Polygenic predisposition to venous thromboembolism is associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates

Genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis may impact COVID-19 infection and its sequelae. Participants in the ongoing prospective cohort study, Million Veteran Program (MVP), who were tested for COVID-19, with European ancestry, were evaluated for associations with polygenic venous thromboembolic risk, Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) (rs6025) and prothrombin gene 3 -UTR mutation (F2 G20210A)(rs1799963), and their interactions. Logistic regression models assessed genetic associations with VTE diagnosis, COVID-19 (positive) testing rates and outcome severity (modified WHO criteria), and post-test conditions, adjusting for outpatient anticoagulation medication usage, age, sex, and genetic principal components. 108,437 out of 464,961 European American MVP participants were tested for COVID-19 with 9786 (9%) positive. PRS(VTE), FVL, F2 G20210A were not significantly associated with the propensity of being tested for COVID-19. PRS(VTE) was significantly associated with a positive COVID-19 test in F5 wild type (WT) individuals (OR 1.05; 95% CI [1.02-1.07]), but not in FVL carriers (0.97, [0.91-1.94]). There was no association with severe outcome for FVL, F2 G20210A or PRS(VTE). Outpatient anticoagulation usage in the two years prior to testing was associated with worse clinical outcomes. PRS(VTE) was associated with prevalent VTE diagnosis among both FVL carriers or F5 wild type individuals as well as incident VTE in the two years prior to testing. Increased genetic propensity for VTE in the MVP was associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates, suggesting a role of coagulation in the initial steps of COVID-19 infection. Key PointsO_LIIncreased genetic predisposition to venous thrombosis is associated with increased COVID-19 positive testing rates. C_LIO_LIPRS for VTE further risk stratifies factor V Leiden carriers regarding their VTE risk. C_LI

A MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, confers protective effects in COVID-19 infection

RationaleA common MUC5B gene polymorphism, rs35705950-T, is associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but its role in the SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity is unclear. ObjectivesTo assess whether rs35705950-T confers differential risk for clinical outcomes associated with COVID-19 infection among participants in the Million Veteran Program (MVP) and COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI). MethodsMVP participants were examined for an association between the incidence or severity of COVID-19 and the presence of a MUC5B rs35705950-T allele. Comorbidities and clinical events were extracted from the electronic health records (EHR). The analysis was performed within each ancestry group in the MVP, adjusting for sex, age, age2, and first twenty principal components followed by a trans-ethnic meta-analysis. We then pursued replication and performed a meta-analysis with the trans-ethnic summary statistics from the HGI. A phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) of the rs35705950-T was conducted to explore associated pathophysiologic conditions. Measurements and Main ResultsA COVID-19 severity scale was modified from the World Health Organization criteria, and phenotypes derived from the International Classification of Disease-9/10 were extracted from EHR. Presence of rs35705950-T was associated with fewer hospitalizations (Ncases=25353, Ncontrols=631,024; OR=0.86 [0.80-0.93], p=7.4 x 10-5) in trans-ethnic meta-analysis within MVP and joint meta-analyses with the HGI (N=1641311; OR=0.89 [0.85-0.93], p =1.9 x 10-6). Moreover, individuals of European Ancestry with at least one copy of rs35705950-T had fewer post-COVID-19 pneumonia events (OR=0.85 [0.76-0.96], p =0.008). PheWAS exclusively revealed pulmonary involvement. ConclusionsThe MUC5B variant rs35705950-T is protective in COVID-19 infection.

Massachusetts General Hospital Covid-19 Registry reveals two distinct populations of hospitalized patients by race and ethnicity

ObjectiveTo evaluate differences by race/ethnicity in clinical characteristics and outcomes among hospitalized patients with Covid-19 at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). MethodsThe MGH Covid-19 Registry includes confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients hospitalized at MGH and is based on manual chart reviews and data extraction from electronic health records (EHRs). We evaluated differences between White/Non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients in demographics, complications and 14-day outcomes among the N=866 patients hospitalized with Covid-19 from March 11, 2020 - May 4, 2020. ResultsOverall, 43% of patients hospitalized with Covid-19 were women, median age was 60.4 [IQR=(48.2, 75)], 11.3% were Black/non-Hispanic and 35.2% were Hispanic. Hispanic patients, representing 35.2% of patients, were younger than White/non-Hispanic patients [median age 51y; IQR=(40.6, 61.6) versus 72y; (58.0, 81.7) (p< 0.001)]. Hispanic patients were symptomatic longer before presenting to care (median 5 vs 3d, p=0.039) but were more likely to be sent home with self-quarantine than be admitted to hospital (29% vs 16%, p< 0.001). Hispanic patients had fewer comorbidities yet comparable rates of ICU or death (34% vs 36%). Nonetheless, a greater proportion of Hispanic patients recovered by 14 days after presentation (62% vs 45%, p< 0.001; OR=1.99, p=0.011 in multivariable adjusted model) and fewer died (2% versus 18%, p< 0.001). ConclusionsHospitalized Hispanic patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities compared to White/non-Hispanic patients; despite comparable rates of ICU care or death, a greater proportion recovered. These results have implications for public health policy and the design and conduct of clinical trials.

