 93/69% in the 6th week, and 80/65% at the long-term follow up (mean 8.2 months, range 3.5-21). Colectomy rate was 10.6% (five patients). Age, gender, disease duration, indication (steroid-resistance/dependence), disease severity, C-reactive protein, concomitant thiopurinic therapy or smoking habit did not influence on efficacy. Extent of the disease was the only predictive factor (p=0.02). Only 4 cases of mild adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective and safe for UC. Real life clinical practice may have better outcome than showed in randomized controlled trials. Extent of the disease was the only predictive factor for clinical response in our experience.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infliximab , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies
6.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(7): 421-6, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18783686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease (CD) showed by randomized controlled trials must be confirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of infliximab in CD patients of the Madrid area, looking for clinical predictors of response. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with infliximab in 8 University hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain) with a minimum follow up of 14 wks. RESULTS: 169 patients included (48%males, mean age 39 +/- 12 yrs). 64% of them had perianal disease. 82% were under immunosuppressants. 1,355 infliximab infusions administered (mean 8, range 1-30). 90% response rate and 48% remission rate were obtained with induction therapy. 73% followed maintenance treatment, and 78% of them maintained or improved the response after a mean follow up of 28 months (range 3.5-86). 24 patients lost response during the follow up, after a mean of 41 wks (range 6-248). Only the prescription of maintenance therapy was predictive factor for favourable response (p < 0.01). 17 infusion reactions were reported (10% of the patients, 1.2% of the infusions; only one case was severe) and were the cause of treatment withdrawal in 7 patients. Co-treatment with immunosuppressive drugs and maintenance infliximab therapy were protective factors for infusion reactions (p < 0.05). Other adverse events occurred in 26% of the patients, and were cause of treatment withdrawal in 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective and safe for CD management but concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and maintenance treatment should be prescribed to obtain the best outcome. That confirms in a real life clinical setting the favourable results obtained in randomized clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infliximab , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
7.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 31(7): 421-426, ago. 2008. tab
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-70196

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: La eficacia de infliximab en la enfermedad deCrohn (EC), demostrada por los diferentes ensayos clínicos,ha de ser confirmada en la práctica clínica. Nuestro objetivofue evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad del infliximab en pacientescon EC del área de Madrid, buscando predictores derespuesta.MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico que incluyelos pacientes con EC tratados con infliximab en 8 hospitalesde la Comunidad de Madrid, con un seguimiento mínimo de14 semanas.RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a un total de 169 pacientes (un 48%varones, con una edad de 39 ± 12 años), un 64% con enfermedadperianal y un 82% bajo tratamiento inmunosupresor.Se administraron un total de 1.355 perfusiones de infliximab(media, 8; rango, 1-30): un 90% de los pacientesrespondió, un 48% alcanzó la remisión clínica, un 73% siguiótratamiento de mantenimiento, y un 78% mantuvo omejoró su respuesta tras un seguimiento medio de 28 meses(rango, 3,5-86). Se perdió la respuesta durante el seguimientode 24 pacientes, tras una media de 41 semanas (rango, 6-248). Sólo la prescripción de tratamiento de mantenimientofue un predictor favorable de respuesta (p < 0,01); se contabilizaron 17 reacciones infusionales (en el 10% de los pacientes,el 1,2% de las perfusiones; sólo se constató un casograve) y fueron causa de la suspensión del tratamiento en 7pacientes. El cotratamiento con los inmunosupresores y eltratamiento de mantenimiento con infliximab fueron los factoresprotectores para sufrir reacciones infusionales (p <0,05). Otros efectos adversos se produjeron en el 26% de lospacientes, y fueron causa de suspensión del tratamiento en 7pacientes.CONCLUSIONES: Infliximab es eficaz y seguro en el tratamientode la EC, pero deberían prescribirse el tratamientode mantenimiento y el concomitante con inmunosupresorespara obtener los mejores resultados. Esto confirma en un escenariode práctica clínica real los resultados obtenidos enensayos clínicos


BACKGROUND: Efficacy of infliximab in Crohn’s disease(CD) showed by randomized controlled trials must beconfirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate efficacyand safety of infliximab in CD patients of the Madrid area,looking for clinical predictors of response.METHODS: Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patientstreated with infliximab in 8 University hospitals of theMadrid area (Spain) with a minimum follow up of 14wks.RESULTS: 169 patients included (48%males, mean age 39 ±12 yrs). 64% of them had perianal disease. 82% were underimmunosuppressants. 1355 infliximab infusions administered(mean 8, range 1-30). 90% response rate and 48%remission rate were obtained with induction therapy. 73%followed maintenance treatment, and 78% of them maintainedor improved the response after a mean follow up of 28months (range 3.5-86). 24 patients lost response during thefollow up, after a mean of 41wks (range 6-248). Only theprescription of maintenance therapy was predictive factorfor favourable response (p < 0.01). 17 infusion reactionswere reported (10% of the patients, 1.2% of the infusions;only one case was severe) and were the cause of treatmentwithdrawal in 7 patients. Co-treatment with immunosuppressivedrugs and maintenance infliximab therapy wereprotective factors for infusion reactions (p < 0.05). Other adverseevents occurred in 26% of the patients, and were causeof treatment withdrawal in 7 patients.CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective and safe for CD managementbut concomitant immunosuppressive drugs andmaintenance treatment should be prescribed to obtain thebest outcome. That confirms in a real life clinical setting the favourable results obtained in randomized clinical trials (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Retrospective Studies , Efficacy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
8.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 103(1): 71-6, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17764498

ABSTRACT

AIM: Quadruple therapy is generally recommended as second-line therapy after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. However, this regimen requires the administration of four drugs with a complex scheme, is associated with a relatively high incidence of adverse effects, and bismuth salts are not available worldwide anymore. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a triple second-line levofloxacin-based regimen in patients with H. pylori eradication failure. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. PATIENTS: in whom a first treatment with proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin had failed. INTERVENTION: A second eradication regimen with levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) was prescribed for 10 days. OUTCOME: Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 wk after therapy. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interview and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by means of a specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Three hundred consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 48 yr, 47% were male, 38% had peptic ulcer, and 62% functional dyspepsia. Almost all (97%) patients took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 81% (95% CI 77-86%) and 77% (73-82%). Adverse effects were reported in 22% of the patients, mainly including nausea (8%), metallic taste (5%), abdominal pain (3%), and myalgias (3%); none of them were severe. CONCLUSION: Ten-day levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, being simple and safe.


Subject(s)
Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Levofloxacin , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Breath Tests , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Mucosa/microbiology , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Failure , Urea/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...