Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 126
Filter
1.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 11: 1285223, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361580

ABSTRACT

Introduction: We conducted a study to determine the prevalence of structural heart disease in patients with CF, the characteristics of a cardiomyopathy not previously described in this population, and its possible relationship with nutritional deficiencies in CF. Methods: We studied 3 CMP CF patients referred for heart-lung transplantation and a prospective series of 120 adult CF patients. All patients underwent a clinical examination, blood tests including levels of vitamins and trace elements, and echocardiography with evaluation of myocardial strain. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed in patients with CMP and in a control group. Histopathological study was performed on hearts obtained in transplant or necropsy. Results: We found a prevalence of 10% (CI 4.6%-15.4%) of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the prospective cohort. Myocardial strain parameters were already altered in CF patients with otherwise normal hearts. Histopathological examination of 4 hearts from CF CMP patients showed a unique histological pattern of multifocal myocardial fibrosis similar to Keshan disease. Four of the five CF CMP patients undergoing CMR showed late gadolinium uptake, with a characteristic patchy pattern in 3 cases (p < 0.001 vs. CF controls). Selenium deficiency (Se < 60 µg/L) was associated with more severe LV dysfunction, higher prevalence of CF CMP, higher NTproBNP levels, and more severe pulmonary and digestive involvement. Conclusion: 10% of adults with CF showed significant cardiac involvement, with histological and imaging features resembling Keshan disease. Selenium deficiency was associated with the presence and severity of LV dysfunction in these patients.

2.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 76(5): 167-175, Ene-Jun. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-216663

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Los cuidados paliativos hacen referencia al tratamiento dirigido a la identificación precoz e impecable del dolor y otros problemas físicos, psicosociales y espirituales que limitan la calidad de vida de la persona, la familia y sus cuidadores. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar las intervenciones paliativas utilizadas para la valoración y el control de síntomas en personas con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) avanzada. Materiales y métodos: Se desarrolló una revisión sistémica de la bibliografía aplicando los pasos propuestos por Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). La búsqueda se orientó a partir de una pregunta de revisión estructurada y se incluyeron estudios originales de pacientes con EP avanzada publicados en bases de datos como Medline y Google Scholar entre 2010 a 2021. Resultados: Se revisaron 31 estudios en texto completo y se excluyeron 12 estudios por no alcanzar los criterios de calidad. En total, se incluyeron 19 trabajos en esta revisión sistemática, identificando 10 herramientas clínicas para valorar las necesidades paliativas en EP avanzada, cuatro intervenciones farmacológicas, y tres intervenciones no farmacológicas centradas en disminuir síntomas motores, mejorar la calidad de vida y evitar el estado on/off. Un estudio notificó la derivación del paciente a terapias complementarias y asistidas por dispositivos. Conclusión: Como parte del abordaje paliativo se han descrito un conjunto de herramientas para identificar síntomas y valorar necesidades de atención paliativa. Las intervenciones en la EP avanzada se enfocan en el control de los síntomas motores y no motores para disminuir el impacto de la enfermedad sobre la calidad de vida.(AU)


Introduction: Palliative care refers to treatment aimed at the early and comprehensive identification of pain and other physical, psychosocial and spiritual problems that limit the quality of life of the person, their family and their caregivers. The aim of this article is to identify palliative interventions used for the assessment and control of symptoms in people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted following the steps proposed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was guided by a structured review question and included original studies of patients with advanced PD published in databases such as Medline and Google Scholar between 2010 and 2021. Results: Thirty-one full-text studies were reviewed and 12 were excluded due to not meeting quality criteria. A total of 19 papers were included in this systematic review, which identified 10 clinical tools to assess palliative needs in advanced PD, four pharmacological interventions, and three non-pharmacological interventions focused on reducing motor symptoms, improving quality of life and avoiding the on/off state. One study reported the referral of patients to complementary and device-assisted therapies. Conclusion: As part of the palliative approach, a set of tools for identifying symptoms and assessing palliative care needs have been described. Interventions in advanced PD focus on the control of motor and non-motor symptoms so as to reduce the impact of the disease on quality of life.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Palliative Care , Parkinson Disease , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pain Management , Symptom Assessment , Neurology , Nervous System Diseases
3.
Rev Neurol ; 76(5): 167-175, 2023 03 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36843177

