Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-518860

ABSTRACT

The clinical course of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is variable and to a substantial degree still unpredictable, especially in persons who have neither been vaccinated nor recovered from previous infection. We hypothesized that disease progression and inflammatory responses were associated with alterations in the microbiome and metabolome. To test this, we integrated metagenome, metabolome, cytokine, and transcriptome profiles of longitudinally collected samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the beginning of the pandemic (before vaccines or variants of concern) and non-infected controls, and leveraged detailed clinical information and post-hoc confounder analysis to identify robust within- and cross-omics associations. Severe COVID-19 was directly associated with a depletion of potentially beneficial intestinal microbes mainly belonging to Clostridiales, whereas oropharyngeal microbiota disturbance appeared to be mainly driven by antibiotic use. COVID-19 severity was also associated with enhanced plasma concentrations of kynurenine, and reduced levels of various other tryptophan metabolites, lysophosphatidylcholines, and secondary bile acids. Decreased abundance of Clostridiales potentially mediated the observed reduction in 5-hydroxytryptophan levels. Moreover, altered plasma levels of various tryptophan metabolites and lower abundances of Clostridiales explained significant increases in the production of IL-6, IFN{gamma} and/or TNF. Collectively, our study identifies correlated microbiome and metabolome alterations as a potential contributor to inflammatory dysregulation in severe COVID-19. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=150 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/518860v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@de2c31org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@27663corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a90af7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f17e9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

2.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22277959

ABSTRACT

BackgroundNirmatrelvir/ritonavir is an effective therapy against SARS-CoV-2. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk for severe COVID-19 and show impaired vaccine responses underlining the importance of antiviral therapy. However, use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is not recommended in these patients due to lack of clinical and pharmacokinetic data. ObjectiveTo investigate pharmacokinetics and hepatic tolerance of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients with ESRD and haemodialysis (HD). Patients and methodsFour patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 150/100mg twice daily as recommended for renal impairment; HD ran in two- to three-day intervals. Plasma and serum samples were drawn before and after each HD during the 5-day treatment and for ensuing 3-5 days. ResultsMedian peak levels of nirmatrelvir obtained two hours after medication pre-HD in three patients were 7745ng/mL on day 3 and 6653ng/mL on day 5; median post-HD levels (C6h) declined to 5765ng/mL (74%) and 5521ng/mL (83%), on days 3 and 5 of treatment, respectively. Three days after end of treatment, median levels were 365ng/mL pre-HD and 30ng/mL post-HD. Measurements of the fourth patient, six hours after drug intake pre-HD showed nirmatrelvir-levels of 3704ng/mL on treatment day 3 which fell to 2308ng/mL post-HD, at one hour before intake of the next dose (Cmin). ConclusionUse of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients with ESRD results in high nirmatrelvir blood concentrations, which are still within the range known from patients without renal failure. No accumulation of nirmatrelvir took place and levels declined to zero within few days after end of treatment.

3.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-502609

ABSTRACT

The recently emerged BA.2.75 Omicron sublineage of SARS-CoV-2 identified in numerous countries is rapidly increasing in prevalence in regions of India. Compared with BA.2, the spike protein of BA.2.75 differs in nine amino acid residues. To determine the impact of the spike mutations on polyclonal and monoclonal antibody activity, we investigated the neutralization sensitivity of BA.2.75 in comparison with B.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5. Analysis of post-boost samples from 30 vaccinated individuals revealed significantly lower serum neutralizing activity against BA.2.75 than against BA.2. However, BA.2.75 was more sensitive to serum neutralization than the widely circulating BA.4/5 sublineages. Moreover, evaluation of 17 clinical-stage monoclonal antibodies demonstrated individual differences in Omicron sublineage activity. Notably, some authorized antibodies with low activity against other Omicron sublineages demonstrated high BA.2.75 neutralizing potency. Our results indicate a less pronounced degree of antibody evasion of BA.2.75 compared with BA.4/5 and suggest that factors beyond immune evasion may be required for an expansion of BA.2.75 over BA.4/5.

4.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22277255

ABSTRACT

Glycoprotein 90K, encoded by the interferon-stimulated gene LGALS3BP, displays broad antiviral activity. It reduces HIV-1 infectivity by interfering with Env maturation and virion incorporation, and increases survival of Influenza A virus-infected mice via antiviral innate immune signaling. Here, we analyzed the expression of 90K/LGALS3BP in 44 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. 90K protein serum levels were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to uninfected sex- and age-matched controls. Furthermore, PBMC-associated concentrations of 90K protein were overall reduced by SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo, suggesting enhanced secretion into the extracellular space. Mining of published PBMC scRNA-seq datasets uncovered monocyte-specific induction of LGALS3BP mRNA expression in COVID-19 patients. In functional assays, neither 90K overexpression in susceptible cell lines nor exogenous addition of purified 90K consistently inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data suggests that 90K/LGALS3BP contributes to the global type I IFN response during SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo without displaying detectable antiviral properties.

