Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 20(22)2016 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27277013

ABSTRACT

We estimated whether previous episodes of influenza and trivalent influenza vaccination prevented laboratory-confirmed influenza in Navarre, Spain, in season 2013/14. Patients with medically-attended influenza-like illness (MA-ILI) in hospitals (n = 645) and primary healthcare (n = 525) were included. We compared 589 influenza cases and 581 negative controls. MA-ILI related to a specific virus subtype in the previous five seasons was defined as a laboratory-confirmed influenza infection with the same virus subtype or MA-ILI during weeks when more than 25% of swabs were positive for this subtype. Persons with previous MA-ILI had 30% (95% confidence interval (CI): -7 to 54) lower risk of MA-ILI, and those with previous MA-ILI related to A(H1N1)pdm09 or A(H3N2) virus, had a, respectively, 63% (95% CI: 16-84) and 65% (95% CI: 13-86) lower risk of new laboratory-confirmed influenza by the same subtype. Overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza was 31% (95% CI: 5-50): 45% (95% CI: 12-65) for A(H1N1)pdm09 and 20% (95% CI: -16 to 44) for A(H3N2). While a previous influenza episode induced high protection only against the same virus subtype, influenza vaccination provided low to moderate protection against all circulating subtypes. Influenza vaccine remains the main preventive option for high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Vaccine Potency , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza B virus/isolation & purification , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Population Surveillance , Primary Health Care , Seasons , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Surveillance , Spain/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(30): e1240, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26222861

ABSTRACT

Mortality is a major end-point in the evaluation of influenza vaccine effectiveness. However, this effect is not well known, since most previous studies failed to show good control of biases. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in preventing all-cause mortality in community-dwelling seniors.Since 2009, a population-based cohort study using healthcare databases has been conducted in Navarra, Spain. In 2 late influenza seasons, 2011/2012 and 2012/2013, all-cause mortality in the period January to May was compared between seniors (65 years or over) who received the trivalent influenza vaccine and those who were unvaccinated, adjusting for demographics, major chronic conditions, dependence, previous hospitalization, and pneumococcal vaccination.The cohort included 103,156 seniors in the 2011/2012 season and 105,140 in the 2012/2013 season (58% vaccinated). Seniors vaccinated in the previous season who discontinued vaccination (6% of the total) had excess mortality and were excluded to prevent frailty bias. The final analysis included 80,730 person-years and 2778 deaths. Vaccinated seniors had 16% less all-cause mortality than those unvaccinated (adjusted rate ratio [RR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.93). This association disappeared in the post-influenza period (adjusted RR = 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.85-1.09). A similar comparison did not find an association in January to May of the 2009/2010 pandemic season (adjusted RR = 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.14), when no effect of the seasonal vaccine was expected. On average, 1 death was prevented for every 328 seniors vaccinated: 1 for every 649 in the 65 to 74 year age group and 1 for every 251 among those aged 75 and over.These results suggest a moderate preventive effect and a high potential impact of the seasonal influenza vaccine against all-cause mortality. This reinforces the recommendation of annual influenza vaccination in seniors.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Population Surveillance , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cause of Death/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Survival Rate/trends
3.
PLoS One ; 9(9): e108485, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25254376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The transmission of influenza viruses occurs person to person and is facilitated by contacts within enclosed environments such as households. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary attack rates and factors associated with household transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the pandemic and post-pandemic seasons. METHODS: During the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons, 76 sentinel physicians in Navarra, Spain, took nasopharyngeal and pharyngeal swabs from patients diagnosed with influenza-like illness. A trained nurse telephoned households of those patients who were laboratory-confirmed for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 to ask about the symptoms, risk factors and vaccination status of each household member. RESULTS: In the 405 households with a patient laboratory-confirmed for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, 977 susceptible contacts were identified; 16% of them (95% CI 14-19%) presented influenza-like illness and were considered as secondary cases. The secondary attack rate was 14% in 2009-2010 and 19% in the 2010-2011 season (p=0.049), an increase that mainly affected persons with major chronic conditions. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk of being a secondary case was higher in the 2010-2011 season than in the 2009-2010 season (adjusted odds ratio: 1.72; 95% CI 1.17-2.54), and in children under 5 years, with a decreasing risk in older contacts. Influenza vaccination was associated with lesser incidence of influenza-like illness near to statistical significance (adjusted odds ratio: 0.29; 95% CI 0.08-1.03). CONCLUSION: The secondary attack rate in households was higher in the second season than in the first pandemic season. Children had a greater risk of infection. Preventive measures should be maintained in the second pandemic season, especially in high-risk persons.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/transmission , Seasons , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 191, 2013 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23496887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some studies have evaluated vaccine effectiveness in preventing outpatient influenza while others have analysed its effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the trivalent influenza vaccine in preventing outpatient illness and hospitalizations from laboratory-confirmed influenza in the 2010-2011 season. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in the population covered by the general practitioner sentinel network for influenza surveillance in Navarre, Spain. Patients with influenza-like illness in hospitals and primary health care were swabbed for influenza testing. Influenza vaccination status and other covariates were obtained from health care databases. Using logistic regression, the vaccination status of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases was compared with that of test-negative controls, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, outpatient visits in the previous 12 months, health care setting, time between symptom onset and swabbing, period and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. Effectiveness was calculated as (1-odds ratio)x100. RESULTS: The 303 confirmed influenza cases (88% for A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza) were compared with the 286 influenza test-negative controls. The percentage of persons vaccinated against influenza was 4.3% and 15.7%, respectively (p<0.001). The adjusted estimate of effectiveness was 67% (95% CI: 24%, 86%) for all patients and 64% (95% CI: 8%, 86%) in those with an indication for vaccination (persons age 60 or older or with major chronic conditions). Having received both the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine and the 2009-2010 pandemic influenza vaccine provided 87% protection (95% CI: 30%, 98%) as compared to those not vaccinated. CONCLUSION: The 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine had a moderate protective effect in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Sentinel Surveillance , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Electronic Health Records , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Vaccine ; 30(2): 195-200, 2012 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22100636