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care refers to treatment aimed at the early and comprehensive identification of pain and other physical, psychosocial and spiritual problems that limit the quality of life of the person, their family and their caregivers. The aim of this article is to identify palliative interventions used for the assessment and control of symptoms in people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted following the steps proposed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was guided by a structured review question and included original studies of patients with advanced PD published in databases such as Medline and Google Scholar between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: Thirty-one full-text studies were reviewed and 12 were excluded due to not meeting quality criteria. A total of 19 papers were included in this systematic review, which identified 10 clinical tools to assess palliative needs in advanced PD, four pharmacological interventions, and three non-pharmacological interventions focused on reducing motor symptoms, improving quality of life and avoiding the on/off state. One study reported the referral of patients to complementary and device-assisted therapies. CONCLUSION: As part of the palliative approach, a set of tools for identifying symptoms and assessing palliative care needs have been described. Interventions in advanced PD focus on the control of motor and non-motor symptoms so as to reduce the impact of the disease on quality of life.


TITLE: Cuidados paliativos para personas con enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada. Revisión sistemática.Introducción. Los cuidados paliativos hacen referencia al tratamiento dirigido a la identificación precoz e impecable del dolor y otros problemas físicos, psicosociales y espirituales que limitan la calidad de vida de la persona, la familia y sus cuidadores. El objetivo de este artículo es identificar las intervenciones paliativas utilizadas para la valoración y el control de síntomas en personas con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) avanzada. Materiales y métodos. Se desarrolló una revisión sistémica de la bibliografía aplicando los pasos propuestos por Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). La búsqueda se orientó a partir de una pregunta de revisión estructurada y se incluyeron estudios originales de pacientes con EP avanzada publicados en bases de datos como Medline y Google Scholar entre 2010 a 2021. Resultados. Se revisaron 31 estudios en texto completo y se excluyeron 12 estudios por no alcanzar los criterios de calidad. En total, se incluyeron 19 trabajos en esta revisión sistemática, identificando 10 herramientas clínicas para valorar las necesidades paliativas en EP avanzada, cuatro intervenciones farmacológicas, y tres intervenciones no farmacológicas centradas en disminuir síntomas motores, mejorar la calidad de vida y evitar el estado on/off. Un estudio notificó la derivación del paciente a terapias complementarias y asistidas por dispositivos. Conclusión. Como parte del abordaje paliativo se han descrito un conjunto de herramientas para identificar síntomas y valorar necesidades de atención paliativa. Las intervenciones en la EP avanzada se enfocan en el control de los síntomas motores y no motores para disminuir el impacto de la enfermedad sobre la calidad de vida.


Subject(s)
Palliative Care , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Quality of Life , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Pain , Caregivers
5.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 36(1): 82-87, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the common barriers leading to delayed initial management, microbiological diagnosis, and appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment in sepsis. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by the application of a population-based survey. Four different surveys were designed, targeting the healthcare personnel located in main hospital areas [emergency department (SEMES); infectious diseases and clinical microbiology-microbiological diagnosis (SEIMC-M); intensive care and infectious diseases, (SEMICYUC-GTEIS); and infectious diseases and clinical microbiology-clinical diagnosis, (SEIMC-C)]. RESULTS: A total of 700 valid surveys were collected from June to November 2019: 380 (54.3%) of SEMES, 127 (18.1%) of SEIMC-M, 97 (13.9%) de SEMICYUC-GTEIS and 96 (13.7%) of SEIMC-C, in 270 hospitals of all levels of care. The qSOFA score was used as a screening tool. The most used biomarker was procalcitonin (n=92, 39.8%). The sepsis code was implemented in 157 of 235 participating centers (66.2%), particularly in tertiary level hospitals. The mean frequency of contaminated blood cultures was 8.9% (8.7). In 85 (78.7%) centers, positive results of blood cultures were available within the first 72 hours and were communicated to the treating physician effectively by phone or e-mail in 76 (81.7%) cases. The main reason for escalating treatment was clinical deterioration, and the reason for de-escalating antimicrobials was significantly different between the specialties. Quality indicators were not frequently monitored among the different participating centers. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant barriers that hinder adequate management processes in sepsis in Spanish hospitals.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Communicable Diseases , Sepsis , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/diagnosis , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Care , Emergency Service, Hospital
8.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 46(8): 446-454, ago. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-207874

