HIV-DNA content in pTfh cells is associated with residual viremia in elite controllers.

OBJECTIVE: The source of residual HIV viremia is highly debated and its potential relationship with the HIV reservoir has not been clarified. Herein, we analysed the cell-associated HIV-DNA content in two important cell compartments of the HIV reservoir, resting CD4+ T memory (Trm) and peripheral T follicular helper (pTfh) cells, and the association with the residual HIV viremia in individuals with spontaneous HIV replication control (elite controllers, EC group) and in individuals with antiretroviral therapy (ART)-mediated HIV replication control (cART group). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: Seventeen chronically HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication were included. Cell-associated HIV-DNA was measured by ultrasensitive digital-droplet-PCR in purified Trm and pTfh cells. Residual HIV plasma viremia was quantified using a single-copy assay with a sensitivity of 0.3 HIV-RNA copies/ml. RESULTS: A significant and positive correlation was demonstrated between HIV-DNA levels in pTfh cells and residual plasma viral load (rpVL) (rho = 0.928, P = 0.008) in HIV-positive elite controllers, but not in HIV-positive treated patients, despite the lower levels of cell-associated HIV-DNA found in elite controllers compared with cART patients in pTfh cells [176 (77-882) vs. 608 (361-860) copies/million cells, respectively; P = 0.05]. CONCLUSION: This association suggests that pTfh cells could have an important contribution to persistent viremia in elite controllers. This could be the consequence of a more limited control of HIV replication in elite controllers with higher transcriptional activity of HIV in pTfh cells of elite controllers than that in cART patients.

Transcriptional signature of resting-memory CD4 T cells differentiates spontaneous from treatment-induced HIV control.

The HIV reservoir is the main barrier to eradicating HIV infection, and resting memory CD4 T (Trm) cells are one of the most relevant cellular component harboring latent proviruses. This is the first study analyzing the transcriptional profile of Trm cells, in two well-characterized groups of HIV patients with distinct mechanisms of viral replication control (spontaneous versus treatment-induced). We use a systems biology approach to unravel subtle but important differences in the molecular mechanisms operating at the cellular level that could be associated with the host's ability to control virus replication and persistence. Despite the absence of significant differences in the transcriptome of Trm cells between Elite Controllers (ECs) and cART-treated (TX) patients at the single gene level, we found 353 gene ontology (GO) categories upregulated in EC compared with TX. Our results suggest the existence of mechanisms at two different levels: first boosting both adaptive and innate immune responses, and second promoting active viral replication and halting HIV latency in the Trm cell compartment of ECs as compared with TX patients. These differences in the transcriptional profile of Trm cells could be involved in the lower HIV reservoir observed in ECs compared with TX individuals, although mechanistic studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Combining transcriptome analysis and systems biology methods is likely to provide important findings to help us in the design of therapeutic strategies aimed at purging the HIV reservoir. KEY MESSAGES: HIV-elite controllers have the lowest HIV-DNA content in resting memory CD4 T cells. HIV-ECs show a particular transcriptional profile in resting memory CD4 T cells. Molecular mechanisms of enhanced adaptative and innate immune response in HIV-ECs. High viral replication and low viral latency establishment associate to the EC status.

CD4 recovery is associated with genetic variation in IFNγ and IL19 genes.

Not all HIV-infected patients receiving cART are able to recover optimal CD4-T cell levels despite achieving undetectable viremia. We evaluated the potential association between polymorphisms (SNPs) in cytokines involved in immune response (IL15, IFNγ and IL19) and the failure to achieve optimal CD4 T-cells restoration after cART. For this, we carried out a retrospective study in 412 HIV-infected patients starting cART with CD4<200 cells/µL. These patients were classified as immunological non-responders (INR) if having a CD4 increase (ΔCD4) below 200 cells/µL after two years on successful cART. IL15, IFNγ and IL19 polymorphisms were genotyped using Sequenom's MassARRAY platform. We found 134 INR patients with a median [IQR] ΔCD4 = 133[73-174] cells/µL. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, infection route, ethnic origin, hepatitis co-infection and HIV infection length, the AA genotype of the SNP rs2430561 in IFNγ (OR:2.01[1.13-3.56], p = 0.017) and the TT genotype of polymorphism rs2243191 in IL19 (OR:2.58 [1.17-5.68], p = 0.019) showed significant association with the INR status. Our results show that polymorphisms in IFNγ and IL19 genes significantly impacts in the probability of not achieving an optimal immune recovery in HIV-patients starting cART with CD4 T-cells <200 cells/µL. Thus, these SNPs could represent potential predictive markers of the immunodiscordant response.