Cardiometabolic Risk Factors for COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

ImportanceEarly epidemiological studies report associations of diverse cardiometabolic conditions especially body mass index (BMI), with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, but causality has not been established. Identifying causal risk factors is critical to inform preventive strategies aimed at modifying disease risk. ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate the causal associations of cardiometabolic conditions with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. DesignTwo-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) Study. SettingPopulation-based cohorts that contributed to the genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis by the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative. ParticipantsPatients hospitalized with COVID-19 diagnosed by RNA PCR, serologic testing, or clinician diagnosis. Population controls defined as anyone who was not a case in the cohorts. ExposuresSelected genetic variants associated with 17 cardiometabolic diseases, including diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and BMI, at p<5x10-8 from published largescale GWAS. Main outcomesWe performed an inverse-variance weighted averages of variant-specific causal estimates for susceptibility, defined as people who tested positive for COVID-19 vs. population controls, and severity, defined as patients hospitalized with COVID-19 vs. population controls, and repeated the analysis for BMI using effect estimates from UKBB. To estimate direct and indirect causal effects of BMI through obesity-related cardiometabolic diseases, we performed pairwise multivariable MR. We used p<0.05/17 exposure/2 outcomes=0.0015 to declare statistical significance. ResultsGenetically increased BMI was causally associated with testing positive for COVID-19 [6,696 cases / 1,073,072 controls; p=6.7x10-4, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval 1.08 (1.03, 1.13) per kg/m2] and a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization [3,199 cases/897,488 controls; p=8.7x10-4, 1.12 (1.04, 1.21) per kg/m2]. In the multivariable MR, the direct effect of BMI was abolished upon conditioning on the effect on type 2 diabetes but persisted when conditioning on the effects on coronary artery disease, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and c-reactive protein. No other cardiometabolic exposures tested were associated with a higher risk of poorer COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusions and RelevanceGenetic evidence supports BMI as a causal risk factor for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. This relationship may be mediated via type 2 diabetes. Obesity may have amplified the disease burden of the COVID-19 pandemic either single-handedly or through its metabolic consequences. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs there a causal association between cardiometabolic conditions and COVID-19 susceptibility or severity? FindingsUsing two-sample Mendelian randomization of 17 cardiometabolic diseases and traits, only body mass index was found to be causally associated with testing positive for COVID-19 (6,696 cases/ 1,073,072 controls; p=6.7x10-4) and a higher risk of COVID-19 (3,199 cases/897,488 controls; p=8.7x10-4). MeaningGenetic evidence supports BMI as a causal risk factor for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity.

COVID-19 Outpatient Screening: a Prediction Score for Adverse Events

BackgroundWe sought to develop an automatable score to predict hospitalization, critical illness, or death in patients at risk for COVID-19 presenting for urgent care during the Massachusetts outbreak. MethodsSingle-center study of adult outpatients seen in respiratory illness clinics (RICs) or the emergency department (ED), including development (n = 9381, March 7-May 2) and prospective (n = 2205, May 3-14) cohorts. Data was queried from Partners Enterprise Data Warehouse. Outcomes were hospitalization, critical illness or death within 7 days. We developed the COVID-19 Acuity Score (CoVA) using automatically extracted data from the electronic medical record and learning-to-rank ordinal logistic regression modeling. Calibration was assessed using predicted-to-observed ratio (E/O). Discrimination was assessed by C-statistics (AUC). ResultsIn the development cohort, 27.3%, 7.2%, and 1.1% of patients experienced hospitalization, critical illness, or death, respectively; and in the prospective cohort, 26.1%, 6.3%, and 0.5%. CoVA showed excellent performance in the development cohort (concurrent validation) for hospitalization (E/O: 1.00, AUC: 0.80); for critical illness (E/O: 1.00, AUC: 0.82); and for death (E/O: 1.00, AUC: 0.87). Performance in the prospective cohort (prospective validation) was similar for hospitalization (E/O: 1.01, AUC: 0.76); for critical illness (E/O 1.03, AUC: 0.79); and for death (E/O: 1.63, AUC=0.93). Among 30 predictors, the top five were age, diastolic blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, COVID-19 testing status, and respiratory rate. ConclusionsCoVA is a prospectively validated automatable score to assessing risk for adverse outcomes related to COVID-19 infection in the outpatient setting.