ABSTRACT

La evolución del tratamiento de oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea (ECMO) y en particular del transporte de los pacientes sometidos a él, ha cambiado de forma significativa en la última década y lo ha hecho de manera desigual en diferentes regiones. Se ha demostrado que la creación de centros de referencia especializados mejora los resultados. Por todo ello ha sido necesario crear redes de equipos especializados y el número de transportes secundarios de pacientes con este tratamiento está en aumento. Con el fin de mejorar la calidad del tratamiento y ofrecer una guía para los servicios que intervienen en estos transportes, los grupos de trabajo de transporte crítico de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC) y la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) han realizado un trabajo conjunto de elaboración de estas recomendaciones, enfocadas a los siguientes aspectos: indicaciones, sistemas de centros de referencia, medios de transporte, características y equipamiento, equipos humanos, formación y seguridad clínica (AU)


The evolution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment and the transport of patients receiving this treatment has changed dramatically in the last decade unevenly in different regions. The creation of specialized referral centers has been shown to improve outcomes. For all these reasons, it has been necessary to create networks of specialized teams and the number of secondary transports of patients with this treatment is increasing. In order to improve the quality of treatment and offer a guide to the services involved in these transports, the critical transport working groups of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) have carried out a joint effort to prepare these recommendations, focused on the following aspects: indications, reference center systems, means of transport, characteristics and equipment, human teams, training and clinical safety (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Critical Care , Transportation of Patients/methods , Societies, Medical , Consensus , Spain
10.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 46(8): 446-454, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752606

ABSTRACT

The evolution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment and the transport of patients receiving this treatment has changed dramatically in the last decade unevenly in different regions. The creation of specialized referral centers has been shown to improve outcomes. For all these reasons, it has been necessary to create networks of specialized teams and the number of secondary transports of patients with this treatment is increasing. In order to improve the quality of treatment and offer a guide to the services involved in these transports, the critical transport working groups of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) have carried out a joint effort to prepare these recommendations, focused on the following aspects: indications, reference center systems, means of transport, characteristics and equipment, human teams, training and clinical safety.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Child , Consensus , Critical Care , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Humans
13.
Rev Neurol ; 71(10): 377-386, 2020 Nov 16.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145749

ABSTRACT

Sleep-related movement and behaviour disorders may have an impact on sleep quality and lead to daytime symptoms. These groups of conditions include diseases such as restless legs syndrome, periodic leg movements, and REM and NREM parasomnias. The knowledge of their clinical features and management is of utmost importance for the neurologist and sleep specialist. Frequently, these patients are referred to such specialists and it is relevant to know that certain sleep disorders may be associated with other neurological conditions.


TITLE: Trastornos del movimiento y de la conducta durante el sueño en el adulto.Los trastornos del movimiento y de la conducta durante el sueño pueden tener un impacto en la calidad del sueño del paciente y dar lugar a síntomas diurnos. En estos grupos de enfermedades se incluyen entidades como el síndrome de piernas inquietas, los movimientos periódicos de las piernas y las parasomnias del sueño de movimientos oculares rápidos (REM) y no REM. El conocimiento de sus características clínicas y nociones sobre su manejo es de gran importancia para el neurólogo y especialista en sueño por su frecuencia e impacto en la calidad del sujeto. Con frecuencia, estos pacientes son referidos a dichos especialistas, y es relevante conocer que ciertos trastornos del sueño pueden asociarse a otras enfermedades neurológicas.


Subject(s)
Parasomnias , Restless Legs Syndrome , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adult , Humans , Sleep
14.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(9): 340-350, 1 nov., 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-194921

ABSTRACT

A finales de enero, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declaró el brote actual de la enfermedad por coronavirus COVID-19 como emergencia de salud pública de importancia internacional. En España, desde que el 14 de marzo de 2020 el Gobierno decretase el estado de alarma, los médicos encargados de las pruebas neurofisiológicas las hemos estado realizando sin tener un criterio consensuado ni unas pautas adecuadas de seguridad claras para los facultativos, los técnicos ni los pacientes. Las siguientes recomendaciones, basadas en el actual conocimiento de la enfermedad y, por tanto, susceptibles de variaciones en el futuro, se proponen cuando la pandemia parece que ha entrado en un proceso de disminución de la virulencia y, con ello, las medidas estrictas de confinamiento hasta ahora mantenidas; sin embargo, ante la posibilidad de una segunda oleada de rebrotes de la pandemia, parece necesario establecer unas recomendaciones básicas y de mínimos para respetar el derecho del paciente a una atención adecuada, similar a la previa a la pandemia, y mantener unos mínimos de seguridad para los propios pacientes y los médicos, técnicos y personal sanitario que realizan estas pruebas. Se trata de recomendaciones sobre el establecimiento de una prioridad basándose en el motivo de consulta, el establecimiento de llamadas de comprobación de la situación clínica del paciente antes de acudir a la consulta externa y las normas de ejecución de las pruebas neurofisiológicas, que se basan, en general, en la preservación de circuitos hospitalarios, el respeto y el cuidado de las barreras de contagio conocidas de esta enfermedad, y la utilización de material desechable. Estas recomendaciones son de especial interés, sobre todo por la incertidumbre de no saber la evolución de la infección por el SARS-CoV-2 en las próximas semanas o meses