5.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22276272

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo determine the immediate need for a fourth COVID-19 vaccination based on the neutralizing capacity in patients on methotrexate (MTX) therapy after mRNA booster immunization. MethodsIn this observational cohort study, neutralizing serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype (Wu01) and variant of concern (VOC) Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 were assessed by pseudovirus neutralization assay before, 4 and 12 weeks after mRNA booster immunization in 50 rheumatic patients on MTX, 26 of whom paused the medication. 44 non-immunosuppressed persons (NIP) served as control group. ResultsWhile the neutralizing serum activity against SARS-CoV-2 Wu01 and Omicron variants increased 67-to 73-fold in the NIP after booster vaccination, the serum activity in patients receiving MTX increased only 20-to 23-fold. As a result, significantly lower neutralizing capacities were measured in patients on MTX compared to the NIP at week 4. Patients who continued MTX treatment during vaccination had significantly lower neutralizing serum titres against all three virus strains at week 4 and 12 compared to patients who paused MTX and the control group, except for BA.2 at week 12. Patients who paused MTX reached comparably high neutralization titres as the NIP, except for Wu01 at week 12. Neutralization of omicron variants was significantly lower in comparison to wildtype in both groups. ConclusionPatients pausing MTX showed a similar vaccine response to NIP. Patients who continued MTX demonstrated an impaired booster response indicating a potential benefit of a second booster vaccination.

6.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-494393

ABSTRACT

Protein glycosylation is a complex and heterogeneous post-translational modification. Specifically, the human plasma proteome is rich in glycoproteins, and as protein glycosylation is frequently dysregulated in disease, glycoproteomics is considered an underexplored resource for biomarker discovery. Here, we present OxoScan-MS, a data-independent mass spectrometric acquisition technology and data analysis software that facilitates sensitive, fast, and cost-effective glycoproteome profiling of plasma and serum samples in large cohort studies. OxoScan-MS quantifies glycosylated peptide features by exploiting a scanning quadrupole to assign precursors to oxonium ions, glycopeptide-specific fragments. OxoScan-MS reaches a high level of sensitivity and selectivity in untargeted glycopeptide profiling, such that it can be efficiently used with fast microflow chromatography without a need for experimental enrichment of glycopeptides from neat plasma. We apply OxoScan-MS to profile the plasma glycoproteomic in an inpatient cohort hospitalised due to severe COVID-19, and obtain precise quantities for 1,002 glycopeptide features. We reveal that severe COVID-19 induces differential glycosylation in disease-relevant plasma glycoproteins, including IgA, fibrinogen and alpha-1-antitrypsin. Thus, with OxoScan-MS we present a strategy for quantitatively mapping glycoproteomes that scales to hundreds and thousands of samples, and report glycoproteomic changes in severe COVID-19.

