Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 50(6): 163-168, 01 nov. 2022. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-211527

ABSTRACT

Introduction Clinical trials and real-life studies have been published showing effectiveness of benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthmatic patients. The aim of the present study is to describe super-responders to benralizumab in a series of 79 patients who completed at least 1 year of treatment, and to compare super-responders with non super-responders. Methods This is a multicenter study of the Register of Severe Asthma of the Region of Murcia (RE-ASGRAMUR) Group performed in eight hospitals under the conditions of routine clinical practice. Patients with zero exacerbations and no oral corticosteroid therapy for asthma were considered super-responders. We analyzed clinical, functional, and inflammatory parameters of selected patients. Results In all, 50 of the 79 patients (63%) met the super-responder criteria. In addition, 36% of the patients (26/71) were considered as complete responders to treatment (super--responder + Asthma Control Test [ACT] ≥ 20 + forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] ≥ 80%). The super--responders were significantly older in age (P = 0.0029), had higher eosinophils count (P = 0.0423), higher proportion of nasal polyps (P = 0.036), and they had less severe disease at baseline. After 1 year of treatment, the super-responders had higher levels of ACT questionnaire (23 vs 19, P = 0.0007) and better percentage of FEV1 (83 vs 75, P = 0.0359). Conclusion Almost two of the three patients treated with benralizumab were super--responders after 1 year of treatment and 36% had a complete response. Super-responders were associated with older age, higher eosinophils count, had nasal polyposis as comorbidity, and had less severe disease at baseline. This data illustrated the good real-life response of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma to the treatment with benralizumab (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Disease Progression , Eosinophils
5.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 20(5): 201-5, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1292329

ABSTRACT

After nasal provocation test in patients with allergic rhinitis, using the allergen they were sensitized to, we have observed: 1) an increase in the percentage of nasal eosinophils after 2, 3, 24 and 48 hours; 2) sneezes, mainly in the first 30 minutes; 3) nasal obstruction in the first three hours; 4) absence of rhinorrhea, but not in all the patients; and 5) no predominance of nasal, auricular and/or palatine pruritus at any time. When patients without rhinitis, or with allergic rhinitis were stimulated using a pneumoallergen they were not sensitized to, no significative increase in the nasal eosinophils percentage was found. No symptoms were observed either. So, we can conclude that nasal secretion samples, for eosinophilia percentage determination, should be taken from 2 to 48 hours after nasal provocation, and that the most frequent symptoms, which are probably related to cellular changes, are nasal obstruction and sneezes.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Eosinophilia/etiology , Nasal Mucosa/pathology , Nasal Provocation Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Leukocyte Count , Middle Aged , Nasal Obstruction/etiology , Pruritus/etiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/pathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/pathology , Skin Tests , Sneezing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...