At the end of January, the current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus disease was declared an important international public health emergency. In Spain, since the government declared the state of alarm on 14 March 2020, doctors responsible for carrying out neurophysiological tests have been performing them without any consensus criterion or clear safety guidelines for doctors, technicians or patients. The following recommendations, based on current knowledge of the disease and therefore liable to change in the future, are proposed when the pandemic appears to have entered a process of decreasing virulence and, with it, the strict containment measures established to date. However, in view of the possibility of a second wave of the pandemic, it seems necessary to establish basic and minimum recommendations to respect the patient's right to appropriate care, similar to that provided prior to the pandemic, and to maintain minimum safety standards for the patients themselves and for the doctors, technicians and health personnel carrying out these tests. These recommendations concern the constitution of a priority based on the reason for consultation, the establishment of calls to check the patient's clinical situation before going to the outpatient department and the rules for carrying out neurophysiological tests, which are generally based on the preservation of hospital circuits, respect for and observation of the known barriers to contagion of this disease, and the use of disposable material. These recommendations are of particular interest, especially given the uncertainty of not knowing the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in the coming weeks or months


Subject(s)
Humans , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Electrophysiology/instrumentation , Electrophysiology/standards , Infection Control/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Ambulatory Care , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Infection Control/standards , Spain/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control
15.
Rev. neurol. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(10): 377-386, 16 nov., 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198073

ABSTRACT

Los trastornos del movimiento y de la conducta durante el sueño pueden tener un impacto en la calidad del sueño del paciente y dar lugar a síntomas diurnos. En estos grupos de enfermedades se incluyen entidades como el síndrome de piernas inquietas, los movimientos periódicos de las piernas y las parasomnias del sueño de movimientos oculares rápidos (REM) y no REM. El conocimiento de sus características clínicas y nociones sobre su manejo es de gran importancia para el neurólogo y especialista en sueño por su frecuencia e impacto en la calidad del sujeto. Con frecuencia, estos pacientes son referidos a dichos especialistas, y es relevante conocer que ciertos trastornos del sueño pueden asociarse a otras enfermedades neurológicas


Sleep-related movement and behaviour disorders may have an impact on sleep quality and lead to daytime symptoms. These groups of conditions include diseases such as restless legs syndrome, periodic leg movements, and REM and NREM parasomnias. The knowledge of their clinical features and management is of utmost importance for the neurologist and sleep specialist. Frequently, these patients are referred to such specialists and it is relevant to know that certain sleep disorders may be associated with other neurological conditions


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Movement Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology , Restless Legs Syndrome/physiopathology , REM Sleep Parasomnias/physiopathology , Dreams/physiology , Epilepsy/physiopathology
16.
Rev Neurol ; 71(9): 340-350, 2020 11 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33085079

ABSTRACT

At the end of January, the current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus disease was declared an important international public health emergency. In Spain, since the government declared the state of alarm on 14 March 2020, doctors responsible for carrying out neurophysiological tests have been performing them without any consensus criterion or clear safety guidelines for doctors, technicians or patients. The following recommendations, based on current knowledge of the disease and therefore liable to change in the future, are proposed when the pandemic appears to have entered a process of decreasing virulence and, with it, the strict containment measures established to date. However, in view of the possibility of a second wave of the pandemic, it seems necessary to establish basic and minimum recommendations to respect the patient's right to appropriate care, similar to that provided prior to the pandemic, and to maintain minimum safety standards for the patients themselves and for the doctors, technicians and health personnel carrying out these tests. These recommendations concern the constitution of a priority based on the reason for consultation, the establishment of calls to check the patient's clinical situation before going to the outpatient department and the rules for carrying out neurophysiological tests, which are generally based on the preservation of hospital circuits, respect for and observation of the known barriers to contagion of this disease, and the use of disposable material. These recommendations are of particular interest, especially given the uncertainty of not knowing the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in the coming weeks or months.


