Five Year Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Aneurysm Sac Evolution in the GREAT Registry: an Insight in Diabetics Using Propensity Matched Controls.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in the five year abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression rate after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: An international prospective registry (Europe, USA, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand) of patients treated with the GORE EXCLUDER endograft. All scheduled EVARs for infrarenal AAA between 2014 and 2016 with complete five year imaging follow up were included. Emergency procedures, ancillary proximal procedures, and inflammatory and infectious aetiologies were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics, and Cox proportional hazards survival models were used. A control group of patients without DM with similar age and comorbidities was selected using propensity scores, matched in a 1:2 scheme. RESULTS: A total of 2 888 patients (86.1% male; mean age 73.5 ± 8 years) was included, of whom 545 (18.9%) had DM. Patients with DM had higher rates of hypertension (89.2% vs. 78.4%), dyslipidaemia (76.0% vs. 60.7%), coronary artery disease (52.3% vs. 37.9%), and chronic renal impairment (20.9% vs. 14.0%) (all p < .001). The mean pre-procedural AAA diameter was 58.1 ± 10 mm. Five years post-EVAR, the type 1A endoleak rate was 1.1% (0.6% DM vs. 1.2% non-DM), the endograft related re-intervention rate was 7.3% (6.2% vs. 7.6%), the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 1.4% (1.1% vs. 1.5%), and aortic related mortality rate was 1.0% (0.6% vs. 1.2%), without statistically significant differences between groups. The overall five year mortality rate was higher in diabetics (36.3% vs. 30.5%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 - 1.58; p = .001). No statistically significant differences were found in sac regression rate (≥ 5 mm) between diabetics and non-diabetics 70.0% vs. 73.1%; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.04; p = .131. These differences remained statistically non-significant after excluding patients performed out of instructions for use (p = .61) and patients with types 1, 2 or 3 endoleaks (p = .39). CONCLUSION: The paradoxical relationship between DM and AAA does not appear to result in differences in post-EVAR sac regression rates. However, even when controlling for other comorbidities, patients with DM undergoing EVAR may have a higher five year mortality rate.

Midterm Results of Endovascular Treatment for Complete Iliac Axis Occlusions Using Covered Stents.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac disease is seeing a growing popularity despite the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II recommendations for open surgery in this cases. However, the available evidence does not focus particularly on patients with complete unilateral iliac axis obstruction (CIAO) (TASC II D4 group). This study reports mid-term results of endovascular therapy with covered stents for CIAO. METHODS: This is single-center retrospective review of patients with CIAO endovascular treatment from January 2015 to December 2017 (3 years). Two types of covered stents were used, alone or combined: the Viabahn self-expandable stent (W. L. Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) and the Advanta V12 balloon-expandable stent (Atrium-Maquet, Hudson, NH). Thirty-day outcomes, long-term patency (assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimates), in-hospital stay, and limb salvage were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with CIAO were treated in the period (87.2% male, mean age 64.3 ± 9 years). A majority presented with critical limb ischemia (56.4%, n = 22). Recanalization could be accomplished from an ipsilateral or contralateral femoral access in 82.1% of patients (1 case needed the use of a re-entry device), and from a left brachial access in 17.9%. Technical success was 100%. About 66.7% of cases received an aortic kissing stent technique. Common femoral artery/profundoplasty with prosthetic or bovine patch was associated with 74.3% of cases. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% (1/39). Primary, assisted, and secondary patency rates at 24 months were all 96.8%. Mean in-hospital stay was 5 days; no limb loss was registered during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of complete iliac axis occlusions can offer comparable midterm patency rates to open surgery aortoiliac femoral bypass, when an adequate combination of balloon and self-expandable covered stents is used and an appropriate outflow through the common femoral artery is warranted.

Debranching aortic surgery.

