ABSTRACT
Significant sums are spent every year to find effective treatments to control inflammation and speed up the repair of damaged skin. This study investigated the main mechanisms involved in the skin wound cure. Consequently, it offered guidance to develop new therapies to control OxInflammation and infection and decrease functional loss and cost issues. This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, with a structured search in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, analyzing 23 original studies. Bias analysis and study quality were assessed using the SYRCLE tool (Prospero number is CRD262 936). Our results highlight the activation of membrane receptors (IFN-δ, TNF-α, toll-like) in phagocytes, especially macrophages, during early wound healing. The STAT1, IP3, and NF-kß pathways are positively regulated, while Ca2+ mobilization correlates with ROS production and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. This pathway activation leads to the proteolytic cleavage of caspase-1, releasing IL-1ß and IL-18, which are responsible for immune modulation and vasodilation. Mediators such as IL-1, iNOS, TNF-α, and TGF-ß are released, influencing pro- and anti-inflammatory cascades, increasing ROS levels, and inducing the oxidation of lipids, proteins, and DNA. During healing, the respiratory burst depletes antioxidant defenses (SOD, CAT, GST), creating a pro-oxidative environment. The IFN-δ pathway, ROS production, and inflammatory markers establish a positive feedback loop, recruiting more polymorphonuclear cells and reinforcing the positive interaction between oxidative stress and inflammation. This process is crucial because, in the immune system, the vicious positive cycle between ROS, the oxidative environment, and, above all, the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome inappropriately triggers hypoxia, increases ROS levels, activates pro-inflammatory cytokines and inhibits the antioxidant action and resolution of anti-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to the evolution of chronic inflammation and tissue damage.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a utilidade e o valor prognóstico da tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa em pacientes com sepse, e investigar a associação dos resultados deste exame com os níveis séricos de algumas moléculas inflamatórias. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, realizado em uma unidade de terapia intensiva para pacientes adultos com 18 leitos. Os critérios de exclusão foram imunossupressão grave ou tratamento com antibióticos iniciado mais de 48 horas antes da avaliação. Aplicamos o exame de tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa quando da inclusão (dia 1) e no dia 3. Avaliamos os níveis de interleucina 6, interleucina 10, proteínas do grupo 1 de mobilidade alta e de ST2 solúvel no sangue obtido quando da inclusão. Resultados: Dos 79 pacientes incluídos, 17 (21,6%) tiveram os sinais da tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa considerados tecnicamente não confiáveis, tendo sido excluídos do estudo. Assim, incluímos na análise final 62 pacientes, que foram submetidos a 95 exames de tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa dentro das primeiras 48 horas após sua inclusão. A média de idade foi de 51,5 (DP: 18,9), e 49 (62%) dos pacientes eram do sexo masculino. Os índices de hiperemia reativa dos dias 1 e 3 não se associaram com necessidade de vasopressores, SOFA, APACHE II ou mortalidade aos 28 dias. Dentre os pacientes que morreram, em comparação aos sobreviventes, houve aumento significante nos índices de hiperemia reativa no dia 3 em comparação ao dia 1 (p = 0,0045). Ocorreu fraca correlação negativa entre o índice obtido por tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa no dia 1 e os níveis de proteínas do grupo 1 de mobilidade alta (r = -0,287). Conclusão: Dificuldades técnicas e falta de associações claras dos resultados do exame com a gravidade clínica e com o desfecho foram fortes limitantes da utilidade do exame de tonometria arterial periférica - hiperemia reativa em pacientes sépticos admitidos à unidade de terapia intensiva.
