Effectiveness and safety of the radiofrequency ablation of single hyperfunctioning parathyroid lesions suggestive of adenomas in primary hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive approach to single parathyroid adenoma in primary hyperparathyroidism; however, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RFA to treat hyper-functioning parathyroid lesions suggestive of adenomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism treated with RFA for single parathyroid lesions in our reference center between November 2017 and June 2021. Pre-treatment (baseline) and follow-up analytical data were gathered on total protein-adjusted calcium, parathyroid hormone [PTH], phosphorus, and 24-h urine calcium. Effectiveness was defined as complete response (normal calcium and PTH), partial response (reduced but not normalized PTH with normal serum calcium), or disease persistence (elevated calcium and PTH). SPSS 15.0 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Four of thirty-three enrolled patients were lost to the follow-up. The final sample comprised 29 patients (22 females) with mean age of 60.93 ± 13.28 years followed up for a mean of 16.29 ± 7.23 months. Complete response was observed in 48.27%, partial response in 37.93%, and hyperparathyroidism persistence in 13.79%. Serum calcium and PTH levels were significantly lower at 1 and 2 years of post-treatment than at baseline. Adverse effects were mild, with two cases of dysphonia (self-limited in one patient) and no cases of hypocalcaemia or hypoparathyroidism. CONCLUSION: RFA may be a safe and effective technique to treat hyper-functioning parathyroid lesions in selected patients.

Effects of risedronate on metabolic bone disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis

Evaluar el efecto de un antirresortivo sobre la masa ósea y los marcadores del remodelado óseo en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 (DM-1) y osteoporosis(OP). El estudio incluyó 52 pacientes con DM-1 con una duración de 21 a 36 años y OP u osteopenia, con edades comprendidas entre los 26 y los 69 años. Los pacientes con OP recibieron 30 mg/semana de risedronato (n = 35) ycalcio + vitamina D; mientras que los pacientes con osteopenia y los que rechazaron el risedronato (n = 17) sólo recibieron calcio + vitamina D. A los 12meses, el grupo con risedronato demostró una mejora significativa en los niveles de fosfatasa ácida resistente al tartrato (FART) (p < 0,0001), proteína óseaGla (BGP por sus siglas en inglés) (p < 0,0001), fosfatasa alcalina ósea (FAO) (p < 0,0001) y hemoglobina A1c (HbA1c) (p < 0,0001). La densidad mineralósea (DMO) fue aumentada a 6 y 12 meses comparado con el nivel basal en la columna (CL) (p < 0,0001) y el cuello femoral (CF) (p < 0,0001). A los 12 meses, el grupo convencional demostró una mejora significativa en HbA1c (p < 0,012) y una reducción en BGP (p < 0,03) y en FAO (p<0,0001). El grupo con tratamiento convencional no demostró cambios significativos en la DMO en la CLy el CF durante el periodo de 12 meses. El tratamiento con risedronato mejora la DMO en pacientes con DM-1 crónica

To assess the effect of a antiresorptive on bone mass and remodeling markers in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM-1) and osteoporosis (OP). Studyincluded 52 patients with DM-1 of 21-36 years duration and OP or osteopenia, aged 29-69 years. OP patients received 30 mg/week risedronate (n = 35)and calcium + vitamin D; osteopenic patients and risedronate refusers (n = 17) received only calcium + vitamin D. At 12 months, the risedronate group showedsignificant improvements in tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (p < 0.0001), osteocalcin (BGP) (p < 0.0001), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (p < 0.0001),and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (p < 0.0001); bone mineral density (BMD) was increased at 6 and 12 months versus baseline in lumbar spine (LS) (p < 0.0001) and femoral neck (FN) (p < 0.0001). At 12 months, the conventional group showed a significant improvement in HbA1c (p < 0.012) and reduction in BGP (p < 0.03) and BAP (p < 0.0001). The conventional treatment group showedno significant changes in BMD at LS and FN during the 12-month period. Risedronate treatment improves BMD in long-term DM-1 patients (AU)

Bone mineral density at time of clinical diagnosis of adult-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To study bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling factors at the time of diagnosis of adult-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: In 22 men and 10 women, who ranged in age from 20 to 39 years, a study was undertaken promptly after diagnosis of type 1 DM (on the basis of criteria established by the World Health Organization). Before any treatment, the clinical history, glycemia, ketonuria, basal and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide levels, islet cell antibodies (ICA), glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA), and bone remodeling variables were recorded for all the study subjects. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR1000) was performed to measure BMD in the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and Ward's triangle. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients, 24 (75%) showed positive levels of ICA or GADA (or both), whereas 8 (25%) tested negative. The BMD values-Z-scores (standard deviation [SD] adjusted for age and sex)-were lower among the patients with DM than in a matched healthy population in both the LS (-0.61 +/- 1.23 SD; P = 0.008) and the FN (-0.38 +/- 1.00 SD; P = 0.003). Twelve patients had a T-score between -2.5 SD and -1 SD in the LS, and 14 had the same scores in the FN and were classified as having osteopenia. A correlation was found between BMD values and C-peptide levels in the LS (r = 0.231; P = 0.02) and the FN (r = 0.27; P = 0.01). The BMD values did not correlate with bone remodeling markers, hemoglobin A1c, or immunologic variables. CONCLUSION: We found reduced bone mass in patients with type 1 DM at the time of the clinical diagnosis. A high percentage of patients with DM have osteopenia, which may not, therefore, be a late complication of type 1 DM. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Intensive insulin therapy and bone mineral density in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a prospective study.

