Association of serum soluble Fas concentrations and mortality of septic patients.

INTRODUCTION: Scarce data on Fas, one of the main receptors that activates the apoptosis extrinsic pathway, in septic patients exists. Higher blood soluble Fas (sFas) concentrations in non-survivor septic patients compared with survivors have been found in small studies; however, the association of blood sFas concentrations with mortality controlling for sepsis severity has not been stablished due to this small sample size in those studies. Thus, our main objective study was to determine whether an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists. METHODS: We included septic patients in this observational and prospective study carried out in three Spanish Intensive Care Units. We obtained serum samples at sepsis diagnosis sepsis for sFas levels determination. RESULTS: Thirty-day non-surviving patients (n=85) compared to surviving patients (n=151) had higher serum sFas levels (p<0.001). We found in multiple logistic regression analysis an association of serum sFas levels with mortality controlling for age and SOFA (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002-1.006; p<0.001), and for age and APACHE-II (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002-1.006; p<0.001). Serum sFas levels showed and area under the curve for mortality prediction of 71% (95% CI=65-71%; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher mortality rate in patients with serum sFas levels>83.5ng/mL (Hazard ratio=3.2; 95% CI=2.1-5.0; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: That an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists was our main new finding study.

Association of serum soluble Fas concentrations and mortality of septic patients / Asociación de concentraciones séricas de soluble Fas y mortalidad de pacientes sépticos

Introduction: Scarce data on Fas, one of the main receptors that activates the apoptosis extrinsic pathway, in septic patients exists. Higher blood soluble Fas (sFas) concentrations in non-survivor septic patients compared with survivors have been found in small studies; however, the association of blood sFas concentrations with mortality controlling for sepsis severity has not been stablished due to this small sample size in those studies. Thus, our main objective study was to determine whether an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists. Methods: We included septic patients in this observational and prospective study carried out in three Spanish Intensive Care Units. We obtained serum samples at sepsis diagnosis sepsis for sFas levels determination. Results: Thirty-day non-surviving patients (n=85) compared to surviving patients (n=151) had higher serum sFas levels (p<0.001). We found in multiple logistic regression analysis an association of serum sFas levels with mortality controlling for age and SOFA (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002–1.006; p<0.001), and for age and APACHE-II (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002–1.006; p<0.001). Serum sFas levels showed and area under the curve for mortality prediction of 71% (95% CI=65–71%; p<0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed higher mortality rate in patients with serum sFas levels>83.5ng/mL (Hazard ratio=3.2; 95% CI=2.1–5.0; p<0.001). Conclusions: That an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists was our main new finding study.(AU)

Introducción: Existen pocos datos sobre Fas, uno de los principales receptores que activan la vía extrínseca de la apoptosis, en pacientes septicos. En estudios de pequeño tamaño muestral se han encontrado altas concentraciones sanguíneas de soluble Fas (sFas) en pacientes sépticos fallecidos en comparación con supervivientes; sin embargo, no ha sido establecida la asociación de concentraciones sanguíneas de sFas con mortalidad controlando por la gravedad de la sepsis. Por lo tanto, el principal objetivo de nuestro estudio fue determinar si existe una asociación entre concentraciones sanguíneas de sFas y la mortalidad en sepsis controlando por la gravedad. Métodos: Incluímos pacientes sépticos en este estudio observacional y prospectivo realizado en tres Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos españolas. Obtuvimos muestras de suero en el momento del diagnóstico de la sepsis para la determinación de concentraciones de sFas. Resultados: Los pacientes fallecidos durante los primeros treinta días (n=85) comparados con los supervivientes (n=151) tuvieron mayores concentraciones séricas de sFas (p<0,001). Se encontró una asociación de concentraciones séricas de sFas con mortalidad controlando por edad y SOFA (OR=1,004; 95% IC=1,002-1,006; p < 0,001), y por edad y APACHE-II (OR=1,004; 95% IC=1,002-1,006; p < 0,001). Las concentraciones séricas de sFas mostraron un área bajo la curva para la predicción de mortalidad del 71% (IC 95%=65%-71%; p < 0,001). El análisis Kaplan-Meier mostró una mayor mortalidad en los pacientes con concentraciones séricas de sFas > 83,5 ng/mL (Hazard ratio=3,2; 95% IC=2,1-5,0; p < 0,001). Conclusiones: La asociación entre concentraciones sanguíneas de sFas y la mortalidad en sepsis controlando por la gravedad fue el principal nuevo hallazgo de nuestro estudio.(AU)