TITLE: Recomendaciones sobre estudios neurofisiológicos en tiempos de pandemia de COVID-19.A finales de enero, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declaró el brote actual de la enfermedad por coronavirus COVID-19 como emergencia de salud pública de importancia internacional. En España, desde que el 14 de marzo de 2020 el Gobierno decretase el estado de alarma, los médicos encargados de las pruebas neurofisiológicas las hemos estado realizando sin tener un criterio consensuado ni unas pautas adecuadas de seguridad claras para los facultativos, los técnicos ni los pacientes. Las siguientes recomendaciones, basadas en el actual conocimiento de la enfermedad y, por tanto, susceptibles de variaciones en el futuro, se proponen cuando la pandemia parece que ha entrado en un proceso de disminución de la virulencia y, con ello, las medidas estrictas de confinamiento hasta ahora mantenidas; sin embargo, ante la posibilidad de una segunda oleada de rebrotes de la pandemia, parece necesario establecer unas recomendaciones básicas y de mínimos para respetar el derecho del paciente a una atención adecuada, similar a la previa a la pandemia, y mantener unos mínimos de seguridad para los propios pacientes y los médicos, técnicos y personal sanitario que realizan estas pruebas. Se trata de recomendaciones sobre el establecimiento de una prioridad basándose en el motivo de consulta, el establecimiento de llamadas de comprobación de la situación clínica del paciente antes de acudir a la consulta externa y las normas de ejecución de las pruebas neurofisiológicas, que se basan, en general, en la preservación de circuitos hospitalarios, el respeto y el cuidado de las barreras de contagio conocidas de esta enfermedad, y la utilización de material desechable. Estas recomendaciones son de especial interés, sobre todo por la incertidumbre de no saber la evolución de la infección por el SARS-CoV-2 en las próximas semanas o meses.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Electrophysiology , Infection Control , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Humans , Ambulatory Care , Continuity of Patient Care , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , COVID-19 , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection , Electrophysiology/instrumentation , Electrophysiology/methods , Electrophysiology/standards , Equipment Contamination , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Inpatients , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Occupational Exposure , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment , Telemedicine
17.
SEMERGEN, Soc. Esp. Med. Rural Gen. (Ed. Impr.) ; 46(supl.1): 6-11, ago. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-192618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the primary care management division of the Healthcare Area of Leon (58 RT-qPCR-positive cases and 52 RT-qPCR-negative cases). Information regarding symptoms was collected and all patients were simultaneously tested using two rapid diagnostic tests - RDTs (Combined - cRDT and Differentiated - dRDT). The association between symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated by non-conditional logistic regression, with estimation of Odds Ratio. RESULTS: A total of 110 subjects were studied, 52% of whom were women (mean age: 48.2±11.0 years). There were 42.3% of negative RT-qPCRs that were positive in some RDTs. Fever over 38°C (present in 35.5% of cases) and anosmia (present in 41.8%) were the symptoms most associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, a relationship that remained statistically significant in patients with negative RT-qPCR and some positive RDT (aOR=6.64; 95%CI=1.33-33.13 and aOR=19.38; 95% CI=3.69-101.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RT-qPCR is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not exempt from false negatives. Our results show that patients who present mild or moderate symptoms with negative RT-qPCR, but with fever and/or anosmia, should be considered as suspicious cases and should be evaluated with other diagnostic methods