CD32 Expression is not Associated to HIV-DNA content in CD4 cell subsets of individuals with Different Levels of HIV Control.

A recent study has pointed out to CD32a as a potential biomarker of HIV-persistent CD4 cells. We have characterized the level and phenotype of CD32+ cells contained in different subsets of CD4 T-cells and its potential correlation with level of total HIV-DNA in thirty HIV patients (10 typical progressors naïve for cART, 10 cART-suppressed patients, and 10 elite controllers). Total HIV-DNA was quantified in different subsets of CD4 T-cells: Trm and pTfh cells. Level and immunephenotype of CD32+ cells were analyzed in these same subsets by flow cytometry. CD32 expression in Trm and pTfh subsets was similar in the different groups, and there was no significant correlation between the level of total HIV-DNA and the level of CD32 expression in these subsets. However, total HIV-DNA level was correlated with expression of CD127 (rho = -0.46, p = 0.043) and of CCR6 (rho = -0.418, p = 0.027) on CD32+ cells. Our results do not support CD32 as a biomarker of total HIV-DNA content. However, analyzing the expression of certain markers by CD32+ cells could improve the utility of this marker in the clinical setting, prompting the necessity of further studies to both validate our results and to explore the potential utility of certain markers expressed by CD32+ cells.

Peripheral T follicular helper Cells Make a Difference in HIV Reservoir Size between Elite Controllers and Patients on Successful cART.

HIV latency is the main barrier to HIV eradication. Peripheral T follicular helper (pTfh) cells have a prominent role in HIV persistence. Herein, we analyzed the HIV reservoir size within memory CD4+ T-cell subsets in patients with HIV replication control. Twenty HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication were included, with 10 elite controllers (EC) and 10 treated (TX) individuals. The HIV reservoir size was analyzed in resting memory CD4+ T-cells (Trm), pTfh, and non-pTfh cells using an ultrasensitive digital-droplet-PCR assay. Inter-group and intra-group differences were tested using non-parametric tests. Compared with the TX patients, the EC patients had smaller HIV reservoir not only in Trm but also in pTfh and non-pTfh subsets of memory CD4+ T-cells. The largest differences were observed in pTfh cells (p = 0.025). The pTfh and non-pTfh cells harbored similar levels of HIV-DNA in the EC (p = 0.60) and TX patients (p = 0.17); however, the contribution to HIV-DNA levels in memory CD4+ T-cells varied among the pTfh and non-pTfh subsets in both groups of patients. The EC patients showed smaller HIV reservoir in memory CD4+ cells, especially in the pTfh subset, a population of cells with a pivotal role in the antiviral immune response, suggesting a potential link between low levels of infection in pTfh cells and the ability of the EC patients to spontaneously control HIV replication.

[Reasons for the introduction of darunavir in the antirretroviral treatment in HIV-infected patients]. / Motivos de introducción de darunavir en un régimen antirretroviral en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia adquirida.

INTRODUCTION: In 2009 a deep change in ARV treatment took place in Spain with the introduction of new ARV drugs. The principal objective of the study was to determine the clinical situation of the patients in which DRV/r was introduced in the ARV therapy. METHODS: Observational, cross sectional and multicentre study in which 91 reference hospitals participated. Patient's enrollment was carried out between 2008 and 2009. Data were collected retrospectively considering standard clinical practice. RESULTS: 719 medical records were reviewed. Patients had a different clinical situation compared to nowadays with predominance of multiresistant virus which leaded to virologic failure. The principal reason for introducing DRV/r in the ARV regimen was the virologic failure (54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering this situation, DRV/r became a therapeutic option which represented a change in the ARV paradigm in that period.