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations. Using healthcare databases we defined the target population for vaccination in Navarre, Spain, consisting of 217,320 people with major chronic conditions or aged 60 years and older. All hospitalized patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) were swabbed for influenza testing. A total of 269 patients with ILI were hospitalized and 61 of them were found positive for influenza virus: 58 for A(H1N1)2009 and 3 for B virus. The incidence rates of hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed influenza were compared by vaccination status. In the Cox regression model adjusted for sex, age, children in the household, urban/rural residence, comorbidity, pandemic vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, outpatient visits and hospitalization in the previous year, the seasonal vaccine effectiveness was 58% (95% CI: 16-79%). The nested test-negative case-control analysis gave an adjusted estimate of 59% (95% CI: 4-83%). These results suggest a moderate effect of the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing hospitalization in a risk population. The close estimates obtained in the cohort and the test-negative case-control analyses suggest good control of biases.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Influenza, Human/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
6.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 85(1): 47-56, 2011.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750842

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two waves of influenza (H1N1) 2009 were produced in Navarre in 2009, one in the summer and the other in the fall. We aim to compare the characteristics of the two epidemic waves. METHODS: We analysed individual influenza reports, virological confirmations in the primary care sentinel network, and hospitalised cases with confirmed influenza in Navarre. We compared the summer period (week 21 to 39 in 2009) with the fall-winter period (week 40 in 2009 to 20 in 2010). RESULTS: Two waves of influenza A(H1N1)2009 occurred during 2009, with peaks in July and November. In the summer (week 21 to 39) 4389 cases of influenza syndrome were reported, with young adults the most affected group (58% aged 15-44 years). The highest incidence was registered after the San Fermin fiesta (92 cases per 100,000 population in week 29), with immediate return to baseline levels. A second wave occurred in the fall, with rates up to 7 times higher (667 cases per 100,000 in week 45); they remained above the epidemic threshold for 9 weeks, with children aged 5-14 years (111 per 1000) the most affected group. In the peak of both waves the percentage of smears confirmed for influenza reached 60%. During the summer there were 66 admissions with confirmed influenza (H1N1) 2009, and 158 than in the fall. The proportion of cases requiring admission to hospital was higher in the summer (1.5%) than in fall (0.8%: p<0,0001). CONCLUSION: Influenza circulation was much lower in the summer. Serious cases occurred in periods of both high and low incidence of influenza syndromes.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Seasons , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 85(1): 105-11, 2011.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21750849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A specific vaccination campaign against influenza A (H1N1) was conducted in 2009. We evaluated its impact in Navarre. METHODS: In the cohort of non-institutionalised population with chronic diseases covered by the Navarre Health Service (n=131,333), assuming 100% effectiveness from day 8 after administration of the pandemic vaccine, we estimated its impact on the prevention of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 cases and hospitalisations between weeks 47/2009 and 3/2010. RESULTS: In the nine weeks of the study, 973 cases of influenza syndrome were diagnosed (7 per 1000); but only 28% were due to influenza A (H1N1) 2009. In addition, there were 14 hospitalisations with virological confirmation (11 per 100,000). With 19% coverage with the pandemic vaccine (versus 40% with the seasonal vaccine), 7.7% of cases and 10.5% of hospitalisations were prevented during the study period. For each case prevented, 1092 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered, and for each hospitalisation avoided 15,021 doses were administered. If coverage had been the same as for the seasonal vaccine, it would have been possible to prevent 16.2% of cases and 22.2% of hospitalisations. If coverage had been double than for the seasonal vaccine and vaccination campaign had taken place two weeks earlier, it would have been possible to prevent 70.7% of cases and 68.0% of hospitalizations, with 261 doses needed to prevent one case and 6206 doses to avoid one hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: Despite the high effectiveness of the vaccine, its impact in Navarre has been minimal due to low coverage and late initiation of the vaccination campaign.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology
8.
BMC Public Health ; 11: 300, 2011 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21569323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We compared mortality by cause of death in HIV-infected adults in the era of combined antiretroviral therapy with mortality in the general population in the same age and sex groups. METHODS: Mortality by cause of death was analyzed for the period 1999-2006 in the cohort of persons aged 20-59 years diagnosed with HIV infection and residing in Navarre (Spain). This was compared with mortality from the same causes in the general population of the same age and sex using standardized mortality ratios (SMR). RESULTS: There were 210 deaths among 1145 persons diagnosed with HIV (29.5 per 1000 person-years). About 50% of these deaths were from AIDS. Persons diagnosed with HIV infection had exceeded all-cause mortality (SMR 14.0, 95% CI 12.2 to 16.1) and non-AIDS mortality (SMR 6.9, 5.7 to 8.5). The analysis showed excess mortality from hepatic disease (SMR 69.0, 48.1 to 78.6), drug overdose or addiction (SMR 46.0, 29.2 to 69.0), suicide (SMR 9.6, 3.8 to 19.7), cancer (SMR 3.2, 1.8 to 5.1) and cardiovascular disease (SMR 3.1, 1.3 to 6.1). Mortality in HIV-infected intravenous drug users did not change significantly between the periods 1999-2002 and 2003-2006, but it declined by 56% in non-injecting drug users (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with HIV infection continue to have considerable excess mortality despite the availability of effective antiretroviral treatments. However, excess mortality in the HIV patients has declined since these treatments were introduced, especially in persons without a history of intravenous drug use.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death/trends , HIV Infections/mortality , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 85(1): 55-64, ene.-mar. 2011. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-86095