Conventional open surgery still remains as the gold standard of care for aortic arch and thoracoabdominal pathology. In centers of excellence, open repair of the arch has been performed with 5% immediate mortality and a low rate of complications; however overall mortality rates are around 15%, being up to 40% of all patients rejected for treatment due to their age or comorbidities. For thoracoabdominal aortic pathology, data reported from centers of excellence show immediate mortality rates from 5% to 19%, spinal cord ischemia from 2.7% to 13.2%, and renal failure needing dialysis from 4.6% to 5.6%. For these reasons, different alternatives that use endovascular techniques, including debranching procedures, have been developed. The reported results for hybrid debranching procedures are controversial and difficult to interpret because series are retrospective, heterogenic and including a small number of patients. Clearly, an important selection bias exists: debranching procedures are performed in elderly patients with more comorbidities and with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms that have more complex and extensive disease. Considering this fact, debranching procedures still remain a useful alternative: for aortic arch pathology debranching techniques can avoid or reduce the time of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) or cardiac arrest which may be beneficial in high-risk patients that otherwise would be rejected for treatment. And compared to pure endovascular techniques, they can be used in emergency cases with applicability in a wide range of anatomies. For thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, they are mainly useful when other lesser invasive endovascular options are not feasible due to anatomical limitations or when they are not available in cases where delaying the intervention is not an option.

Hybrid aortic repair with antegrade supra-aortic and renovisceral debranching from ascending aorta.

Aortic dissection is a life threatening condition. Hybrid repair has been described for the treatment of complex aortic pathology such as thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) and type A and B dissections, although open and total endovascular repair are also possible. Open surgery is still associated with substantial perioperative morbi-mortality rates, thus less invasive techniques such as endovascular repair and hybrid procedures can achieve good results in centers with experience. We present the case of a patient with a chronic type B dissection and TAAA degeneration that was treated in a single stage hybrid procedure with antegrade supra-aortic and renovisceral debranching from the ascending aorta and TEVAR. At three-year follow up, the patient is free of intervention-related complications.

Complex Aortic Aneurysm: A Current Indication for Debranching.

Conventional open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is still associated with severe complications and shows immediate mortality rates up to 20%. Although there is an increasing number of cases treated exclusively by an endovascular approach, renovisceral debranching still represents a valid alternative in high-risk patients for open surgery and in those patients where endovascular procedures are not feasible due to anatomic limitations or are not available when patients cannot wait for treatment. Herein we report the case of a patient with multiple surgical interventions and an extensive aortic aneurysm, complicated with a chronic contained rupture of the renovisceral aorta, who was successfully treated by means of a hybrid technique involving renovisceral debranching after discarding a pure endovascular management due to anatomical criteria.

Effect of antiplatelet therapy on aneurysmal sac expansion associated with type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has gained widespread use through a solid reputation of safety and effectiveness. However, some issues, such as endoleaks and sac growth over time, still arise as important concerns. Antiplatelet therapy, mandatory as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, may play a role in both phenomena by interfering with blood clotting properties and the inflammatory process associated with AAA. We analyzed whether different antiplatelet therapies were independent risk factors for type II endoleak (T2E) persistence and midterm sac growth after EVAR. METHODS: All patients with T2E detected in the first post-EVAR control were included, except those without at least 1 year of complete follow-up. Data for demographics, clinical comorbidities, EVAR devices, and antiplatelet therapies were recorded. All patients underwent routine follow-up with contrast-enhanced tomography at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. A three-dimensional rendering of each endoleak was performed for detailed volumetry. Main outcomes were endoleak persistence at 6 months and sac growth >5 mm at end of follow-up. RESULTS: During a 9-year period, 87 patients with initial T2E were monitored for a mean of 41.5 months. On discharge, salicylates were prescribed to 50, clopidogrel to 16, and multiagent therapy or anticoagulation to 9; no therapy was given to 12. No significant differences in comorbidities or baseline AAA characteristics were found between groups. At 6 months thereafter, 59% (n = 51) of the initial T2Es persisted. At end of follow-up, 32 patients had sac growth >5 mm (37%). Sac growth was significantly less frequent in the group treated with salicylates (26% vs 60%; P = .004). Cox proportional hazards model reinforced the role of salicylates as protectors for sac growth over time (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.87; P = .024), whereas T2E nidus volume and endoleak complexity behaved like independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy with salicylates appears to be linked to a decreased risk of sac growth >5 mm over time in patients with T2Es detected right after EVAR. Population-based cohort studies are mandatory to confirm this finding and to guide a potential recommendation.

"Lower limbs revascularization from supraceliac and thoracic aorta".

