Lack of association of S100ß and neuron-specific enolase with mortality in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between brain damage biomarkers and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The sample comprised 70 patients admitted to an ICU. Blood samples were collected from all patients on ICU admission, and levels of S100ß and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was associated with mortality, but NSE and S100ß were not associated with this outcome. In contrast, S100ß levels were significantly higher in delirious and non-delirious patients who required mechanical ventilation during ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Levels of brain biomarkers at the time of ICU admission did not predict mortality in critically ill patients.

Lack of association of S100 and neuron-specific enolase with mortality in critically ill patients

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between brain damage biomarkers and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The sample comprised 70 patients admitted to an ICU. Blood samples were collected from all patients on ICU admission, and levels of S100β and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were determined by ELISA. Results: Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was associated with mortality, but NSE and S100β were not associated with this outcome. In contrast, S100β levels were significantly higher in delirious and non-delirious patients who required mechanical ventilation during ICU stay. Conclusion: Levels of brain biomarkers at the time of ICU admission did not predict mortality in critically ill patients. .

CAM-ICU and ICDSC agreement in medical and surgical ICU patients is influenced by disease severity.

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a prevalent condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) associated with worse outcomes. The principal aim of the present study was compare the agreement between two tools for delirium assessment in medical and surgical patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: Consecutive adult surgical and medical patients admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hours between March 2009 and September 2010 were included. Delirium was evaluated twice a day using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and Confusion Assessment Method adapted to the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). The kappa (k) and AC1 coefficients were calculated as a measure of agreement between the CAM-ICU and ICDSC. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 69 (12%) emergency surgical, 207 (35%) elective surgical and 319 (54%) medical patients. Delirium incidence evaluated by the ICDSC, but not by the CAM-ICU, was similar among the three groups. Overall agreement between CAM-ICU and ICDSC was moderate (k = 0.5) to substantial (AC1 = 0.71). In medical patients the agreement between the two instruments was moderate (k = 0.53) to substantial (AC1 = 0.76). The agreement between the two tools in emergency surgical patients was also moderate (k = 0.53) to substantial (AC1 = 0.68). In elective surgical patients the agreement between the two instruments was low (k = 0.42) to substantial (AC1 = 0.74).Agreement rates seemed to be influenced by disease severity. The agreement rate in the general ICU population with APACHE II = <14 was k = 0.57 and AC1 = 0.81, compared to k = 0.44 and AC1 = 0.59, in patients with more severe disease. This was even more different when the need for mechanical ventilation was used as a surrogate of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement rates between CAM-ICU and ICDSC may vary between different groups of ICU patients and seems to be affected by disease severity.

Incidência de delirium durante a internação em unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes pré-tratados com estatinas no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca / The incidence of delirium in patients pretreated with statins who remain in an intensive care unit after cardiac surgery

OBJETIVO: Determinar a associação entre a administração pré-operatória de estatina e o delírium pós-operatório em uma corte prospectiva de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados pacientes adultos internados na unidade de terapia intensiva após cirurgia cardíaca entre janeiro e junho de 2011. A triagem para delirium foi realizada utilizando o Confusion Assessment Method para analisar delirium em uma unidade de terapia intensiva (CAM-ICU) e Delirium Screening Checklist para terapia intensiva (ICDSC) durante a internação na terapia intensiva RESULTADOS: Cento e sessenta e nove pacientes foram submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca eletiva, dos quais 40,2% estavam utilizando estatina no pré-operatório. Delirium foi identificado em 14,9% dos pacientes que não utilizavam estatina comparado com 11,8% dos que utilizavam (p=0,817) quando avaliados pelo CAM-ICU. Utilizando o ICDSC 18,8% dos pacientes que não usam estatina comparado com 10.3% dos que usam (p=0,191). CONCLUSÃO: Não há relação entre uso de estatinas com a ocorrência de delirium em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the preoperative administration of statins and postoperative delirium in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: All adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery between January and June 2011 were included. Delirium was screened during the postoperative period using the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC). RESULTS: A total of 169 patients underwent elective cardiac surgery, and 40.2% of the patients were treated preoperatively with statins. Delirium was identified using the CAM-ICU in 14.9% of patients not taking preoperative statins in comparison with 11.8% of the patients taking statins (p = 0.817). Using the ICDSC, delirium was identified in 18.8% of patients not taking statins in comparison with 10.3% of the patients taking statins (p = 0.191). CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative statins is not correlated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Comparison of CAM-ICU and ICDSC for the detection of delirium in critically ill patients focusing on relevant clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Delirium is a frequent and serious problem in the intensive care unit (ICU) that is associated with increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). The main objective of the present study was to compare and assess the agreement between the diagnosis of delirium obtained by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) in patients admitted to the ICU and their association with outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hours between May and November 2008 were included. Patients with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of -4 to -5 for more than 3 days were excluded. Delirium was evaluated twice a day by the ICDSC and CAM-ICU. Patients were followed-up until ICU discharge or for a maximum of 28 days. RESULTS: During the study period, 383 patients were admitted to the ICU and 162 (42%) were evaluated; delirium was identified in 26.5% of patients by CAM-ICU and in 34.6% by ICDSC. There was agreement in diagnosing delirium diagnosis between the 2 methods in 42 (27.8%) patients and in excluding delirium in 105 (64.8%) patients. The ICDSC was positive in 14 (8.6%) patients in whom CAM-ICU was negative. Delirium, diagnosed either by ICDSC or CAM-ICU assessments, was associated with both significantly increased hospital LOS (14.8 ± 8.3 vs 9.8 ± 6.4, P < .001; 15.3 ± 8.7 vs 10.5 ± 7.1, P < .001, respectively), mortality in the ICU (11.1% vs 5.8%, P < .001; 12.5% vs 2.5%, P = .022), and in the hospital (10.7% vs 5.6%, P < .001; 23.2% vs 10.9%, P = .047). In addition, patients with positive ICDSC presenting with negative CAM-ICU had similar outcomes as compared with those without delirium. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study suggest that the CAM-ICU is better predictor of outcome when compared with ICDSC.

The incidence of delirium in patients pretreated with statins who remain in an intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. / Incidência de delirium durante a internação em unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes pré-tratados com estatinas no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the preoperative administration of statins and postoperative delirium in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: All adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery between January and June 2011 were included. Delirium was screened during the postoperative period using the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC). RESULTS: A total of 169 patients underwent elective cardiac surgery, and 40.2% of the patients were treated preoperatively with statins. Delirium was identified using the CAM-ICU in 14.9% of patients not taking preoperative statins in comparison with 11.8% of the patients taking statins (p = 0.817). Using the ICDSC, delirium was identified in 18.8% of patients not taking statins in comparison with 10.3% of the patients taking statins (p = 0.191). CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative statins is not correlated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.