Immunophenotypic identification and characterization of tumor cells and infiltrating cell populations in meningiomas.

Meningiomas are primary tumors of the central nervous system composed of both neoplastic and other infiltrating cells. We determined the cellular composition of 51 meningioma samples by multiparameter flow cytometric (MFC) immunophenotyping and investigated the potential relationship between mRNA and protein expression levels of neoplastic cells. For immunophenotypic, morphologic, and cytogenetic characterization of individual cell populations, a large panel of markers was used together with phagocytic/endocytic functional assays and MFC sorting. Overall, our results revealed coexistence of CD45(-) neoplastic cells and CD45(+) immune infiltrating cells in all meningiomas. Infiltrating cells included tissue macrophages, with an HLA-DR(+)CD14(+)CD45(+)CD68(+)CD16(-/+)CD33(-/+) phenotype and high phagocytic/endocytic activity, and a small proportion of cytotoxic lymphocytes (mostly T CD8(+) and natural killer cells). Tumor cells expressed multiple cell adhesion proteins, tetraspanins, HLA-I/HLA-DR molecules, complement regulatory proteins, cell surface ectoenzymes, and growth factor receptors. Noteworthy, the relationship between mRNA and protein levels was variable, depending on the proteins evaluated and the level of infiltration by immune cells. In summary, our results indicate that MFC immunophenotyping provides a reliable tool for the characterization of the patterns of protein expression of different cell populations coexisting in meningioma samples, with a more accurate measure of gene expression profiles of tumor cells at the functional/protein level than conventional mRNA microarray, independently of the degree of infiltration of the tumor by immune cells.

Delineation of commonly deleted chromosomal regions in meningiomas by high-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays.

Despite recent advances in the identification of the cytogenetic profiles of meningiomas, a significant group of tumors still show normal karyotypes or few chromosomal changes. The authors analyzed the cytogenetic profile of 50 meningiomas using fluorescence in situ hybridization and high-density (500 K) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Our results confirm that del(22q) (52%) and del(1p) (16%) (common deleted regions: 22q11.21-22q13.3. and 1p31.2-p36.33) are the most frequent alterations. Additionally, recurrent monosomy 14 (8%), del(6q) (10%), del(7p) (10%), and del(19q) (4%) were observed, while copy number patterns consistent with recurrent chromosomal gains, gene amplification, and copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) were either absent or rare. Based on their overall SNP profiles, meningiomas could be classified into: (i) diploid cases, (ii) meningiomas with a single chromosomal change [e.g., monosomy 22/del(22q)] and (iii) tumors with ≥2 altered chromosomes. In summary, our results confirm and extend on previous observations showing that the most recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in meningiomas correspond to chromosome losses localized in chromosomes 1, 22 and less frequently in chromosomes 6, 7, 14, and 19, while chromosomal gains and cnLOH are restricted to a small proportion of cases. Finally, a set of cancer-associated candidate genes associated with the TP53, MYC, CASP3, HDAC1, and TERT signaling pathways was identified, in cases with coexisting monosomy 14 and del(1p).

Gene expression profiles of meningiomas are associated with tumor cytogenetics and patient outcome.

Cytogenetic analysis is a powerful tool for predicting recurrence in meningiomas, even among histologically benign/grade I tumors. Despite this, no study has been reported in which the impact of tumor cytogenetics on the gene expression profiles (GEP) has been analyzed in meningiomas. Here, we analyzed the GEP of 47 tumors and correlated them with the most clinical relevant cytogenetic subgroups of meningiomas, as confirmed through the analysis of 172 patients. Additionally three normal meningeal samples were also studied. Overall, our results show a clear association between the clinically relevant cytogenetic subgroups of meningiomas including diploid tumors (n = 18), isolated -22/22q- (n = 12), del(1p36) alone (n = 4) and complex karyotypes associated with del(1p36) and/or -14q (n = 13) and their GEP. Accordingly, based on the expression of 85 genes (40 of which were coded in the altered chromosomes used for patient stratification) the cytogenetic class of the tumor could be predicted with an error of <1%, a clear association being found between the GEP and patient outcome (P = 0.03) but not tumor histopathology. In summary, we show a clear association between GEP of neoplastic cells and clinically relevant cytogenetic subgroups of meningiomas.

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization of mapped BAC DNA clones to screen for chromosome 14 copy number abnormalities in meningiomas.