7.
Sarah Wulf Hanson; Cristiana Abbafati; Joachim G Aerts; Ziyad Al-Aly; Charlie Ashbaugh; Tala Ballouz; Oleg Blyuss; Polina Bobkova; Gouke Bonsel; Svetlana Borzakova; Danilo Buonsenso; Denis Butnaru; Austin Carter; Helen Chu; Cristina De Rose; Mohamed Mustafa Diab; Emil Ekbom; Maha El Tantawi; Victor Fomin; Robert Frithiof; Aysylu Gamirova; Petr V Glybochko; Juanita A. Haagsma; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard; Erin B Hamilton; Gabrielle Harris; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Raimund Helbok; Merel E Hellemons; David Hillus; Susanne M Huijts; Michael Hultstrom; Waasila Jassat; Florian Kurth; Ing-Marie Larsson; Miklos Lipcsey; Chelsea Liu; Callan D Loflin; Andrei Malinovschi; Wenhui Mao; Lyudmila Mazankova; Denise McCulloch; Dominik Menges; Noushin Mohammadifard; Daniel Munblit; Nikita A Nekliudov; Osondu Ogbuoji; Ismail M Osmanov; Jose L. Penalvo; Maria Skaalum Petersen; Milo A Puhan; Mujibur Rahman; Verena Rass; Nickolas Reinig; Gerard M Ribbers; Antonia Ricchiuto; Sten Rubertsson; Elmira Samitova; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Anastasia Shikhaleva; Kyle E Simpson; Dario Sinatti; Joan B Soriano; Ekaterina Spiridonova; Fridolin Steinbeis; Andrey A Svistunov; Piero Valentini; Brittney J van de Water; Rita van den Berg-Emons; Ewa Wallin; Martin Witzenrath; Yifan Wu; Hanzhang Xu; Thomas Zoller; Christopher Adolph; James Albright; Joanne O Amlag; Aleksandr Y Aravkin; Bree L Bang-Jensen; Catherine Bisignano; Rachel Castellano; Emma Castro; Suman Chakrabarti; James K Collins; Xiaochen Dai; Farah Daoud; Carolyn Dapper; Amanda Deen; Bruce B Duncan; Megan Erickson; Samuel B Ewald; Alize J Ferrari; Abraham D. Flaxman; Nancy Fullman; Amiran Gamkrelidze; John R Giles; Gaorui Guo; Simon I Hay; Jiawei He; Monika Helak; Erin N Hulland; Maia Kereselidze; Kris J Krohn; Alice Lazzar-Atwood; Akiaja Lindstrom; Rafael Lozano; Beatrice Magistro; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Johan Mansson; Ana M Mantilla Herrera; Ali H Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Shuhei Nomura; Maja Pasovic; David M Pigott; Robert C Reiner Jr.; Grace Reinke; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro; Damian Francesco Santomauro; Aleksei Sholokhov; Emma Elizabeth Spurlock; Rebecca Walcott; Ally Walker; Charles Shey Wiysonge; Peng Zheng; Janet Prvu Bettger; Christopher JL Murray; Theo Vos.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22275532

ABSTRACT

ImportanceWhile much of the attention on the COVID-19 pandemic was directed at the daily counts of cases and those with serious disease overwhelming health services, increasingly, reports have appeared of people who experience debilitating symptoms after the initial infection. This is popularly known as long COVID. ObjectiveTo estimate by country and territory of the number of patients affected by long COVID in 2020 and 2021, the severity of their symptoms and expected pattern of recovery DesignWe jointly analyzed ten ongoing cohort studies in ten countries for the occurrence of three major symptom clusters of long COVID among representative COVID cases. The defining symptoms of the three clusters (fatigue, cognitive problems, and shortness of breath) are explicitly mentioned in the WHO clinical case definition. For incidence of long COVID, we adopted the minimum duration after infection of three months from the WHO case definition. We pooled data from the contributing studies, two large medical record databases in the United States, and findings from 44 published studies using a Bayesian meta-regression tool. We separately estimated occurrence and pattern of recovery in patients with milder acute infections and those hospitalized. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of long COVID globally and by country in 2020 and 2021 as well as the severity-weighted prevalence using disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease study. ResultsAnalyses are based on detailed information for 1906 community infections and 10526 hospitalized patients from the ten collaborating cohorts, three of which included children. We added published data on 37262 community infections and 9540 hospitalized patients as well as ICD-coded medical record data concerning 1.3 million infections. Globally, in 2020 and 2021, 144.7 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 54.8-312.9) people suffered from any of the three symptom clusters of long COVID. This corresponds to 3.69% (1.38-7.96) of all infections. The fatigue, respiratory, and cognitive clusters occurred in 51.0% (16.9-92.4), 60.4% (18.9-89.1), and 35.4% (9.4-75.1) of long COVID cases, respectively. Those with milder acute COVID-19 cases had a quicker estimated recovery (median duration 3.99 months [IQR 3.84-4.20]) than those admitted for the acute infection (median duration 8.84 months [IQR 8.10-9.78]). At twelve months, 15.1% (10.3-21.1) continued to experience long COVID symptoms. Conclusions and relevanceThe occurrence of debilitating ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 is common. Knowing how many people are affected, and for how long, is important to plan for rehabilitative services and support to return to social activities, places of learning, and the workplace when symptoms start to wane. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the extent and nature of the most common long COVID symptoms by country in 2020 and 2021? FindingsGlobally, 144.7 million people experienced one or more of three symptom clusters (fatigue; cognitive problems; and ongoing respiratory problems) of long COVID three months after infection, in 2020 and 2021. Most cases arose from milder infections. At 12 months after infection, 15.1% of these cases had not yet recovered. MeaningThe substantial number of people with long COVID are in need of rehabilitative care and support to transition back into the workplace or education when symptoms start to wane.