ABSTRACT

Fundamento: La gripe (H1N1) 2009 produjo en Navarra una onda en verano y otra en otoño de 2009. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar las características de ambas ondas epidémicas. Métodos: Analizamos la notificación individualizada de gripe, las confirmaciones virológicas en la red centinela de atención primaria, y los casos hospitalizados con confirmación de gripe en Navarra y comparamos los periodos de verano (semanas 21 a 39 de 2009) y otoño-invierno (semanas 40 de 2009 a 20 de 2010). Resultados: Durante 2009 hubo dos ondas de gripe A(H1N1)2009, con picos en julio y noviembre. En verano (semana 21 a 39) se notificaron 4.389 casos de síndrome gripal, siendo los más afectados los adultos jóvenes (58% entre 15 y 44 años). La mayor incidencia se registró tras las fiestas de San Fermín (92 casos por 100.000 en la semana 29) con retorno inmediato a niveles basales. En otoño se produjo una segunda onda que alcanzó tasas 7 veces mayores (667 casos por 100.000 en la semana 45) y se mantuvieron 9 semanas por encima del umbral epidémico, siendo el grupo de edad más afectado el de niños de 5 a 14 años (111 por 1000). En el pico de las dos ondas el porcentaje de frotis confirmados para gripe superó el 60%. Durante el verano se produjeron 66 ingresos con confirmación de gripe (H1N1)2009, y en otoño 158. La proporción de casos que requirieron ingresos en hospital fue mayor en verano (1,5%) que en otoño (0,8%; p<0,0001). Conclusión: La circulación de la gripe fue mucho menor en verano. La aparición de casos graves se produjo tanto en momentos con alta como con baja incidencia de síndromes gripales(AU)


Background: Two waves of influenza (H1N1)2009 were produced in Navarre in 2009, one in the summer and the other in the fall. We aim to compare the characteristics of the two epidemic waves. Methods: We analysed individual influenza reports, virological confirmations in the primary care sentinel network, and hospitalised cases with confirmed influenza in Navarre. We compared the summer period (week 21 to 39 in 2009) with the fall-winter period (week 40 in 2009 to 20 in 2010). Results: Two waves of influenza A(H1N1)2009 occurred during 2009, with peaks in July and November. In the summer (week 21 to 39) 4389 cases of influenza syndrome were reported, with young adults the most affected group (58% aged 15-44 years). The highest incidence was registered after the San Fermin fiesta (92 cases per 100,000 population in week 29), with immediate return to baseline levels. A second wave occurred in the fall, with rates up to 7 times higher (667 cases per 100,000 in week 45); they remained above the epidemic threshold for 9 weeks, with children aged 5-14 years (111 per 1000) the most affected group. In the peak of both waves the percentage of smears confirmed for influenza reached 60%. During the summer there were 66 admissions with confirmed influenza (H1N1)2009, and 158 than in the fall. The proportion of cases requiring admission to hospital was higher in the summer (1.5%) than in fall (0.8%: p<0,0001). Conclusion: Influenza circulation was much lower in the summer. Serious cases occurred in periods of both high and low incidence of influenza syndromes(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Public Health/methods , Preventive Medicine/methods , Preventive Medicine/trends , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Seasons
10.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 85(1): 113-119, ene.-mar. 2011. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-86102

