Recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology for the management of psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease that affects the skin, musculoskeletal structures and other organs and systems compromising functionality, quality of life and reducing the life expectancy of patients. It is a complex disease that requires specialist and timely care and management. The alternatives for treating the manifestations of psoriatic arthritis have increased and the effect of the different agents on specific manifestations has been clarified in recent studies. Therefore, we should incorporate the available evidence to build a strategy for the treatment of these patients. The Mexican College of Rheumatology selected a committee to evaluate these different alternatives and make recommendations. METHODS: The study group included 16 rheumatologists and 3 certified dermatologists, selected from different health institutions and regions of the country. An executive committee was formed to coordinate the meetings and a committee of experts selected the literature search criteria, prepared the research questions, rated the quality of the evidence, and produced the recommendations in the different disease domains based on the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: 24 updated recommendations were generated for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. The recommendations establish the role of the drugs currently available in our country. The importance of adequate disease control is emphasized, individualizing the level of involvement of each patient in each of the six domains potentially affected by the disease. In addition, the sequence in the choice of treatments available for each domain is established, based on their efficacy, safety profile and accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: With this consensus document, it will be possible to improve the care of patients with psoriatic arthritis. The recommendations were generated based on the best available information and in consideration of the Mexican health system.

Recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology for the management of psoriatic arthritis. / Recomendaciones del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología para el manejo de la artritis psoriásica.

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease that affects the skin, musculoskeletal structures and other organs and systems compromising functionality, quality of life and reducing the life expectancy of patients. It is a complex disease that requires specialist and timely care and management. The alternatives for treating the manifestations of psoriatic arthritis have increased and the effect of the different agents on specific manifestations has been clarified in recent studies. Therefore, we should incorporate the available evidence to build a strategy for the treatment of these patients. The Mexican College of Rheumatology selected a committee to evaluate these different alternatives and make recommendations. METHODS: The study group included 16 rheumatologists and 3 certified dermatologists, selected from different health institutions and regions of the country. An executive committee was formed to coordinate the meetings and a committee of experts selected the literature search criteria, prepared the research questions, rated the quality of the evidence, and produced the recommendations in the different disease domains based on the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: 24 updated recommendations were generated for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. The recommendations establish the role of the drugs currently available in our country. The importance of adequate disease control is emphasized, individualizing the level of involvement of each patient in each of the six domains potentially affected by the disease. In addition, the sequence in the choice of treatments available for each domain is established, based on their efficacy, safety profile and accessibility. CONCLUSIONS: With this consensus document, it will be possible to improve the care of patients with psoriatic arthritis. The recommendations were generated based on the best available information and in consideration of the Mexican health system.

Recomendaciones del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología para el manejo de la artritis psoriásica [Pré-print] / Recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology for the management of psoriatic arthritis [Pré-print]

La artritis psoriásica (APs) es una enfermedad inflamatoria sistémica crónica que afecta a la piel, las estructuras musculoesqueléticas y otros órganos y sistemas, comprometiendo la funcionalidad, la calidad de vida y reduciendo la expectativa de vida de los pacientes. Es una enfermedad compleja que requiere atención y manejo especializado y oportuno. Las alternativas para el tratamiento de las manifestaciones de la APs se han incrementado y, adicionalmente, el efecto de los distintos agentes sobre manifestaciones específicas ha sido aclarado en estudios recientes, por lo tanto, es conveniente incorporar la evidencia disponible para construir una estrategia en el tratamiento de estos pacientes. El Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología seleccionó una comisión para evaluar estas distintas alternativas y generar recomendaciones. El grupo de estudio incluyó a 16 reumatólogos y tres dermatólogos certificados, que fueron seleccionados de diferentes instituciones de salud y regiones del país. Se conformó un comité ejecutivo que coordinó las reuniones y un comité de expertos que seleccionó los criterios de búsqueda en la literatura, elaboró las preguntas de investigación, calificó la calidad de la evidencia y generó las recomendaciones en los distintos dominios de la enfermedad con base en la metodología Se generaron 24 recomendaciones actualizadas para el tratamiento de pacientes con APs. Las recomendaciones establecen el papel de los medicamentos disponibles actualmente en nuestro país. Se enfatiza la importancia del control adecuado de la enfermedad, individualizando el perfil de involucramiento de cada paciente en cada uno de los seis dominios potencialmente afectados por la enfermedad. Además, se establece la secuencia en la elección de los tratamientos disponibles para cada dominio, basada en su eficacia, perfil de seguridad y accesibilidad. Con este documento de consenso se podrá mejorar la atención de los pacientes con APs. Las recomendaciones se generaron de acuerdo con la mejor información disponible y en consideración del sistema de salud de México.

Recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology for the Management of Spondyloarthritis. / Recomendaciones del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología para el manejo de las espondiloartritis.

OBJECTIVES: To update the recommendations for the management of patients with Spondyloarthritis (SpA) in the Mexican population, and identify which variables could influence patient management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 15 experts in SpA translated, analyzed and modified the recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology (CMR) and the International Society for the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis (ASAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2016 group through a systematic review of the literature by two external reviewers during the period from 2015 to 2018 using the grade of recommendation, Oxford levels of evidence, percentage of concordance (Delphi). RESULTS: Compared to previous recommendations, there were no significant changes from the year 2015. However, we modified the five fundamental principles and reduced the number of recommendations to ten by incorporating the first item in the text and combining five recommendations into two and adding a further recommendation. We confirmed the tendency to use glucocorticoids for patients with inflammatory activity and scarce access to biologicals. We identified the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with SpA and their influence on the application of the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The ten recommendations of the CMR and the analysis of the characteristics of the Mexican patients with SpA focussed on step therapy, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies, in a spectrum from easily accessible to high-tech substances available to a small percentage of the population.

Eficacia de leflunomida 100 mg semanales comparado con dosis bajas de metotrexate en pacientes con artritis reumatoide activa. Estudio clínico doble ciego aleatorizado / Efficacy of leflunomide 100 mg weekly compared to low dose methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Double blind, randomized clinical trial

Objetivos. Estudio clínico aleatorizado para determinar la eficacia y seguridad de leflunomida (LFN) 100mg/semana en artritis reumatoide (AR), comparado con dosis bajas de metotrexate (MTX) 10mg/semana a 52 semanas. Pacientes y métodos. Se incluyeron pacientes con criterios de AR activa (ACR1987). Fueron realizados estudios de laboratorio, radiografías de manos y determinaciones clinimétricas para establecer criterios de respuesta clínica de ACR y EULAR. El análisis estadístico se obtuvo a través de mejoría ACR20. La eficacia se estableció por análisis de ANOVA de muestras independientes entre ambos grupos (p<=0,05). La seguridad fue analizada con porcentaje de eventos adversos. Resultados. De 90 pacientes evaluados, 5 fueron eliminados; 85 aleatorizados e incluidos en 2 grupos: 43 (LFN) y 42 (MTX). Completaron el estudio con LFN el 72% y con MTX el 74,4%. El criterio de mejoría de ACR20 al final del estudio fue alcanzado para LFN en 90,3% y para MTX 78,1%, p=0,14. El valor DAS28 al final para LFN fue de 3,45, y para MTX de 3,67, no existiendo diferencias significativas (p=0,43). Los pacientes excluidos para LFN fueron 11, y 10 para MTX. La falla terapéutica se definió en 5,2% para LFN, y 12,1 en el caso de MTX. No se reportaron eventos adversos graves que pusieran en riesgo la vida de los pacientes. Conclusiones. Los resultados confirman que LFN usada en dosis semanales de 100mg, ofrece una adecuada y sostenida mejoría de las manifestaciones clínicas de AR, al compararlo con una dosis baja de MTX. Pudiendo ser una opción terapéutica en algunos pacientes como monoterapia o en combinación con otros antirreumáticos (AU)

Objective: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LFN) 100 mg/week compared to low dose Methotrexate (MTX) 10 mg/week in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with 52 weeks of follow up in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. Patients and methods: Patients who met ARC1987 criteria for RA were included. All patients had medical records, including laboratory tests and hand X-rays. Clinical evaluations for improvement and ACR and EULAR response criteria were performed. Statistical analysis for independent’s samples between both groups defined a P value of <= .05. Safety was evaluated by comparing the proportion of adverse events (AE) registered. Results: Of 90 patients screened; five were withdrawn; the remaining 85 patients were randomised: 43 LFN and 42 MTX. Sixty-three patients completed the study; 72% in the LFN group and 74.4% in the MTX group. ACR20 improvement criteria were achieved by LFN group in 90.3%, and in MTX 78.1% (P = .14) at week 52. EULAR improvement criteria applied at the end point showed a DAS28 score for the LFN group of 3.45, and for the MTX group was 3.67(P = .43). Total withdrawals, including loss during follow up, AE and lack of efficacy for each group was 12 patients in the LFN group, and 10 patients in the MTX group. Regarding safety, no serious AE of a life threatening nature were reported. Conclusions: These outcomes confirm that LFN 100 mg/week offers an adequate and sustained improvement effect on the clinical manifestations of RA, similar to low dose treatment with MTX 10 mg/every week after 52 weeks of follow up; it may be a good therapeutic option alone or in combination with others anti-rheumatic drugs (AU)