8.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-491823

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic prompted a global vaccination effort and the development of numerous COVID-19 vaccines at an unprecedented scale and pace. As a result, current COVID- 19 vaccination regimens comprise diverse vaccine modalities, immunogen combinations and dosing intervals. Here, we compare vaccine-specific antibody and memory B cell responses following two-dose mRNA, single-dose Ad26.COV2.S and two-dose ChAdOx1 or combination ChAdOx1/mRNA vaccination. Plasma neutralizing activity as well as the magnitude, clonal composition and antibody maturation of the RBD-specific memory B cell compartment showed substantial differences between the vaccination regimens. While individual monoclonal antibodies derived from memory B cells exhibited similar binding affinities and neutralizing potency against Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2, there were significant differences in epitope specificity and neutralizing breadth against viral variants of concern. Although the ChAdOx1 vaccine was inferior to mRNA and Ad26.COV2.S in several respects, biochemical and structural analyses revealed enrichment in a subgroup of memory B cell neutralizing antibodies with distinct RBD-binding properties resulting in remarkable potency and breadth.

9.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-487257

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies play a critical role in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 but are challenged by viral evolution and antibody evasion, exemplified by the highly resistant Omicron BA.1 sublineage.1-12 Importantly, the recently identified Omicron sublineages BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 with differing spike mutations are rapidly emerging in various countries. By determining polyclonal serum activity of 50 convalescent or vaccinated individuals against BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5, we reveal a further reduction of BA.4/5 susceptibility to vaccinee sera. Most notably, delineation of the sensitivity to an extended panel of 163 antibodies demonstrates pronounced antigenic differences of individual sublineages with distinct escape patterns and increased antibody resistance of BA.4/5 compared to the most prevalent BA.2 sublineage. These results suggest that the antigenic distance from BA.1 and the increased resistance compared to BA.2 may favor immune escape-mediated expansion of BA.4/5 after the first Omicron wave. Finally, while most monoclonal antibodies in clinical stages are inactive against all Omicron sublineages, we identify promising novel antibodies with high pan-Omicron neutralizing potency. Our study provides a detailed understanding of the antibody escape from the most recently emerging Omicron sublineages that can inform on effective strategies to prevent and treat COVID-19.

10.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22270302

ABSTRACT

Elderly individuals are at high risk for severe COVID-19. Due to modest vaccine responses compared to younger individuals and the time elapsed since prioritized vaccinations, the emerging immune-evasive Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is a particular concern for the elderly. Here we longitudinally determined SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing serum activity against different variants in a cohort of 37 individuals with a median age of 82 years. Participants were followed for 10 months after an initial two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination and up to 4.5 months after a BNT162b2 booster. Detectable Omicron-neutralizing activity was nearly absent after two vaccinations but elicited in 89% of individuals by the booster immunization. Neutralizing titers against the Wu01, Delta, and Omicron variants showed similar post-boost declines and 81% of individuals maintained detectable activity against Omicron. Our study demonstrates the mRNA booster effectiveness in inducing Omicron neutralizing activity and provides critical information on vaccine response durability in the highly vulnerable elderly population.

11.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-22269616

ABSTRACT

Hyperinflammation, coagulopathy and immune dysfunction are prominent in patients with severe infections. Extracellular chromatin clearance by plasma DNases suppresses such pathologies in mice but whether severe infection interferes with these pathways is unclear. Here, we show that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection or microbial sepsis exhibit low extracellular DNA clearance capacity associated with the release of the DNase inhibitor actin. Unlike naked DNA degradation (DNase), neutrophil extracellular trap degradation (NETase) was insensitive to G-actin, indicating distinct underlying mechanisms. Activity-based proteomic profiling of severely ill SARS-CoV-2 patient plasma revealed that patients with high NETase and DNase activities exhibited 18-fold higher survival compared to patients with low activity proteomic profiles. Remarkably, low DNA clearance capacity was also prominent in healthy individuals with chronic inflammation, suggesting that pre-existing inflammatory conditions may increase the risk for mortality upon infection. Hence, functional proteomic profiling illustrates that non-redundant DNA clearance activities protect critically ill patients from mortality, uncovering protein combinations that can accurately predict mortality in critically ill patients.

12.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267769

ABSTRACT

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is causing a rapid increase in infections in various countries. This new variant of concern carries an unusually high number of mutations in key epitopes of neutralizing antibodies on the spike glycoprotein, suggesting potential immune evasion. Here we assessed serum neutralizing capacity in longitudinal cohorts of vaccinated and convalescent individuals, as well as monoclonal antibody activity against Omicron using pseudovirus neutralization assays. We report a near-complete lack of neutralizing activity against Omicron in polyclonal sera after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, in convalescent individuals, as well as resistance to different monoclonal antibodies in clinical use. However, mRNA booster immunizations in vaccinated and convalescent individuals resulted in a significant increase of serum neutralizing activity against Omicron. Our study demonstrates that booster immunizations will be critical to substantially improve the humoral immune response against the Omicron variant.