OBJETIVO: Evaluar los factores asociados con falsos negativos a RT-qPCR negativa y sintomatología leve o moderada de COVID-19. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal. Se utilizó una muestra aleatoria de pacientes no hospitalizados de la Gerencia de Atención Primaria del Área de Salud de León (58 con RT-qPCR positiva y 52 con RT-qPCR negativa). Se recogió información sobre síntomas, y a todos se les realizaron simultáneamente dos pruebas de diagnóstico rápido (PDR): combinada (PRD-C) y diferenciada (PRD-D). La asociación de los síntomas con la infección por SARS-CoV-2 se evaluó mediante regresión logística no condicional, con el cálculo de odds ratio (OR). RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron un total de 110 personas, y el 52% de ellas fueron mujeres (edad media: 48,2±11,0años). El 42,3% de las RT-qPCR negativas dieron positivo en algún PDR. La fiebre de más de 38°C (presente en el 35,5% de los casos) y la anosmia (presente en el 41,2%) fueron los síntomas más asociados a la infección por SARS-CoV-2, relación que se mantuvo estadísticamente significativa en pacientes con RT-qPCR negativa y algún PDR positivo (ORa: 6,64; IC95%: 1,33-33,13, y ORa: 19,38; IC95%: 3,69-101,89, respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: La RT-qPCR es la técnica de elección en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2, pero no está exenta de falsos negativos. Nuestros resultados ponen de manifiesto que los pacientes que presentan síntomas leves o moderados con RT-qPCR negativa pero con fiebre y/o anosmia deben ser considerados casos sospechosos y deben ser valorados con otros métodos diagnósticos


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/statistics & numerical data , Fever/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology
18.
Semergen ; 46 Suppl 1: 6-11, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors associated with false negatives in RT-qPCR in patients with mild-moderate symptoms of COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of non-hospitalized patients from the primary care management division of the Healthcare Area of Leon (58 RT-qPCR-positive cases and 52 RT-qPCR-negative cases). Information regarding symptoms was collected and all patients were simultaneously tested using two rapid diagnostic tests - RDTs (Combined - cRDT and Differentiated - dRDT). The association between symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated by non-conditional logistic regression, with estimation of Odds Ratio. RESULTS: A total of 110 subjects were studied, 52% of whom were women (mean age: 48.2±11.0 years). There were 42.3% of negative RT-qPCRs that were positive in some RDTs. Fever over 38°C (present in 35.5% of cases) and anosmia (present in 41.8%) were the symptoms most associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, a relationship that remained statistically significant in patients with negative RT-qPCR and some positive RDT (aOR=6.64; 95%CI=1.33-33.13 and aOR=19.38; 95% CI=3.69-101.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RT-qPCR is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but it is not exempt from false negatives. Our results show that patients who present mild or moderate symptoms with negative RT-qPCR, but with fever and/or anosmia, should be considered as suspicious cases and should be evaluated with other diagnostic methods.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Adult , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Cross-Sectional Studies , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Predictive Value of Tests
19.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 12(1): 37-51, ene.-mar. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-186903

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Al menos el 10% de pacientes con trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo (TOC) son refractarios al tratamiento psicofarmacológico. La aparición de nuevas tecnologías neuroquirúrgicas (estimulación cerebral profunda[ECP]) de modulación de la actividad neuronal alterada está posibilitando su extensión a casos graves y refractarios de TOC en los que anteriormente se utilizaban técnicas quirúrgicas no reversibles. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar la evidencia científica existente sobre la eficacia y aplicabilidad de esta técnica en este grupo de pacientes. Método: Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura en las bases de datos PubMed/Medline, Embase y PsycINFO usando las palabras clave relacionadas con «deep brain stimulation», «DBS» y «obsessive-compulsive disorder», «OCD». Dos de los autores seleccionaron los artículos, de manera independiente, a partir de sus abstracts y en función de si describían alguno de los aspectos principales de la técnica en el TOC: aplicabilidad; mecanismo de acción; dianas terapéuticas cerebrales; efectividad; efectos secundarios, y coterapias. Toda la información fue sistemáticamente extraída y evaluada. Resultados: El análisis crítico de la evidencia señala que la aplicación de la ECP en el tratamiento del TOC refractario está aportando resultados satisfactorios, con rangos asumibles de efectos secundarios. Sin embargo, todavía no hay evidencia suficiente que permita priorizar el uso de una determinada diana cerebral. La selección de pacientes ha de seguir un análisis de riesgo/beneficio, debiéndose individualizar la decisión de mantener un tratamiento concomitante farmacológico/psicoterapéutico. Conclusiones: La ECP se encuentra todavía en el ámbito de la investigación, pero su aplicación en el TOC-refractario es cada vez más frecuente, produciendo en la mayoría de los estudios una significativa mejoría de los síntomas, y también del funcionamiento y calidad de vida. Es preciso realizar más estudios controlados y aleatorizados sobre su efectividad a largo plazo, y sobre su relación riesgo/beneficio y costes


Introduction: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. Method: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. Results: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. Conclusions: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit


Subject(s)
Humans , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods
20.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28676437

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. RESULTS: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Humans , Quality of Life , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...