Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971685

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The National Palliative Care and Interventional Radiotherapy Study Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) carried out a survey whose aim was to obtain a "snapshot" of the real-world practice of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatments in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey was conducted on SurveyMonkey's online interface and was sent via e-mail to our society Radiation Oncologists. RESULTS: Fifty-eight Italian radiation oncologists (ROs), representing 54 centers, answered the survey. Thirteen percent of the ROs declared they treat fewer than 10 NMSC lesions annually, 36% treat between 11 and 20, and 51% treat more than 20 lesions annually. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT) was offered by 25% of the ROs, and every case was reportedly discussed by a multidisciplinary team (71%). Electrons (74%), volumetric modulated arc therapy (V-MAT) (57%), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (43%), and IRT (26%) were the main treatment options. With external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 46 and 53 different RT schedules were treated for curative and palliative intent, respectively; whereas for IRT, there were 21 and 7 for curative and palliative intent, respectively. The most popular EBRT curative options were 50-70.95/22-35 fractions (fx) and 50-70 Gy/16-20fx and for EBRT palliative settings, 30Gy/10fx, and 20-35Gy/5fx. For IRT, the most popular curative options were 32-50Gy/8-10fx and 30-54Gy/3-5fx, whereas 30Gy/6fz was the palliative option. Less than 10 re-RT cases were reported in one year in 42.5%, 11-20 cases in 42.5%, and >20 cases annually in 15%. Electrons (61%), VMAT (49%), and BRT (25%) were the most widely used approaches: 20-40Gy in 10fx and 20-25Gy in 5fx were the recommended fractionations. CONCLUSION: The survey shows a variegated reality. A national registry with more detailed data could help in undercover its causes.

2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(9): 4175-4184, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37203844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report a monoinstitutional multidisciplinary experience about the use of multiparametric imaging to identify the areas with higher risk of relapse in localized prostate cancer, with the purpose of allowing a biologically planned target dose escalation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who received treatments at our Interventional Oncology Center with interstitial interventional radiotherapy from 2014 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer; and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk class unfavorable intermediate or high/very high risk. The diagnostic work-up included multiparametric Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multiparametric Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET-CT) with choline or PSMA (or alternatively bone scan). All patients were assessed and received one treatment with interstitial high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) delivering external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy). All procedures were performed using transrectal ultrasound guidance under general anesthesia and the prescribed doses were 10 Gy to the whole prostate, 12 Gy to the peripheral zone and 15 Gy to the areas at risk. RESULTS: We report the data of 21 patients who were considered for the statistical analysis with a mean age of 62.5 years. The mean PSA nadir was 0.03 ng/ml (range 0-0.09). So far, no biochemical nor radiological recurrences have been recorded in our series. Regarding acute toxicity, the most commonly reported side effects were G1 urinary in 28.5% of patients and G2 urinary in 9.5%; all recorded acute toxicities resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: We present a real-life experience of biologically planned local dose escalation by interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) boost, followed by external beam radiotherapy in patients with intermediate unfavorable- or high/very high risk. The local control and the biochemical control rates are proved to be excellent and the toxicity profile tolerable.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Brachytherapy/methods , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage
3.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 35(8): e445-e452, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36792447

ABSTRACT

Uveal melanoma represents the most common intraocular neoplasia among adults. Brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy; IRT) has a great advantage, when compared with enucleation, both in terms of organ and function sparing. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study introduced into clinical practice a standardised procedure that allowed the equivalence of IRT with enucleation in terms of overall survival to be demonstrated. IRT is carried out by placing a plaque in direct contact with the sclera under the uveal melanoma. Several radioactive sources may be used, including 106-ruthenium, 125-iodine, 103-palladium and 90-strontium. It is a multidisciplinary procedure requiring the collaboration of interventional radiation oncologists and ophthalmologists in the operating theatre and medical physicists for an accurate treatment time calculation. It also relies on ultrasound imaging to identify the lesion and verifiy the correct plaque placement. An emerging tool of paramount importance could be the use of artificial intelligence and predictive models to identify those patients at higher risk of developing late side-effects and therefore who may deserve preventive and supportive therapies.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Uveal Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Brachytherapy/methods , Artificial Intelligence , Retrospective Studies , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology
5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(8): 2891-2899, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35503635