13.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21267253

ABSTRACT

Global healthcare systems continue to be challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is a need for clinical assays that can both help to optimize resource allocation and accelerate the development and evaluation of new therapies. Here, we present a multiplex proteomic panel assay for the assessment of disease severity and outcome prediction in COVID-19. The assay quantifies 50 peptides derived from 30 COVID-19 severity markers in a single measurement using analytical flow rate liquid chromatography and multiple reaction monitoring (LC-MRM), on equipment that is broadly available in routine and regulated analytical laboratories. We demonstrate accurate classification of COVID-19 severity in patients from two cohorts. Furthermore, the assay outperforms established risk assessments such as SOFA and APACHE II in predicting survival in a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort. The prognostic value implies its use for support of clinical decisions in settings with overstrained healthcare resources e.g. to optimally allocate resources to severely ill individuals with high chance of survival. It can furthermore be helpful for monitoring of novel therapies in clinical trials.

14.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21266249

ABSTRACT

PurposeSix-19% of critically ill COVID-19 patients display circulating auto-antibodies against type I interferons (IFN-AABs). Here, we establish a clinically applicable strategy for early identification of IFN-AAB-positive patients for potential subsequent clinical interventions. MethodsWe analysed sera of 430 COVID-19 patients with severe and critical disease from four hospitals for presence of IFN-AABs by ELISA. Binding specificity and neutralizing activity were evaluated via competition assay and virus-infection-based neutralization assay. We defined clinical parameters associated with IFN-AAB positivity. In a subgroup of critically ill patients, we analyzed effects of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on the levels of IFN-AABs, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and clinical outcome. ResultsThe prevalence of neutralizing AABs to IFN- and IFN-{omega} in COVID-19 patients was 4.2% (18/430), while being undetectable in an uninfected control cohort. Neutralizing IFN-AABs were detectable exclusively in critically affected, predominantly male (83%) patients (7.6% IFN- and 4.6% IFN-{omega} in 207 patients with critical COVID-19). IFN-AABs were present early post-symptom onset and at the peak of disease. Fever and oxygen requirement at hospital admission co-presented with neutralizing IFN-AAB positivity. IFN-AABs were associated with higher mortality (92.3% versus 19.1 % in patients without IFN-AABs). TPE reduced levels of IFN-AABs in three of five patients and may increase survival of IFN-AAB-positive patients compared to those not undergoing TPE. ConclusionIFN-AABs may serve as early biomarker for development of severe COVID-19. We propose to implement routine screening of hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to our algorithm for rapid identification of patients with IFN-AABs who most likely benefit from specific therapies.

15.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-460777

ABSTRACT

The high incidence of thrombotic events suggests a possible role of the contact system pathway in COVID-19 pathology. Here, we demonstrate altered levels of factor XII (FXII) and its activation products in two independent cohorts of critically ill COVID-19 patients in comparison to patients suffering from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to influenza virus (ARDS-influenza). Compatible with this data, we report rapid consumption of FXII in COVID-19, but not in ARDS-influenza, plasma. Interestingly, the kaolin clotting time was not prolonged in COVID-19 as compared to ARDS-influenza. Using confocal and electron microscopy, we show that increased FXII activation rate, in conjunction with elevated fibrinogen levels, triggers formation of fibrinolysis-resistant, compact clots with thin fibers and small pores in COVID-19. Accordingly, we observed clot lysis in 30% of COVID-19 patients and 84% of ARDS-influenza subjects. Analysis of lung tissue sections revealed wide-spread extra- and intra-vascular compact fibrin deposits in COVID-19. Together, our results indicate that elevated fibrinogen levels and increased FXII activation rate promote thrombosis and thrombolysis resistance via enhanced thrombus formation and stability in COVID-19.