Revascularization of femoral arteries from descending thoracic or supraceliac aorta is an uncommon procedure, in part because of the popularization of the technically easier extra-anatomic bypasses. However, using those aortic levels as the source of the bypass inflow is a useful alternative in selected patients with aortoiliac disease, with excellent results. We report long-term results in 4 patients with revascularization from thoracic aorta and another 2 cases from aorta at supraceliac level. This technique should be considered as a good alternative in patients with adverse abdominal conditions or with a severely diseased infrarenal aorta due to heavy calcification.

Use of aortic extension cuffs for preserving hypogastric blood flow in endovascular aneurysm repair with aneurysmal involvement of common iliac arteries.

BACKGROUND: Intentional hypogastric artery covering during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) can carry a non-negligible rate of complications; to preserve pelvic blood flow, several approaches are in use, such as sandwich techniques, branched iliac devices, or the use of aortic extender cuffs in a bell-bottom configuration. We assess the performance of the latter for treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms during EVAR. METHODS: Prospective gathering of data in 21 dilated common iliac arteries (18-25 mm) with coexisting abdominal aorta aneurysm, which were treated from 2005 to 2010 and received a GORE(®) Excluder endograft and one (n = 14) or several aortic extenders in a bell-bottom configuration. Control group consisted of 136 EVARs performed with the same device in the same time frame. Median follow-up was of 47 months, with contrast-enhanced computed tomography assessment 1 month after the procedure and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Age and comorbidities were homogeneously distributed among groups, although the aortic aneurysm diameter was lower in the bell-bottom group (50 mm vs. 58.2 mm, P < 0.001). There was no 30-day mortality registered in this group, and only one patient died during follow-up (5.3%), without relation with the aneurysmal disease. No significant differences were found in reintervention (15.8% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.707) or endoleak rates (36.8% vs. 38.9%, Fisher P = 1). There were no type I and four type II endoleaks, two of which precised treatment for sac growth. Endoleak-free survival (P = 0.994) and reintervention-free survival (P = 0.563) did not show differences either. CONCLUSION: Bell-bottom technique is a feasible and safe alternative for preserving hypogastric blood flow, and does not imply a higher risk of reintervention or endoleak at 3-year follow-up.

Pseudooclusión carotídea sintomática: tratamiento quirúrgico y resultados / Symptomatic pseudo-occlusion of the carotid artery: surgical treatment and outcomes

Introducción. Estudios multicéntricos recientes sugieren un dudoso beneficio de la endarterectomía carotídea (EC) en pacientes con pseudooclusión carotídea (POC). Objetivo. Evaluar el resultado clínico y hemodinámico de la EC en las POC sintomáticas. Pacientes y métodos. Entre 1999 y 2005 se intervinieron 13 pacientes con POC interna (3,96% de la cirugía carotídea) sintomáticas: siete con infarto cerebral (53,8%), tres con accidente isquémico transitorio (23,1%), dos con amaurosis fugaz (15,4%) y uno con síncopes de repetición (7,7%). En todos se realizó eco-Doppler y angiografía. Criterios diagnósticos del eco-Doppler: oclusión origen carótida interna, flujo en goteo o señal distal amortiguada. Criterios diagnósticos de la angiografía: obstrucción origen carótida interna con relleno filiforme distal. Se indicó la revascularización quirúrgica en todos ellos. Resultados. En 12 pacientes se pudo revascularizar la carótida interna (92,3%) y en uno se hizo su ligadura (7,7%). Técnica de revascularización: 11 EC y un bypass a carótida interna distal. Morbimortalidad quirúrgica del 0%. Control clínico: 3-69 meses (media: 31,6 meses) mediante eco-Doppler de troncos supraaórticos y transcraneal, encontrándose todos vivos, asintomáticos y con permeabilidad de la carótida interna. La reserva hemodinámica homolateral postoperatoria se ha encontrado normalizada en la mayoría de los pacientes. Conclusiones. Se considera indicada la intervención quirúrgica en casos sintomáticos de POC, ya que logra la repermeabilización de la carótida y la normalización de la reserva hemodinámica en un alto porcentaje, previniendo además la aparición de nueva sintomatología a largo plazo