ABSTRACT

Fundamento: En 2009 se realizó una campaña de vacunación específica frente a la gripe (H1N1) 2009. El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar su impacto en Navarra. Métodos: En la cohorte de población no institucionalizada de enfermos crónicos cubiertos por el Servicio Navarro de Salud (N=131.333), asumiendo una efectividad del 100% desde el octavo día tras la administración de la vacuna pandémica, estimamos su impacto en la prevención de casos y de hospitalizaciones por gripe (H1N1) 2009 entre las semanas 47/2009 y 3/2010. Resultados: En las nueve semanas del estudio se diagnosticaron 973 casos de síndrome gripal (7 por 1000). El 28% fueron debidos a gripe (H1N1) 2009. Además hubo 14 personas hospitalizadas con confirmación virológica (11 por 100.000). Con una cobertura de vacuna del 19% (frente al 40% de la estacional) se logró prevenir el 7,7% de los casos y el 10,5% de las hospitalizaciones durante el periodo de estudio. Se administraron 1.092 dosis de vacuna pandémica por cada caso prevenido y 15.021 dosis por cada hospitalización evitada. Con una cobertura idéntica a la de la vacuna estacional se habría conseguido prevenir 16,2% de los casos y 22,2% de las hospitalizaciones. Si se hubiese duplicado esta cobertura y adelantado la campaña de vacunación dos semanas se habrían prevenido 70,7% de los casos y 68,0% de los ingresos, necesitando 261 dosis para prevenir un caso y 6206 dosis para evitar una hospitalización. Conclusión: A pesar de la elevada efectividad de la vacuna su impacto en Navarra fue mínimo, debido a la baja cobertura y al inicio tardío de la campaña de vacunación(AU)


Background:Aspecific vaccination campaign against influenza A(H1N1) was conducted in 2009.We evaluated its impact in Navarre. Methods: In the cohort of non-institutionalised population with chronic diseases covered by the Navarre Health Service (n=131,333), assuming 100% effectiveness from day 8 after administration of the pandemic vaccine, we estimated its impact on the prevention of influenza A(H1N1)2009 cases and hospitalisations between weeks 47/2009 and 3/2010. Results: In the nine weeks of the study, 973 cases of influenza syndrome were diagnosed (7 per 1000); but only 28% were due to influenza A(H1N1)2009. In addition, there were 14 hospitalisations with virological confirmation (11 per 100,000).With 19% coverage with the pandemic vaccine (versus 40% with the seasonal vaccine), 7.7% of cases and 10.5% of hospitalisations were prevented during the study period. For each case prevented, 1092 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered, and for each hospitalisation avoided 15,021 doses were administered. If coverage had been the same as for the seasonal vaccine, it would have been possible to prevent 16.2% of cases and 22.2% of hospitalisations. If coverage had been double than for the seasonal vaccine and vaccination campaign had taken place two weeks earlier, it would have been possible to prevent 70.7% of cases and 68.0% of hospitalizations,with 261 doses needed to prevent one case and 6206 doses to avoid one hospitalisation. Conclusion: Despite the high effectiveness of the vaccine, its impact in Navarre has been minimal due to low coverage and late initiation of the vaccination campaign(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Mass Vaccination/methods , Mass Vaccination/organization & administration , Mass Vaccination/trends , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/trends , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Epidemiological Monitoring/trends , Epidemiological Monitoring , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Immunologic Surveillance/immunology , Health Surveillance/trends , Epidemiologic Surveillance Services , Health Surveillance Services
11.
Vaccine ; 27(15): 2089-93, 2009 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19356610

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the effectiveness of the Jeryl Lynn strain vaccine in a large outbreak of mumps in Navarre, Spain, 2006-2008. Each of the 241 cases of mumps occurring in children over 15 months of age born between 1998 and 2005 was compared with 5 controls individually matched by sex, birth date, district of residence and paediatrician. Vaccination history was obtained blindly from clinical records. Conditional logistic regression was used to obtain the matched odds ratios (ORs), and effectiveness was calculated as 1-OR. Some 70% of cases had received one dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, and 24% had received two doses. Overall vaccine effectiveness was 72% (95% CI, 39-87%). Two doses were more effective (83%; 54-94%) than a single dose (66%; 25-85%). Among vaccinated children, risk was higher in those who had received the first dose after 36 months of age (OR=3.1; 1.2-8.4) and those who had received the second dose 3 or more years before study enrolment (OR=10.2; 1.5-70.7). Early waning of immunity in children after the second dose may contribute to reduced vaccine effectiveness for mumps prevention.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Age Factors , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Notification , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Immunization, Secondary , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Mumps/immunology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Vaccination
12.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 81(4): 387-98, 2007.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18041541

