ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is an essential measure to measure the impact of the disease and treatments on the lives of patients. However, in Latin America there is no validated and reliable instrument to assess this construct. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to validate the EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument in the Mexican population with CRC. METHODS: This study aims to validate the EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument in the Mexican population with CRC. The study used an instrumental design and a nonprobabilistic sample due to availability, made up of 251 patients with CRC, with an average age of 54.7 ± 12.28 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, as well as concurrent validity tests. RESULTS: The exploratory factorial analysis yielded 4 factors that explained 51.64% of the variance, with a Cronbach reliability coefficient of .766 and an Omega index of .725. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model fits the data almost perfectly, with an error close to 0, which shows that it is a balanced and parsimonious instrument to measure the QoL of the patients with CRC. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The EORTC QLQ-CR29 instrument proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research directed at patients with CRC in Mexico. Its use is recommended by multidisciplinary health teams in oncology in Mexico, since it allows knowing the patient's perspective on the impact of CRC on their life, guiding therapeutic decision-making and being a primary outcome measure.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Describir los efectos de intervenciones psicológicas sobre ansiedad, depresión, malestar emocional y/o calidad de vida (CdV) de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Método: Revisión narrativa de la literatura en MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL y Cochrane Library, 2011-2021. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 553 artículos, de los cuales se incluyeron doce. La mayoría fueron intervenciones breves, individuales y presenciales. La Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual fue la intervención más reportada, mostrando efectos positivos en CdV, específicamente en pacientes con estoma; la Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso y la terapia centrada en soluciones también identificaron mejorías en CdV. La terapia de reminiscencia y una intervención para la autoeficacia redujeron la ansiedad y depresión. No se comprobó la efectividad del entrenamiento en relajación y de escritura; la psicoeducación mostró efectos inconsistentes. Conclusión: Existe una escasez de estudios realizados durante los últimos años, los cuales no evidencian un consenso del modelo terapéutico que produzca mejores consistentes en el bienestar psicológico. (AU)
Objective: To describe the effects of psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, emotional distress and/or quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Narrative literature review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, 2011-2021. Results: A total of 553 articles were obtained, of which twelve were included. Most were brief, individual, face-to-face interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most reported intervention, showing positive effects on QoL, specifically in stoma patients; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and solution-focused therapy also identified improvements in QoL. Reminiscence therapy and a self-efficacy intervention reported significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Relaxation and writing training were not proven effective; psychoeducation showed inconsistent effects. Conclusion: There is a paucity of studies conducted during the last years, which do not evidence a consensus of the therapeutic model that produces consistent improvements in psychological well-being. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , PsychotherapyABSTRACT
Objective: To describe the effects of psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, emotional distress and/or quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Narrative literature review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, 2011-2021. Results: A total of 553 articles were obtained, of which twelve were included. Most were brief, individual, face-to-face interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most reported intervention, showing positive effects on QoL, specifically in stoma patients; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and solution-focused therapy also identified improvements in QoL. Reminiscence therapy and a self-efficacy intervention reported significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Relaxation and writing training were not proven effective; psychoeducation showed inconsistent effects. Conclusion: There is a paucity of studies conducted during the last years, which do not evidence a consensus of the therapeutic model that produces consistent improvements in psychological well-being.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cancer patient satisfaction with the healthcare team is of great relevance for assessing the quality of the care provided by the health system. In Mexico, no valid and reliable tool is available to assess this construct. OBJECTIVE: To validate the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS) instrument, version 4, in cancer patients. METHOD: Cross-sectional design, non-probability convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 200 cancer-diagnosed patients, with mean age of 45.86 ± 15.01 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis identified four factors, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.945, and an explained variance of 68.15 %. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model adjusts to the data with an error close to zero and, in addition, it is balanced and carefully measures overall patient satisfaction with the treatment. CONCLUSION: FACIT-TS-PS was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research in Mexican cancer patients. Its use is recommended in the evaluation of oncology multidisciplinary healthcare teams in Mexico.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La satisfacción del paciente oncológico con el equipo de salud es de relevancia para evaluar la calidad de la atención del sistema de salud. En México no se dispone de una herramienta válida y confiable para evaluar este constructo. OBJETIVO: Validar el Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en el Tratamiento para Enfermedades Crónicas-Satisfacción con el Tratamiento-Satisfacción del Paciente (FACIT-TS-PS) versión 4, en pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. MÉTODO: Diseño transversal, muestreo no probabilístico, por disponibilidad. La muestra consistió en 200 pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer, con edad promedio de 45.86 ± 15.01 años. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron cuatro factores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.945 y una varianza explicada de 68.15 %. El análisis factorial confirmatorio indicó que el modelo teórico propuesto se ajusta a los datos con error próximo a cero y que, además, es equilibrado y mide cuidadosamente la satisfacción global del paciente con el tratamiento. CONCLUSIÓN: FACIT-TS-PS mostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para su uso en la atención clínica e investigación dirigida a pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Se recomienda su utilización en la evaluación de equipos de salud multidisciplinarios en oncología en México.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allied Health Personnel , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Neoplasms/psychology , Nurse-Patient Relations , Physician-Patient Relations , Professional-Patient Relations , Young AdultABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La satisfacción del paciente oncológico con el equipo de salud es de relevancia para evaluar la calidad de la atención del sistema de salud. En México no se dispone de una herramienta válida y confiable para evaluar este constructo. Objetivo: Validar el Instrumento de Evaluación de Funcionalidad en el Tratamiento para Enfermedades Crónicas-Satisfacción con el Tratamiento-Satisfacción del Paciente (FACIT-TS-PS) versión 4, en pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Método: Diseño transversal, muestreo no probabilístico, por disponibilidad. La muestra consistió en 200 pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer, con edad promedio de 45.86 ± 15.01 años. Se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. Resultados: Se identificaron cuatro factores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0.945 y una varianza explicada de 68.15 %. El análisis factorial confirmatorio indicó que el modelo teórico propuesto se ajusta a los datos con error próximo a cero y que, además, es equilibrado y mide cuidadosamente la satisfacción global del paciente con el tratamiento. Conclusión: FACIT-TS-PS mostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para su uso en la atención clínica e investigación dirigida a pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Se recomienda su utilización en la evaluación de equipos de salud multidisciplinarios en oncología en México.
Abstract Introduction: Cancer patient satisfaction with the healthcare team is of great relevance for assessing the quality of the care provided by the health system. In Mexico, no valid and reliable tool is available to assess this construct. Objective: To validate the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction (FACIT-TS-PS) instrument, version 4, in cancer patients. Method: Cross-sectional design, non-probability convenience sampling. The sample consisted of 200 cancer-diagnosed patients, with mean age of 45.86 ± 15.01 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Results: The exploratory factor analysis identified four factors, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.945, and an explained variance of 68.15 %. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the proposed theoretical model adjusts to the data with an error close to zero and, in addition, it is balanced and carefully measures overall patient satisfaction with the treatment. Conclusion: FACIT-TS-PS was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical care and research in Mexican cancer patients. Its use is recommended in the evaluation of oncology multidisciplinary healthcare teams in Mexico.
