Effectiveness of hexaminolevulinate fluorescence cystoscopy for the diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in daily clinical practice: a Spanish multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) with hexaminolevulinate as an adjunct to white-light cystoscopy (WLC) vs WLC alone for the detection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), in routine clinical practice in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An intra-patient comparative, multicentre, prospective, observational study. Adults with suspected or documented primary or recurrent NMIBC at eight Spanish centres were included in the study. All patients were examined with WLC followed by BLC with hexaminolevulinate. We evaluated the detection rate of bladder cancer lesions by WLC and BLC with hexaminolevulinate, overall and by tumour stage and compared with histological examination of the biopsied lesions. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated. RESULTS: In all, 1,569 lesions were identified from 283 patients: 621 were tumour lesions according to histology and 948 were false-positives. Of the 621 tumour lesions, 475 were detected by WLC (sensitivity 76.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 73.2-79.8) and 579 were detected by BLC (sensitivity 93.2%, 95% CI 91.0-95.1; P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in the sensitivity in the detection of all types of NMIBC lesions with BLC compared with WLC. Of 219 patients with tumours, 188 had NMIBC [highest grade: carcinoma in situ (CIS), n = 36; Ta, n = 87; T1, n = 65). CIS lesions were identified more with BLC (n = 27) than with WLC [n = 19; sensitivity: BLC 75.0% (95% CI 57.8-87.9) vs WLC 52.8% (95% CI 35.5-69.6); P = 0.021]. Results varied across centres. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that improvement in diagnosis of NMIBC, mainly CIS and Ta tumours, obtained with BLC with hexaminolevulinate as an adjunct to WLC vs WLC alone can be shown in routine clinical practice.

Genetic predisposition to early recurrence in clinically localized prostate cancer.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Currently available nomograms to predict preoperative risk of early biochemical recurrence (EBCR) after radical prostatectomy are solely based on classic clinicopathological variables. Despite providing useful predictions, these models are not perfect. Indeed, most researchers agree that nomograms can be improved by incorporating novel biomarkers. In the last few years, several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with prostate cancer, but little is known about their impact on disease recurrence. We have identified four SNPs associated with EBCR. The addition of SNPs to classic nomograms resulted in a significant improvement in terms of discrimination and calibration. The new nomogram, which combines clinicopathological and genetic variables, will help to improve prediction of prostate cancer recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate genetic susceptibility to early biochemical recurrence (EBCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP), as a prognostic factor for early systemic dissemination. To build a preoperative nomogram to predict EBCR combining genetic and clinicopathological factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 670 patients from six University Hospitals who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa), and were followed-up for at least 5 years or until biochemical recurrence. EBCR was defined as a level prostate-specific antigen >0.4 ng/mL within 1 year of RP; preoperative variables studied were: age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and the genotype of 83 PCa-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Univariate allele association tests and multivariate logistic regression were used to generate predictive models for EBCR, with clinicopathological factors and adding SNPs. We internally validated the models by bootstrapping and compared their accuracy using the area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement, integrated discrimination improvement, calibration plots and Vickers' decision curves. RESULTS: Four common SNPs at KLK3, KLK2, SULT1A1 and BGLAP genes were independently associated with EBCR. A significant increase in AUC was observed when SNPs were added to the model: AUC (95% confidence interval) 0.728 (0.674-0.784) vs 0.763 (0.708-0.817). Net reclassification improvement showed a significant increase in probability for events of 60.7% and a decrease for non-events of 63.5%. Integrated discrimination improvement and decision curves confirmed the superiority of the new model. CONCLUSIONS: Four SNPs associated with EBCR significantly improved the accuracy of clinicopathological factors. We present a nomogram for preoperative prediction of EBCR after RP.

Prognostic impact of the 2009 UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for renal cell carcinoma with venous extension.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of venous involvement and tumour thrombus level in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains highly controversial. In 2010, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union International Centre le Cancer (UICC) revised the RCC staging system (7th edition) based on tumour thrombus level, differentiating the T stage of tumours limited to renal-vein-only involvement. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumour thrombus extension in a multi-institutional cohort of patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An international consortium of 11 institutions was established to retrospectively review a combined cohort of 1215 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy and tumour thrombectomy for RCC, including 585 patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement or higher. MEASUREMENTS: Predictive factors of survival, including histology, tumour thrombus level, nodal status, Fuhrman grade, and tumour size, were analysed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 1122 patients with complete data were reviewed. The median follow-up for all patients was 24.7 mo, with a median survival of 33.8 mo. The 5-yr survival was 43.2% (renal vein involvement), 37% (IVC below the diaphragm), and 22% with caval involvement above the diaphragm. On multivariate analysis, tumour size (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.64 [range: 1.03-2.59]; p=0.036), Fuhrman grade (HR: 2.26 [range: 1.65-3.1]; p=0.000), nodal metastasis (HR: 1.32 [range: 1.09-1.67]; p=0.005), and tumour thrombus level (HR: 2.10 [range: 1.53-3.0]; p=0.00) correlated independently with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Based on analysis of the largest known cohort of patients with RCC along with IVC and atrial thrombus involvement, tumour thrombus level is an independent predictor of survival. Our findings support the changes to the latest AJCC/UICC staging system.