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Navarra has an information system of HIV diagnoses working since the beginning of the epidemic up to the present day. This study aims at describing and evaluating this system, focusing on its sensitivity. METHODS: The updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems from the CDC were used to describe the purpose and operation of the system and to analyse its attributes for the period 1985-2003. For the evaluation of the sensitivity the regional database of antiretrovirals distribution was used. RESULTS: The HIV surveillance system of Navarra is confidential and name-based, and includes all HIV-infection cases diagnosed each year. The information sources of the system are: (a) all the laboratories in the public health system that perform the western blot test, and (b) hospital discharge registries. The system covers the entire population of Navarre (584,734 inhabitants). It uses the HIV case definition proposed by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS. The system is well-accepted by the community and by all the stakeholders, including those providing data. By the end of 2003 it included 2302 HIV cases, and 98.8% of all patients who had ever received antiretrovirals in Navarra. CONCLUSIONS: The HIV information system of Navarra is simple, useful, well-accepted and highly sensitive. The information about antiretroviral distribution was useful for this evaluation.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , Information Systems , Population Surveillance , Humans , Information Systems/standards , Spain
13.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 81(4): 387-398, jul.-ago. 2007. ilus, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-056637

ABSTRACT

Fundamento: Navarra cuenta con un sistema de información sobre los diagnósticos de infección por VIH que abarca desde el comienzo de la epidemia hasta la actualidad. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir y evaluar su funcionamiento y sus atributos, haciendo énfasis en el estudio de su sensibilidad. Métodos: Siguiendo las directrices para la Evaluación de Sistemas de Vigilancia en Salud Pública de los Centros para el Control y Prevención de Enfermedades de Atlanta, describimos el sistema de información sobre diagnósticos de infección por VIH de Navarra (el sistema) y analizamos sus atributos cualitativos y cuantitativos entre 1985 y 2003. Para valorar la sensibilidad se utilizó como referencia el registro de dispensación de antirretrovirales de los hospitales de Navarra. Resultados: El sistema de información sobre diagnósticos de infección por VIH de Navarra es nominal y confidencial, e incluye los casos nuevos diagnosticados cada año. Sus fuentes de información son todos los laboratorios que realizan la prueba de confirmación de Western blot en el sistema público, y el registro de altas hospitalarias de la Comunidad Autónoma. Cubre a toda la población de Navarra (584.734 habitantes), y utiliza la definición de caso de infección por VIH del Centro Europeo para la Vigilancia Epidemiológica del VIH y el sida. Es un sistema bien aceptado por la comunidad y por los responsables de suministrar los datos. Hasta diciembre de 2003 se habían incluido 2.302 casos, incluyendo al 98,8% de los pacientes que reciben o han recibido antirretrovirales en Navarra. Conclusiones: Este sistema de información es sencillo, útil, bien aceptado y altamente sensible. La información sobre uso de antirretrovirales ha sido de utilidad para su evaluación


Background: Navarra has an information system of HIV diagnoses working since the beginning of the epidemic up to the present day. This study aims at describing and evaluating this system, focusing on its sensitivity. Methods: The updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems from the CDC were used to describe the purpose and operation of the system and to analyse its attributes for the period 1985-2003. For the evaluation of the sensitivity the regional database of antiretrovirals distribution was used. Results: The HIV surveillance system of Navarra is confidential and name-based, and includes all HIV-infection cases diagnosed each year. The information sources of the system are: a) all the laboratories in the public health system that perform the western blot test, and b) hospital discharge registries. The system covers the entire population of Navarre (584,734 inhabitants). It uses the HIV case definition proposed by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS. The system is well-accepted by the community and by all the stakeholders, including those providing data. By the end of 2003 it included 2,302 HIV cases, and 98.8% of all patients who had ever received antiretrovirals in Navarra. Conclusions: The HIV information system of Navarra is simple, useful, well-accepted and highly sensitive. The information about antiretroviral distribution was useful for this evaluation


Subject(s)
Humans , Information Systems/trends , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV/pathogenicity , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiological Monitoring , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Spain/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations
14.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 129(2): 41-5, 2007 Jun 09.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17588359

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) has been commercialized in Spain since June 2001. We aim to evaluate the impact of this vaccine in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Navarre. POPULATION AND METHOD: The laboratories of microbiology of Navarre declare all the isolations of Streptococcus pneumoniae in samples of normally sterile corporal fluids. We analyzed the incidence of IPD in children younger than 5 years between weeks 41 of 2000 and 40 of 2005. RESULTS: The doses of PCV7 sold up to 2005 would provide a cover of 27% in children younger than 5 years, having assumed 4 dose schedules. In the 5 seasons, 103 cases of IPD were diagnosed. From the 2 first seasons (2000-2002) to the last one (2004-2005) a reduction of 69% in the incidence rate of IPD caused by vaccine serotypes was observed (from 33 to 10 cases by 100,000 children under 5 years; p = 0.003). Between those same periods the incidence of IPD caused by non-vaccine serotypes increased a 36% (from 42 to 57 by 100,000; p = 0.405). The global incidence of IPD diminished a 12% (from 77 to 67 by 100,000; p = 0.689). The percentage of cases that had received PCV7 increased until 45% in season 2004-2005 (p < 0.001). The meningitis and bacteraemic pneumonias supposed 42% of the IPD, without significant changes during the period (p = 0.442). CONCLUSIONS: Since the PCV7 was marketed the pattern of serotypes has changed, but the expected reduction in the total IPD incidence has not been achieved.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Vaccines , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Child, Preschool , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology
15.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 129(2): 41-45, jun. 2007. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-057871