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the usefulness and prognostic value of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry in patients with sepsis. Moreover, we investigated the association of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry results with serum levels of certain inflammatory molecules. Methods: Prospective study, conducted in an 18-bed mixed intensive care unit for adults. The exclusion criteria included severe immunosuppression or antibiotic therapy initiated more than 48 hours before assessment. We measured the reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry on inclusion (day 1) and on day 3. Interleukin-6, interleukin-10, high-mobility group box 1 protein and soluble ST2 levels were measured in the blood obtained upon inclusion. Results: Seventeen of the 79 patients (21.6%) enrolled were determined to have reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry signals considered technically unreliable and were excluded from the study. Thus, 62 patients were included in the final analysis, and they underwent a total of 95 reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry exams within the first 48 hours after inclusion. The mean age was 51.5 (SD: 18.9), and 49 (62%) of the patients were male. Reactive hyperemia indexes from days 1 and 3 were not associated with vasopressor need, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or 28-day mortality. Among the patients who died, compared with survivors, there was a significant increase in the day 3 reactive hyperemia index compared with day 1 (p = 0.045). There was a weak negative correlation between the day 1 reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry index and the levels of high-mobility group box 1 protein (r = -0.287). Conclusion: Technical difficulties and the lack of clear associations between the exam results and clinical severity or outcomes strongly limits the utility of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry in septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Sepsis/diagnosis , Hyperemia/diagnosis , Manometry/methods , Prognosis , Time Factors , Biomarkers/blood , Prospective Studies , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/blood , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Intensive Care Units , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Background and Purpose. Skin wound healing is a dynamic process driven by molecular events responsible for the morphofunctional repair of the injured tissue. In a systematic review, we analyzed the relevance of plant fractions and isolates on skin wound healing. By revising preclinical investigations with murine models, we investigated if the current evidence could support clinical trials. Methods. Studies were selected in the MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus databases according to the PRISMA statement. All 32 identified studies were submitted to data extraction and the methodological bias was investigated according to ARRIVE strategy. Results. The studies demonstrated that plant fractions and isolates are able to modulate the inflammatory process during skin wound healing, being also effective in attenuating the oxidative tissue damage in the scar tissue and stimulating cell proliferation, neoangiogenesis, collagen synthesis, granulation tissue expansion, reepithelialization, and the wound closure rate. However, we identified serious methodological flaws in all studies, such as the high level of reporting bias and absence of standardized experimental designs, analytical methods, and outcome measures. Conclusion. Considering these limitations, the current evidence generated from flawed methodological animal studies makes it difficult to determine the relevance of herbal medicines to treat skin wounds and derails conducting clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Wound Healing/drug effects , Animals , MiceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the usefulness and prognostic value of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry in patients with sepsis. Moreover, we investigated the association of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry results with serum levels of certain inflammatory molecules. METHODS:: Prospective study, conducted in an 18-bed mixed intensive care unit for adults. The exclusion criteria included severe immunosuppression or antibiotic therapy initiated more than 48 hours before assessment. We measured the reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry on inclusion (day 1) and on day 3. Interleukin-6, interleukin-10, high-mobility group box 1 protein and soluble ST2 levels were measured in the blood obtained upon inclusion. RESULTS:: Seventeen of the 79 patients (21.6%) enrolled were determined to have reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry signals considered technically unreliable and were excluded from the study. Thus, 62 patients were included in the final analysis, and they underwent a total of 95 reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry exams within the first 48 hours after inclusion. The mean age was 51.5 (SD: 18.9), and 49 (62%) of the patients were male. Reactive hyperemia indexes from days 1 and 3 were not associated with vasopressor need, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or 28-day mortality. Among the patients who died, compared with survivors, there was a significant increase in the day 3 reactive hyperemia index compared with day 1 (p = 0.045). There was a weak negative correlation between the day 1 reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry index and the levels of high-mobility group box 1 protein (r = -0.287). CONCLUSION:: Technical difficulties and the lack of clear associations between the exam results and clinical severity or outcomes strongly limits the utility of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry in septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Subject(s)
Hyperemia/diagnosis , Manometry/methods , Sepsis/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/mortality , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Este trabalho avalia o conhecimento e a opinião de pacientes ambulatoriais de um hospital-escola a respeito da participação de acadêmicos de Medicina nos atendimentos. Aplicaram-se questionários com perguntas objetivas e dissertativas a 131 pacientes enquanto aguardavam primeira consulta médica na unidade. Dos entrevistados, 58,8% sabiam o que significava o termo "hospital-escola" e 57,3% tinham conhecimento de que o hospital analisado se inclui nesse conceito. Apenas 6,9% dos pacientes afirmaram ter recebido explicações sobre o conceito e funcionamento do hospital-escola no momento da marcação da consulta e 36,6% relataram não saber que seriam atendidos por estudantes supervisionados pelo médico professor. Quanto à opinião sobre o atendimento por alunos, 69,5% o consideram bom e importante para o aprendizado deles, que serão os médicos do futuro; 26,7% não se incomodam; e 3,1% preferem atendimento exclusivo pelo médico. Após análise, verificou-se que mais de um terço dos pacientes não sabia que seria atendido por estudantes e que há necessidade de informá-los sobre a dinâmica de atendimento médico no momento do agendamento das consultas.
The goal of this paper is to evaluate the knowledge and opinions of patients in a university hospital on the participation of medical students in medical appointments. Questionnaires with "yes" or "no" closed questions and open questions were answered by 131 patients while they were waiting for their first medical appointment at the hospital. 58.8% of respondents knew the meaning of "teaching hospital" and 57.3% knew that the hospital fell within this category. Only 6.9% of patients reported having received information on the definition and particularities of a teaching hospital when scheduling their appointments, and 36.6% reported not knowing that they would be attended by students supervised by a physician teacher. 69.5% of patients considered being attended by a student positively, as an important step in the students' learning process; 26.7% did not mind being attended to by a medical student, and 3.1% would have preferred to have been attended to by a qualified physician only. This study has concluded that it is necessary to inform patients of the particularities of teaching hospitals when they schedule their appointments.