Improved prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy by genetic polymorphisms.

PURPOSE: Single nucleotide polymorphisms are inherited genetic variations that can predispose or protect individuals against clinical events. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphism profiling may improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 703 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer who had at least 5 years of followup after surgery. All patients were genotyped for 83 prostate cancer related single nucleotide polymorphisms using a low density oligonucleotide microarray. Baseline clinicopathological variables and single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed to predict biochemical recurrence within 5 years using stepwise logistic regression. Discrimination was measured by ROC curve AUC, specificity, sensitivity, predictive values, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination index. RESULTS: The overall biochemical recurrence rate was 35%. The model with the best fit combined 8 covariates, including the 5 clinicopathological variables prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, pathological stage, lymph node involvement and margin status, and 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms at the KLK2, SULT1A1 and TLR4 genes. Model predictive power was defined by 80% positive predictive value, 74% negative predictive value and an AUC of 0.78. The model based on clinicopathological variables plus single nucleotide polymorphisms showed significant improvement over the model without single nucleotide polymorphisms, as indicated by 23.3% net reclassification improvement (p = 0.003), integrated discrimination index (p <0.001) and likelihood ratio test (p <0.001). Internal validation proved model robustness (bootstrap corrected AUC 0.78, range 0.74 to 0.82). The calibration plot showed close agreement between biochemical recurrence observed and predicted probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy based on clinicopathological data can be significantly improved by including patient genetic information.

[Surgical treatment of renal adenocarcinoma with venous thrombus]. / Tratamiento quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma renal con trombo venoso.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze therapeutic management and survival of renal adenocarcinoma with tumor venous extension treated by surgery in our experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluate a series of 29 cases of renal adenocarcinoma with venous thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy from January 1986 to November 2003. Mean age was 63.4 11.9 (29-79) years. 23 patients were males (79%) and 6 (21%) females. 17 (59%) patients had the tumor in the right kidney and 12 (42%) in the left kidney. Tumor thrombus level was: Level I (renal vein-inferior vena cava) 13 (45%), Level II (infrahepatic vena cava) 9 (31%), Level III (retrohepatic vena cava/suprahepatic) 3 (10%), and Level IV (auricula) 4 (14%). 92% of the cases presented perirenal fat involvement. Survival analysis was performed including 24 cases of the 29. We analyzed overall and cancer-specific survival, as well as possible influence of tumor thrombus level, fat involvement, and tumor grade as prognostic factors. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 8.15 +/- 2.25 cm (5-13). Surgical approach was purely abdominal in 23 cases (79%) and thoraco-phreno-laparotomy in 6 (21%). Hepatic mobilization maneuvers and hepatic pedicle clamping were performed in 5 (17%) patients. Venous clamping was: renal-cava 13 cases (44%), triple clamping I1 (37%) (9 infrahepatic and 2 suprahepatic), and supradiaphragmatic-auricula 5 (17%). Conventional extracorporeal circulation (CEC) with moderate hypothermia (26-28 degrees C) was employed in 4 cases and CEC with heart arrest (4 min) in one. Mean follow-up was 52 months. At the time of review 9 patients were alive, 11 had died from tumor and 4 had died from other causes. Mean overall survival was 71 +/- 12 months and cancer specific survival 86 +/- 14 months. Neither renal fat involvement (p=0.6) nor tumor thrombus level (p = 0.9) were prognostic factors for survival in the univariant analysis, but tumor grade was (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with venous tumor extension without lymph node involvement or metastasis should be treated by radical surgery with complete excision of the tumor thrombus. Tumor grade was a prognostic factor for survival, but venous involvement level and presence of perirenal fat involvement were not.