Introduction. Recent multicentre studies suggest dubious benefits for carotid endarterectomy (CE) in patients with pseudo-occlusion of the carotid artery (POC). Aim. To evaluate the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of CE in cases of symptomatic POC. Patients and methods. Between 1999 and 2005 interventions were carried out on 13 patients with symptomatic pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery (3.96% of the carotid surgery conducted): seven with cerebral infarction (53.8%), three with transient ischemic attack (23.1%), two with amaurosis fugax (15.4%) and one with recurring syncopes (7.7%). Doppler ultrasonography and angiography recordings were performed in all cases. Diagnostic criteria for Doppler ultrasonography were occlusion with its origin in the internal carotid artery, a drip flow or attenuated distal signals. Diagnostic criteria for angiography were occlusion with its origin in the internal carotid artery with filiform distal filling. Surgical revascularisation was indicated in all cases. Results. The internal carotid artery was revascularised in 12 patients (92.3%) and ligation was performed in one of them (7.7%). Revascularisation technique: 11 CE and one distal internal carotid artery bypass. Surgical morbidity and mortality rates of 0%. Clinical monitoring: 3-69 months (mean: 31.6 months) using transcranial and supra-aortic trunk Doppler ultrasonography; all patients were alive, asymptomatic and with patency of the internal carotid artery. The post-operative homolateral haemodynamic reserve was found to be at normal levels in most of the patients. Conclusions. Surgical intervention is considered to be indicated in symptomatic cases of POC, as it achieves repatency of the carotid artery and normalises the haemodynamic reserve in a high percentage of cases; it also prevents the appearance of new symptoms in the long term

Historia natural de los aneurismas de la aorta torácica / The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms

Introducción. La historia natural de los aneurismas de la aorta torácica (AAT) está escasamente documentada debido a la dificultad en el diagnóstico de pacientes asintomáticos con AAT y la falta de estudios de cribado en la población. Su evolución natural es el crecimiento progresivo que concluye en la ruptura, con elevada mortalidad. Desarrollo. Revisión sistemática de la bibliografía publicada en las bases de datos Medline y PubMed mediante las palabras clave indicadas al pie y en especial con la evaluación de los registros informatizados con bases de datos amplias de universidades o sociedades europeas y americanas de cirugía vascular, cardiovascular y torácica. Conclusiones. La supervivencia a cinco años de los pacientes con AAT no tratados es menor del 19%; la causa principal de muerte es la ruptura aneurismática. El tamaño es el factor fundamental de riesgo de ruptura. El riesgo de ruptura aumenta exponencialmente cuando el diámetro de la aorta ascendente supera los 6 cm y el de la aorta descendente los 7 cm, e igualmente cuando se producen crecimientos rápidos. La cirugía mejora la evolución natural de la enfermedad. La historia natural de los AAT está determinada por su tamaño y tasa de crecimiento. El principio de toma de decisiones en el tratamiento de estos enfermos ha de basarse en determinar el riesgo individualizado de complicaciones en su evolución natural (ruptura, disección) frente al riesgo de la corrección quirúrgica en la experiencia del grupo quirúrgico concreto. La cirugía endovascular ha supuesto ya un impacto positivo en la historia natural al permitir la corrección de AAT en pacientes de alto riesgo, sin otras posibilidades previas de tratamiento

Introduction. The literature on the natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) is scarce due to the difficulty involved in diagnosing asymptomatic patients with TAA and the lack of screening studies conducted in the population. Its natural history comprises a progressive growth that ends in rupture, with a high mortality rate. Development. We carried out a systematic search of the literature published in the Medline and PubMed databases using the key words indicated in the footnote below. Additionally and perhaps more important, we also evaluated the computer records in extensive databases from universities and European or American vascular, cardiovascular and thoracic surgery societies. Conclusions. The survival rate of untreated TAA patients at five years is lower than 19%, the main cause of death being aneurysmal rupture. Size is a fundamental factor associated to the risk of rupture. The risk of rupture increases exponentially when the diameter of the ascending aorta exceeds 6 cm and that of the descending aorta goes beyond 7 cm; this is also the true when rapid growth takes place. Surgery improves the natural history of the disease. The natural history of TAAs is determined by their size and growth rate. The principle guiding decision-making in the treatment of these patients must be based on determining the individual risk of complications in their natural history (rupture, dissection) versus the risk involved in surgical correction, according to the experience of each particular surgical group. Endovascular surgery has had a positive effect on the natural history by allowing TAA to be corrected in high-risk patients who previously had no other chances of treatment open to them