Muscle health in Hispanic women. REDLINC VIII.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate muscle strength and related factors in Hispanic women.Methods: We studied 593 women between 40 and 89 years old. The women were asked about personal and clinical information. The following instruments were applied: dynamometer (strength), Short Physical Performance Battery (physical performance), SARC-F (sarcopenia), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (physical activity), Menopause Rating Scale (quality of life), 36-item Short Form (general health), and Frailty (Fried's criteria).Results: Low muscle strength rises from 7.1% of women in their 40s to 79.4% in their 80s. Physical performance is low in 0.5% of the first group and rises to 60.5% in the second. The risk of sarcopenia increases significantly from 6.7% in younger women to 58.1% in older women. Frailty, which affects less than 1% of women under age 60 years, increases to 39.5% in their 80s. Sedentary lifestyle rises from 26% to 68.3%. Fragility impairs the quality of life and the perception of health (p < 0.0001). The deterioration of different tests of muscle function is significantly associated with age >70 years (OR 5-20) and with osteoarthritis (OR 4-9). Menopause before the age of 45 years increases the risk of sarcopenia (odds ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.0).Conclusion: With aging there is a decrease in muscle strength and an increase in frailty. This entails a decrease in the quality of life.

Does the menopausal status of female gynecologists affect their prescription of menopausal hormone therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether menopausal status and symptoms among female gynecologists would influence their clinical behavior related to menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). METHODS: Female gynecologists of 11 Latin American countries were requested to fill out the Menopause Rating Scale and a questionnaire containing personal information and that related to MHT use. RESULTS: A total of 818 gynecologists accepted to participate (86.4%). Overall, the mean age was 45.0 ± 10.7 years, 32.2% were postmenopausal, and 17.6% worked in an academic position; 81.8% reported that they would use MHT if they have symptoms, regardless of menopausal status. Academic gynecologists favor personal MHT use at a higher rate (p = 0.04) and have a higher MHT prescription rate as compared to non-academic ones (p = 0.0001). The same trend was observed among post- as compared to premenopausal ones (p = 0.01) and among those who had hysterectomy alone as compared to those experiencing natural menopause (p = 0.002). The presence of menopausal symptoms did not influence their MHT prescription. Current use of MHT and alternative therapy was higher among post- than premenopausal gynecologists (both, p = 0.0001) and among those who had undergone hysterectomy than those experiencing natural menopause. A 38.5% perceived breast cancer as the main risk related to MHT, and a high proportion prescribed non-hormonal drugs (86.4%) or alternative therapies (84.5%). CONCLUSION: Most female gynecologists in this survey would use MHT if menopausal symptoms were present. Postmenopausal physicians use MHT and prescribe it to their symptomatic patients at a higher rate than premenopausal physicians.

Menopausal symptoms appear before the menopause and persist 5 years beyond: a detailed analysis of a multinational study.

OBJECTIVE: Few Latin American studies have described menopausal symptoms in detail by means of a standardized assessment tool. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of menopausal symptoms and their impact over quality of life among mid-aged Latin American women. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, 8373 otherwise healthy women aged 40-59 years from 12 Latin American countries were asked to fill out the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) and a questionnaire containing personal sociodemographic data. Menopause status (pre-, peri- and postmenopausal) was defined according to the criteria of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop. RESULTS: Of all the studied women, 90.9% had at least one menopausal symptom (complaint) that they rated. Muscle and joint discomfort, physical and mental exhaustion and depressive mood were highly prevalent and rated as severe-very severe (scores of 3 and 4), at a higher rate than vasomotor symptoms (15.6%, 13.8% and 13.7% vs. 9.6%, respectively). Of premenopausal women (40-44 years), 77.0% reported at least one rated complaint, with 12.9% displaying MRS scores defined as severe (> 16). The latter rate increased to 26.4% in perimenopausal, 31.6% in early postmenopausal and 29.9% among late postmenopausal women. As measured with the MRS, the presence of hot flushes increased the risk of impairment of overall quality of life in both premenopausal (odds ratio 12.67; 95% confidence interval 9.53-16.83) and peri/postmenopausal women (odds ratio 9.37; 95% confidence interval 7.85-11.19). CONCLUSION: In this large, mid-aged, female Latin American series, muscle/joint discomfort and psychological symptoms were the most prevalent and severely rated menopausal symptoms. The symptoms appear early in the premenopause, significantly impair quality of life and persist 5 years beyond the menopause.

The US National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III): prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Latin American women.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (METS) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Since the prevalence of METS increases after menopause, gynecological routine consultation offers an excellent screening opportunity. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of METS in Latin American postmenopausal women and factors modifying its risk; as well as to assess the role of simple routine care measurements in the diagnosis of the METS. METHODS: A total of 3965 postmenopausal women, aged 45-64 years, seeking health care at 12 gynecological centers in major Latin American cities were included in this cross-sectional study. The US National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) guidelines were applied to assess METS. This was present if three or more of the following conditions were present: waist circumference > or = 88 cm; blood pressure > or = 130/85 mmHg; fasting plasma triglycerides > or = 150 mg/dl; high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 50 mg/dl; glucose > or = 110 mg/dl or subjects were receiving treatment for their condition. RESULTS: The prevalences of having at least two, three, four or five components were 62.5, 35.1, 13.5 and 3.2%, respectively. The prevalence increased from 28.1% in those aged 40-44 years to 42.9% in those aged 60-64 years. The risk of METS detection (multivariate analysis) increased with age (odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.43), time elapsed since menopause (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.38), smoking cigarettes (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19-1.65), obesity (OR 13.01, 95% CI 10.93-15.49) and hypertension (OR 9.30, 95% CI 7.91-10.94). In contrast, hormone therapy reduces this risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.70). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Latin American women seeking gynecologic health care. Age, years since menopause, obesity and hypertension are strong predictors of this condition.