Tratamiento quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma renal con trombo venoso / Surgical treatment of renal adenocarcinoma with venous thrombus

OBJETIVO: Analizar nuestra experienciaen el manejo terapéutico y la supervivencia de lospacientes con adenocarcinoma renal con extensiónvenosa tumoral tratados con cirugía.MÉTODOS: Evaluamos retrospectivamente una serie de29 casos de adenocarcinoma renal con trombo venosoque fueron tratados mediante nefrectomía radical ytrombectomía desde Enero de 1986 a Noviembre de2003. La media de edad de nuestra serie fue de 63,411.9 (29-79) años, 23 casos fueron varones (79%) y6 (21%) mujeres. El tumor se localizó en el riñón derechoen 17 (59%) pacientes y en 12 (42%) en el izquierdo.El nivel de trombo tumoral fue: Nivel I (Vena renalcava)13 (45%), Nivel II (Cava Infrahepática)9(31%),Nivel III (Cava Retrohepática/Suprahepática) 3 (10%),Nivel IV (Aurícula) 4 (14%) El 92% de los casos presentabaafectación de la grasa perirrenal. El cálculo dela supervivencia se realizó sobre 24 casos del total de29. Analizamos la supervivencia global y cáncer-específicaasí como la posible influencia del nivel de trombo tumoral, la afectación de grasa y el grado tumoralcomo posibles factores pronósticos.RESULTADOS: El tamaño medio tumoral fue de 8.15 ±2.25 (5-13) cm. La vía de abordaje utilizada fue abdominalpura en 23 casos (79%) y toraco-abdominal en6 (21%). Realizamos maniobras de movilización hepáticay clampaje del pedículo hepático en 5(17%)pacientes. La forma de clampaje venoso realizado fue:Reno-cavo 13(44%), Triple clamplaje 11(37%) (9 infrahepáticoy 2 suprahepático), y Supradiafragmático-Aurícula 5(17%). En 4 casos se utilizó circulación extracorpóreaconvencional (CEC) con hipotermia moderada(26-28º C) y en un caso se uso CEC con ParadaCardiaca (4 min). El seguimiento medio de la serie fuede 52 meses. En el momento de la revisión: 9 pacientesestaban vivos, 11 muertos por tumor y 4 muertospor otras causas. La media de supervivencia global fuede 71±12 meses y cáncer-específica de 86±14meses. En el análisis univariante ni la invasión de lagrasa renal (p=0,6), ni el nivel del trombo venoso(p=0,9) fueron factores pronósticos de supervivencia, sien cambio el grado tumoral (p=0,03).CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes con extensión tumoralvenosa sin afectación ganglionar o metastásica debende ser tratados con cirugía radical y extracción completadel trombo tumoral. El grado tumoral fue un factorpronóstico en la supervivencia, no así el nivel de afectaciónvenosa y la existencia de invasión de la grasaperirrenal

OBJECTIVES: To analyze therapeutic management and survival of renal adenocarcinoma with tumor venous extension treated by surgery in our experience. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluate a series of 29 cases of renal adenocarcinoma with venous thrombus who underwent radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy from January 1986 to November 2003. Mean age was 63.4 11.9 (29-79) years. 23 patients were males (79%) and 6 (21%) females. 17 (59%) patients had the tumor in the right kidney and 12 (42%) in the left kidney. Tumor thrombus level was: Level I (renal vein-inferior vena cava) 13 (45%), Level II (infrahepatic vena cava) 9 (31%), Level III (retrohepatic vena cava/suprahepatic) 3 (10%), and Level IV (auricula) 4 (14%). 92% of the cases presented perirenal fat involvement. Survival analysis was performed including 24 cases of the 29. We analyzed overall and cancer-specific survival, as well as possible influence of tumor thrombus level, fat involvement, and tumor grade as prognostic factors. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 8.15 ± 2.25 cm (5- 13). Surgical approach was purely abdominal in 23 cases (79%) and thoraco-phreno-laparotomy in 6 (21%). Hepatic mobilization maneuvers and hepatic pedicle clamping were performed in 5 (17%) patients. Venous clamping was: renal-cava 13 cases (44%), triple clamping 11 (37%) (9 infrahepatic and 2 suprahepatic), and supradiaphragmatic-auricula 5 (17%). Conventional extracorporeal circulation (CEC) with moderate hypothermia (26-28º C) was employed in 4 cases and CEC with heart arrest (4 min) in one. Mean follow-up was 52 months. At the time of review 9 patients were alive,11 had died from tumor and 4 had died from other causes. Mean overall survival was 71 ± 12 months and cancer specific survival 86 ± 14 months. Neither renal fat involvement (p=0,6) nor tumor thrombus level (p = 0.9) were prognostic factors for survival in the univariant analysis, but tumor grade was (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with venous tumor extension without lymph node involvement or metastasis should be treated by radical surgery with complete excision of the tumor thrombus. Tumor grade was a prognostic factor for survival, but venous involvement level and presence of perirenal fat involvement were not