16.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21262468

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is highly immunogenic and effective, but recent studies have indicated waning anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses over time. Increasing infection rates has led authorities in several countries to initiate booster campaigns for vulnerable populations, including the elderly. However, the durability of vaccine-induced immunity in the elderly is currently unknown. Here, we describe interim results of a prospective cohort study comparing immune responses in a cohort of vaccinated elderly persons to those in healthcare workers (HCW), measured six months after first immunisation with BNT162b2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-, full Spike- and RBD-IgG seropositivity rates and IgG levels at six months were significantly lower in the elderly compared to HCW. Serum neutralization of Delta VOC measured by pseudovirus neutralisation test was detectable in 43/71 (60.6%, 95%CI: 48.9-71.1) in the elderly cohort compared to 79/83 in the HCW cohort (95.2%, 95%CI: 88.3-98.1) at six months post vaccination. Consistent with the overall lower antibody levels, SARS-CoV-2-S1 T cell reactivity was reduced in the elderly compared to HCW (261.6 mIU/ml, IQR:141.5-828.6 vs 1198.0 mIU/ml, IQR: 593.9-2533.6, p<0.0001). Collectively, these findings suggest that the established two-dose vaccination regimen elicits less durable immune responses in the elderly compared to young adults. Given the recent surge in hospitalisations, even in countries with high vaccination rates such as Israel, the current data may support booster vaccinations of the elderly. Further studies to determine long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in high-risk populations and the safety and effectiveness of additional boosters are needed.

17.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21261883

ABSTRACT

BackgroundProspective and longitudinal data on pulmonary injury over one year after acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are sparse. Research questionWith this study, we aim to investigate pulmonary outcome following SARS-CoV-2 infection including pulmonary function, computed chest tomography, respiratory symptoms and quality of life over 12 months. Study design and Methods180 patients after acute COVID-19 were enrolled into a single-centre, prospective observational study and examined 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Chest CT-scans, pulmonary function and symptoms assessed by St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire were used to evaluate objective and subjective respiratory limitations. Patients were stratified according to acute COVID-19 disease severity. ResultsOf 180 patients enrolled, 42/180 were not hospitalized during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, 29/180 were hospitalized without need for oxygen, 43/180 with need for low-flow and 24/180 with high-flow oxygen, 26/180 required invasive mechanical ventilation and 16/180 were treated with ECMO. After acute COVID-19, pulmonary restriction and reduced carbon monoxide diffusion capacity was associated with disease severity after the acute phase and improved over 12 months except for those requiring ECMO treatment. Patients with milder disease showed a predominant reduction of ventilated area instead of simple restriction. The CT score of lung involvement in the acute phase increased significantly with COVID-19 severity and was associated with restriction and reduction in diffusion capacity in follow-up. Respiratory symptoms improved for patients in higher severity groups during follow-up, but not for patients with mild initially disease. InterpretationSeverity of respiratory failure during COVID-19 correlates with the degree of pulmonary function impairment and respiratory quality of life in the year after acute infection. Patients with mild vs. severe disease show different patterns of lung involvement and symptom resolution. Clinical Trial RegistrationThe study is registered at the German registry for clinical studies (DRKS00021688)