Association of cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers with outcomes in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic acute brain injury: systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Acute brain injuries are associated with high mortality rates and poor long-term functional outcomes. Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in patients with acute brain injuries may help elucidate some of the pathophysiological pathways involved in the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic search and descriptive review using the MEDLINE database and the PubMed interface from inception up to June 29, 2021, to retrieve observational studies in which the relationship between CSF concentrations of protein biomarkers and neurological outcomes was reported in patients with acute brain injury [traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, status epilepticus or post-cardiac arrest]. We classified the studies according to whether or not biomarker concentrations were associated with neurological outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. RESULTS: Of the 39 studies that met our criteria, 30 reported that the biomarker concentration was associated with neurological outcome and 9 reported no association. In TBI, increased extracellular concentrations of biomarkers related to neuronal cytoskeletal disruption, apoptosis and inflammation were associated with the severity of acute brain injury, early mortality and worse long-term functional outcome. Reduced concentrations of protein biomarkers related to impaired redox function were associated with increased risk of neurological deficit. In non-traumatic acute brain injury, concentrations of CSF protein biomarkers related to dysregulated inflammation and apoptosis were associated with a greater risk of vasospasm and a larger volume of brain ischemia. There was a high risk of bias across the studies. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute brain injury, altered CSF concentrations of protein biomarkers related to cytoskeletal damage, inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress may be predictive of worse neurological outcomes.

Association of serum soluble Fas concentrations and mortality of septic patients.

INTRODUCTION: Scarce data on Fas, one of the main receptors that activates the apoptosis extrinsic pathway, in septic patients exists. Higher blood soluble Fas (sFas) concentrations in non-survivor septic patients compared with survivors have been found in small studies; however, the association of blood sFas concentrations with mortality controlling for sepsis severity has not been stablished due to this small sample size in those studies. Thus, our main objective study was to determine whether an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists. METHODS: We included septic patients in this observational and prospective study carried out in three Spanish Intensive Care Units. We obtained serum samples at sepsis diagnosis sepsis for sFas levels determination. RESULTS: Thirty-day non-surviving patients (n=85) compared to surviving patients (n=151) had higher serum sFas levels (p<0.001). We found in multiple logistic regression analysis an association of serum sFas levels with mortality controlling for age and SOFA (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002-1.006; p<0.001), and for age and APACHE-II (OR=1.004; 95% CI=1.002-1.006; p<0.001). Serum sFas levels showed and area under the curve for mortality prediction of 71% (95% CI=65-71%; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher mortality rate in patients with serum sFas levels>83.5ng/mL (Hazard ratio=3.2; 95% CI=2.1-5.0; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: That an association between blood sFas concentrations and sepsis mortality controlling for sepsis severity exists was our main new finding study.

Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound in the screening of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal ultrasound (US) may provide data on the presence of esophageal varices in cirrhosis. We assess the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective recording of clinical data was carried out in cirrhotic patients who underwent abdominal US and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We compared patients with and without large varices and assessed the value of US in predicting the presence of these lesions as well as other significant variables. RESULTS: Of the 353 patients included, 123 (35%) had esophageal varices. The presence of US signs of portal hypertension independently predicted the existence of esophageal varices with a sensitivity of 87.9%, a specificity of 34.9%, a positive predictive value of 40.6%, and a negative predictive value of 85.1%, which could increase to 91.5% if the patient presented plasma albumin and platelet concentrations above the mean values (3.1 g/dl and 122×10 cells/l, respectively). Plasma albumin and platelet concentrations were the two other variables with independent predictive capacity. Applying these selection criteria, up to 30% of screening endoscopies may not be necessary, and up to 43% in patients with compensated cirrhosis. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, however, US does not have predictive capacity. The results obtained are comparable with those reported for transient elastography. CONCLUSION: Abdominal US is a highly reliable technique for detecting patients with a low risk of presenting esophageal varices. Its use may avoid up to 43% of screening endoscopies in patients with compensated cirrhosis. The results obtained are similar to those observed using transient elastography.