Chromosome 14 loss in meningiomas are associated with more aggressive tumour behaviour. To date, no studies have been reported in which the entire chromosome 14q of meningioma tumour cells has been studied by high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH). Here, we used a high-resolution a-CGH to define the exact localization and extent of numerical changes of chromosome 14 in meningioma patients. An array containing 807 bacterial artificial chromosome clones specific for chromosome 14q (average resolution of approximately 130 Kb) was constructed and applied to the study of 25 meningiomas in parallel to the confirmatory interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) analyses. Overall, abnormalities of chromosome 14q were detected in 10/25 cases (40%). Interestingly, in seven of these cases, loss of chromosome 14q32.3 was detected by iFISH and confirmed to correspond to monosomy 14 by a-CGH. In contrast, discrepant results were found between iFISH and a-CGH in the other three altered cases. In one patient, a diploid background was observed by iFISH, while monosomy 14 was identified by a-CGH. In the remaining two cases, which showed gains of the IGH gene by iFISH, a-CGH did not detected copy number changes in one case showing a tetraploid karyotype, while in the other tumour, varying genetic imbalances along the long arm of chromosome 14 were detected. In summary, here, we report for the first time, the high-resolution a-CGH profiles of chromosome 14q in meningiomas, confirming that monosomy 14 is the most frequent alteration associated with this chromosome; other numerical abnormalities being only sporadically detected.

Patient gender is associated with distinct patterns of chromosomal abnormalities and sex chromosome linked gene-expression profiles in meningiomas.

The female predominance of meningiomas has been established, but how this is affected by hormones is still under discussion. We analyzed the characteristics of meningiomas from male (n = 53) and female (n = 111) patients by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH). In addition, in a subgroup of 45 (12 male and 33 female) patients, tumors were hybridized with the Affymetrix U133A chip. We show a higher frequency of larger tumors (p = .01) and intracranial meningiomas (p = .04) together with a higher relapse rate (p = .03) in male than in female patients. Male patients had a higher percentage of del(1p36) (p < .001), while loss of an X chromosome was restricted to tumors from female patients (p = .008). In turn, iFISH studies showed a higher frequency of chromosome losses, other than monosomy 22 alone, in meningiomas from male patients (p = .002), while female patients displayed a higher frequency of chromosome gains (p = .04) or monosomy 22 alone (p = .03) in the ancestral tumor clone. Interestingly, individual chromosomal abnormalities had a distinct impact on the recurrence-free survival rate of male versus female patients. In turn, gene expression showed that eight genes (RPS4Y1, DDX3Y, JARID1D, DDX3X, EIF1AY, XIST, USP9Y, and CYorf15B) had significantly different expression patterns (R(2) > 0.80; p < .05) in tumors from male and female patients. In summary, we show the existence of different patterns of chromosome abnormalities and gene-expression profiles associated with patient gender, which could help to explain the slightly different clinical behavior of these two patient groups.

Early recurrences in histologically benign/grade I meningiomas are associated with large tumors and coexistence of monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone.

Tumor recurrence is the major clinical complication in meningiomas, and its prediction in histologically benign/grade I tumors remains a challenge. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic value of specific chromosomal abnormalities and the genetic heterogeneity of the tumor, together with other clinicobiological disease features, for predicting early relapses in histologically benign/grade I meningiomas. A total of 149 consecutive histologically benign/grade I meningiomas in patients who underwent complete tumor resection were prospectively analyzed. Using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization, we studied the prognostic impact of the abnormalities detected for 11 different chromosomes, together with other relevant clinicobiological and histopathological characteristics of the disease, on recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 2.5, 5, and 10 years. From the prognostic point of view, losses of chromosomes 9, 10, 14, and 18 and del(1p36) were associated with a shorter RFS at 2.5, 5, and 10 years. Similarly, histologically benign/grade I meningiomas showing coexistence of monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone displayed a higher frequency of early relapses. In fact, coexistence of -14 and del(1p36) in the ancestral tumor cell clone, together with tumor size, represented the best combination of independent prognostic factors for the identification of those patients with a high risk of an early relapse. Our results indicate that patients with large histologically benign/grade I meningiomas carrying monosomy 14 and del(1p36) in their ancestral tumor cell clone have a high probability of relapsing early after diagnostic surgery. These findings suggest the need for closer follow-up in this small group of patients.

[Cytogenetic alterations in meningioma tumors and their impact on disease outcome]. / Alteraciones citogenéticas en meningiomas y su impacto en la evolución de la enfermedad.