18.
Frauke Degenhardt; David Ellinghaus; Simonas Juzenas; Jon Lerga-Jaso; Mareike Wendorff; Douglas Maya-Miles; Florian Uellendahl-Werth; Hesham ElAbd; Malte Christoph Ruehlemann; Jatin Arora; Onur Oezer; Ole Bernt Lenning; Ronny Myhre; May Sissel Vadla; Eike Matthias Wacker; Lars Wienbrandt; Aaron Blandino Ortiz; Adolfo de Salazar; Adolfo Garrido Chercoles; Adriana Palom; Agustin Ruiz; Alba-Estela Garcia-Fernandez; Albert Blanco-Grau; Alberto Mantovani; Alberto Zanella; Aleksander Rygh Holten; Alena Mayer; Alessandra Bandera; Alessandro Cherubini; Alessandro Protti; Alessio Aghemo; Alessio Gerussi; Alfredo Ramirez; Alice Braun; Almut Nebel; Ana Barreira; Ana Lleo; Ana Teles; Anders Kildal; Andrea Biondi; Andrea Caballero-Garralda; Andrea Ganna; Andrea Gori; Andreas Glueck; Andreas Lind; Anja Tanck; Anke Hinney; Anna Carreras Carreras Nolla; Anna Ludovica Fracanzani; Anna Peschuck; Annalisa Cavallero; Anne Ma Dyrhol-Riise; Antonella Ruello; Antonio Julia; Antonio Muscatello; Antonio Pesenti; Antonio Voza; Ariadna Rando-Segura; Aurora Solier; Axel Schmidt; Beatriz Cortes; Beatriz Mateos; Beatriz Nafria-Jimenez; Benedikt Schaefer; Bjoern Jensen; Carla Bellinghausen; Carlo Maj; Carlos Ferrando; Carmen de la Horra; Carmen Quereda; Carsten Skurk; Charlotte Thibeault; Chiara Scollo; Christian Herr; Christoph D Spinner; Christoph Gassner; Christoph Lange; Cinzia Hu; Cinzia Paccapelo; Clara Lehmann; Claudio Angelini; Claudio Cappadona; Clinton Azuure; Cristiana Bianco; Cristina Cea; Cristina Sancho; Dag Arne Lihaug Hoff; Daniela Galimberti; Daniele Prati; David Haschka; David Jimenez; David Pestana; David Toapanta; Eduardo Muniz-Diaz; Elena Azzolini; Elena Sandoval; Eleonora Binatti; Elio Scarpini; Elisa T Helbig; Elisabetta Casalone; Eloisa Urrechaga; Elvezia Maria Paraboschi; Emanuele Pontali; Enric Reverter; Enrique J Calderon; Enrique Navas; Erik Solligard; Ernesto Contro; Eunate Arana-Arri; Fatima Aziz; Federico Garcia; Felix Garcia Sanchez; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi; Flora Peyvandi; Florian Kurth; Francesco Blasi; Francesco Malvestiti; Francisco J Medrano; Francisco Mesonero; Francisco Rodriguez-Frias; Frank Hanses; Fredrik Mueller; Georg Hemmrich-Stanisak; Giacomo Bellani; Giacomo Grasselli; Gianni Pezzoli; Giorgio Costantino; Giovanni Albano; Giulia Cardamone; Giuseppe Bellelli; Giuseppe Citerio; Giuseppe Foti; Giuseppe Lamorte; Giuseppe Matullo; Guido Baselli; Hayato Kurihara; Holger Neb; Ilaria My; Ingo Kurth; Isabel Hernandez; Isabell Pink; Itziar de Rojas; Ivan Galvan-Femenia; Jan Cato Holter; Jan Egil Afset; Jan Heyckendorf; Jan Kaessens; Jan Kristian Damas; Jan Rybniker; Janine Altmueller; Javier Ampuero; Javier Martin; Jeanette Erdmann; Jesus M Banales; Joan Ramon Badia; Joaquin Dopazo; Jochen Schneider; Jonas Bergan; Jordi Barretina; Joern Walter; Jose Hernandez Quero; Josune Goikoetxea; Juan Delgado; Juan M Guerrero; Julia Fazaal; Julia Kraft; Julia Schroeder; Kari Risnes; Karina Banasik; Karl Erik Mueller; Karoline I Gaede; Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria; Kristian Tonby; Lars Heggelund; Laura Izquierdo-Sanchez; Laura Rachele Bettini; Lauro Sumoy; Leif Erik Sander; Lena J Lippert; Leonardo Terranova; Lindokuhle Nkambule; Lisa Knopp; Lise Tuset Gustad; Lucia Garbarino; Luigi Santoro; Luis Tellez; Luisa Roade; Mahnoosh Ostadreza; Maider Intxausti; Manolis Kogevinas; Mar Riveiro-Barciela; Marco Schaefer; Mari EK Niemi; Maria A Gutierrez-Stampa; Maria Carrabba; Maria E Figuera Basso; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Maria Hernandez-Tejero; Maria JGT Vehreschild; Maria Manunta; Marialbert Acosta-Herrera; Mariella D'Angio; Marina Baldini; Marina Cazzaniga; Marit M Grimsrud; Markus Cornberg; Markus M Noethen; Marta Marquie; Massimo Castoldi; Mattia Cordioli; Maurizio Cecconi; Mauro D'Amato; Max Augustin; Melissa Tomasi; Merce Boada; Michael Dreher; Michael J Seilmaier; Michael Joannidis; Michael Wittig; Michela Mazzocco; Michele Ciccarelli; Miguel Rodriguez-Gandia; Monica Bocciolone; Monica Miozzo; Natale Imaz-Ayo; Natalia Blay; Natalia Chueca; Nicola Montano; Nicole Braun; Nicole Ludwig; Nikolaus Marx; Nilda Martinez; Oliver A Cornely; Oliver Witzke; Orazio Palmieri; Paola Faverio; Paoletta Preatoni; Paolo Bonfanti; Paolo Omodei; Paolo Tentorio; Pedro Castro; Pedro M Rodrigues; Pedro Pablo Espana; Per Hoffmann; Philip Rosenstiel; Philipp Schommers; Phillip Suwalski; Raul de Pablo; Ricard Ferrer; Robert Bals; Roberta Gualtierotti; Rocio Gallego-Duran; Rosa Nieto; Rossana Carpani; Ruben Morilla; Salvatore Badalamenti; Sammra Haider; Sandra Ciesek; Sandra May; Sara Bombace; Sara Marsal; Sara Pigazzini; Sebastian Klein; Serena Pelusi; Sibylle Wilfling; Silvano Bosari; Sonja Volland; Soren Brunak; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Stefan Schreiber; Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach; Stefano Aliberti; Stephan Ripke; Susanne Dudman; Tanja Wesse; Tenghao Zheng; Thomas Bahmer; Thomas Eggermann; Thomas Illig; Thorsten Brenner; Tomas Pumarola; Torsten Feldt; Trine Folseraas; Trinidad Gonzalez Cejudo; Ulf Landmesser; Ulrike Protzer; Ute Hehr; Valeria Rimoldi; Valter Monzani; Vegard Skogen; Verena Keitel; Verena Kopfnagel; Vicente Friaza; Victor Andrade; Victor Moreno; Wolfgang Albrecht; Wolfgang Peter; Wolfgang Poller; Xavier Farre; Xiaoli Yi; Xiaomin Wang; Yascha Khodamoradi; Zehra Karadeniz; Anna Latiano; Siegfried Goerg; Petra Bacher; Philipp Koehler; Florian Tran; Heinz Zoller; Eva C Schulte; Bettina Heidecker; Kerstin U Ludwig; Javier Fernandez; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Agustin Albillos; Pietro Invernizzi; Maria Buti; Stefano Duga; Luis Bujanda; Johannes R Hov; Tobias L Lenz; Rosanna Asselta; Rafael de Cid; Luca Valenti; Tom Hemming Karlsen; Mario Caceres; Andre Franke; - COVICAT study group; - Covid-19 Aachen Study (COVAS); - Pa COVID-19 Study Group; - The Humanitas COVID-19 Task Force; - The Humanitas Gavazzeni COVID-19 Task Force; - Norwegian SARS-CoV-2 Study group.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21260624