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to find a contrast-enhanced CT-radiomic signature to predict clinical incomplete response in patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent locoregional treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 190 patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma treated using focal therapies (radiofrequency or microwave ablation) from September 2018 to October 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment response was evaluated on a per-target-nodule basis on the 6-months follow-up contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging using the mRECIST criteria. Radiomics analysis was performed using an in-house developed open-source R library. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied for univariate analysis; features with a p-value lower than 0.05 were selected. Pearson correlation was applied to discard highly correlated features (cut-off=0.9). The remaining features were included in a logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic curves; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were also computed. The model was validated performing 2000 bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: 56 treated lesions from 42 patients were selected. Treatment responses were: complete response for 26 lesions (46.4%), 18 partial responses (32.1%), 10 stable diseases (17.9%), 2 progression diseases (3.6%). Area-Under-Curve value was 0.667 (95% CI: 0.527-0.806); accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 0.66, 0.85, 0.50, 0.59 and 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: This contrast-enhanced CT-based model can be helpful to early identify poor responder's hepatocellular carcinoma patients and personalize treatments.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
6.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(5): 1695-1700, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Eccrine porocarcinoma (EPC) is a malignant adnexal tumor accounting for about 0.005% of skin tumors. The standard treatment of EPC is the complete surgical excision of the primary lesion and of the clinically involved lymph nodes. There is limited evidence regarding the role of radiotherapy (RT) in managing EPC after surgery. Therefore, the aim of this multidisciplinary systematic review is to analyze the available evidence about postoperative RT in the curative treatment of EPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search strategy was launched trough the main scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane. An additional manual search and a chain citation were performed about potentially relevant papers. The key words used for the search included "eccrine porocarcinoma", "porocarcinoma", "radiotherapy", "radiation therapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "postoperative radiotherapy". RESULTS: A total of 104 publications were identified and 14 papers were included in the final analysis. The only articles found on adjuvant RT in EPC were case reports published between 1996 and 2019. There was a slight female prevalence (57% female/43% male) with a mean age of 65 years (range 37-85). Head-and-neck region was the most frequently involved anatomical site followed by legs. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical removal of EPC could be considered in cases with positive or close margins and in cases with unfavorable histological features. In view of limited literature data and the rarity of EPC the best treatment sequence should always be discussed within the frame of a multidisciplinary setting. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical removal of EPC could be considered in cases with positive or close margins and in cases with unfavorable histological features.


Subject(s)
Eccrine Porocarcinoma , Sweat Gland Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Eccrine Porocarcinoma/pathology , Eccrine Porocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Eccrine Porocarcinoma/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Sweat Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Sweat Gland Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sweat Gland Neoplasms/surgery
7.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(23): 7272-7274, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919226

ABSTRACT

The possible role of evolutionary game theory (EGT), to pursue a tailored therapeutic strategy, has recently gained widespread interest within the clinical setting of oncological patients. The potentially revolutionary shift of paradigm suggested by EGT points to the fact that, for metastatic patients, the optimal therapeutic strategy should be aimed at reducing the survival fitness of tumor cells compared with normal cells, thus allowing natural selection to help control the overall tumor burden, instead of trying to kill all tumor cells. A specific subset of metastatic patients, the so-called oligometastatic patients, has not been adequately considered so far in the light of EGT theoretical approach. A modern and comprehensive definition of oligometastatic patient should consider at least three main parameters: the total number of lesions, the timing of their appearance and their biological heterogeneity. A valid therapeutic option for oligometastatic patients could be to integrate together both systemic and local therapies, such as interventional oncology. The potential advantage of implementing interventional oncology in the clinical practice, for example in oligorecurrent or oligoprogressive patients, could be to delay or even to avoid unnecessary shifts in systemic therapies. Another important point to consider is the potential role that the treatment of a single metastatic site may have in terms of immune system activation towards other untreated metastatic sites; such phenomenon is known as abscopal effect.


Subject(s)
Game Theory , Neoplasm Metastasis/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Disease Progression , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasms/pathology , Recurrence , Tumor Burden
8.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 23(8): 1611-1619, ago. 2021.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-222160

ABSTRACT

Objective The aim of our systematic review was to assess the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy) in the management of primary and/or recurrent vulvar carcinoma. Evidence acquisition A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Only full-text English-language articles related to IRT for treatment of primary or recurrent VC were identified and reviewed. Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter and review were excluded. Time restriction (1990–2018) as concerns the years of the publication was considered. Evidence synthesis Primary disease: the median 5-year LC was 43.5% (range 19–68%); the median 5-year DFS was 44.5% (range 44–81%); the median 5-year OS was 50.5% (range 27–85%). Recurrent disease: the median 5-year DFS was 64% (range 56–72%) and the median 5-year OS was 45% (range 33%-57%). Acute ≥ grade 2 toxicity was reported in three patients (1.6%). The severe late toxicity rates (grade 3–4) ranged from 0% to 14.3% (median 7.7%). Conclusion IRT as part of primary treatment for primary and/or recurrent vulvar cancer is associated with promising clinical outcomes (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Vulvar Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy/methods , Vulvar Neoplasms/mortality , Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Disease-Free Survival
9.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(12): 4205-4210, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34227087