In recent years important advances have been achieved in the understanding of the genetic abnormalities present in meningioma tumors and its association with the ontogeny and progression of these tumor. Accordingly, while the presence of monosomy 22/22q-, associated with mutation of the NF2, BAM22, RRP22, GAR22, MN1, SMARCB1, CLH22 and/or LARGE genes, is associated with neoplasic transformation, other alterations such us monosomy 14, del(1p), different chromosomal abnormalities localized at 9p, 10q and 17q and complex karyotypes are frequently related to tumor progression. From the clinical point of view, currently available information about the impact of the different cytogenetic abnormalities on disease behavior and patient outcome is still scanty; nevertheless, the presence of gains of chromosome 22 in the context of a hyperdiploid karyotype, as well as del(1p) and monosomy 14 have been associated with a statistically significantly shorter recurrence-free survival, this later abnormality showing an independent prognostic value.

Alteraciones citogenéticas en meningiomas y su impacto en la evolución de la enfermedad / Cytogenetic alterations in meningioma tumors and their impact on disease outcome

En los últimos años se ha avanzado de forma notable en el conocimiento de las alteraciones genéticas presentes en los meningiomas y su asociación con la ontogenia y progresión tumoral. Así, mientras que la presencia de monosomía 22/22q­, asociada a mutación en los genes NF2, BAM22, RRP22, GAR22, MN1, SMARCB1, CLH22 y LARGE, se asocia con el proceso de transformación neoplásica, la monosomía 14, deleciones 1p, alteraciones en los cromosomas 9p, 10q y 17q y los cariotipos complejos constituirían habitualmente alteraciones genéticas asociadas con la progresión tumoral. Desde el punto de vista pronóstico, la información disponible sobre el valor de las anomalías genéticas sigue siendo escasa; no obstante, la presencia de ganancias del cromosoma 22 en el contexto de un cariotipo complejo, así como la deleción del cromosoma 1p y la monosomía 14, se ha asociado con una supervivencia libre de recaída significativamente más corta, y esta última alteración ha mostrado un valor pronóstico independiente

In recent years important advances have been achieved in the understanding of the genetic abnormalities present in meningioma tumors and its association with the ontogeny and progression of these tumor. Accordingly, while the presence of monosomy 22/22q­, associated with mutation of the NF2, BAM22, RRP22, GAR22, MN1, SMARCB1, CLH22 and/or LARGE genes, is associated with neoplasic transformation, other alterations such us monosomy 14, del(1p), different chromosomal abnormalities localized at 9p, 10q and 17q and complex karyotypes are frequently related to tumor progression. From the clinical point of view, currently available information about the impact of the different cytogenetic abnormalities on disease behavior and patient outcome is still scanty; nevertheless, the presence of gains of chromosome 22 in the context of a hyperdiploid karyotype, as well as del(1p) and monosomy 14 have been associated with a statistically significantly shorter recurrence-free survival, this later abnormality showing an independent prognostic value

Microarray-based analysis of spinal versus intracranial meningiomas: different clinical, biological, and genetic characteristics associated with distinct patterns of gene expression.

It has long been recognized that spinal meningiomas show particular clinical and histological features. Here, we compare the clinico-biological characteristics as well as the genetic abnormalities and patterns of gene expression of spinal and intracranial meningiomas. Fourteen spinal and 141 intracranial meningioma patients were analyzed at diagnosis. In all tumors, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) studies were performed for the detection of quantitative abnormalities for 11 different chromosomes. Additionally, microarray analyses were performed on a subgroup of 18 histologically benign meningiomas (7 spinal and 11 intracranial). Upon comparison with intracranial tumors, spinal meningiomas showed a marked predominance of psammomatous and transitional tumors (p = 0.001), together with a higher proportion of cases displaying a single tumor cell clone by iFISH (p = 0.004). In 86% of the spinal versus 56% of the intracranial tumors (p = 0.01), the ancestral tumor cell clone detected showed either absence of any chromosomal abnormality or monosomy 22/22q- alone. Analysis of gene expression profiles showed differential expression between spinal and intracranial meningiomas for a total of 1555 genes, 35 of which allowed a clear distinction between both tumor types. Most of these 35 genes (n = 30) showed significantly higher expression among spinal tumors and corresponded to genes involved in signal transduction pathways, which did not show a significantly different expression according to tumor histopathology. In summary, we show the occurrence of unique patterns of genetic abnormalities and gene expression profiles in spinal as compared to intracranial meningiomas that provide new insights into the molecular pathways involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of spinal meningiomas, and could help explain their particular clinical and histological features.

The cytogenetic relationship between primary and recurrent meningiomas points to the need for new treatment strategies in cases at high risk of relapse.