ABSTRACT

Given the highly variable clinical phenotype of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a deeper analysis of the host genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 is important to improve our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we describe an extended GWAS meta-analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 3,260 COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and 12,483 population controls from Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany/Austria, including stratified analyses based on age, sex and disease severity, as well as targeted analyses of chromosome Y haplotypes, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and the SARS-CoV-2 peptidome. By inversion imputation, we traced a reported association at 17q21.31 to a highly pleiotropic [~]0.9-Mb inversion polymorphism and characterized the potential effects of the inversion in detail. Our data, together with the 5th release of summary statistics from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, also identified a new locus at 19q13.33, including NAPSA, a gene which is expressed primarily in alveolar cells responsible for gas exchange in the lung.

19.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21259374

ABSTRACT

Global healthcare systems are challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need to optimize allocation of treatment and resources in intensive care, as clinically established risk assessments such as SOFA and APACHE II scores show only limited performance for predicting the survival of severely ill COVID-19 patients. Comprehensively capturing the host physiology, we speculated that proteomics in combination with new data-driven analysis strategies could produce a new generation of prognostic discriminators. We studied two independent cohorts of patients with severe COVID-19 who required intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation. SOFA score, Charlson comorbidity index and APACHE II score were poor predictors of survival. Plasma proteomics instead identified 14 proteins that showed concentration trajectories different between survivors and non-survivors. A proteomic predictor trained on single samples obtained at the first time point at maximum treatment level (i.e. WHO grade 7) and weeks before the outcome, achieved accurate classification of survivors in an exploratory (AUROC 0.81) as well as in the independent validation cohort (AUROC of 1.0). The majority of proteins with high relevance in the prediction model belong to the coagulation system and complement cascade. Our study demonstrates that predictors derived from plasma protein levels have the potential to substantially outperform current prognostic markers in intensive care. Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00021688

20.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21258481

ABSTRACT

Severe COVID-19 is linked to both dysfunctional immune response and unrestrained immunopathogenesis, and it remains unclear if T cells also contribute to disease pathology. Here, we combined single-cell transcriptomics and proteomics with mechanistic studies to assess pathogenic T cell functions and inducing signals. We identified highly activated, CD16+ T cells with increased cytotoxic functions in severe COVID-19. CD16 expression enabled immune complex-mediated, T cell receptor-independent degranulation and cytotoxicity not found in other diseases. CD16+ T cells from COVID-19 patients promoted microvascular endothelial cell injury and release of neutrophil and monocyte chemoattractants. CD16+ T cell clones persisted beyond acute disease maintaining their cytotoxic phenotype. Age-dependent generation of C3a in severe COVID-19 induced activated CD16+ cytotoxic T cells. The proportion of activated CD16+ T cells and plasma levels of complement proteins upstream of C3a correlated with clinical outcome of COVID-19, supporting a pathological role of exacerbated cytotoxicity and complement activation in COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...