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: From a clinical point of view, Kimura's disease is typically characterized by a subcutaneous mass occurring predominantly in the head and neck region. It occurs predominantly in young men of Asian descent, with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life. However, KD has been also reported in other ethnic groups and in children. The most frequently used local treatments are surgical excision, radiotherapy, and surgical excision followed by radiotherapy. The aim of this multicenter systematic review is to highlight the available literature evidence about the outcome of RT in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of any relevant literature in the principal medical databases, such as PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane library, was conducted. The inclusion criteria were original articles specifically reporting about KD and RT, including both prospective and retrospective studies. RESULTS: We were able to identify 11 studies, published from 1989 to 2021, eligible for inclusion in this review. Overall, data on 124 patients were recorded and are presented in this systematic review. The median recurrence rate, considering all patients, was 11% (ranging from 0% to 41.2%). In seven out of 11 studies, the relapse rate was less than 20%. Moreover, the relapse rate was 0% in four studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multicenter systematic literature review show that evidence on RT of KD is limited and derives only from retrospective studies. In this setting RT seems to be well-tolerated and able to produce very high response rates in unresected lesions and reasonable results in terms of local control both as an exclusive and adjuvant treatment.


Subject(s)
Kimura Disease/radiotherapy , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic
10.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(9): 3440-3443, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34002817

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to provide an update about the current clinical indications of RT in this poorly explored field outside the traditional oncological setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search on the main databases, including PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane from their inception until 31st December 2020. An additional manual check of scientific meeting proceedings and books was conducted in order to identify all the potentially useful sources. Only essays published in English have been considered for the purposes of this analysis. The searched items included: "Radiotherapy or Radiation Therapy" and "Benign disorder or Benign disease". RESULTS: We provided a list of current clinical indications for benign disorders based on the latest international surveys available, including major sites: eye, bone, head and neck, skin, brain, heart and peripheral vascular system. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for benign diseases is still a feasible therapeutic strategy, which may allow to treat several invalidating conditions, especially after medical therapies have failed thus avoiding potentially invalidating major surgical procedures. A careful evaluation in selecting the indication is essential and all the choices should be thoroughly discussed with the patients.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans
11.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(8): 1611-1619, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33650029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our systematic review was to assess the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy) in the management of primary and/or recurrent vulvar carcinoma. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Only full-text English-language articles related to IRT for treatment of primary or recurrent VC were identified and reviewed. Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter and review were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) as concerns the years of the publication was considered. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Primary disease: the median 5-year LC was 43.5% (range 19-68%); the median 5-year DFS was 44.5% (range 44-81%); the median 5-year OS was 50.5% (range 27-85%). Recurrent disease: the median 5-year DFS was 64% (range 56-72%) and the median 5-year OS was 45% (range 33%-57%). Acute ≥ grade 2 toxicity was reported in three patients (1.6%). The severe late toxicity rates (grade 3-4) ranged from 0% to 14.3% (median 7.7%). CONCLUSION: IRT as part of primary treatment for primary and/or recurrent vulvar cancer is associated with promising clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Vulvar Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Vulvar Neoplasms/mortality , Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery
13.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(14): 7589-7597, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32744685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed at examining efficacy of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy-IRT) alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in stage I esophageal cancer as exclusive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. We analyzed only clinical study as full-text publication, reporting on patients with stage I esophageal cancer treated with IRT alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., EBRT). Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter, and review were excluded. Patients who underwent previous surgery were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) was applied for years of the publication. RESULTS: Twelve studies have been selected. The number of evaluated patients was 514; the median age was 69 years. In the IRT group, the median: local control (LC) was 77% (range 63%-100%), disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.4% (range 49%-86.3%), the overall survival (OS) was 60% (range 31%-84%), the cancer specific survival (CSS) was 80% (range 55-100%), and grade 3-4 toxicity range was 0%-26%. CONCLUSIONS: IRT alone or combined to EBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage I esophageal cancer. Definitive radiation therapy could be an alternative to surgery in patients with superficial cancer.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Brachytherapy/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging
15.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(2): 773-776, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016981

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The concept of abscopal effect is currently gaining importance in modern oncology, as the link between localized irradiation and triggering of immuno-mediated systemic antitumor effects is getting clearer. An increasing number of reports documented abscopal effect mainly after external beam irradiation. Interventional radiotherapy (IR) may be used with sealed radioactive sources as brachytherapy (BT) or with unsealed radioactive sources as transarterial radioembolization (TARE). The aim of this paper is to review the existing clinical IR data and discuss the mechanisms of the abscopal effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic research of the main bibliographic databases (PubMed, WOS, Scopus, and Google Scholar) from the earliest possible date through August 2019 was performed. The search strategy was based on the terms "abscopal effect", "interventional radiotherapy", "brachytherapy" and "TARE". RESULTS: Thirteen titles were identified. Three papers met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All of them were case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there are still scarce data in literature regarding the association of locoregional interventional treatments with the abscopal effect, this review demonstrates that the immunomodulatory theories, which have been widely used so far for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), may be actually considered valid also in the contest of IR.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy/methods , Brachytherapy/trends , Embolization, Therapeutic/trends , Forecasting , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Radiotherapy/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...