PURPOSE: Recurrence is the major factor influencing the clinical outcome of meningioma patients although the exact relationship between primary and recurrent tumors still needs to be clarified. The aim of the present study is to analyze the cytogenetic relationship between primary and subsequent recurrent meningiomas developed within the same individual. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization was done for the identification of numerical abnormalities of 12 chromosomes in single-cell suspensions from 59 tumor samples corresponding to 25 recurrent meningioma patients. In 47 of these tumors, the distribution of different tumor cell clones was also analyzed in paraffin-embedded tissue sections. In parallel, 132 nonrecurrent cases were also studied. RESULTS: Most recurrent meningiomas showed complex cytogenetic aberrations associated with two or more tumor cell clones in the first tumor analyzed. Interestingly, in most individuals (74%), exactly the same tumor cell clones identified in the initial lesion were also detected in the subsequent recurrent tumor samples. In the recurrent tumor samples of the remaining cases (26%), we observed tumor cell clones related to those detected in the initial lesion but which had acquired one or more additional chromosome aberrations associated with either the emergence of new clones with more complex karyotypes or the disappearance of the most representative clones from the primary lesions. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors showed that the Maillo et al. prognostic score, based on age of patient, tumor grade, and monosomy 14, together with tumor size was the best combination of independent variables for predicting tumor recurrence at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Overall, our results indicate that the development of recurrent meningiomas after complete tumor resection is usually due to regrowth of the primary tumor and rarely to the emergence of an unrelated meningioma, underlining the need for alternative treatment strategies in cases at high risk of relapse, particularly those with a high Maillo et al. prognostic score and larger tumors.

Characterization of chromosome 14 abnormalities by interphase in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization in 124 meningiomas: correlation with clinical, histopathologic, and prognostic features.

We analyzed quantitative chromosome 14 abnormalities in 124 meningiomas by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) and confirmed the nature of abnormalities by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We correlated the abnormalities with clinical, histopathologic, and prognostic factors. Of 124 cases, 50 (40.3%) showed loss (14.5%) or gain (25.8%) of the 14q32 chromosome region by iFISH. Most corresponded to numeric abnormalities: monosomy (12.9%), trisomy (1.6%), or tetrasomy (24.2%); in only 2 cases (1.6%), chromosome 14 loss did not involve the whole chromosome and was restricted to the 14q31-q32 region (confirmed by CGH). Cases with gain or monosomy corresponded more frequently to histologically malignant tumors (P = .009). Patients with monosomy 14/14q-, but not those with gain, more often were male (P = .04) and had a greater incidence of recurrence (P = .003) and shorter relapse-free survival (P = .03). The 2 patients with loss limited to 14q31-q32 had histologically benign tumors and no relapse after more than 5 years' follow-up. Most meningiomas with chromosome 14 abnormalities have numeric changes, with interstitial deletions of 14q31-q32 present in few cases. Of the abnormalities detected, only monosomy 14 showed an adverse prognostic impact.

Intratumoral patterns of clonal evolution in meningiomas as defined by multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): is there a relationship between histopathologically benign and atypical/anaplastic lesions?

Meningiomas are cytogenetically heterogeneous tumors in which chromosome gains and losses frequently occur. Based on the intertumoral cytogenetic heterogeneity of meningiomas, hypothetical models of clonal evolution have been proposed in these tumors which have never been confirmed at the intratumoral cell level. The aim of this study was to establish the intratumoral patterns of clonal evolution associated with chromosomal instability in individual patients as a way to establish tumor progression pathways in meningiomas and their relationship with tumor histopathology and behavior. A total of 125 meningioma patients were analyzed at diagnosis. In all cases, multicolor interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) studies were performed on fresh tumor samples for the detection of quantitative abnormalities for 11 different chromosomes. In addition, overall tumor cell DNA content was measured in parallel by flow cytometry. iFISH studies were also performed in parallel on tissue sections in a subset of 30 patients. FISH studies showed that 56 (45%) of the 125 cases analyzed had a single tumor cell clone, all these cases corresponding to histologically benign grade I tumors. In the remaining cases (55%) more than one tumor cell clone was identified: two in 45 cases (36%), three in 19 (15%), and four or more clones in five cases (4%). Overall, flow cytometric analysis of cell DNA contents showed the presence of DNA aneuploidy in 44 of these cases (35%), 30% corresponding to DNA hyperdiploid and 5% to hypodiploid cases; from the DNA aneuploid cases, 35 (28%) showed two clones and 9 (7%) had three or more clones. A high degree of correlation (r >/= 0.89; P < 0.001) was found between FISH and flow cytometry as regards the overall quantitative DNA changes detected with both techniques, the former being more sensitive. Among the cases with chromosome abnormalities, the earliest tumor cell clone observed was frequently characterized by the loss of one or more chromosomes (64% of all meningiomas); loss of either a single chromosome 22 or, less frequently, of a sex chromosome (X or Y) and del (1p) was commonly found as the single initial cytogenetic aberration (30%, 5%, and 5% of the cases, respectively). Interestingly, an isolated loss of chromosome 22 was only found as the initial abnormality in one out of 14 atypical/anaplastic meningiomas, while the same cytogenetic pattern was present in the ancestral tumor cell clone of 32% of the benign tumors. Cytogenetic patterns based on chromosome gains were found in the ancestral tumor cell clone in 4% of the patients, 2% corresponding to tetraploid tumors. Overall, cytogenetic evolution of the earliest tumor cell clones was frequently associated with tetraploidization (31%). Our results show that meningiomas are genetically heterogeneous tumors that display different patterns of numerical chromosome changes, with the presence of more than one tumor cell clone detected in almost half of the cases including all atypical/anaplastic cases. Interestingly, the pathways of intratumoral clonal evolution observed in the benign tumors were different from those observed in atypical/anaplastic meningiomas, suggesting that the latter tumors might not always represent a more advanced stage of histologically benign meningiomas.