To determine the effect of metabolic control on bone mineral density (BMD) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (type 1 DM), we studied BMD (by dual-energy X-ray energy absorptiometry) and bone remodeling parameters in 62 patients with type 1 DM both before and 7 years after commencement of intensive insulin therapy. Overall outcomes after the 7-year treatment included the stabilization of BMD at all sites, as well as a significant decrease in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (4.302 +/- 2.62 vs 2.65 +/- 0.97 IU/I; p=0.0001) and increase in intact parathyroid hormone (PTHi) (28.05 +/- 15.7 vs 39.78 +/- 22.41 ng/l; p=0.005). Presence of diabetic retinopathy (RTP) versus its absence (non-RTP) was associated with lower BMD in femoral neck (FN) (0.831 +/- 0.142 vs 0.756 +/- 0.153 mg/ cm2; p = 0.03) and Ward's triangle (WT) (0.736 +/- 0.165 vs 0.632 +/- 0.172 mg/cm2; p=0.03), and with a lower T-score in FN (-0.93 +/- 1.34 vs -1.70 +/- 1.46; p = 0.04) and WT (-0.72 +/- 1.42 vs -1.540 +/- 1.55; p = 0.04) and Z-score in FN (-0.591 +/- 1.23 vs -1.132 +/- 1.46; p=0.01). The percentage of patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis in the RTP group was significantly higher than in the non-RTP group (72% vs 53%, p=0.05; RR= 3.2) and the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of the RTP group were also higher (8.53 +/- 1.6% vs 7.1+/- 1.1%; p=0.05). The improvement in metabolic control, increase in body mass index and decrease in resorption parameters could contribute to the stabilization of bone mass in type I DM but the presence of retinopathy is a critical factor in the progression of diabetic osteopenia.

Bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry in Spanish patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Previous studies suggest that low bone mass is a potential complication of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless, the factors that influence diabetic osteopenia are not well established. In order to evaluate the prevalence and magnitude of diabetic osteopenia and its association with clinical and metabolic variables, we studied 94 consecutive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Their age ranged from 20 to 56 years and duration of diabetes varied from 1 to 35 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine and proximal femur and the values were expressed as z-score. The presence and extent of microvascular complications, degree of metabolic control, and other risk factors for osteoporosis were recorded and some biochemical markers of bone metabolism were assessed. Diabetic patients showed reduced BMD in all sites (lumbar spine: -0.89 +/- 1.21; femoral neck: -0.99 +/- 1.24; Ward triangle: -1.05 +/- 1.24; P < 0.0001). Of the 94 patients 19.1% met diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis. BMD correlated with body mass index in all sites and with the duration of disease in Ward's triangle. Presence and extent of diabetic complications were associated with lower BMD, as was smoking. No correlation was found between BMD and biochemical markers. In conclusion, osteopenia is a common complication in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Microvascular complications are a critical point in the progression of diabetic osteopenia. Other risk factors for osteoporosis (nutritional status and smoking) must be taken into account.

[Gestational diabetes: new approaches to an old and growing problem]. / Diabetes gestacional: nuevos planteamientos a un antiguo y creciente problema.

Gestational diabetes is defined as glucose intolerance of variable severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. Gestational Diabetes generally disappears as soon as the pregnancy is terminated. The prevalence of gestational diabetes is 2% to 13%, depending on the genetic characteristics and environment of the population under study. Classic risk factors identify a population of women at risk of gestational diabetes (obesity, family history of diabetes, or previous poor obstetric history); however, these risk factors identify only 60% of women diagnosed as having gestational diabetes. Therefore, it is necessary to screen all pregnant women, regardless of history, for gestational diabetes. The optimal time to screen for gestational diabetes in pregnancy is between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. The screening test consist of 50 g of oral glucose followed by a plasma determination at 1 hour. If the plasma glucose 1 hour after the oral load is > or = 140 mg/dl, a glucose tolerance test is indicated. The goal of management (diet, insulin and exercise) of the gestational diabetic women is to maintain normoglycemia, needed to avoid complications for the fetus and mother.