ABSTRACT

Fundamento y objetivo: Desde junio de 2001 se comercializa en España la vacuna neumocócica conjugada heptavalente (VNC7v). Nuestro objetivo ha sido evaluar su impacto en la incidencia de enfermedad neumocócica invasiva (ENI) en Navarra. Población y método: Los laboratorios de microbiología de Navarra declaran todos los aislamientos de neumococo en muestras de fluidos corporales normalmente estériles. Analizamos la incidencia de ENI en niños menores de 5 años entre las semanas 41 de 2000 y 40 de 2005. Resultados: Las dosis de VNC7v vendidas hasta 2005 permitirían alcanzar una cobertura del 27% en menores de 5 años, suponiendo 4 dosis por niño. Entre las 5 temporadas se diagnosticaron 103 casos de ENI. Comparando la incidencia de ENI en las 2 primeras temporadas (2000-2002) con la última (2004-2005), se observa un descenso del 69% en la tasa por serotipos vacunales (de 33 a 10 casos por 100.000 menores de 5 años; p = 0,003). Entre esos mismos períodos, la incidencia de ENI por serotipos no vacunales aumentó un 36% (de 42 a 57 por 100.000; p = 0,405). La incidencia global de ENI disminuyó un 12% (de 77 a 67 por 100.000; p = 0,689). El porcentaje de casos que habían recibido VNC7v aumentó hasta el 45% en la temporada 2004-2005 (p < 0,001). Las meningitis y neumonías bacteriémicas supusieron el 42% de las ENI, sin cambios significativos durante el período (p = 0,442). Conclusiones: Tras la comercialización de la VNC7v ha cambiado el patrón de serotipos, pero no se ha conseguido el descenso esperado de la incidencia global de ENI


Background and objective: The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) has been commercialized in Spain since June 2001. We aim to evaluate the impact of this vaccine in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Navarre. Population and method: The laboratories of microbiology of Navarre declare all the isolations of Streptococcus pneumoniae in samples of normally sterile corporal fluids. We analyzed the incidence of IPD in children younger than 5 years between weeks 41 of 2000 and 40 of 2005. Results: The doses of PCV7 sold up to 2005 would provide a cover of 27% in children younger than 5 years, having assumed 4 dose schedules. In the 5 seasons, 103 cases of IPD were diagnosed. From the 2 first seasons (2000-2002) to the last one (2004-2005) a reduction of 69% in the incidence rate of IPD caused by vaccine serotypes was observed (from 33 to 10 cases by 100,000 children under 5 years; p = 0.003). Between those same periods the incidence of IPD caused by non-vaccine serotypes increased a 36% (from 42 to 57 by 100,000; p = 0.405). The global incidence of IPD diminished a 12% (from 77 to 67 by 100,000; p = 0.689). The percentage of cases that had received PCV7 increased until 45% in season 2004-2005 (p < 0.001). The meningitis and bacteraemic pneumonias supposed 42% of the IPD, without significant changes during the period (p = 0.442). Conclusions: Since the PCV7 was marketed the pattern of serotypes has changed, but the expected reduction in the total IPD incidence has not been achieved


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Humans , Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/pharmacokinetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Epidemiological Monitoring , Communicable Disease Control/trends
16.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 129(2): 46-50, jun. 2007. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-057872

ABSTRACT

Fundamento y objetivo: La hipertrofia ventricular izquierda (HVI) es la enfermedad cardíaca más frecuente en hipertensos. El objetivo es conocer la prevalencia de HVI en población hipertensa de larga evolución tratada en el ámbito de atención primaria (AP), así como su perfil epidemiológico. Pacientes y método: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y multicéntrico, de 915 hipertensos que acudieron consecutivamente a consultas de AP y llevaban más de 5 años en tratamiento farmacológico. Se midió la presión arterial y se realizó anamnesis y registro de datos electrocardiográficos y bioquímicos. Se evaluó la HVI según criterios de Cornell y/o Sokolow-Lyon. Resultados: La población estudiada (el 63% mujeres) tiene una media de edad de 68,7 años; el 31,6% son diabéticos y el 37,5% tiene la presión arterial controlada. El 30,5% presenta criterios electrocardiográficos de HVI, con mayor prevalencia en mujeres; asimismo, las mujeres con HVI tienen una edad más avanzada. El 30% tiene antecedentes de enfermedad cardiovascular y la prevalencia de insuficiencia cardíaca es mayor en pacientes con HVI. El 54% está en politerapia antihipertensiva y no hay diferencias significativas en el tratamiento de los pacientes con y sin HVI. El 77% de los pacientes con HVI cumplen únicamente el criterio de Cornell; el 12%, sólo el de Sokolow-Lyon y el 11%, ambos criterios. Los pacientes que sólo tienen positividad para el criterio de Cornell se caracterizan por predominio del sexo femenino y mayor prevalencia de obesidad. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de HVI, valorada mediante criterios electrocardiográficos, es elevada en hipertensos de larga evolución, especialmente en mujeres. Es preciso insistir en la realización periódica de electrocardiogramas en hipertensos e incrementar el esfuerzo terapéutico