Análisis de costes y de coste/eficacia de las pautas preferentes de GESIDA para el tratamiento antirretroviral inicial / Costs and cost effectiveness analysis of preferred GESIDA regimens for initial antiretroviral therapy

Introducción El panel de expertos de GESIDA/Plan Nacional del Sida propone «pautas preferentes» de tratamiento antirretroviral como terapia de inicio en pacientes infectados por el VIH. Las pautas preferentes se basan en resultados de ensayos clínicos y en la opinión de los expertos del panel. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar los costes y la eficiencia (coste/eficacia) de iniciar tratamiento con estas pautas. Métodos Evaluación económica de los costes y de la eficiencia (coste/eficacia) mediante la construcción de árboles de decisión. Se definió eficacia como la probabilidad de tener carga viral <50 copias ml en la semana 48 un análisis por intención de tratar perspectiva es del sistema nacional salud habiéndose tenido cuenta solo los costes directos diferenciales fármacos manejo efectos adversos estudios resistencias y determinación hla b 5701 el ámbito España horizonte temporal semanas se refieren a 2011 realizó sensibilidad determinista construyendo tres escenarios para cada pauta: basal más favorable desfavorable Resultados En el escenario basal, los costes de iniciar tratamiento oscilaron entre 7.550 euros para ABC/3TC+EFV y 13.327 euros para TDF/FTC+RAL. La eficacia osciló entre 0,66 para ABC/3TC+LPV/r y 0,86 para TDF/FTC+RAL. La eficiencia, en términos de coste/eficacia, osciló entre 10.175 y 15.539 euros por respondedor a las 48 semanas, para TDF/FTC/EFV y TDF/FTC+RAL, respectivamente. Conclusión La pauta más eficiente fue TDF/FTC+EFV, seguida de ABC/3TC+EFV. El análisis de sensibilidad confirmó la robustez de estos hallazgos(AU)

Introduction GESIDA (AIDS Study Group) and the National AIDS Plan panel of experts propose “preferred regimens” of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV infected patients. These preferred regimens are based on the results of clinical trials, and on the opinions of the experts of the panel. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and the cost effectiveness of initiating treatment following these guidelines. Methods Economic assessment of costs and cost effectiveness through the construction of decision trees. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of having viral load <50 copies ml at week 48 in an intention-to-treat analysis the perspective of is that national health system taking into account only differential direct costs art management adverse effects studies resistance and determination hla b 5701 area spain time horizon weeks are those 2011 a deterministic sensitivity was performed building three scenarios for each regimen: baseline most favourable unfavourable Results In the baseline scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 7,550 Euros for the ABC/3TC+EFV to 13,327 Euros for TDF/FTC+RAL. The efficacy ranges between 0.66 for ABC/3TC+LPV/r and 0.86 for TDF/FTC+RAL. Efficiency, in terms of cost effectiveness, varies between 10,175 and 15,539 Euros per responder at 48 weeks, for TDF/FTC/EFV and TDF/FTC+RAL respectively. Conclusion The most efficient regimen was TDF/FTC+EFV, followed by ABC/3TC+EFV. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these findings (AU)

[Costs and cost effectiveness analysis of preferred GESIDA regimens for initial antiretroviral therapy]. / Análisis de costes y de coste/eficacia de las pautas preferentes de GESIDA para el tratamiento antirretroviral inicial.

INTRODUCTION: GESIDA (AIDS Study Group) and the National AIDS Plan panel of experts propose "preferred regimens" of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV infected patients. These preferred regimens are based on the results of clinical trials, and on the opinions of the experts of the panel. The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and the cost effectiveness of initiating treatment following these guidelines. METHODS: Economic assessment of costs and cost effectiveness through the construction of decision trees. Effectiveness was defined as the probability of having viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48 in an intention-to-treat analysis. The perspective of the analysis is that of the National Health System, taking into account only the differential direct costs (ART, management of adverse effects, studies of resistance, and determination of HLA B * 5701). The area is Spain, the time horizon is 48 weeks, and the costs are those of 2011. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed, building three scenarios for each regimen: baseline, the most favourable, and the most unfavourable. RESULTS: In the baseline scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranges from 7,550 Euros for the ABC/3TC+EFV to 13,327 Euros for TDF/FTC+RAL. The efficacy ranges between 0.66 for ABC/3TC+LPV/r and 0.86 for TDF/FTC+RAL. Efficiency, in terms of cost effectiveness, varies between 10,175 and 15,539 Euros per responder at 48 weeks, for TDF/FTC/EFV and TDF/FTC+RAL respectively. CONCLUSION: The most efficient regimen was TDF/FTC+EFV, followed by ABC/3TC+EFV. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these findings.