New classification scheme for the prognostic stratification of meningioma on the basis of chromosome 14 abnormalities, patient age, and tumor histopathology.

PURPOSE: Meningiomas are usually considered benign tumors. However, relapses occur in 10% to 20% of all patients, including both histopathologically aggressive and benign tumors. This study explored the value of numerical abnormalities for 10 different chromosomes in meningiomas for predicting relapse-free survival (RFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study prospectively analyzed the frequency of numerical abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y in 70 meningioma patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization and their relationship with disease characteristics at diagnosis and patients' outcome. RESULTS: Results showed the presence of numerical abnormalities for one or more chromosomes in most patients (77%). Chromosome 22 in the whole series and chromosome Y in males were those more frequently altered, followed by chromosomes 1, 14, and X in females. Patients with abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, the sex chromosomes, and gains of chromosome 22 were associated with adverse prognostic features, more frequent relapses, and shorter RFS. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor grade together with chromosome 14 status and age were the best combination of independent variables for predicting RFS. According to these variables, all patients with a score of two or more than two adverse prognostic factors had experienced relapse at 5 years, whereas none of those with a score of zero had experienced relapse 10 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: In addition to age and histologic grade, abnormalities of chromosome 14 contribute to a better prognostic stratification of meningioma patients at diagnosis. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients, also including larger numbers of patients who experienced relapse, are necessary to confirm the utility of the proposed predictive model.

Incidence of numerical chromosome aberrations in meningioma tumors as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 10 chromosome-specific probes.

OBJECTIVE: Although information on the cytogenetic characteristics of meningioma tumors has accumulated progressively over the past few decades, information on the genetic heterogeneity of meningiomas is still scanty. The aim of the present study was to analyze by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the incidence of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y in a group of 70 consecutive meningioma tumors. Another goal was to establish the potential associations among the altered chromosomes, as a way to assess both intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. METHODS: For the purpose of the study, 70 patients diagnosed with meningioma were analyzed. Interphase FISH for the detection of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22, X, and Y was applied to fresh tumor samples from each of the patients studied. RESULTS: The overall incidence of numerical abnormalities was 76%. Chromosome Y in males and chromosome 22 in the whole series were the most common abnormalities (46% and 61%, respectively). Despite the finding that monosomy of chromosome 22/22q(-) deletions are the most frequent individual abnormality (53%), we have observed that chromosome gains are significantly more common than chromosome losses (60% versus 40%). Chromosome gains corresponded to abnormalities of chromosomes 1 (27%), 9 (25%), 10 (23%), 11 (22%), 14 (33%), 15 (22%), 17 (23%), and X in females (35%) and males (23%) whereas chromosome losses apart from chromosome 22 frequently involved chromosomes 14 (19%), X in males (23%), and Y in males (32%). Although an association was found among most gained chromosomes on one side and chromosome losses on the other side, different association patterns were observed. Furthermore, in the latter group, monosomy 22/22q(-) was associated with monosomy X in females and monosomy 14/14q(-) was associated with nulisomy Y in males. In addition, chromosome losses usually involved a large proportion of the tumor cells whereas chromosome gains were restricted to small tumor cell clones, including tetraploid cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that meningiomas are genetically heterogeneous tumors that display different patterns of numerical chromosome changes, as assessed by interphase FISH.