Background and objective: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is the most frequent manifestation of cardiac damage in hypertension. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of LVH in hypertensive patients of long evolution at Primary Care (PC) and to describe their epidemiological profile. Patients and method: 915 hypertensive patients treated for more than 5 years with antihypertensive drugs, who were atended in a consecutive way by de PC physicians, were evaluated in a multicentral and descriptive study. Clinical evaluation data together with electrocardiographic (EKG) and laboratory results were recorded. LVH was assessed by the Cornell and/or Sokolow-Lyon criteria. Results: Study population was characterized by a mean age of 68.7 years, 63% women, 31.6% diabetics, and 37.5% presented controlled blood pressure levels. 30.5% of them presented LVH criteria on EKG, being more prevalent among women, and on the other hand, women with LVH were of a greater age. 30% of patients presented history of cardiovascular disease and heart failure was more frequent among those with LVH. 54% were polymedicated with blood pressure lowering drugs, however there were no differences between groups of patients with and without LVH regarding their treatment. The Cornell criterion and the Sokolow-Lyon criterion alone were presented in a 77% and 12% of patients, respectively, and 11% of them were positive for both criteria. Patients with positivity for only the Cornell criterion were characterized by a greater prevalence of women and obesity. Conclusions: The prevalence of LVH assessed by EKG criteria is high among hypertensive population of long evolution. A greater effort is needed to guarantee a periodic EKG performance in hypertensive patients together with a therapeutic strategy improvement


Subject(s)
Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Obesity/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 44(11): 1436-41, 2007 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17479939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) has shown high efficacy in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by vaccine serotypes. We aimed to assess the overall effectiveness of PCV7 against IPD in Navarra, Spain. METHODS: All children aged <5 years who were diagnosed with IPD during the period 2001-2005 (n=85) and 5 control subjects per case patient (n=425), individually matched by birth date and birth hospital, were analyzed. Vaccination records were obtained from the regional immunization registry. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. RESULTS: Eighteen case patients (21%) and 114 control subjects (27%) had received >or=1 dose of PCV7. PCV7 serotypes were responsible for 34 (51%) of the cases in unvaccinated children. The overall effectiveness for case prevention was 31% (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.27). In a separate analysis, vaccination with PCV7 was 88% effective in preventing IPD due to vaccine serotypes (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.91) and was associated with a higher risk of IPD due to nonvaccine serogroups (odds ratio, 6.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-23.3). CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal a higher risk of IPD caused by non-PCV7 serogroups among vaccinated children. Consequently, the overall effectiveness of PCV7 for IPD prevention may be greatly reduced.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Vaccines , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Female , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Meningococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Serotyping , Spain , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Vaccines, Conjugate/administration & dosage
18.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 25(1): 5-10, 2007 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17261240

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in causes of death among persons with HIV infection. METHODS: An analysis of mortality according to cause was performed in persons diagnosed with HIV infection and residing in the province of Navarre (Spain) from 1985 to 2004. RESULTS: Among 1,649 persons diagnosed with HIV infection up to 2004, 709 (43.0%) had died. Mortality reached the maximum in 1993-1996 with 83.1 deaths per 1,000 person-years (PY). Since that time and up to 2001-2004, mortality due to AIDS decreased from 68.3 to 14.1 per 1,000 PY (p = 0.0001). From 1989-1992 period to the 2001-2004 period, mortality due to drug overdose dropped from 9.2 to 3.6 per 1,000 PY (p = 0.0035) and mortality due to hepatic disease rose from 1.6 to 6.6 per 1000 PY (p = 0.0061), with no significant changes in all other causes. In 2001-2004, AIDS continued to be the first cause of death (44.4%) in this population, followed by hepatic disease (20.9%) and drug overdose (11.3%). In the era of potent antiretroviral therapy (1997-2004), death caused by AIDS (rate ratio = 0.63; p = 0.0344) and by all other causes (RR = 0.59; p = 0.0232) was lower among women. In addition, mortality due to causes other than AIDS was higher in persons 40 years of age and older (RR = 1.77; P = 0.0050) and mortality was lower in homosexual men (RR = 0.22; p = 0.0360). A simultaneous diagnosis of HIV infection and AIDS was associated with higher mortality by AIDS (RR, 3.39; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: AIDS continues to be the primary cause of death in HIV-infected people, and mortality due to hepatic diseases and drug overdose is high. Early diagnosis of HIV-infection would reduce the incidence of deaths due to AIDS.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Cause of Death , Disease Progression , Drug Overdose/mortality , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Liver Diseases/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Risk Factors , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Spain/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/mortality
19.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-052704

