Quality of life after whole brain radiotherapy compared with radiosurgery of the tumor bed: results from a randomized trial

Background. A recent randomized trial (NCT01535209) demonstrated no difference in neurocognitive function between stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with resected single brain metastasis. Patients treated with SRT-TB had lower overall survival compared with the WBRT arm. Here, we compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who received WBRT vs. SRT-TB. Methods. A self-reported questionnaire was used to assess HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 with the QLQ-BN20 module) before RT, 2 months after RT, and every 3 months thereafter. HRQOL results are presented as mean scores and compared between groups. Results. Of 59 randomized patients, 37 (64%) were eligible for HRQOL analysis, 15 received SRT-TB, and 22 had WBRT. There were no differences between groups in global health status and main function scales/symptoms (except for drowsiness and appetite loss, which were worse with WBRT 2 months after RT). Global health status decreased 2 and 5 months after RT, but significantly only for SRT-TB (p = 0.025). Physical function decreased significantly 5 months after SRT-TB (p = 0.008). Future uncertainty worsened after RT, but significantly only for SRT-TB after 2 months (p = 0.036). Patients treated with WBRT had significant worsening of appetite, hair loss, and drowsiness after treatment. Conclusions. Despite higher symptom burden after WBRT attributed to the side effects of RT (such as appetite loss, drowsiness, and hair loss), global health status, physical functioning, and future uncertainty favored WBRT compared with SRT-TB. This may be related to the compromised brain tumor control with omission of WBRT (AU)

No disponible

Quality of life after whole brain radiotherapy compared with radiosurgery of the tumor bed: results from a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial (NCT01535209) demonstrated no difference in neurocognitive function between stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with resected single brain metastasis. Patients treated with SRT-TB had lower overall survival compared with the WBRT arm. Here, we compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who received WBRT vs. SRT-TB. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire was used to assess HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 with the QLQ-BN20 module) before RT, 2 months after RT, and every 3 months thereafter. HRQOL results are presented as mean scores and compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 59 randomized patients, 37 (64%) were eligible for HRQOL analysis, 15 received SRT-TB, and 22 had WBRT. There were no differences between groups in global health status and main function scales/symptoms (except for drowsiness and appetite loss, which were worse with WBRT 2 months after RT). Global health status decreased 2 and 5 months after RT, but significantly only for SRT-TB (p = 0.025). Physical function decreased significantly 5 months after SRT-TB (p = 0.008). Future uncertainty worsened after RT, but significantly only for SRT-TB after 2 months (p = 0.036). Patients treated with WBRT had significant worsening of appetite, hair loss, and drowsiness after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher symptom burden after WBRT attributed to the side effects of RT (such as appetite loss, drowsiness, and hair loss), global health status, physical functioning, and future uncertainty favored WBRT compared with SRT-TB. This may be related to the compromised brain tumor control with omission of WBRT.

Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in local control are required when using preoperative chemoradiation for cT4 or advanced cT3 rectal cancer. There is therefore a need to explore more effective schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with fixed cT3 or cT4 cancer were randomized either to 5 × 5 Gy and three cycles of FOLFOX4 (group A) or to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions combined with two 5-day cycles of bolus 5-Fu 325 mg/m(2)/day and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2)/day during the first and fifth week of irradiation along with five infusions of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (group B). The protocol was amended in 2012 to allow oxaliplatin to be then foregone in both groups. RESULTS: Of 541 entered patients, 515 were eligible for analysis; 261 in group A and 254 in group B. Preoperative treatment acute toxicity was lower in group A than group B, P = 0.006; any toxicity being, respectively, 75% versus 83%, grade III-IV 23% versus 21% and toxic deaths 1% versus 3%. R0 resection rates (primary end point) and pathological complete response rates in groups A and B were, respectively, 77% versus 71%, P = 0.07, and 16% versus 12%, P = 0.17. The median follow-up was 35 months. At 3 years, the rates of overall survival and disease-free survival in groups A and B were, respectively, 73% versus 65%, P = 0.046, and 53% versus 52%, P = 0.85, together with the cumulative incidence of local failure and distant metastases being, respectively, 22% versus 21%, P = 0.82, and 30% versus 27%, P = 0.26. Postoperative and late complications rates in group A and group B were, respectively, 29% versus 25%, P = 0.18, and 20% versus 22%, P = 0.54. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in local efficacy between 5 × 5 Gy with consolidation chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiation. Nevertheless, an improved overall survival and lower acute toxicity favours the 5 × 5 Gy schedule with consolidation chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: The trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00833131.