Efficacy of leflunomide 100mg weekly compared to low dose methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Double blind, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical efficacy and safety of Leflunomide (LFN) 100 mg/week compared to low dose Methotrexate (MTX) 10 mg/week in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with 52 weeks of follow up in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who met ARC1987 criteria for RA were included. All patients had medical records, including laboratory tests and hand X-rays. Clinical evaluations for improvement and ACR and EULAR response criteria were performed. Statistical analysis for independent's samples between both groups defined a P value of ≤.05. Safety was evaluated by comparing the proportion of adverse events (AE) registered. RESULTS: Of 90 patients screened; five were withdrawn; the remaining 85 patients were randomised: 43 LFN and 42 MTX. Sixty-three patients completed the study; 72% in the LFN group and 74.4% in the MTX group. ACR20 improvement criteria were achieved by LFN group in 90.3%, and in MTX 78.1% (P=.14) at week 52. EULAR improvement criteria applied at the end point showed a DAS28 score for the LFN group of 3.45, and for the MTX group was 3.67(P=.43). Total withdrawals, including loss during follow up, AE and lack of efficacy for each group was 12 patients in the LFN group, and 10 patients in the MTX group. Regarding safety, no serious AE of a life threatening nature were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes confirm that LFN 100 mg/week offers an adequate and sustained improvement effect on the clinical manifestations of RA, similar to low dose treatment with MTX 10 mg/every week after 52 weeks of follow up; it may be a good therapeutic option alone or in combination with others anti-rheumatic drugs.

Neumonía eosinofílica crónica: ¿fenómeno autoinmune o enfermedad inmunoalérgica. Reporte de un caso y revisión de literatura / Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: Autoimmune phenomenon or immunoallergic disease. Case report and literature review

Las neumonía eosinofílica se clasifica por su presentación en aguda o crónica; las características distintivas se basan en la presencia de tos, disnea, fiebre e infiltrados pulmonares con acumulación de células inflamatorias, predominante de eosinófilos. La asociación de eosinofilia y padecimientos reumatológicos es bien conocida, como en el caso de la fascitis eosinofílica y el síndrome de Churg-Strauss. La coexistencia de neumonía eosinofílica crónica y artritis reumatoide ha sido reportada, ya sea de inicio coincidente o en artritis reumatoide establecida. El papel fisiopatológico de los eosinófilos en las enfermedades autoinmunes no está bien definido, sin embargo se ha demostrado que la producción de citocinas proinflamatorias estimulan y activan diferentes grupos celulares, pudiendo en forma simultánea inducir autoanticuerpos e incremento y/o infiltración de eosinófilos en diversos tejidos, sin tener una enfermedad autoinmune subyacente. Presentamos el caso de una mujer joven con neumonía eosinofílica crónica con manifestaciones clínicas reumatológicas y presencia de autoanticuerpos, que se resolvió en forma espontánea (AU)

Eosinophilic pneumonia is classified by its acute or chronic presentation, the distinguishing characteristics of which are based on the presence of cough, dyspnea, fever and pulmonary infiltrates with accumulation of inflammatory cells, predominantly eosinophils. The association of eosinophilia and rheumatologic disorders is well known, as in the case of eosinophilic fasciitis and the Churg-Strauss syndrome. The coexistence of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia and rheumatoid arthritis has been reported, either early rheumatoid arthritis of definitive disease. The pathophysiological role of eosinophils in autoimmune diseases is not well defined, however it has been shown that the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate and activates different cell groups, and can simultaneously induce autoantibodies and/or increased infiltration of eosinophils in various tissues, without an underlying autoimmune disease. The case of a young woman with rheumatic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia manifestations and the presence of autoantibodies, which resolved spontaneously, is presented here (AU)

Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: autoimmune phenomenon or immunoallergic disease? Case report and literature review.

Eosinophilic pneumonia is classified by its acute or chronic presentation, the distinguishing characteristics of which are based on the presence of cough, dyspnea, fever and pulmonary infiltrates with accumulation of inflammatory cells, predominantly eosinophils. The association of eosinophilia and rheumatologic disorders is well known, as in the case of eosinophilic fasciitis and the Churg-Strauss syndrome. The coexistence of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia and rheumatoid arthritis has been reported, either early rheumatoid arthritis of definitive disease. The pathophysiological role of eosinophils in autoimmune diseases is not well defined, however it has been shown that the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate and activates different cell groups, and can simultaneously induce autoantibodies and/or increased infiltration of eosinophils in various tissues, without an underlying autoimmune disease. The case of a young woman with rheumatic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia manifestations and the presence of autoantibodies, which resolved spontaneously, is presented here.