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Describir los cambios en la mortalidad en las personas infectadas por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Métodos. En las personas con diagnóstico de infección por VIH residentes en Navarra se analizó la mortalidad por causas desde 1985 hasta 2004. Resultados. De 1.649 personas diagnosticadas hasta 2004, 709 (43,0%) habían fallecido. La mortalidad alcanzó el máximo en 1993-1996 con 83,1 defunciones por 1.000 personas-año. La mortalidad por sida era de 68,3 y ha disminuido hasta 14,1 por 1.000 personas-año (p < 0,0001) en 2001-2004. Entre 1989-1992 y 2001-2004 la mortalidad por sobredosis por drogas disminuyó de 9,2 a 3,6 por 1.000 (p 5 0,0035) y la debida a enfermedad hepática aumentó de 1,6 a 6,6 por 1.000 personas-año (p 5 0,0061), sin cambios significativos en las restantes causas. En 2001-2004 el sida continuaba siendo la primera causa de muerte (44,4%), seguido por las enfermedades hepáticas (20,9%) y las sobredosis de drogas (11,3%). En la era de la terapia antirretroviral potente (1997-2004) la mortalidad es menor en mujeres, tanto por sida (razón de tasas [RT] 5 0,63; p 5 0,0344) como por otras causas (RT 5 0,59; p 5 0,0232), la edad mayor de 40 años se asocia a mayor mortalidad por causas distintas del sida (RT 5 1,77; p 5 0,0050) y la categoría de transmisión homosexual a menor (RT 5 0,22; p 5 0,0360). El diagnóstico simultáneo de VIH y sida conlleva mayor mortalidad por sida (RT 5 3,39; p < 0,0001). Conclusiones. El sida sigue siendo la primera causa de muerte en personas infectadas por el VIH, y también es elevada la mortalidad por hepatopatía y sobredosis. El diagnóstico temprano de la infección por VIH reduciría la mortalidad por sida (AU)


Objective. To describe the changes in causes of death among persons with HIV infection. Methods. An analysis of mortality according to cause was performed in persons diagnosed with HIV infection and residing in the province of Navarre (Spain) from 1985 to 2004. Results. Among 1,649 persons diagnosed with HIV infection up to 2004, 709 (43.0%) had died. Mortality reached the maximum in 1993-1996 with 83.1 deaths per 1,000 person-years (PY). Since that time and up to 2001-2004, mortality due to AIDS decreased from 68.3 to 14.1 per 1,000 PY (p 5 0.0001). From 1989-1992 period to the 2001-2004 period, mortality due to drug overdose dropped from 9.2 to 3.6 per 1,000 PY (p 5 0.0035) and mortality due to hepatic disease rose from 1.6 to 6.6 per 1000 PY (p 5 0.0061), with no significant changes in all other causes. In 2001-2004, AIDS continued to be the first cause of death (44.4%) in this population, followed by hepatic disease (20.9%) and drug overdose (11.3%). In the era of potent antiretroviral therapy (1997-2004), death caused by AIDS (rate ratio 5 0.63; p 5 0.0344) and by all other causes (RR 5 0.59; p 5 0.0232) was lower among women. In addition, mortality due to causes other than AIDS was higher in persons 40 years of age and older (RR 5 1.77; P 5 0.0050) and mortality was lower in homosexual men (RR 5 0.22; p 5 0.0360). A simultaneous diagnosis of HIV infection and AIDS was associated with higher mortality by AIDS (RR, 3.39; p < 0.0001). Conclusions. AIDS continues to be the primary cause of death in HIV-infected people, and mortality due to hepatic diseases and drug overdose is high. Early diagnosis of HIV-infection would reduce the incidence of deaths due to AIDS (AU)


Subject(s)
Adult , Middle Aged , Humans , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Cause of Death , Disease Progression , Liver Diseases/mortality , Drug Overdose/mortality
20.
Gac Sanit ; 19(5): 393-7, 2005.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16242098

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The number and proportion of cases in the HIV registry of Navarre (Spain) that were residents of this region were quantified, according to the census and the healthcare card database. RESULTS: Of the 2,385 persons diagnosed with HIV infection to 2003, only 1,610 (67.5%) were residents of Navarre. The rate of HIV cases diagnosed among residents in Navarre was over 90 cases per million between 1994 and 1998, with values similar to those of Switzerland. In contrast with the time-trend in other European countries, the time-trend in Navarre decreased from 1994 to 2003. Since 2000 the rate of new HIV cases in Navarre has been lower than rates in Portugal, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Belgium, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: To prevent overestimation of the number of HIV infections, cases duplicated between regions should be excluded. This could be achieved by a national HIV surveillance system.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...